Post-transcriptional regulation of myogenic transcription factors during muscle development and pathogenesis.

The transcriptional regulation of skeletal muscle (SKM) development (myogenesis) has been documented for over 3 decades and served as a paradigm for tissue-specific cell type determination and differentiation. Myogenic stem cells (MuSC) in embryos and adult SKM are regulated by the transcription factors Pax3 and Pax7 for their stem cell characteristics, while their lineage determination and terminal differentiation are both dictated by the myogenic regulatory factors (MRF) that comprise Mrf4, Myf5, Myogenin, and MyoD. The myocyte enhancer factor Mef2c is activated by MRF during terminal differentiation and collaborates with them to promote myoblast fusion and differentiation. Recent studies have found critical regulation of these myogenic transcription factors at mRNA level, including subcellular localization, stability, and translational regulation. Therefore, the regulation of Pax3/7, MRFs and Mef2c mRNAs by RNA-binding factors and non-coding RNAs (ncRNA), including microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA), will be the focus of this review and the impact of this regulation on myogenesis will be further addressed. Interestingly, the stem cell characteristics of MuSC has been found to be critically regulated by ncRNAs, implying the involvement of ncRNAs in SKM homeostasis and regeneration. Current studies have further identified that some ncRNAs are implicated in the etiology of some SKM diseases and can serve as valuable tools/indicators for prediction of prognosis. The roles of ncRNAs in the MuSC biology and SKM disease etiology will also be discussed in this review.

MyoD Over-Expression Rescues GST-bFGF Repressed Myogenesis.

During embryogenesis, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is released from neural tube and myotome to promote myogenic fate in the somite, and is routinely used for the culture of adult skeletal muscle (SKM) stem cells (MuSC, called satellite cells). However, the mechanism employed by bFGF to promote SKM lineage and MuSC proliferation has not been analyzed in detail. Furthermore, the question of if the post-translational modification (PTM) of bFGF is important to its stemness-promoting effect has not been answered. In this study, GST-bFGF was expressed and purified from E.coli, which lacks the PTM system in eukaryotes. We found that both GST-bFGF and commercially available bFGF activated the Akt-Erk pathway and had strong cell proliferation effect on C2C12 myoblasts and MuSC. GST-bFGF reversibly compromised the myogenesis of C2C12 myoblasts and MuSC, and it increased the expression of Myf5, Pax3/7, and Cyclin D1 but strongly repressed that of MyoD, suggesting the maintenance of myogenic stemness amid repressed MyoD expression. The proliferation effect of GST-bFGF was conserved in C2C12 over-expressed with MyoD (C2C12-tTA-MyoD), implying its independence of the down-regulation of MyoD. In addition, the repressive effect of GST-bFGF on myogenic differentiation was almost totally rescued by the over-expression of MyoD. Together, these evidences suggest that (1) GST-bFGF and bFGF have similar effects on myogenic cell proliferation and differentiation, and (2) GST-bFGF can promote MuSC stemness and proliferation by differentially regulating MRFs and Pax3/7, (3) MyoD repression by GST-bFGF is reversible and independent of the proliferation effect, and (4) GST-bFGF can be a good substitute for bFGF in sustaining MuSC stemness and proliferation.

Reciprocal Regulation of Peroxisome Biogenesis and Myogenic Factors Is Critical for Myogenesis.

Mitochondria (MITO) and peroxisomes (PEXO) are the major organelles involved in the oxidative metabolism of cells, but detailed examination of their dynamics and functional adaptations during skeletal muscle (SKM) development (myogenesis) is still lacking. In this study, we found that during myogenesis, MITO DNA, ROS level, and redox ratio increased in myotubes, but the membrane potential (Δψm) and ATP content reduced, implying that the MITO efficiency might reduce during myogenesis. The PEXO number and density both increased during myogenesis, which probably resulted from the accumulation and increased biogenesis of PEXO. The expression of PEXO biogenesis factors was induced during myogenesis in vitro and in utero, and their promoters were also activated by MyoD. Knockdown of the biogenesis factors Pex3 repressed not only the PEXO density and functions but also the levels of MITO genes and functions, suggesting a close coupling between PEXO biogenesis and MITO functions. Surprisingly, Pex3 knockdown by the CRISPRi system repressed myogenic differentiation, indicating critical involvement of PEXO biogenesis in myogenesis. Taken together, these observations suggest that the dynamics and functions of both MITO and PEXO are coupled with each other and with the metabolic changes that occur during myogenesis, and these metabolic couplings are critical to myogenesis.