A 20-Centimeter Peritoneal Inclusion Cyst Presenting as Vaginal Prolapse.

This video shows the surgical excision of a 20-cm peritoneal inclusion cyst with laparoscopic repair of pelvic floor defects caused by the mass effect of the cyst. A 44-year-old woman presented with bulge symptoms and a reducible posterior prolapse extending 4 cm beyond the introitus inconsistent with an enterocele/rectocele. Dynamic MRI revealed a 20-cm cystic mass surrounding the uterine fundus extending down the posterior wall of the vagina, anterior to the rectum. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy revealed stage-IV endometriosis and a large peritoneal inclusion cyst extending from the pelvic brim to the rectovaginal septum. The cyst was mobilized through retroperitoneal dissection. Redundant peritoneum was excised down to the perineal body, and the distended posterior vaginal wall was plicated laparoscopically. The peritoneum was closed in a purse-string fashion, obliterating any potential space. Resolution of the prolapse was confirmed along with restoration of normal anatomy. We managed a unique case of a large peritoneal inclusion cyst presenting as vaginal prolapse. To correct defects after cystectomy, laparoscopic repair was performed similarly to closing an enterocele. Repair of a high posterior defect can be performed laparoscopically when working abdominally to avoid vaginal incisions, allowing for excellent visualization and access.

Urethral Diverticulum Marsupialization With Modified Spence-Duckett Procedure.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a modified approach to the Spence-Duckett procedure for treatment of a distal urethral diverticulum. A urethral diverticulum is an outpouching of urethral mucosa occurring in 2-5% of the population.1 They are thought to commonly arise due to chronic inflammation or infection of the peri-urethral glands.2,3 MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a 37-year-old female with vaginal bulge, dyspareunia, and dysuria. On examination, she had a 2-centimeter tender mass abutting the distal urethra. Imaging such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging is critical to map the location of the diverticula along the urethra and extent of urethral involvement as it can inform surgical technique. Diverticula are typically located postero-laterally at the mid- or distal urethra; however, they can be found at any location along the urethra.2,3 Care must be taken to avoid disruption of the continence mechanism at the mid-urethra to prevent incontinence after surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 1.7 × 1.7 × 1.8 centimeter unilocular cystic structure at the left posteromedial distal urethra consistent with a urethral diverticulum. The patient desired surgical management. RESULTS: Spence and Duckett traditionally described insertion of one blade of the Metzenbaum scissors in the urethra with incision into the diverticulum and anterior vaginal wall followed by marsupialization.4 Given the small size of the diverticular ostium identified, we opted to make an incision using a scalpel from the ostium down the posterior aspect of the urethra and proximally to the anterior vaginal wall. We then excised the diverticular sac prior to marsupialization. At 6 weeks after surgery, she had full resolution of her symptoms without development of urinary incontinence. Pathologic examination is important because while rare, cancers can originate from urethral diverticula, with a prevalence of 6-9%.5 Pathology was consistent with urethral diverticulum and negative for dysplasia. CONCLUSION: While effective, the Spence-Duckett technique is described as a "generous meatotomy" with risks of urethral shortening. Our modified approach reduces these risks, resolves bothersome symptomatology, improves cosmesis, and minimizes risk of anatomic or functional urethral compromise.

De novo stress incontinence and pelvic muscle symptoms after transvaginal mesh repair.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the rate of de novo stress incontinence, pelvic muscle symptoms, mesh exposure, visceral injury rate, and recurrent prolapse after transvaginal mesh repair. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of 335 consecutive women with stage II or worse vaginal prolapse who underwent Prolift (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) between July 7, 2005 and Jan. 31, 2008. RESULTS: In all, 71% underwent total Prolift, 20% anterior, and 8% posterior alone. Average age was 62 years and mean follow-up was 8 months. The intraoperative visceral injury rate was 6.6%, mesh exposure rate was 3.8%, and recurrent failure rate was 5.2%. The postoperative de novo stress incontinence rate was 24.3%. In this series, 18% of women had pelvic muscle symptoms postoperatively; 74% of these resolved within 6 months with conservative management. CONCLUSION: After Prolift, surgeons can expect a low rate of recurrent prolapse and mesh exposure. However, pelvic muscle dysfunction and de novo stress incontinence will be encountered postoperatively in a moderate number of women.

