Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 27(5): 586-595, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33576703

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgery can be performed in hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) and ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), as well as in traditional inpatient venues. Patients who undergo orthopedic surgery may be prescribed opioids for the management of postsurgical pain. However, the association between surgery venue, postsurgical opioid use, and health care costs remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare postsurgical opioid use and health care costs associated with 6 different orthopedic surgical procedures performed at inpatient, ASC, and HOPD venues. METHODS: Using the Optum Research Database, this retrospective study analyzed commercial health care claims from adult patients in the United States undergoing specific orthopedic procedures (total knee arthroplasty, partial knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, and lumbar spinal fusion) between April 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017. The date of the first procedure in that period was the index date; continuous insurance coverage for 12 months before the index date (baseline period) to 6 months following the index date (postsurgical period, which includes the index date) was required. Opioid use and all-cause costs were measured in the postsurgical period. Baseline patient characteristics included demographics, Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index, and opioid use. Multivariable analysis identified factors influencing postsurgical costs and persistent opioid use (defined as ≥ 1 opioid fill within 3 days after surgery [or discharge for inpatient stay] and ≥1 additional opioid fill during the postsurgical period at least 90 days after the index date). RESULTS: The sample included 126,172 patients (mean age, 58 years; 49% female). Overall, most procedures were performed at inpatient venues (68%), followed by HOPDs (18%) and ASCs (14%); the percentage of procedures performed at ASCs increased from 12% to 17% from 2012 to 2017. Patients whose procedures were performed at ASCs reported the lowest adjusted percentage of persistent opioid use following the procedure (18%) compared with those with procedures performed at HOPDs (24%) or inpatient venues (26%). Adjusted 30-day costs were 14% and 27% lower for patients with procedures in HOPDs and ASCs, respectively, compared with inpatient venues (P < 0.001 for both), and adjusted costs over the first 90 days were similar. CONCLUSIONS: All-cause costs on the day of surgery through 30 days after surgery for these 6 orthopedic procedures were significantly lower in HOPDs and ASCs compared with inpatient venues, even after adjustment for cohort, surgery year, demographic characteristics, baseline Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index, and any opioid use within 90 days before the procedure. Additionally, patients undergoing orthopedic surgery at ASCs had the lowest adjusted percentage of persistent opioid use compared with those undergoing surgery at HOPDs or inpatient venues. Migration of certain orthopedic procedures from inpatient venues to HOPDs or ASCs may reduce health care costs and decrease the potential for persistent opioid use. DISCLOSURES: This study and editorial support for the preparation of this manuscript was funded by Pacira BioSciences, which contracted with Optum to conduct the study. Cisternas, Korrer, and Wilson are employees of Optum. Waterman was employed with Pacira BioSciences at the time of the study. Portions of this work were presented at AMCP Nexus 2019; October 29-November 1, 2019; National Harbor, MD.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/economia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
2.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 35(11): 1937-1944, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31298592

RESUMO

Objective: To describe pill burden before and after hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment initiation among patients newly treated for HCV infection, and to evaluate the association between HCV pill burden and gaps in HCV therapy. Methods: This was a retrospective administrative claims study of patients treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for HCV from 1 November 2013 to 31 July 2016. HCV pill burden was defined as the pill count per day for the index HCV regimen. Mean overall pill burden (HCV medications plus non-HCV medications) was calculated in the 90 days before and after DAA initiation. Gaps in the index HCV regimen were assessed in the 6 months after DAA initiation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the odds of a gap in HCV therapy across HCV pill burden categories (1 pill/day, 2 pills/day, and ≥3 pills/day). Results: Among 9815 patients who met the study criteria, mean overall pill burdens before and after DAA treatment initiation were 5.4 and 7.7, respectively (p < .001). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of a ≥15-day gap in HCV therapy was 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38-2.22) for patients with 2 HCV pills/day and 2.11 (95% CI = 1.78-2.51) for patients with ≥3 pills/day, compared with patients with 1 HCV pill/day. Conclusions: Patients with HCV have a substantial pill burden even before initiating HCV treatment. As higher HCV pill burden was associated with lower medication adherence, pill burden should be an important consideration in HCV treatment selection.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Benefits Q ; 24(1): 46-54, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18543833

RESUMO

Although consumer-driven health plans (CDHPs) have grown dramatically, the question of whether CDHPs have reduced health care costs has not been answered definitively. This article presents what the authors believe to be the first study to analyze a large sample of claims data and to look in detail at different types of utilization among enrollees in a CDHP and those in a traditional comprehensive major medical (CMM) plan. After adjusting for the finding that CDHP enrollees are both younger and healthier than those in CMM plans, the authors found that CDHP enrollees show no consistent or significant utilization differences for measures over which consumers have little control (e.g., inpatient stays); lower utilization for measures over which consumers have greater control (e.g., emergency room visits); and higher utilization of preventive services.


Assuntos
Participação da Comunidade , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/estatística & dados numéricos , Poupança para Cobertura de Despesas Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviços de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Masculino , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/economia , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA