The "Flipped Classroom" Model for Teaching in the Intensive Care Unit.

INTRODUCTION: The intensive care unit (ICU) is a dynamic and complex learning environment. The wide range in trainee's experience, specialty training, fluctuations in patient acuity and volume, limitations in trainee duty hours, and additional responsibilities of the faculty contribute to the challenge in providing a consistent experience with traditional educational strategies. The "flipped classroom" is an educational model with the potential to improve the learning environment. In this paradigm, students gain exposure to new material outside class and then use class time to assimilate the knowledge through problem-solving exercises or discussion. The rationale and pedagogical foundations for the flipped classroom are reviewed, practical considerations are discussed, and an example of successful implementation is provided. METHODS: An education curriculum was devised and evaluated prospectively for teaching point-of-care echocardiography to residents rotating in the surgical ICU. RESULTS: Preintervention and postintervention scores of knowledge, confidence, perceived usefulness, and likelihood of use the skills improved for each module. The quality of the experience was rated highly for each of the sessions. CONCLUSION: The flipped classroom education curriculum has many advantages. This pilot study was well received, and learners showed improvement in all areas evaluated, across several demographic subgroups and self-identified learning styles.

Accreditation of Simulation Fellowships and Training Programs: More Checkboxes or Elevating the Field?

SUMMARY STATEMENT: As the field of healthcare simulation matures, formal accreditation for simulation fellowships and training programs has become increasingly available and touted as a solution to standardize the education of those specializing in healthcare simulation. Some simulation experts hold opposing views regarding the potential value of simulation fellowship program accreditation. We report on the proceedings of a spirited debate at the 20th International Meeting on Simulation in Healthcare in January 2020. Pro arguments view accreditation as the logical evolution of a maturing profession: improving training quality through standard setting, providing external validation for individual programs, and enhancing the program's return on investment. Con arguments view accreditation as an incompletely formulated construct; burdensome to the "financially strapped" fellowship director, misaligned with simulation fellows' needs and expectations, and confusing to administrators mistakenly equating accreditation with credentialing. In addition, opponents of accreditation postulate that incorporating curricular standards, practice guidelines, and strategies derived and implemented without rigor, supporting evidence and universal consensus is premature. This narrative review of our debate compares and contrasts contemporary perspectives on simulation fellowship program accreditation, concluding with formal recommendations for learners, administrators, sponsors, and accrediting bodies.

DebriefLive: A Pilot Study of a Virtual Faculty Development Tool for Debriefing.

INTRODUCTION: The quality of healthcare simulation learning relies heavily on effective debriefers. Traditional methods of faculty development in debriefing lack a structured approach to achieve expertise via graduated and reflective practice. METHODS: The Simulation Learning, Education and Research Network (SimLEARN) developed DebriefLive, a virtual teaching environment, bringing together faculty and participant debriefers from across the Veterans Health Administration. Recorded simulation sessions were viewed followed by the opportunity for participant debriefers to debrief virtual learners. Participant debriefers were then provided structured and objective debriefings of the debriefings with the added opportunity for immediate practice. Program evaluation data for the pilot sessions were collected via electronic survey including a mix of Likert scale questions as well as short answer responses. RESULTS: On a 7-point Likert scale, participant debriefers (n = 15) rated the content as effective (mean = 6.67, SD = 0.47) and appropriate to their level (mean = 6.47, SD = 0.47). The technology of video-based scenarios (mean = 6.6, SD = 0.61), followed by avatar-based debriefing sessions (mean = 6.6, SD = 0.8), was felt to be accurate and appropriate. All participants would agree or strongly agree with recommending this training program to colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation instructors and fellows across the spectrum of the Veterans Health Administration found the innovative computer-based faculty development program DebriefLive acceptable as well as effective in increasing self-efficacy in debriefing. DebriefLive is an innovative and potentially disruptive tool, combining best practices in simulation theory and virtual technologies, for the training and assessment of debriefers.

Innovative strategies in critical care education.

The cadre of information pertinent to critical care medicine continues to expand at a tremendous pace, and we must adapt our strategies of medical education to keep up with the expansion. Differences in learners' characteristics can contribute to a mismatch with historical teaching strategies. Simulation is increasingly popular, but still far from universal. Emerging technology has the potential to improve our knowledge translation, but there is currently sparse literature describing these resources or their benefits and limitations. Directed strategies of assessment and feedback are often suboptimal. Even strategies of accreditation are evolving. This review attempts to summarize salient concepts, suggest resources, and highlight novel strategies to enhance practice and education in the challenging critical care environment.