Transfusion requirement and length of stay of anaemic surgical patients associated with a patient blood management service: a single-Centre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of patient blood management (PBM) in the detection and management of preoperative anaemia before elective surgery. BACKGROUND: PBM is recognised as the standard of care, with diagnosis and management of preoperative anaemia being the key components of PBM. No formal assessment of the value of PBM anaemia screening and correction before scheduled surgery had been made at our hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary-care, academic hospital of consecutive records of elective surgery (n = 25 641). We excluded minor surgeries. We identified anaemic patients who had been assessed by PBM or not (non-PBM). We calculated transfusion incidence and hospital length of stay (LOS) across all surgical specialities. RESULTS: During the 1-year study period, 15 245 patients were eligible for inclusion; 311 patients (2·0%) were transfused, and 83·3% of transfusions were in anaemic patients. Transfusion incidence was 9·2% in anaemic PBM-assessed patients and 17·4% in non-PBM patients. For haemoglobin (Hb) <100 g L-1 , the transfusion incidence was 22·1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 15·5-30·6%] in PBM and 40·0% (95% CI 35·1-45·0%) in non-PBM patients, and for Hb 100-119 g L-1 , it was 4·7% (95% CI 2·8-7·5%) and 7·9% (95% CI 6·3-9·8%), respectively. Overall mean LOS was 2·1 days [standard deviation (SD) 6·0]. Mean LOS with Hb <100 g L-1 was 6·7 days (SD 14·8) in PBM-assessed patients and 12·4 days (SD 19·5) in non-PBM patients and was 3·1 (SD 5·2) and 6·2 (SD 9·5) days, respectively, for Hb 100-119 g L-1 . CONCLUSION: Anaemic elective surgery patients assessed by patient blood management (PBM) had a markedly lower transfusion risk and shorter LOS than anaemic patients not assessed by PBM.

Intensifying insulin regimen after basal insulin optimization in adults with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, randomized, open-label trial comparing insulin glargine plus insulin glulisine with biphasic insulin aspart (LanScape).

AIM: To test the hypothesis that a 'basal plus' regimen--adding once-daily main-meal fast-acting insulin to basal insulin once daily--would be non-inferior to biphasic insulin twice daily as assessed by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration (predefined as ≤0.4%), but would provide superior treatment satisfaction. METHODS: This open-label trial enrolled adults to an 8- or 12-week run-in period, during which oral therapies except metformin were stopped and insulin glargine dose was titrated. Those with fasting glucose <7 mmol/l but HbA1c >7% (53 mmol/mol) were randomized to insulin glargine/glulisine once daily (n = 170) or insulin aspart/aspart protamine 30/70 twice daily (n = 165) for 24 weeks, with dose titration to glucose targets using standardized algorithms. RESULTS: For HbA1c, the basal plus regimen was non-inferior to biphasic insulin (least squares mean difference, 0.21%, upper 97.5% confidence limit 0.38%) meeting the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.4%. Treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version and Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire total scores) significantly favoured basal plus. No difference was observed between the basal plus and the biphasic insulin groups in responders (HbA1c <7%, 20.6 vs 27.9%; p = 0.12), weight gain (2.06 vs 2.50 kg; p = 0.2), diabetes-specific quality of life (Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life average weighted impact (AWI) score) and generic health status (five-dimension European Quality of Life questionnaire). Overall hypoglycaemia rates were similar between groups (15.3 vs 18.2 events/patient-year; p = 0.22); nocturnal hypoglycaemia was higher with the basal plus regimen (5.7 vs 3.6 events/patient-year; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In long-standing type 2 diabetes with suboptimal glycaemia despite oral therapies and basal insulin, the basal plus regimen was non-inferior to biphasic insulin for biomedical outcomes, with a similar overall hypoglycaemia rate but more nocturnal events.

