FDG imaging with long-axial field-of-view PET/CT in patients with high blood glucose-a matched pair analysis.

PURPOSE: High blood glucose (hBG) in patients undergoing [18F]FDG PET/CT scans often results in rescheduling the examination, which may lead to clinical delay for the patient and decrease productivity for the department. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT can minimize the effect of altered bio-distribution in hBG patients and is able to provide diagnostic image quality in hBG situations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Oncologic patients with elevated blood glucose (≥ 8.0 mmol/l) and normal blood glucose (< 8.0 mmol/l, nBG) levels were matched for tumor entity, gender, age, and BMI. hBG patients were further subdivided into two groups (BG 8-11 mmol/l and BG > 11 mmol/l). Tracer uptake in the liver, muscle, and tumor was evaluated. Furthermore, image quality was compared between long acquisitions (ultra-high sensitivity mode, 360 s) on a LAFOV PET/CT and routine acquisitions equivalent to a short-axial field-of-view scanner (simulated (sSAFOV), obtained with high sensitivity mode, 120 s). Tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were used as the main image quality criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-one hBG patients met the inclusion criteria and were matched with 31 nBG patients. Overall, liver uptake was significantly higher in hBG patients (SUVmean, 3.07 ± 0.41 vs. 2.37 ± 0.33; p = 0.03), and brain uptake was significantly lower (SUVmax, 7.58 ± 0.74 vs. 13.38 ± 3.94; p < 0.001), whereas muscle (shoulder/gluteal) uptake showed no statistically significant difference. Tumor uptake was lower in hBG patients, resulting in a significantly lower TBR in the hBG cohort (3.48 ± 0.74 vs. 5.29 ± 1.48, p < 0.001). CNR was higher in nBG compared to hBG patients (12.17 ± 4.86 vs. 23.31 ± 12.22, p < 0.001). However, subgroup analysis of nBG 8-11 mmol/l on sSAFOV PET/CT compared to hBG (> 11 mmol/l) patients examined with LAFOV PET/CT showed no statistical significant difference in CNR (19.84 ± 8.40 vs. 17.79 ± 9.3, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: While elevated blood glucose (> 11 mmol) negatively affected TBR and CNR in our cohort, the images from a LAFOV PET-scanner had comparable CNR to PET-images acquired from nBG patients using sSAFOV PET/CT. Therefore, we argue that oncologic patients with increased blood sugar levels might be imaged safely with LAFOV PET/CT when rescheduling is not feasible.

Fusion iENA Scholar Study: Sensor-Navigated I-124-PET/US Fusion Imaging versus Conventional Diagnostics for Retrospective Functional Assessment of Thyroid Nodules by Medical Students.

In conventional thyroid diagnostics, the topographical correlation between thyroid nodules (TN) depicted on ultrasound (US) in axial or sagittal orientation and coronally displayed scintigraphy images can be challenging. Sensor-navigated I-124-PET/US fusion imaging has been introduced as a problem-solving tool for ambiguous cases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the results of multiple unexperienced medical students (MS) versus multiple nuclear medicine physicians (MD) regarding the overvalue of I-124-PET/US in comparison to conventional diagnostics (CD) for the functional assessment of TN. METHODS: Out of clinical routine, cases with ambiguous findings on CD were selected for I-124-PET/US fusion imaging. Sixty-eight digital patient case files (PCF) of 34 patients (CDonly and CD+PET/US PCF) comprising 66 TN were provided to be retrospectively evaluated by 70 MD and 70 MS, respectively. A total of 2174 ratings (32.9 per TN) were carried out: 555 ratings (8.4 per TN) for CDonly and 532 ratings (8.1 per TN) for CD+PET/US by each MD and MS. RESULTS: Functional assessment revealed 8.5%/11.7% (n.s.) (16.4%/25.8% (p = 0.0002)), 41.8%/28.5% (p < 0.0001) (23.9%/17.9% (p = 0.0193)), 36.0%/30.5% (n.s.) (57.3%/53.9% (n.s.)), and 13.7%/29.4% (p < 0.0001) (2.4%/2.4% (n.s.)) hyperfunctioning, indifferent, hypofunctioning, and not rateable TNs for CDonly (CD+PET/US) and MD/MS, respectively. The respective rating confidence was indicated as absolute certain, quite certain, equivocal, uncertain, and not rateable in 11.7/3.4% (p < 0.0001) (44.9%/38.9% (p = 0.0541), 51.9%/26.7% (p < 0.0001) (46.2%/41.5% (n.s.)), 21.6%/29.0% (p = 0.0051) (6.2%/14.8% (p < 0.0001)), 1.1%/11.5% (p < 0.0001) (0.2%/2.3% (p = 0.0032)), and 13.7%/29.4% (p < 0.0001) (2.4%/2.4% (n.s.)) by MD/MS, respectively. There was a significant difference in the diversity of the observers' functional assessment of TN (MD 0.84 vs. MS 1.02, p = 0.0006) and the respective confidence in functional assessment (MD 0.93 vs. MS 1.16, p < 0.0001) between MD and MS on CDonly, whereas CD+PET/US revealed weaker differences for both groups (MD 0.48 vs. MS 0.47, p = 0.57; and MD 0.66 vs. MS 0.83, p = 0.0437). With the additional application of I-124-PET/US, the rating diversity of both MD and MS markedly tends towards more consistency (p < 0.0001 in each case). CONCLUSION: The additional application of sensor-navigated I-124-PET/US fusion imaging significantly influenced the functional assessment of TN positively, especially for unexperienced observers.