The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antenatal care provision and associated mental health, obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic imposed many challenges on pregnant women, including rapid changes to antenatal care aimed at reducing the societal spread of the virus. This study aimed to assess how the pandemic affected perinatal mental health and other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in a tertiary unit in Queensland, Australia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women booked for care between March 2019 - June 2019 and March 2020 - June 2020. A total of 1984 women were included with no confirmed cases of COVID-19. The primary outcome of this study was adverse maternal mental health defined as an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of ≥13 or an affirmative response to 'EPDS Question 10'. Secondary outcomes were preterm birth <37 weeks and <32 weeks, mode of birth, low birth weight, malpresentation in labour, hypertensive disease, anaemia, iron/vitamin B12 deficiency, stillbirth and a composite of neonatal morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: There were no differences in the primary perinatal mental health outcomes. The rates of composite adverse neonatal outcomes (27 vs. 34 %, p<0.001) during the pandemic were higher; however, there was no difference in perinatal mortality (p=1.0), preterm birth (p=0.44) or mode of delivery (p=0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no adverse consequences on maternal mental health during the pandemic, there was a concerning increase in neonatal morbidity potentially due to the altered model of maternity care implemented in the early COVID-19 pandemic.

The Safety and Effects of Pregnancy after Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: As advanced maternal age and bariatric procedures have become more common, the number of women seeking pregnancy after having abdominoplasty has increased. This has traditionally been a relative contraindication and counselled against, though there are little data in the literature regarding the potential effects to mother and baby. METHODS: A systematic review of Medline and Embase databases was performed to identify cases of pregnancy occurring after abdominoplasty. Data were extracted and analysed for presentation. RESULTS: 17 studies encompassing 237 patients met inclusion. Mean age was 33.08 years. Mean parity prior to first pregnancy after abdominoplasty 2.13. Previous bariatric surgery was reported in 31.75%. Body contouring procedure was abdominoplasty (94.51%), body lift (3.80%) and other (1.69%). Rectus plication was performed in 89.74%, where reported. Mean time between abdominoplasty and pregnancy was 3.75 years. Method of delivery was Caesarean section in 43.63%, and vaginal delivery in 56.37%. Mean gestational age at delivery was 38.90 weeks. Preterm delivery (<37 weeks) was reported in 9.85%, and low birthweight (<2500 g) was reported in 7.22%. Diagnoses or complications were documented in 14 studies (136 patients). These were grouped as foetal/neonatal (n = 21), maternal (n = 104) or abdominal wall/aesthetic (n = 96); and are detailed within. There were no neonatal or maternal mortalities in any study. A lower-than-expected spinal anaesthetic block was stated in 3 cases. Mean follow-up was 8.5 months. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy should not be contraindicated after abdominoplasty. The data presented allow clinicians to have an evidence-based discussion and provide information for shared decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The impact on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in term infants following the introduction of a colour-coded, hierarchical cardiotocography classification system: A retrospective non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Queensland introduced a colour-coded cardiotocograph (CTG) classification system (green, blue, yellow and red) to complement the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists prose-based classification system of 'low, unlikely, maybe or likely' fetal compromise. AIMS: The aim of the study was to determine the clinical impact of the introduction of the colour-coded CTG classification system compared to the prose-based system. We hypothesised there would be no change in the rate of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise (OD-IFC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective non-inferiority study from November 2014 to May 2018 used routinely collected data from the Mater Mother's Hospital. Non-insured women with a singleton, non-anomalous, cephalic fetus at term, attempting a vaginal birth with continuous intrapartum CTG were included. The primary outcome was OD-IFC. Secondary outcomes included various obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Non-inferiority analysis was performed with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 2% risk difference. RESULTS: Eleven thousand seven hundred and twenty-seven participants were included. The OD-IFC rate was similar across the study groups (prose-based 15.1% vs colour-coded 15.3%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.02, 95% CI 0.93-1.13) with the adjusted risk difference of 0.29% (95% CI -0.98 to 1.56), which did not exceed the inferiority margin. There were more spontaneous (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.19) and fewer instrumental (aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95) vaginal births in the colour-coded cohort. There were no differences in neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Reassuringly, the colour-coded CTG classification system was non-inferior to the prose-based system, did not influence OD-IFC but was associated with more spontaneous vaginal deliveries.