Psychosocial aspects of ejaculatory dysfunction and male reproduction.

This article provides a summary of the biopsychosocial model and the assessment and treatment of male sexual dysfunction as manifested in cases of infertility. In couples trying to get pregnant, a unique set of psychosocial and behavioral changes may evolve that directly interferes with a couple's usual pattern of sexual behavior, resulting in sexual dysfunction. The unique set of changes is discussed and how these changes impact on erectile and ejaculatory function. Strategies for assessing and managing male sexual dysfunction that compromise fertility are reviewed.

Determinants of sexual arousal and accuracy of its self-estimation in sexually functional males.

Men with and without sexual dysfunction present with varying patterns of agreement between subjective estimates of sexual arousal and more objective psychophysiological measures of the same construct. This relative accuracy seems to be associated with sexual function, with men who have sexual dysfunction presenting less accurate estimations (mostly reporting below measured arousal levels). The purpose of this study is to clarify the processes underlying sexual arousal and the accuracy of its self-estimation. We looked at potential predictors of sexual arousal (subjective and physiological) and accuracy in estimating objective sexual arousal in a sample of 60 sexually functional males. Predictors included pre-existing sexual attitudes (erotophobia), both trait and state positive and negative affect, self-focused attention, and interoceptive awareness. Results indicate that this sexually functional sample generally reported below their own erection level. Interestingly, trait negative affect was associated with somewhat lower levels of subjective arousal and higher levels of physiological arousal. On the other hand, state positive affect facilitated both subjective and objective arousal and increased somewhat the accuracy of estimates of erectile responding. Pre-existing sexual attitudes as well as variations in self-focused attention and interoceptive awareness evidenced little effect on sexual arousal or the accuracy of its estimation.

Responsiveness and minimum important differences for the erection quality scale.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the responsiveness and treatment sensitivity of the Erection Quality Scale, and provided further psychometric validation of this scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An 8-week, placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of vardenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction was performed. The Erection Quality Scale, together with a number of other patient and partner questionnaires, was administered at a screening visit, at baseline, and weeks 4 and 8 of treatment. Erection Quality Scale responsiveness was investigated by evaluating treatment induced changes and modeling using ANCOVA. Internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and minimum important difference of the Erection Quality Scale were also assessed. RESULTS: Efficacy evaluations demonstrated that the Erection Quality Scale was sufficiently responsive to differentiate the treatment benefits of vardenafil compared with placebo. Internal consistency for the Erection Quality Scale total score was similar across visits, with values high enough to suggest reliability of items included in the scale. Discriminant validity of the Erection Quality Scale total score was demonstrated, with a high correlation with the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (0.88, p <0.0001) and negligible correlations with clinical measures assumed to be unrelated to erection quality. All Erection Quality Scale total score comparisons substantially exceeded the 5-point minimum important difference estimate. CONCLUSIONS: The Erection Quality Scale was responsive and internally consistent, and demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity. Furthermore, this instrument provided a unique contribution to the measurement of erection quality compared to the International Index of Erectile Function. This study provides strong evidence supporting the use of the Erection Quality Scale in clinical trials.

Psychological and interpersonal correlates in men with erectile dysfunction and their partners: a pilot study of treatment outcome with sildenafil.

The role of psychological and interpersonal factors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) with sildenafil or other oral therapies has not been sufficiently investigated. We conducted a pilot study of psychosocial predictors of pharmacotherapy treatment outcome and satisfaction in men with ED and their partners. Sixty-nine men with mild to moderate ED and their partners were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, treatment trial with sildenafil. Treatment measures included a battery of validated self-report measures and questionnaires. Subjects also were interviewed according to a semistructured interview protocol. Partner assessments included self-report measures of sexual function, mood, and relationship satisfaction. Results indicated that, prior to treatment, patients had erectile function scores in the range of mild to moderate ED, with relatively low levels of concomitant depression, anxiety, and psychological stress and high overall levels of relationship adjustment. Partner sexual function was in the normal range of total Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women (BISF-W; Taylor, Rosen, Leiblum, 1994) scores, although more than one third of female partners had specific sexual complaints or problems. Among couples who completed one or both follow-up visits (N = 34), sildenafil treatment resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of sexual function in men, including sexual desire, orgasmic function, erectile function and overall sexual satisfaction. Significant improvements also were noted in partners' ratings of sexual function in most domains, including arousal, pleasure, and orgasm. Higher baseline levels of sex-specific anxiety were negatively associated with improvement in erections following treatment. Relationship adjustment at baseline, contrary to expectations, did not predict erectile or sexual satisfaction following treatment in the men or their partners but was significantly correlated with changes in sexual desire. Baseline levels of depression, anxiety, and stress generally were unrelated to efficacy or treatment satisfaction. However, we observed a curvilinear relationship in the men between baseline levels of stress and treatment discontinuation (i.e., subjects with moderate levels of stress were less likely to discontinue treatment). Because of a high number of dropouts, results of this pilot study await confirmation in a larger and more adequately powered clinical trial.

Erection quality scale: initial scale development and validation.

OBJECTIVES: The Erection Quality Scale (EQS) is a new, self-report measure for assessing the quality of penile erections. It is intended to complement existing diagnostic and outcome measures (eg, International Index of Erectile Function, Sexual Encounter Profile) in both clinical practice and outcomes research in erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: The initial phases of development and psychometric validation of the EQS are described. Specifically, qualitative research in patients and healthy men was used to generate relevant constructs. On the basis of the findings from these phases, and recommendations from an expert panel, seven constructs were selected for inclusion. Multiple items with different formats were drafted to measure each of the key constructs. An iterative process of cognitive testing, item revision, and item reduction was used to identify the 15 most appropriate items and their optimal response scales. This version of the scale was tested in a 200-subject discriminant validity study designed to gather data for a psychometric evaluation. Participants were classified into ED-untreated, ED-treated, and healthy control groups to evaluate the discriminant validity of the measure in men with different levels of erectile function. RESULTS: The study results supported a robust single-factor structure, indicating that the EQS provides an overall index of erection quality. An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 denotes adequate test-retest reliability. Furthermore, the EQS correlated well with existing measures and differentiated patients from the three ED classifications, a preliminary indication of discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings presented provide evidence of the scale's potential utility for measuring erection quality in future studies.