Activity of Imipenem-Relebactam and Meropenem-Vaborbactam against Carbapenem-Resistant, SME-Producing Serratia marcescens.

The Serratia marcescens enzyme (SME) is a chromosomally encoded carbapenemase with no known optimal treatment. Various ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors and comparators were evaluated against 8 SME producers via broth microdilution. Four isolates were subsequently tested via time-kill analyses. All isolates were resistant to imipenem, imipenem-relebactam, and meropenem but susceptible to ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam. Ceftazidime, imipenem-relebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam were bactericidal against 3, 0, and 4 isolates, respectively. Meropenem-vaborbactam may be a potential option for severe SME-producing infections.

Activity of Aztreonam in Combination with Avibactam, Clavulanate, Relebactam, and Vaborbactam against Multidrug-Resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

The intrinsic L1 metallo- and L2 serine-ß-lactamases in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia make it naturally multidrug resistant and difficult to treat. There is a need to identify novel treatment strategies for this pathogen, especially against isolates resistant to first-line agents. Aztreonam in combination with avibactam has demonstrated potential, although data on other aztreonam-ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations are lacking. Additionally, molecular mechanisms for reduced susceptibility to these combinations have not been explored. The objectives of this study were to evaluate and compare the in vitro activities and to understand the mechanisms of resistance to aztreonam in combination with avibactam, clavulanate, relebactam, and vaborbactam against S. maltophilia A panel of 47 clinical S. maltophilia strains nonsusceptible to levofloxacin and/or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were tested against each aztreonam-BLI combination via broth microdilution, and 6 isolates were then evaluated in time-kill analyses. Three isolates with various aztreonam-BLI MICs were subjected to whole-genome sequencing and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. Avibactam restored aztreonam susceptibility in 98% of aztreonam-resistant isolates, compared to 61, 71, and 15% with clavulanate, relebactam, and vaborbactam, respectively. The addition of avibactam to aztreonam resulted in a ≥2-log10-CFU/ml decrease at 24 h versus aztreonam alone against 5/6 isolates compared to 1/6 with clavulanate, 4/6 with relebactam, and 2/6 with vaborbactam. Molecular analyses revealed that decreased susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam was associated with increased expression of genes encoding L1 and L2, as well as the efflux pump (smeABC). Aztreonam-avibactam is the most promising BLI-combination against multidrug-resistant S. maltophilia Decreased susceptibility may be due to the combination of overexpressed ß-lactamases and efflux pumps. Further studies evaluating this combination against S. maltophilia are warranted.

Activity of Cefiderocol Alone and in Combination with Levofloxacin, Minocycline, Polymyxin B, or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole against Multidrug-Resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

The production of an L1 metallo-ß-lactamase and an L2 serine active-site ß-lactamase precludes the use of ß-lactams for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Preclinical data suggest that cefiderocol is the first approved ß-lactam with reliable activity against S. maltophilia, but data on strains resistant to current first-line agents are limited, and no studies have assessed cefiderocol-based combinations. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the in vitro activity of cefiderocol alone and in combination with levofloxacin, minocycline, polymyxin B, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) against a collection of highly resistant clinical S. maltophilia isolates. For this purpose, the MICs of cefiderocol, ceftazidime, levofloxacin, minocycline, polymyxin B, and TMP-SMZ for 37 S. maltophilia isolates not susceptible to levofloxacin and/or TMP-SMZ were determined. Nine strains with various cefiderocol MICs were then tested in time-kill experiments with cefiderocol alone and in combination with comparators. The only agents for which susceptibility rates exceeded 40% were cefiderocol (100%) and minocycline (97.3%). Cefiderocol displayed the lowest MIC50 and MIC90 values (0.125 and 0.5 mg/liter, respectively). In time-kill experiments, synergy was observed when cefiderocol was combined with levofloxacin, minocycline, polymyxin B, or TMP-SMZ against 4/9 (44.4%), 6/9 (66.7%), 5/9 (55.5%), and 6/9 (66.7%) isolates, respectively. These data suggest that cefiderocol displays potent in vitro activity against S. maltophilia, including strains resistant to currently preferred agents. Future dynamic and in vivo studies of cefiderocol alone and in combination are warranted to further define cefiderocol's synergistic capabilities and its place in therapy for S. maltophilia infections.