Long-term effects of a sustained-release preparation of acipimox on dyslipidemia and glucose metabolism in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Elevated circulating plasma nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) may contribute to the insulin resistance and hyperglycemia of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), and decreasing plasma NEFA could provide a therapeutic benefit. A sustained-release preparation of acipimox, a lipolysis inhibitor, was used in an attempt to decrease circulating plasma NEFA levels long-term, and the effects on glycemic control, insulin resistance, and serum lipids were measured. Sixty NIDDM patients (43 males and 17 females) took part in a randomized controlled trial of acipimox or placebo for 12 weeks. Fasting plasma NEFA levels did not change in acipimox-treated patients (baseline v 12 weeks, 0.84 +/- 0.35 v 0.88 +/- 0.55 mmol x L(-1), mean +/- SD). Fasting blood glucose was unchanged (mean difference v placebo, -0.5 mmol x L(-1); 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.4 to 0.3 mmol x L[-1]), but serum fructosamine decreased (mean difference v placebo, -26 micromol x L(-1); 95% CI, -51 to 0 mmol x L[-1]), as did the standardized hemoglobin A1 ([HbA1] mean difference v placebo, -1.4%; 95% CI, -3.0% to -0.1%). Insulin resistance measured as steady-state plasma glucose during an insulin-dextrose infusion test was unchanged (mean difference v placebo, -1.4 mmol x L(-1); 95% CI, -3.2 to 0.5 mmol x L[-1]). Serum total cholesterol (mean difference v placebo, -0.4 mmol x L(-1); 95% CI, -0.6 to -0.1 mmol x L[-1]), serum apolipoprotein B ([apo B] mean difference v placebo, -0.19 g x L(-1); 95% CI, -0.3 to -0.1 g x L[-1]), and serum triglycerides (mean difference v placebo for pretreatment v posttreatment ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.88) were all lower with acipimox. Serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mean difference v placebo, 0.10 mmol x L(-1); 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.3 mmol x L[-1]), serum apo A1 (mean difference v placebo, 0.03 g x L(-1); 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.1 g x L[-1]), and serum lipoprotein(a) ([Lp(a)] acipimox v placebo, 154 (0 to 1,574) v 71 (0 to 1,009), median and range) were unchanged. Despite the lack of change in fasting plasma NEFA levels, acipimox caused a modest beneficial improvement in overall glycemic control and plasma lipids in NIDDM patients and could be a useful agent in the treatment of dyslipidemic NIDDM patients.

Effects of early use of pioglitazone in combination with metformin in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is characterised by a progressive decline in HbA1c control over time. Early combination therapy, rather than sequential introduction of individual oral glucose-lowering agents, has been proposed to prevent this gradual rise in HbA1c. This observational study assessed the effect of early dual combination oral glucose-lowering therapies within 6 months of diagnosis in newly diagnosed, drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an observational, open-label, non-randomised study in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes, aged 35-70 years, with HbA1c levels > 8.0% at diagnosis or > 7.0% at the 3-6-month follow-up. Patients were allocated to dietary management alone if the HbA1c level was 7.0-8.0% at diagnosis. Metformin combined with gliclazide, repaglinide, or pioglitazone was given at diagnosis if the HbA1c was > 8.0%. Similar treatments were introduced at 3-6 months if the HbA1c was > 7.0%. Over a 3-year period, HbA1c was measured at 3-monthly intervals. All patients underwent regular dietetic review. Target HbA1c was < or = 7.0%. RESULTS: 416 patients were considered eligible for inclusion, with a mean (+/- SD) age of 54.1 +/- 9.2 years, BMI of 33.5 +/- 6.1 kg/m2, and baseline HbA1c of 8.6 +/- 1.7%. A mixed model analysis of variance on the 178 patients who started with combination therapy, either immediately or after a 3-6 month period on diet, showed that metformin plus gliclazide, repaglinide, or pioglitazone was associated with a gradual increase in HbA1c values. Amongst those patients treated with the metformin/pioglitazone combination there was an estimated 0.1% increase in HbA1c/year. This was much less pronounced than the rises seen in HbA1c/year of 0.5% with the metformin/gliclazide and metformin/repaglinide combinations. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary analysis of an observational, non-randomised, open-label ongoing study has shown that early use of combination therapy at time of diagnosis or within the first 3-6 months following diagnosis with metformin plus pioglitazone in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes results in a slower deterioration in glycaemic control than that with metformin combined with either gliclazide or repaglinide. This may be due to the beta-cell protective properties of pioglitazone. These results need to be confirmed by further studies with a more robust design and methodology.

A double blind study of the effect of acipimox on serum lipids, blood glucose control and insulin action in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Hyperlipidaemia, in particular raised concentrations of serum triglycerides, together with raised plasma non-esterified fatty acid concentrations, is common in patients with Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and may be associated with insulin insensitivity. Thirty non-obese Type 2 diabetic patients (15 controlled with diet alone and 15 with diet plus oral sulphonylurea therapy) were therefore recruited to take part in a double-blind, randomized, crossover comparison of acipimox (250 mg three times daily for 3 months) and placebo. Serum lipids, blood glucose control, insulin sensitivity, and glucose tolerance were measured before and after each treatment period. There was a significant decrease in serum triglycerides (2.05 +/- 1.08 vs 2.91 +/- 1.75: p < 0.005), cholesterol (5.66 +/- 1.02 vs 6.26 +/- 1.17: p = 0.0005), and apoprotein B (1.32 +/- 0.23 vs 1.44 +/- 0.25: p < 0.05) while HDL cholesterol and apoprotein A-1 concentrations were unchanged. There was no change in blood glucose control measured by fasting glucose, insulin, and HBA, concentrations, but there was a significant improvement in insulin action assessed by glucose-insulin infusion. Although plasma non-esterified fatty acid concentrations were lower during the oral glucose tolerance test after acipimox, there was no difference in either the peak or 2-h plasma glucose concentrations and the total area under the glucose curve did not change. Acipimox was well tolerated and no patients withdrew from the study for drug-related symptoms. Thus, acipimox effectively lowers serum cholesterol and triglycerides in patients with Type 2 diabetes without adversely altering blood glucose control, and appears to improve insulin sensitivity.

