Comparative analysis of functional outcomes in arthroscopic repair for traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff injuries.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the etiology of rotator cuff injury (RCI) on outcomes after rotator cuff repair remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of patients with RCIs of different etiologies and identify the risk factors affecting prognosis. METHODS: This study included 73 patients with RCI who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The patients were categorized into either a traumatic group or a non-traumatic group based on their history of trauma. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included shoulder range of motion, muscle strength, and physical examination findings specific to the shoulder for both groups. Clinical differences between arthroscopic repair of traumatic and non-traumatic RCIs were evaluated using univariate analysis. Logistic regression analysis determined independent risk factors for rotator cuff repair prognosis. RESULTS: Among the 73 patients, 31 were in the traumatic group and 42 in the non-traumatic group, with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 12 months and a mean follow-up of 13.8 months. The duration of the disease was significantly longer in the non-traumatic group compared with the traumatic group (P < 0.001). The mean tear area was more significant in the traumatic group than in the non-traumatic group (P = 0.003), and the preoperative pain level and functional scores were better in the non-traumatic group compared with the traumatic group. Postoperatively, there were no differences between the two groups regarding scores, joint mobility, strength, and complications. At 12 months postoperatively, multivariate regression analysis indicated that full-layer tear (OR = 5.106, 95% CI: 1.137-22.927, P = 0.033), fat infiltration (OR = 6.020, 95% CI: 1.113-32.554, P = 0.037), and tear area (OR = 6.038, 95% CI: 2.122-17.177, P < 0.001) significantly affected the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score. CONCLUSION: Compared with non-traumatic RCI, traumatic RCI presents with more pronounced pain and impaired joint function preoperatively yet demonstrates comparable postoperative clinical outcomes. Full-layer tears, fat infiltration, and large tear areas are unfavorable factors affecting rotator cuff repair, and postoperative rehabilitation management of these patients should be emphasized.

Comparison of functional outcomes following early and delayed arthroscopic repair for traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff injuries.

BACKGROUND: The effects of the timing of surgical repair on the outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff injuries (RCI) remain elusive. Thus, this study aimed to compare differences in outcomes following the repair of traumatic and non-traumatic RCI at varying time points. METHODS: The study population comprised 87 patients with traumatic and non-traumatic RCI who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Next, the trauma and the non-trauma groups were stratified into subgroups according to the time of injury (early repair: occurring within 3 months; delayed repair: occurring after 3 months). Measurements before and after surgical interventions were compared to evaluate the effect of the duration of RCI on the functional status of patients in the trauma and non-trauma groups. Primary evaluation indices included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant shoulder function score, and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score. Secondary evaluation indices consisted of shoulder range of motion (ROM), postoperative rotator cuff retear rate, and incidence of joint stiffness. RESULTS: Among the 40 patients in the trauma group, 22 underwent early repair, whereas the remaining 18 underwent delayed repair. In the non-trauma group consisting of 47 patients, 18 underwent early repair, whereas the remaining 29 underwent delayed repair. The minimum clinical follow-up time was 6 months, with an average follow-up time of 10.2 months. During postoperative follow-up, 1 and 6 patients who underwent early and delayed repair experienced re-tear in the trauma group, respectively. Contrastingly, 3 and 8 patients who underwent early and delayed repair presented with re-tear in the non-trauma group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Early repair of traumatic RCI yielded superior outcomes, including improved range of motion, lower pain symptoms, and lower risk of postoperative re-tears compared to delayed repair. Additionally, non-surgical treatment is recommended as the preferred approach for patients with non-traumatic RCI.