Fatality Rates After Infection With the Omicron Variant (B.1.1.529): How Deadly has it been? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Since late 2019, the global community has been gripped by the uncertainty surrounding the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In November 2021, the emergence of the Omicron variant in South Africa added a new dimension. This study aims to assess the disease's severity and determine the extent to which vaccinations contribute to reducing mortality rates. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiological implications of the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 were performed, incorporating an analysis of articles from November 2021that address mortality rates. Results: The analysis incorporated data from 3,214,869 patients infected with omicron, as presented in 270 articles. A total of 6,782 deaths from the virus were recorded (0.21%). In the analysed articles, the pooled mortality rate was 0.003 and the pooled in-house mortality rate was 0.036. Vaccination is an effective step in preventing death (odds ratio: 0.391, p < 0.01). Conclusion: The mortality rates for the omicron variant are lower than for the preceding delta variant. mRNA vaccination affords secure and effective protection against severe disease and death from omicron.

The most influential COVID-19 articles: A systematic review.

Background: Since December 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2),causative pathogen of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has triggered a pandemic with challenges for health care systems around the world. Researchers have studied and published on the subject of SARS-CoV-2 and the disease extensively. What is the significance of articles published, shared and cited in the early stages of such a pandemic? Materials and methods: A systematic literature search in a time frame of 12 months and analysis rating using Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) were performed. Results: The 100 most cited COVID-19 articles were identified. The majority of these articles were from China (n = 54), followed by United States of America (USA) (n = 21) and United Kingdom (UK) (n = 8). All articles were published in high-ranked, peer-reviewed journals, with research focusing onthe the diagnosis, transmission and therapy of COVID-19. The level of evidence of the 100 most cited COVID-19 articles on average was low. Conclusion: In the early stages of a pandemic, new and innovative research can emerge and be highly cited, regardless of the level of evidence.

Hemodynamic Instability during Surgery for Pheochromocytoma: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative hemodynamic instability is one of the most common adverse events in patients undergoing adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of perioperative severe hemodynamic instability. METHODS: We present a retrospective, single-center analysis in a major tertiary hospital of all consecutive patients undergoing elective adrenalectomy from 2005 to 2019 for pheochromocytoma. Severe perioperative hypertension and hypotension were evaluated, defined as changes in blood pressure larger than 30% of the preoperative patient-specific mean arterial pressure (MAP). RESULTS: Unilateral adrenalectomy was performed in 67 patients. Intraoperative episodes of hemodynamic instability occurred in 97% of all patients (n = 65), severe hypertension occurred in 24 patients (36%), and severe hypotensive episodes occurred in 62 patients (93%). Patients with more than five severe hypotensive episodes (n = 29) received higher preoperative alpha-adrenergic blockades (phenoxybenzamine 51 ± 50 mg d-1 vs. 29 ± 27 mg d-1; p = 0.023) and had a longer mean ICU stay (39.6 ± 41.5 h vs. 20.6 ± 19.1 h, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative hypotensive, rather than hypertensive, episodes occurred during adrenalectomy. The occurrence of more than five hypotensive episodes correlated well with a significantly longer hospital stay and ICU time.

Beware of gastric tube in esophagectomy after gastric radiotherapy: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Gastric tube formation and pull-up is the most common technique of reconstruction following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. If previous treatment with radiotherapy for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-lymphoma restricts suitability of the stomach for anastomosis to the esophagus is unknown. CASE SUMMARY: A 57-year-old man underwent sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy for gastric MALT-lymphoma seven years prior to diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Esophagectomy without neoadjuvant treatment was recommended by the multidisciplinary tumor board due to early tumor stage [uT1 (sm2) uN+ cM0 according to TNM-classification of malignant tumors, 8th edition] without lymph node involvement. Minimal invasive esophageal resection with esophagogastrostomy was performed. Due to gastric tube necrosis with anastomotic leakage on the twelfth postoperative day, diverting resection with construction of a cervical salivary fistula was necessary. Rapid recovery facilitated colonic interposition without any complications six months afterwards. CONCLUSION: This case report may represent the start for further investigation to know if it is reasonable to refrain from esophagogastrostomy in patients with a long interval between gastric radiotherapy and surgery.

Pyogenic Liver Abscesses Caused by Acute Appendicitis: Frequency and Diagnostic and Therapeutic Recommendations.

Background: Pyogenic liver abscesses (PLA) are caused by biliary diseases or hematogenous spreading of mostly intra-abdominal infections. Liver abscesses resulted in hematogenous spreading of infections via the portal vein, such as abscesses caused by acute appendicitis. Pyogenic liver abscesses associated with appendicitis have rarely been described in the literature, especially in adults. The standard therapeutic procedures for liver abscesses are broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy and percutaneous drainage. Surgery for liver abscesses is required in cases of unsuccessful processes. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with liver abscesses between January 2005 and June 2013 was performed. Parameters investigated included demographics, etiologies of abscesses, treatment modalities, and germ spectrum including antibiotic profile. Five cases of PLA caused by appendicitis were reviewed in detail. Results: During the study period, 49 patients with PLA and 1,986 patients with acute appendicitis were treated in our hospital. Twenty-one patients with PLA were treated with antibiotic agents and computed tomography (CT)-guided drainage. Liver resections were necessary in 29 of the patients with PLA. In five patients with PLA, abscesses were caused by an acute appendicitis (9.4% of all PLA, 0.25% of all appendicitis operations). Diagnosis of appendicitis as cause of PLA was made during surgery for liver resections in three patients. Previous imaging was not clear in all cases of PLA caused by appendicitis. The most common pre-operative symptoms in patients with PLA caused by appendicitis were fever and right upper quadrant tenderness. Discussion: Pyogenic liver abscesses caused by acute appendicitis are rare. In the study period of eight and one-half years nearly 2,000 cases of acute appendicitis were treated and five of these patients developed liver abscesses (0.25%). Pyogenic liver abscesses should be considered in patients with unusual high infectious parameters, septic symptoms, and detection of unknown liver lesions.

Magnetic endoscopic imaging as a rational investment for specific colonoscopies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic endoscopic imaging (MEI) was regarded as an adjuvant device to improve procedural efficacy and patients' comfort during colonoscopy. METHODS: Several electronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies. Based on the heterogeneity of included studies, random-effects or fixed-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR), risk difference (RD) or mean difference (MD) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Twenty-one randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for meta-analysis, with a total of 7,060 patients. Although there is a slightly lower risk of cecal intubation failure with the adjuvant of MEI (RD 3%; P < 0.00001) compared to the control group, the updated studies show no significant benefits. Similarly, the cecal intubation time, pain scores, and loop formation with the adjuvant of MEI did not show any advantages. However, considerable significant benefits were found in the subgroup of technically difficult colonoscopy and inexperienced colonoscopists. Moreover, MEI was associated with lower loop intubation time, lower abdominal compression times, and better lesion localization. CONCLUSION: The clinical benefits of MEI could be exaggerated. However, MEI has considerable advantages in technically difficult colonoscopies, the assistance for inexperienced colonoscopists, loop resolving, and lesion localization.