The effect of acipimox in patients with type 2 diabetes and persistent hyperlipidaemia.

A placebo-controlled, double-blind study was performed to assess the effect of 12 weeks treatment with acipimox (250 mg three times per day) on lipoproteins and glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. All patients studied had persistent hyperlipidaemia despite acceptable glycaemic control on treatment with diet alone or diet and oral hypoglycaemic agents, achieving glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1) of less than 10.5% but with fasting total triglycerides greater than 2.5 mmol l-1 or total cholesterol greater than 6.5 mmol l-1. Forty-eight patients were randomized to treatment, 21 to acipimox and 27 to placebo; 43 completed the trial. All patients had been diabetic for at least 1 year. Total cholesterol fell by 6% and total triglycerides by 19% following 12 weeks of acipimox, compared to rises in the placebo group of 1% and 16%, respectively (p less than 0.05). There were no significant differences between acipimox and placebo in the change in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apolipoproteins AI, AII, or B, or in glycaemic control during the treatment period. Acipimox is effective in reducing fasting total cholesterol and total triglycerides in patients with Type 2 diabetes with acceptable blood glucose control but persistent hyperlipidaemia. Acipimox does not adversely affect glucose tolerance.

The Parkinson's disease sleep scale: a new instrument for assessing sleep and nocturnal disability in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: No formal instruments are available for quantifying sleep problems in Parkinson's disease. OBJECTIVE: To develop a new sleep scale to quantify the various aspects of nocturnal sleep problems in Parkinson's disease, which may occur in up to 96% of affected individuals. METHODS: Employing a multidisciplinary team approach, a visual analogue scale was devised addressing 15 commonly reported symptoms associated with sleep disturbance in Parkinson's disease-the Parkinson's disease sleep scale (PDSS). In all, 143 patients with Parkinson's disease completed the PDSS, covering the entire spectrum of disease from newly diagnosed to advanced stage. As controls, 137 age healthy matched subjects also completed the scale. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a subgroup of subjects. The Epworth sleepiness scale was also satisfactorily completed by 103 of the patients with Parkinson's disease. RESULTS: PDSS scores in the Parkinson group were significantly different from the healthy controls. Patients with advanced Parkinson's disease had impaired scores compared with early/moderate disease. Individual items of the scale showed good discriminatory power between Parkinson's disease and healthy controls. Relevant items of the PDSS correlated with excessive daytime sleepiness. The scale showed robust test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: This appears to be the first description of a simple bedside screening instrument for evaluation of sleep disturbances in Parkinson's disease. A combination of subitems may help identify specific aspects of sleep disturbance, which in turn may help target treatment.

Efficacy and tolerability of racecadotril in acute diarrhea in children.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Oral rehydration therapy is the only treatment recommended by the World Health Organization in acute diarrhea in children. Antisecretory drugs available could not be used because of their side effects, except for racecadotril, which is efficient in acute diarrhea in adults. METHODS: The efficacy and tolerability of racecadotril (1.5 mg/kg administered orally 3 times daily) as adjuvant therapy to oral rehydration were compared with those of placebo in 172 infants aged 3 months to 4 years (mean age, 12.8 months) who had acute diarrhea. The treatment groups were comparable in terms of age, duration of diarrhea, number of stools, and causative microorganism at inclusion. RESULTS: During the first 48 hours of treatment, patients receiving racecadotril had a significantly lower stool output (grams per hour) than those receiving placebo. The 95% confidence interval was 43%-88% for the full data set (n = 166; P = 0.009) and 33%-75% for the per-protocol population (n = 116; P = 0.001). There was no difference between treatments depending on rotavirus status. Significant differences between treatment groups were also found after 24 hours of treatment: full data set (n = 167; P = 0.026) and per-protocol population (n = 121; P = 0.015). Tolerability was good in both groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the efficacy (up to 50% reduction in stool output) and tolerability of racecadotril as adjuvant therapy to oral rehydration solution in the treatment of severe diarrhea in infants and children.