Ex Vivo Urinary Bactericidal Activity and Urinary Pharmacodynamics of Fosfomycin after Two Repeated Dosing Regimens of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Healthy Adult Subjects.

The ex vivo bactericidal activity and pharmacodynamics of fosfomycin in urine were evaluated in 18 healthy subjects. Subjects received 3 g every other day (QOD) for 3 doses and then every day (QD) for 7 doses or vice versa. Serial urine samples were collected before and up to 24 h after dosing on days 1 and 5. Eight bacterial strains with various genotypic and phenotypic susceptibilities to fosfomycin were used for all experiments (5 Escherichia coli, 2 Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 1 Proteus mirabilis). MICs were performed via agar dilution. Urinary bactericidal titers (UBTs) were performed via modified Schlichter test using participant's drug-free urine as the diluent. Urinary time-kill analyses were performed on pooled 24-h urine aliquots from days 1 and 5. All experiments were performed in triplicate with and without the addition of 25 mg/liter of glucose-6-phosphate (G6P). Mean 24-h urine concentrations of fosfomycin ranged from 324.7 to 434.6 mg/liter regardless of study day or dosing regimen. The urinary antibacterial activity of fosfomycin was also similar across study days and dosing regimens. UBT values did not correlate with MICs determined in the presence of G6P. Fosfomycin was reliably bactericidal in urine only against the 5 E. coli strains, regardless of genotype or MIC value. Together, these data do not support the use of oral fosfomycin tromethamine for pathogens other than E. coli or at a dosing frequency higher than QOD. Fosfomycin MICs determined in the presence of G6P may not accurately reflect the in vivo activity given the lack of G6P in human urine. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02570074.).

Activity of Potential Alternative Treatment Agents for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates Nonsusceptible to Levofloxacin and/or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is difficult to treat due to the production of multiple intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) and the fluoroquinolones have traditionally been considered the drugs of choice but are plagued by increasing resistance and adverse drug effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activities of 12 clinically relevant antimicrobials against clinical S. maltophilia isolates nonsusceptible to levofloxacin and/or TMP-SMZ. A diverse panel of 41 clinical S. maltophilia isolates collected through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program from 2008 to 2018 was evaluated against ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, chloramphenicol, delafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, eravacycline, minocycline, omadacycline, polymyxin B, and tigecycline. MICs were determined in triplicate via reference broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines where available. MIC distributions and susceptibilities were also compared across infection type, acquisition setting, and geographic origin. Susceptibilities to levofloxacin and TMP-SMZ were 29.3% and 36.6%, respectively. Minocycline displayed the highest susceptibility rate overall (92.7%) and the lowest MIC90 value (4 mg/liter) of any of the 12 agents tested. Only 3 isolates were resistant to levofloxacin, TMP-SMZ, and minocycline. Polymyxin B and tigecycline were the second most active agents. No significant differences were observed in MIC distributions across the 3 strata evaluated. These data demonstrate that few antimicrobials, old or new, maintain reliable activity against resistant S. maltophilia The role of minocycline in the treatment of infections due to S. maltophilia warrants further clinical investigation given its potent in vitro activity and favorable adverse effect profile.

Searching for the Optimal Treatment for Metallo- and Serine-ß-Lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae: Aztreonam in Combination with Ceftazidime-avibactam or Meropenem-vaborbactam.

