Qualitative Analysis of Health Systems Utilizing Non-Face-to-Face Chronic Care Management for Medicare-Insured Patients With Diabetes.

Chronic diseases impact 117 million adults in the United States and account for $3.3 trillion in health care spending. This qualitative study investigated experiences with reimbursement structure for non-face-to-face (NFF) chronic care management (CCM) through diverse health system approaches in primary care settings in Southeastern Louisiana. In-depth interviews were conducted with 16 purposively selected key informants, and reflexive thematic analysis was utilized to explore findings. Variation in health system approaches for implementing and quality of NFF CCM programs were identified. Results included differences in health system motivation and methods for financial structuring and quality of third-party vendor and alternative models.

Non-Face-to-Face Chronic Care Management: A Qualitative Study Assessing the Implementation of a New CMS Reimbursement Strategy.

Diabetes and its comorbidities are leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States and disproportionately in Louisiana. Chronic care management (CCM) efforts, such as care coordination models, are important initiatives in mitigating the impact of diabetes, such as poorer health outcomes and increased costs. This study examined one such effort, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' non-face-to-face CCM reimbursement program, for patients with diabetes and at least 1 other chronic condition in Louisiana. This qualitative study included interviews with patients in this program and health care providers and system leaders implementing the program. Results include lessons learned from health system leadership relating to CCM design and implementation, challenges experienced, overlapping initiatives, perceived benefits, performance, billing, and health information technology. Another key finding is that co-pays seem to be a barrier to patient interest in participation in non-face-to-face CCM, especially given that the value of the program is not completely clear to patients. A common strategy to address this co-pay barrier is to target dual eligibles, as Medicaid will cover the co-pay. However, widespread use of such strategies may indirectly exclude individuals who need and may also benefit from non-face-to-face CCM.