Ureteral Compromise in Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Retrospective Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate if ureteral compromise is significantly different between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study comparing all women who underwent laparoscopic and vaginal USLSs at 2 institutions (part of a single training program with procedures performed by 11 fellowship-trained Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery gynecologic surgeons) between January 2008 and June 2013. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients in the study underwent a USLS, 148 in the laparoscopic group and 60 in the vaginal group. At baseline, there were statistically significant differences between the groups in mean age (50.4 vs 55.3 years, P = 0.008), parity (2.44 vs 2.77, P = 0.040), and prior hysterectomy (3.4% vs 11.7% in the laparoscopic and vaginal groups, respectively; P = 0.042).There were no ureteral compromises in the laparoscopic group and 6 in the vaginal group (0.0% vs 10.0%, respectively; P < 0.001). In an analysis evaluating only those ureteral compromises requiring stent placement, the higher rate of ureteral compromise in the vaginal group persisted despite exclusion of those cases requiring only suture removal and replacement (0.0% vs 5.0% in the laparoscopic and vaginal groups, respectively; P = 0.023).There was a lower median blood loss in the laparoscopic group (137.5 vs 200.0 mL, respectively; P = 0.002) as well as a lower rate of readmission (0.7% vs 6.7%, respectively; P = 0.025). There were no other significant differences in postoperative complications between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found a lower rate of ureteral compromise in the laparoscopic approach to USLS compared with the traditional vaginal approach.

Intraoperative and postoperative gastrointestinal complications associated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify the risks of intraoperative and postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) complications associated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and identify possible risk factors. METHODS: A total of 390 medical records were retrospectively reviewed for GI complications. Complications were classified as functional complications [ileus, small bowel obstruction (SBO), and prolonged nausea/emesis] or bowel injury. Nausea/emesis was considered prolonged if these symptoms resulted in a hospital stay of greater than 48 hours, or in readmission. RESULTS: Functional GI complications included 1 ileus, 3 SBOs, and 3 cases of prolonged nausea/emesis. The combined rate for ileus and SBO was 1.0% and the rate of prolonged nausea/emesis was 0.8%. Functional GI complications were associated with prior abdominal surgery (P = 0.048), but there were no differences in age, body mass index, estimated blood loss, or operative time.There were 3 small bowel and 2 rectal injuries for a bowel injury rate of 1.3%. Bowel injury was not associated with prior abdominal surgery (P = 0.071), age, body mass index, estimated blood loss, or operative time. The total reoperation rate for SBO or bowel injury was 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of GI complications in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy are low. Prior abdominal surgery was associated with an increased risk of functional GI complications, but not bowel injury. This information should assist surgeons with preoperative patient counseling.

Effect of operative technique on mesh exposure in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if opening the vaginal cuff during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy influences the rate of mesh exposure. METHODS: A total of 390 medical records were retrospectively reviewed for demographic information, operative technique, and relevant outcomes. RESULTS: Eleven mesh exposures (2.8%) and 14 suture extrusions (3.6%) were found, none involving visceral organs. Mesh exposure was more common when the vaginal cuff was opened, either during hysterectomy or when allowing transvaginal attachment of mesh in patients with a prior hysterectomy (4.9% vs 0.5%; relative risk [RR], 9.0, P = 0.012). In cases where concomitant hysterectomy was performed, a higher mesh exposure rate was seen in open-cuff hysterectomy (total vaginal hysterectomy/laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy) compared to supracervical hysterectomy (4.9% [9/185] vs 0% [0/92]; P = 0.032). Mesh exposure was more common when the mesh was sutured laparoscopically compared with transvaginally in patients undergoing open-cuff hysterectomy (14.3% [5/35] vs 2.7% [4/150]; RR, 5.4; P = 0.013). Permanent suture extrusion was significantly associated with laparoscopic versus transvaginal suturing of mesh (5.6% vs 0.6%; RR, 8.8; P = 0.010). Five patients underwent reoperation for mesh exposure, whereas most suture extrusions were asymptomatic; and all were managed nonsurgically. CONCLUSIONS: We found that preserving the integrity of the vaginal cuff led to a lower incidence of mesh exposure in patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. When hysterectomy is indicated, a supracervical technique should be strongly considered as the mesh exposure rate was significantly lower. If removal of the cervix is indicated, the risk for mesh exposure remains low and should not preclude total hysterectomy, though transvaginal mesh attachment may be preferable.