Objective: Metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, particularly those that co-harbor serine ß-lactamases, are a serious emerging public health threat given their rapid dissemination and the limited number of treatment options. Pre-clinical and anecdotal clinical data support the use of aztreonam in combination with ceftazidime-avibactam against these pathogens, but other aztreonam-based combinations have not been explored. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity and compare synergy between aztreonam in combination with ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam against serine and MBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae via time-kill analyses. Methods: 8 clinical Enterobacteriaceae strains (4 Escherichia coli and 4 Klebsiella pneumoniae) co-producing NDM and at least one serine ß-lactamase were used for all experiments. Drugs were tested alone, in dual ß-lactam combinations, and in triple drug combinations against all strains. Results: All strains were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam and 7/8 (87.5%) strains were resistant to aztreonam. Aztreonam combined with ceftazidime-avibactam was synergistic against all 7 aztreonam-resistant strains. Aztreonam combined with meropenem-vaborbactam was synergistic against all aztreonam-resistant strains with the exception of an OXA-232-producing K. pneumoniae strain. Neither triple combination was synergistic against the aztreonam-susceptible strain. Likewise, neither dual ß-lactam combination was synergistic against any strain. Conclusions: These data suggest that aztreonam plus meropenem-vaborbactam has similar activity to aztreonam plus ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacteriaceae producing NDM and other non-OXA-48-like serine ß-lactamases. Confirmation of these findings in future in vitro and in vivo models is warranted.

Pharmacokinetics and Dialytic Clearance of Isavuconazole During In Vitro and In Vivo Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

The pharmacokinetics (PK) and dialytic clearance of isavuconazole in vitro and in 7 solid organ transplant patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were evaluated. In vivo, mean (± SD) plasma PK parameters of isavuconazole were: C max 4.00±1.45 mg/L, C min 1.76±0.76 mg/L, t ½ 48.36±29.78 h, Vss 288.78±182.11 L, CLss 4.85±3.79 L/h, and AUC 54.01±20.98 mg ⋅ h/L. Transmembrane clearance represented just 0.7% of the total isavuconazole clearance. These data suggest that isavuconazole is not readily removed by CRRT and no dose adjustments are necessary.

In vitro activity of oritavancin alone or in combination against vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant enterococci.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment for serious infections due to Enterococcus spp. is unknown although combination antimicrobial therapy is often recommended for invasive infections to achieve bactericidal activity and improve clinical outcomes. Oritavancin is a novel lipoglycopeptide agent with in vitro activity against enterococci, including vancomycin-resistant VanA-type Enterococcus faecium. Data on its activity in combination with other antibacterials are limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of oritavancin alone and in combination with ceftriaxone, daptomycin, gentamicin, linezolid and rifampicin against vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant enterococci in in vitro time-kill analyses. METHODS: Five enterococcal strains were used for all experiments: three vancomycin-resistant VanA-type E. faecium clinical bloodstream isolates, vancomycin-resistant VanA-type E. faecium ATCC 700221 and vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. Individual drugs were tested at », ½, 1, 2 and 4× MIC. Oritavancin combination experiments were performed with each agent at »× MIC. RESULTS: Daptomycin was the most active single agent and was bactericidal against all strains at 4× MIC, followed by oritavancin, which was bactericidal against all three clinical VRE strains at ≥2× MIC. In combination experiments at »× MIC, oritavancin was synergistic with gentamicin against strains not displaying high-level aminoglycoside resistance. No other synergy against VRE strains was observed in any experiment. Strain- and drug-dependent antagonism was observed for many combinations. CONCLUSIONS: These in vitro data do not support the routine use of combination therapy with oritavancin in the treatment of infections due to VRE.

Performance of ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility testing methods against clinically relevant Gram-negative organisms.

OBJECTIVES: To ensure the accuracy of susceptibility testing methods for ceftazidime/avibactam. METHODS: The performances of the Etest (bioMérieux), 30/20 µg disc (Hardy diagnostics) and 10/4 µg disc (Mast Group) were evaluated against the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method for 102 clinically relevant Gram-negative organisms: 69 ceftazidime- and meropenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and 33 MDR non-K. pneumoniae. Essential and categorical agreement along with major and very major error rates were determined according to CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 78% of isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. None of the three methods met the defined equivalency threshold against all 102 organisms. The Etest performed the best, with categorical agreement of 95% and major errors of 6.3%. Against the 69 ceftazidime- and meropenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, only the Etest and the 10/4 µg disc met the equivalency threshold. None of the three methods met equivalency for the 33 MDR isolates. There were no very major errors observed in any analysis. These results were pooled with those from a previous study of 74 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and data from the ceftazidime/avibactam new drug application to define optimal 30/20 µg disc thresholds using the error-rate bound model-based approaches of the diffusion breakpoint estimation testing software. This analysis identified a susceptibility threshold of ≤19 mm as optimal. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the Etest is a suitable alternative to BMD for testing ceftazidime/avibactam against ceftazidime- and meropenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. The 30/20 µg discs overestimate resistance and may lead to the use of treatment regimens that are more toxic and less effective.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Single-Dose Intravenous (ZTI-01) and Oral Fosfomycin in Healthy Volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of intravenous (i.v.) fosfomycin disodium (ZTI-01) and oral fosfomycin tromethamine were evaluated after a single dose in 28 healthy adult subjects. Subjects received a single 1-h i.v. infusion of 1 g and 8 g fosfomycin disodium and a single dose of 3 g oral fosfomycin tromethamine in a phase I, randomized, open-label, three-period crossover study. Serial blood and urine samples were collected before and up to 48 h after dosing. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters ± standard deviations of fosfomycin in plasma after 1 g and 8 g i.v., respectively, were the following: maximum clearance of drug in serum (Cmax), 44.3 ± 7.6 and 370 ± 61.9 µg/ml; time to maximum concentration of drug in serum (Tmax), 1.1 ± 0.05 and 1.08 ± 0.01 h; volume of distribution (V), 29.7 ± 5.7 and 31.5 ± 10.4 liters; clearance (CL), 8.7 ± 1.7 and 7.8 ± 1.4 liters/h; renal clearance (CLR), 6.6 ± 1.9 and 6.3 ± 1.6 liters/h; area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞), 120 ± 28.5 and 1,060 ± 192 µg·h/ml; and half-life (t1/2), 2.4 ± 0.4 and 2.8 ± 0.6 h. After oral administration, the parameters were the following: Cmax, 26.8 ± 6.4 µg/ml; Tmax, 2.25 ± 0.4 h; V/F, 204 ± 70.7 liters; CL/F, 17 ± 4.7 liters/h; CLR, 6.5 ± 1.8 liters/h; AUC0-∞, 191 ± 57.6 µg · h/ml; and t1/2, 9.04 ± 4.5 h. The percent relative bioavailability of orally administered fosfomycin was 52.8% in relation to the 1-g i.v. dose. Approximately 74% and 80% of the 1-g and 8-g i.v. doses were excreted unchanged in the urine by 48 h compared to 37% after oral administration, with the majority of this excretion occurring by 12 h regardless of dosage form. No new safety concerns were identified during this study. The results of this study support further investigation of i.v. fosfomycin in the target patient population, including patients with complicated urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis.

Hyperhomocysteinemia in retinal artery and retinal vein occlusion.

In 19 patients who had retinal vein occlusion or retinal artery occlusion before the age of 50 years, the incidence of hyperhomocysteinemia, as observed in heterozygosity for homocystinuria, was studied by the performance of a standardized, oral methionine-loading test. In four of the 19 patients (21%), two with retinal artery occlusion and two with central retinal vein occlusion, the after-load peak levels of homocysteine exceeded the mean level, established in normal control subjects, by more than two standard deviations and were as well within the ranges established in obligate heterozygotes for homocystinuria. Because the frequency of heterozygosity for homocystinuria in the normal population is one in 70 (1.4%) at the most, we conclude that hyperhomocysteinemia predisposes to the development of premature retinal artery and retinal vein occlusion (P < .01; chi 2 test).