Repeat cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) are present in 10-20% of patients at the time of their initial cancer diagnosis, and affects over 20% of those who develop colorectal cancer recurrence. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with HIPEC is firmly established as the optimal surgical treatment, but there is very little known about the benefit of repeat or iterative CRS. The aim of this review is to provide a systematic evaluation of the perioperative complications, survival outcomes and quality of life in patients undergoing repeat CRS with HIPEC for CRPM. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane databases was performed to identify all studies that reported outcomes for repeat CRS with or without HIPEC for CRPM. RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety-three manuscripts were screened, and 15 retrospective studies were suitable for inclusion. Sample sizes ranged from 2 to 30 participants and comprised a total of 229 patients. HIPEC was used in all studies, but exact rates were not consistently stated. Perioperative morbidity was reported in four studies, between 16.7% and 37.5%. Nine studies reported mortality rate which was consistently 0%. The median overall survival after repeat CRS ranged from 20 to 62.6 months. No studies provided quality of life metrics. CONCLUSION: Repeat CRS for CRPM has perioperative morbidity and mortality rates comparable to initial CRS, and offers a potential survival benefit in selected patients. There is however limited high-quality data in the literature.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival for patients with high volume colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) affects 15% of patients at initial colorectal cancer diagnosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been demonstrated to be a safe and feasible option, however there is limited data describing its efficacy in advanced peritoneal disease. This study evaluated the effect of NAC on survival in patients with high volume CRPM undergoing CRS with or without HIPEC. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC for CRPM from 2004 to 2019 at our institution was performed. The cohort was divided based on peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) at surgery: Low Volume (PCI ≤ 16) and High Volume (PCI > 16). RESULTS: A total of 326 patients underwent CRS with HIPEC for CRPM. There were 39 patients (12%) with High Volume disease, and 15 of these (38%) received NAC. Patients with High Volume disease had significantly longer operating time, lower likelihood of complete macroscopic cytoreduction (CC-0 score), longer intensive care unit length of stay and longer hospital stay compared to Low Volume disease. In High Volume disease, the NAC group had a significantly shorter median survival of 14.4 months compared to 23.8 months in the non-NAC group (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Patients with High Volume CRPM achieved good median survival following CRS with HIPEC, which challenges the current PCI threshold for offering CRS. The use of NAC in this cohort did not increase perioperative morbidity but was associated with significantly shorter median survival compared to upfront surgery.

When all else fails: the colo-duodenal anastomosis.

Total enterectomy is an exceedingly rare procedure performed out of necessity due to massive intestinal infarction, trauma, or peritoneal malignancy. This case describes a 47-year-old patient who has successfully undergone the procedure to manage mesenteric ischaemia. Bowel continuity was achieved with a duodenocolonic anastomosis, and the patient has been transitioned to life-long total parental nutrition. This case highlights that carefully selected patients can achieve long-term survival with good quality of life rather than palliation.

Peritoneal Tuberculosis in Western Countries: A Rare Case With Concurrent Helminthic Infection.

This case report presents a rare case of peritoneal tuberculosis (TB) coexisting with a helminthic infection in a 25-year-old female residing in Australia, highlighting the diagnostic challenges posed by abdominal TB. Despite the low incidence of TB in Western countries, abdominal TB remains a diagnostic dilemma due to its nonspecific symptoms and potential mimicry of other abdominal pathologies. The case highlights the importance of considering TB as a differential diagnosis of unexplained abdominal symptoms, particularly in individuals with a history of travel or previous residence in high-endemic regions. A multidisciplinary approach involving infectious disease specialists, radiologists, and surgeons is essential for comprehensive management. Prompt initiation of anti-TB therapy is recommended once diagnosis is confirmed.

Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Cases With Peritoneal Metastases Treated With Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Comparative Analysis of Survival Between Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Scores - PCI in a Single Centre.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) has been a strong indicator of prognosis for patients receiving cytoreductive surgery. The aim of this single institution study was to compare the survival of peritoneal carcinoma cases treated with cytoreduction surgery arising from colorectal cancer grouped by PCI scores. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospective dataset maintained from 2000 till September 2022, for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancers was carried out. Of the total of 1,625 peritoneal metastases cases, 415 were identified with colorectal cancer and considered for analysis. Survival was followed for 60 months since the index-peritonectomy for cases in this study. RESULTS: Hazard ratio for 5-year survival using the Cox regression analysis over time (t) with a Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test for significance between the groups indicated, <15 vs. 15 (HR=2.121, p=0.0338), <15 vs. 16-20 (HR=2.748, p<0.0001), <15 vs. >20 (HR=3.158, p<0.0001), 15 vs. 16-20 (HR=1.262, p=0.5658), 15 vs. >20 (HR=1.566, p=0.2771) and for PCI category 16-20 vs. >20 (HR=1.204, p=0.5355) for survival. Median survival for the categories of PCI <15, PCI-15, PCI-16-20, and PCI >15 was 43.967 (95%CI=28.31-59.63), 20.67 (95%CI=5.01-36.33), 19.50 (95%CI=3.84-35.16), and 14.30 (95%CI=1.36-29.96), respectively. CONCLUSION: A correlation of PCI with survival was confirmed in this study reinforcing the need for assessment of PCI at surgery to help prognostication. Detecting synchronous peritoneal metastases early and prompt treatment can help prevent recurrence and increase survival.

Strangulated interstitial interparietal hernia following lower segment caesarean section: a case report.

Interparietal hernias are rare and occur most commonly in the long-term postoperative setting following abdominopelvic surgery. This case report describes the development of a strangulated interparietal hernia through a defect in the posterior rectus sheath 4 days post-lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) in a 36-year-old female. Whilst she had an acute abdomen, she did not have a palpable incisional hernia. Her interparietal hernia was identified via a computed tomography scan of her abdomen and pelvis. She underwent a midline laparotomy where ischaemic small bowel was found within her hernia. This was resected and she had an unremarkable recovery. This case is the first of its kind and highlights the diagnostic challenge of interparietal hernias in acute postoperative patients as well as the importance of having a low threshold for suspicion for complicated interparietal hernias in patients with an acute abdomen following LSCS.

Effective Use of Bromelain and Acetylcysteine (BromAc®) for Treatment of Perigastric Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare clinical condition of progressive peritoneal mucin accumulation. PMP has a reasonable survivability but with a notable risk of tumour recurrence. Standard treatment, including for tumour relapse, aims for a cure with complete cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. In the case of tumour recurrence, surgery becomes progressively complex, and some patients are not suitable for surgery either due to patient preference or morbidity and mortality risk. BromAc® is an emerging, novel mucolytic combination therapy composed of bromelain and acetylcysteine which can be administered intratumorally via radiologically guided drains. It represents a minimally invasive treatment for patients who have symptomatic tumour deposits but are not surgical candidates. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 64-year-old male with a background of appendiceal PMP who presented with a gastric outlet obstruction from a perigastric tumour deposit. This was managed with BromAc® administration, following which the patient's symptoms resolved. This corresponded with an 80% reduction in the tumour volume radiologically. CONCLUSION: BromAc® is an emerging minimally invasive treatment for PMP tumour deposits that may be considered as adjunctive or alternative treatment in patients who are not surgical candidates to reduce tumour burden and improve symptomatology and quality of life.

Overall survival and morbidity are not associated with advanced age for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a single centre experience.

Objectives: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has enabled better prognosis for patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. However, in older age groups, short -and long-term outcomes are still perceived as poor. We evaluated patients aged 70 and over and determine if age is a predictor of morbidity, mortality and overall survival (OS). Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on CRS/HIPEC patients and categorised by age. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included morbidity, mortality, hospital and incentive care unit (ICU) stay and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). Results: A total of 1,129 patients were identified with 134 aged 70+ and 935 under 70. There was no difference in OS (p=0.175) or major morbidity (p=0.051). Advanced age was associated with higher mortality (4.48 vs. 1.11 %, p=0.010), longer ICU stay (p<0.001) and longer hospitalisation (p<0.001). The older group was less likely to achieve complete cytoreduction (61.2 vs. 73 %, p=0.004) and receive EPIC (23.9 vs. 32.7 %, p=0.040). Conclusions: In patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC, age of 70 and above does not impact OS or major morbidity but is associated with increased mortality. Age alone should not be a limiting factor in selecting CRS/HIPEC patients. Careful multi-disciplinary approach is needed when considering those of advanced age.