Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 25(7): 2063-2073, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28197848

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare patient-triggered follow-up (PTFU) for curatively treated colorectal cancer against traditional outpatient follow-up (OPFU). METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed at four time points over one-year post-treatment to two prospectively-recruited cohorts: A, patients entering follow-up and receiving OPFU pre-implementation of PTFU; B, patients entering follow-up (FU) and receiving either OPFU (B1) or PTFU (B2) post-implementation of PTFU. Bi-variate tests were used to compare patient characteristics and outcomes eight months after entering follow-up (generic and cancer-specific quality of life (QoL), satisfaction). Regression analysis explored associations between follow-up model and outcomes. Resource implications and costs of models were compared. RESULTS: Patients in Cohort B1 were significantly more likely to have received chemotherapy (p < 0.001), radiotherapy (p < 0.05), and reported poorer QoL (p = 0.001). Having a longstanding co-morbid condition was the most important determinant of QoL (p < 0.001); model of care was not significant. Patients were satisfied with their follow-up care regardless of model. Health service costs were higher in PTFU over the first year CONCLUSIONS: PTFU is acceptable to patients with colorectal cancer and can be considered to be a realistic alternative to OPFU for clinically suitable patients. The initial costs are higher due to provision of a self-management (SM) programme and remote surveillance. Further research is needed to establish long-term outcomes and costs.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Estudos de Coortes , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Insight ; 19(4): 8-10, 1994 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7798732

RESUMO

A retrospective study of 1214 outpatients in Sierra Leone, West Africa was done to answer the question, "What is the visual acuity following extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with an intraocular lens (IOL) for patients in a developing country?" Only 24% achieved uncorrected pseudophakic visual acuity of 20/20 to 20/50. Additionally, postoperative complications and patient complaints were tracked. Results showed suture irritation was less prevalent in those patients when 10-0 nylon suture was used, cut close, and the knot rotated and buried.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Acuidade Visual , Extração de Catarata/métodos , Pesquisa em Enfermagem Clínica , Países em Desenvolvimento , Humanos , Nylons , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Serra Leoa , Enfermagem Transcultural
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA