Value of Old Imaging for Patients Undergoing Parathyroidectomy for Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

INTRODUCTION: Although imaging plays no role in diagnosing primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), preoperative localization is essential for a focused parathyroidectomy. We hypothesized that reviewing imaging obtained prior to PHPT diagnosis can identify enlarged parathyroid glands and provide information that might potentially impact the preoperative evaluation and intraoperative course of patients undergoing parathyroidectomy. METHODS: We included adult patients with PHPT who underwent parathyroidectomy between October 2015 and October 2020 and had contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging of the lower neck and upper chest obtained prior to diagnosis for unrelated indications. A radiologist reviewed the prediagnosis CTs blinded to subsequent parathyroid localization imaging and operative findings. A surgeon assessed the radiologist's findings in the context of each case to determine the potential impact of information from old imaging on surgical decision-making. RESULTS: We identified at least one enlarged parathyroid gland on prior contrast-enhanced CT in 30 (75%) of 40 included patients. Despite old imaging enabling correct localization, 60% of these 30 underwent dedicated parathyroid imaging prior to parathyroidectomy. Knowledge of the enlarged parathyroid(s) on prior imaging might have allowed a more focused approach in 10.0% and prompted a more thorough exploration in 13.3%. In the total cohort, reviewing prior imaging could have provided information capable of changing the preoperative evaluation in 52.5% and the operative course in 17.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of enlarged parathyroid glands on contrast-enhanced CT imaging that predates a diagnosis of PHPT is possible. Prospective studies might verify the impact of these findings on the preoperative evaluation and operative course of patients undergoing parathyroidectomy.

Outcomes Following Cholecystectomy on a Service Designed to Maximize Chief Resident Entrustment.

BACKGROUND: The chief resident service provides surgical trainees in their final year of training the opportunity to maximize responsibility, continuity, and decision-making. Although supervised, chief residents operate according to personal preferences instead of adapting to their attendings' preferences. We hypothesized that outcomes following cholecystectomy are equivalent between the chief resident service and standard academic services. METHODS: We matched adults undergoing cholecystectomy from 07/2016-06/2019 on the chief resident service to two standard academic service patients based on operative indication and age. We compared demographics, operative details, and 30-d complications. RESULTS: This study included 186 patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Body mass index (32.4 versus 32.0, P = 0.49) and Charlson comorbidity index (0.9 versus 1.4, P = 0.16) were similar between chief resident and standard academic services, respectively. Operative approach was similar (95.2% laparoscopic on chief resident service versus 94.4% on standard service), but residents on the chief resident service performed cholangiograms more often (48.4% versus 22.6%, P < 0.01) and averaged longer operative times during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with cholangiogram (146±28 versus 85±22 min, P < 0.01) and without (94±31 versus 76±35 min, P < 0.01) compared with standard academic services, respectively. 30-d complication rates were similar (5.2% chief resident versus 5.0% standard, P = 0.95). No patients suffered bile leak, bile duct injury, or reoperation. Emergency Department visits were similar (12.1% chief resident versus 7.4% standard, P = 0.32); readmissions were less frequent on the chief resident service (0.0% versus 5.0% standard, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate supervision, chief residents provide safe care for patients undergoing cholecystectomy while directing medical decisions and practicing according to their preferences.

Inguinal Hernia Repairs on the Chief's Service: A Safe Educational Model in Resident Entrustment.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a Chief Resident Service educational model provides safe care for patients compared to that received on standard academic services where rotating residents adopt the practices and preferences of their attending. DESIGN: We retrospectively identified patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs from July 2016 through June 2019 and matched Chief's service patients to standard academic service patients 1:1 on CPT, sex and age. We compared patient characteristics, recurrence rates, outcomes and complications. SETTING: Tertiary care center, single institution. PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 77 patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs (66% open and 34% laparoscopic) on the Chief's service matched successfully to 77 standard academic service patients during the study period. RESULTS: Age, BMI and ASA were similar between the services, but Chief's service patients were less likely to be current smokers (1.3% vs. 24.7%) and more likely to be former smokers (59.7% vs. 26.0%) than standard academic service patients (p < 0.01). Patients presenting with incarcerated hernias (5.2% vs. 9.1%), recurrent (10.4% vs. 5.2%) and bilateral hernias (19.5% vs. 10.4%) were similar between the Chief's service and standard academic services, respectively (all p > 0.05). Operative times were longer for the Chief's service for open (123 min vs. 67, p < 0.01) and laparoscopic (112 min vs. 79, p = 0.02) repairs. Recurrence rates (6.5% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.47) and complications including infection, seroma or hematoma requiring evacuation and need for reoperation were similarly low (p > 0.05) between the Chief's and standard academic services, respectively. Despite low complication rates, Chief's service patients were more likely to present to the ED post-op (14.3% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.001), but readmission rates were similarly low (2.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Providing general surgery chief residents with a supervised opportunity to direct, plan and provide surgical care in clinic and the operating room, as a transition to independent practice following graduation, is safe for patients presenting with inguinal hernias. Concerns about patient safety should not be a barrier to maximizing entrustment for the evaluation and operative management of select core general surgery diagnoses and operations.