Changing health workforce attitudes to promote improved physical health in mental health service users: Keeping our Staff in Mind (KoSiM).

ISSUE ADDRESSED: People living with mental illness die on average 15 years earlier than the general population, primarily due to preventable and premature cardiovascular disease. Lifestyle interventions can be effective in reducing cardiovascular risk, yet mental health services do not routinely provide targeted lifestyle interventions. Exposing mental health staff to lifestyle interventions prior to targeting patients may be critical to changing culture and improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to improve the physical health of mental health staff through a targeted lifestyle intervention. METHODS: A pragmatic single-arm intervention study was conducted in a public mental health service, including inpatient and community settings, in Sydney, Australia. Participants in this study were n = 212 clinical and non-clinical staff. A five-session individualised lifestyle intervention (delivered over 5 weeks) incorporating physical activity and nutritional counselling was delivered by multidisciplinary teams. Participants were assessed at baseline, following the intervention, and at follow-up (mean = 16.7 weeks). The primary outcome was the barriers, attitudes, knowledge and confidence regarding screening, promoting and intervening to improve physical health outcomes of patients (M-BACK questionnaire). Secondary outcomes included anthropometric measures, cardiorespiratory fitness, sedentary time and nutritional intake. Repeated measures ANCOVAs were performed. RESULTS: A total of 212 staff (79% female) participated in this study. M-BACK total score significantly increased from baseline to follow-up (P < .001). Waist circumference, sedentary time and total energy intake all significantly decreased (all P's < .001) and cardiorespiratory fitness significantly increased (P < .001). CONCLUSION: A brief lifestyle intervention for staff of a public mental health service may increase the capability of the participants to improve their own physical health. SO WHAT?: Improving staff health may be an important strategy in improving the uptake and/or the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions targeting mental health service users.

Comparison of 3T MR arthrography and 3T MRI in intra-articular hip pathology: a cost-analysis.

BACKGROUND: MR arthrography (MRA) has previously been the radiological gold standard for investigating labral and chondral lesions of the hip joint. In recent years, 3T MRI has demonstrated comparable accuracy, being adopted as the first-line imaging investigation in many institutions. AIMS: We compare the associated increased cost and radiation dose of the fluoroscopic component of the MRA compared to MRI. METHODS: In this retrospective review over 2 years, 120 patients (mean age 27.3 years ± 13.2, range 8-67) underwent 3T MRA or non-contrast 3T MRI. Three musculoskeletal radiologists reported the data independently. Primary objectives included cost-comparison between each and radiation dose of the fluoroscopic component of the MRA. Secondary objectives included comparing detection of pathology involving the acetabular labrum, femoral cartilage, and acetabular cartilage. RESULTS: Then, 58 (48%) underwent 3T MRA and 62 (52%) patients underwent 3T MRI. The added cost of the fluoroscopic injection prior to MRA was €116.31/patient, equating to €7211.22 savings/year. MRA was associated with a small radiation dose of 0.003 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning from 3T MRA to 3T MRI in the investigation of intra-articular hip pathology increases cost savings and reduces radiation dose.

Cardio-metabolic risk in individuals prescribed long-acting injectable antipsychotic medication.

People living with severe mental illness (SMI) experience significant physical health co-morbidity. Few studies have focused on physical health outcomes for those prescribed long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics. This observational cross-sectional study aimed to assess the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and other cardio-metabolic risk factors in a large cohort prescribed LAI and managed by community mental health services. For participants with elevated cardio-metabolic risk factors, the proportion receiving appropriate management was assessed. Of the 301 eligible participants, many met the full criteria for MetS (44%) and its components. Cardio-metabolic risk factors were largely under- or un-treated. Smoking rates were very high (62%) along with reported high rates of physical inactivity and poor dietary intake. The vast majority (89%) reported seeing their general practitioner in the preceding twelve months. Individuals prescribed LAI have a very high prevalence of MetS and potentially modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Routine monitoring accompanied by evidence-based treatment of cardiometabolic abnormalities which contribute to significant morbidity, disability and premature death should be prioritised. Better collaboration between mental health services and primary care providers should be pursued to optimise the delivery of effective physical health care to individuals living with SMI.