Subcutaneous pharmacokinetics of the cardiac hormone vessel dilator.

Vessel dilator, a hormone synthesized in the heart, eliminates 71% of human small-cell lung cancers and 67% of human breast cancers growing in mice when given subcutaneously (s.c.) via osmotic pumps. The pharmacokinetics of s.c. administered vessel dilator have not been evaluated previously. In the present study, the pharmacokinetics of vessel dilator following s.c. bolus (ScB) or 3 h s.c. infusion (ScI) were compared with those following i.v. bolus (IvB) administration in male Fischer 344 rats. The half-life (t½ ) of vessel dilator after ScI, IvB and ScB was 54, 43 and 30 min, respectively. The tmax for vessel dilator after IvB, ScB and ScI administration was 1.5, 23 and 156 min, respectively, whereas the corresponding Cmax values were 3749, 887 and 471 ng/L (normalized against the dose used for ScB and IvB). The area under the curve (AUC0-∞ ) for vessel dilator was 1166, 880 and 1652 ng h/mL (normalized) following IvB, ScB and ScI administration, respectively. The volume of distribution for vessel dilator was 2.38, 0.92 and 1.08 L following IvB, ScB and SCI administration, respectively; corresponding clearance values were 1.69, 1.50 and 0.78 L/h, respectively. Plasma concentrations of vessel dilator after each of the three methods of administration mirrored their predicted concentration-time profiles. We conclude that vessel dilator administered via ScI has a significantly greater AUC and t½ and slowed clearance compared with IvB or ScB administration (P < 0.001), suggesting that s.c. infusion is the preferred method of administration, based on pharmacokinetics, to treat cancers.

Variability in airway inflammation, symptoms, lung function and reliever use in asthma: anti-inflammatory reliever hypothesis and STIFLE study design.

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease. Increase in airway inflammation is hypothesised to contribute to worsening of asthma symptoms and deterioration in lung function, resulting in the use of reliever medication. Short-acting ß2-agonists only treat the symptoms, whereas an anti-inflammatory reliever is believed to treat both symptoms and the underlying inflammation, thereby arresting the progression to an exacerbation. As-needed budesonide/formoterol as an anti-inflammatory reliever reduces the risk of severe exacerbations. However, supporting mechanistic evidence has not yet been described, specifically the temporal dynamics of parameters including airway inflammation, over time and during asthma worsening. The STIFLE study aims to characterise daily variability in airway inflammation, symptoms, lung function and reliever use in people with asthma. This phase IV, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, exploratory study will enrol 60-80 adult patients with asthma receiving low- or medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting ß2-agonists (EudraCT identifier number 2018-003467-64). Participants will be randomised 1:1 to either as-needed budesonide/formoterol dry-powder inhaler or salbutamol reliever for 24 weeks, in addition to their maintenance therapy. Daily data will be captured for fractional exhaled nitric oxide, spirometry, asthma symptoms and medication use using devices connected to a smartphone via the STIFLE application. STIFLE will thereby enable not only characterisation of the variability of airway inflammation and clinical outcomes in relation to asthma worsening, but also elucidate the effect of as-needed budesonide/formoterol on airway inflammation against a background of daily maintenance therapy.

Corticosteroid therapy in asthma: predictors of responsiveness.

Variable responses to corticosteroids are seen in a multitude of disease states including asthma, a disease in which these anti-inflammatory medications play a central role in both acute and chronic management. Clinical factors associated with steroid insensitivity, strategies for managing patients with steroid insensitivity, and underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for variable responses to corticosteroids are described.

Effect of montelukast on time-course of exhaled nitric oxide in asthma: influence of LTC4 synthase A(-444)C polymorphism.

Leukotrienes (LT) mediate inflammation in asthma. The fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) is thought to be a sensitive and reproducible method for assessing airway inflammation in asthmatics and the anti-inflammatory effects of drugs. A number of factors are known to contribute to intrapatient variation in FE(NO) which can confound interpretation. The aims of this study were to characterize the time-course of FE(NO), determine the effect of montelukast on the time-course of FE(NO), and evaluate the influence of the LTC(4) synthase A(-444)C polymorphism on montelukast-evoked changes in FE(NO). Following a 2-week run-in, 7 males and 5 females with asthma, 10-16 years old, received 5 or 10 mg of montelukast or an identical placebo at bedtime for 7 days in double-blind, crossover fashion, followed by a 7-day washout. FE(NO)was quantified every 30 min for 3 or 6 hr at baseline and on days 1, 2, 3, and 7 of treatment. A time-averaged value for FE(NO) was calculated (FE(NO)*), and % changes in FE(NO)* relative to baseline vs. time following placebo and montelukast were compared. The genotype of the A(-444)C polymorphism was determined by PCR and RFLP. FE(NO) varied markedly as a function of time in each patient. Time-averaged values of FE(NO) (FE(NO)*) during placebo and montelukast treatment were similar. Montelukast significantly reduced the slope of the % change in FE(NO)* vs. time curve in heterozygotes (n = 4), but not in A/A homozygotes (n = 8). These data suggest that heterozygotes respond better to montelukast compared to A/A homozygotes, at least with respect to changes in FE(NO). We conclude that assessment of inflammation or the anti-inflammatory effects of drugs in asthma based on single determinations of FE(NO) can be misleading. We further conclude that the A(-444)C polymorphism in the LTC(4) synthase gene probably contributes to interpatient variability in montelukast-evoked changes in FE(NO)* and warrants further study.

The effect of weight on the efficacy and safety of C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate for the treatment of acute hereditary angioedema.

BACKGROUND: Despite the worldwide obesity epidemic, there have been very few studies investigating the influence of body weight on treatment dosing and outcomes in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether the standard weight-based dosing recommendation of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrate (20 IU/kg) is adequate in HAE patients with a high body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Data from patients treated for HAE attacks with 20 IU/kg of C1-INH concentrate were retrospectively analyzed from the open-label IMPACT2 study (International Multicenter Prospective Angioedema C1-INH Trial). Patients were categorized according to BMI as being normal body weight, overweight, or obese. Efficacy end points were time to onset of symptom relief and time to complete resolution of symptoms. The safety profile was evaluated according to adverse events occurring within 7 to 9 days of treatment. RESULTS: Of 57 patients, 24 (42%) were of normal body weight, 20 (35%) were overweight, and 13 (23%) were obese. Median (95% CI) time to onset of symptom relief was 0.37 hour (0.29-0.57) in normal-weight patients, 0.48 hour (0.39-0.53) in overweight patients, and 0.58 hour (0.41-0.94) in obese patients. Median time (95% CI) to complete resolution of symptoms was 15.2 hours (9.3-23.2) in normal-weight patients, 22.6 hours (11.3-44.6) in overweight patients, and 11.0 hours (5.6-23.6) in obese patients (differences not significant). There were no relevant differences in the incidence of adverse events in normal-weight patients (54%), overweight patients (30%), and obese patients (54%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of HAE attacks with weight-based doses of C1-INH concentrate provided reliable treatment response, regardless of body weight, in these patients with HAE.

Pilot study of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Human granulocyte colony-stimulating-factor (G-CSF) is widely used for treatment of neutropenia and to mobilize stem/progenitor cells for bone marrow transplantation. In studies of thousands of healthy donor subjects treated with G-CSF to mobilize stem/progenitor cells, the side-effect profile has been reported to be mild and reversible. In pre-clinical studies, G-CSF was reported to improve spatial learning performance and to markedly reduce amyloid deposition in hippocampus and entorhinal cortex in a murine model of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The present study investigated the effects of a five day schedule of G-CSF administration on tolerability, safety, and cognition in eight patients with mild to moderate stage AD. A double-blind placebo control, cross-over design was implemented. Treatment with G-CSF did not result in serious adverse events. The most common and expected side effects were transient increases in white blood cell count, myalgias and diffuse aching that improved with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications. Of a battery of cognitive tests administered using the CANTAB computerized system, only the mean paired associate learning (PAL total trials adjusted) was significantly improved at the final visit of the study compared to baseline values (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in amyloid-ß1-42 levels in cerebrospinal fluid measured two weeks after G-CSF and two weeks after placebo treatments. In conclusion, administration of G-CSF in a dosage regimen commonly used for bone marrow donors was well tolerated and safe, and provided a signal of positive change in a hippocampal-dependent task of cognitive performance.

Fluticasone propionate plasma concentration and systemic effect: effect of delivery device and duration of administration.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are the preferred therapy in persistent asthma. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) generate a larger particle size compared with metered-dose inhalers (MDIs), which affects pulmonary deposition, bioavailability, and subsequent systemic effects of fluticasone propionate (fluticasone). OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship of fluticasone pharmacokinetics and cortisol suppression for 2 fluticasone formulations (DPI and MDI) administered in adults over 1-week and 6-week treatment periods. METHODS: Two previous studies conducted in adults by the Asthma Clinical Research Network examined relative efficacy and systemic effect of fluticasone from MDI and DPI. Sample sets (n=33) were analyzed for fluticasone after administration of 352 microg from the MDI, and 400 microg from the DPI formulation, twice daily, after a 1-week treatment period. The second study's sample sets (n=9) were analyzed for fluticasone after 6 weeks therapy at 352 microg twice daily from the MDI formulation, allowing achievement of steady state. RESULTS: ANOVA revealed a significant trend of increasing fluticasone area under the curve from 0 to time t (AUC(0-->t)) when comparing DPI with MDI for 1 week with MDI for 6 weeks (P<.0001). Similarly, ANOVA revealed increasing cortisol suppression between these groups (P=.007). Linear regression demonstrated that increasing fluticasone AUC(0-->t) was significantly correlated with cortisol suppression (P<.0001; r(2)=0.41). MDI for 6 weeks showed increasing fluticasone AUC (P=.0008, t test) compared with MDI for 1 week, suggesting accumulation. CONCLUSION: Fluticasone plasma concentrations are significantly greater after MDI compared with DPI, and cortisol suppression is associated with fluticasone plasma concentrations. Accumulation of fluticasone concentrations suggests that time to steady state exceeds 1 week of treatment with MDI.

The need for pediatric studies of allergy and asthma medications.

For many years, clinicians have accepted the fact that most medications do not have dosing guidelines for children younger than 12 years of age. Recently, there has been a great effort to correct this deficiency. With the introduction of the 1997 Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act, a provision was established to grant additional market exclusivity to pharmaceutical firms that performed the required studies that would lead to improved labeling of medications for children. This effort has resulted in a significant advance for the management of asthma and allergic disorders in children. Several allergy and asthma medications are now approved for use in children as young as 1 year of age, with studies currently being conducted in younger age groups. In this review, we discuss the background for this effort and the continuing impact it will have on the future management of allergy and asthma in children.