Factors associated with high antimicrobial use in young calves on Dutch dairy farms: A case-control study.

Since 2012, the Dutch Veterinary Medicine Authority reports antimicrobial usage (AMU) in young calves (<56 d) on dairy farms on an annual basis. The AMU distribution in this age group is skewed, with a low AMU in young calves on the majority of dairy farms and a high AMU in a relatively small number of farms. This results in a notable difference between the mean and median AMU. To further reduce the mean AMU, the AMU on the high-AMU farms must be decreased. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between both young stock management and an indication of the farmers' mindset and AMU in young calves on Dutch dairy farms with a high and low AMU in young calves. This knowledge may be helpful in decreasing AMU in young calves on high-AMU farms. We performed a case-control study in which 200 dairy farms (100 with high AMU and 100 with low AMU in young calves) participated. Case farms were defined as farms with an animal daily-defined dose at the farm level in young calves >28 in 2012 and 2013, based on the 90th percentile of the use of antimicrobials in young calves in 2012. Control farms had an animal daily-defined dose at the farm level in young calves of <0.5 in 2012 and 2013, which was determined to be low use. A questionnaire was conducted about general farm and young stock management, hygiene, housing, vaccination, and calf health. An indication of the farmers' mindset with regard to AMU and treatment of sick calves was determined by including statements (agree/disagree) in the questionnaire. In addition, routinely collected data on herd size, growth in herd size, replacement, and calf mortality were available for analysis. Dairy farmers that immediately started antimicrobial treatment in sick calves had higher odds of being in the high-AMU group than farmers who started treatment of sick calves with supportive nonantimicrobial therapy. Other variables associated with a high AMU in young calves included housing calves on partially slatted floors, a high prevalence of respiratory disease, an unfavorable Salmonella status, and not agreeing with the statement "Young stock need specific management." Both dairy farm management and opinions of dairy producers regarding AMU, indicative of mindset, are important when distinguishing farms with high and low AMU in young calves. Although the rationale behind mindset warrants more research, likely a change in both aspects seems to be required to reduce the AMU in young calves on dairy farms.

Active animal health surveillance in European Union Member States: gaps and opportunities.

Animal health surveillance enables the detection and control of animal diseases including zoonoses. Under the EU-FP7 project RISKSUR, a survey was conducted in 11 EU Member States and Switzerland to describe active surveillance components in 2011 managed by the public or private sector and identify gaps and opportunities. Information was collected about hazard, target population, geographical focus, legal obligation, management, surveillance design, risk-based sampling, and multi-hazard surveillance. Two countries were excluded due to incompleteness of data. Most of the 664 components targeted cattle (26·7%), pigs (17·5%) or poultry (16·0%). The most common surveillance objectives were demonstrating freedom from disease (43·8%) and case detection (26·8%). Over half of components applied risk-based sampling (57·1%), but mainly focused on a single population stratum (targeted risk-based) rather than differentiating between risk levels of different strata (stratified risk-based). About a third of components were multi-hazard (37·3%). Both risk-based sampling and multi-hazard surveillance were used more frequently in privately funded components. The study identified several gaps (e.g. lack of systematic documentation, inconsistent application of terminology) and opportunities (e.g. stratified risk-based sampling). The greater flexibility provided by the new EU Animal Health Law means that systematic evaluation of surveillance alternatives will be required to optimize cost-effectiveness.

Schmallenberg virus in Dutch dairy herds: potential risk factors for high within-herd seroprevalence and malformations in calves, and its impact on productivity.

In November 2011, the new orthobunyavirus Schmallenberg virus (SBV) was identified in dairy cows that had induced fever, drop in milk production and diarrhoea in the Netherlands (Muskens et al., 2012. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 137, 112-115) and a drop in milk production in cows in Northwestern Germany (Hoffmann et al., 2012. Emerging Infectious Diseases 18 (3), 469-472), in August/September 2011. This study aimed at quantifying risk factors for high within-herd prevalence of SBV and SBV-induced malformations in newborn calves in dairy herds in the Netherlands. Additionally, the within-herd impact of SBV infection on mortality rates and milk production was estimated. A case-control design was used, including 75 clinically affected case herds and 74 control herds. Control herds were selected based on absence of malformations in newborn calves and anomalies in reproductive performance. SBV-specific within-herd seroprevalences were estimated. Risk factors for high within-herd SBV seroprevalence (>50%) and the probability of malformed newborn calves in a herd were quantified. In addition, within-herd impact of SBV with regard to milk production and mortality was estimated. Animal-level seroprevalence was 84.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 70.8-92.3) in case herds and 75.8% (95% CI: 67.5-82.5) in control herds. Control herds that were completely free from SBV were not present in the study. Herds that were grazed in 2011 had an increased odds (OR 9.9; 95% CI: 2.4-41.2)) of a high seroprevalence (>50%) compared to herds that were kept indoors. Also, when grazing was applied in 2011, the odds of malformations in newborn calves tended to be 2.6 times higher compared to herds in which cattle were kept indoors. Incidence of malformations in newborn calves at herd level was associated with both within-herd seroprevalence and clinical expression of the disease in adult cattle. The rate of vertical transmission of SBV to the fetus once a dam gets infected seemed low. A total of 146 stillborn or malformed calves were submitted by 65 farmers during the study period, of which 19 were diagnosed as SBV-positive based on pathological investigation and/or RT-qPCR testing of brain tissue. Based on these results combined with calving data from these herds we roughly estimated that at least 0.5% of the calves born between February and September 2012 have been infected by SBV. A drop in milk production was observed between the end of August 2011 and the first half of September (week 35-36), indicating the acute phase of the epidemic. During a 4-week period in which SBV infection was expected to have occurred, the total loss in milk production in affected dairy herds was around 30-51 kg per cow. SBV had no or limited impact on mortality rates which was as expected given the relatively mild expression of SBV in adult cows and the low incidence of malformations in newborn calves.