Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 147(1): 105-109, 2017 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28158445

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact that an electronic ordering system has on the rate of rejection of blood type and screen testing samples and the impact on the number of ABO blood-type discrepancies over a 4-year period. METHODS: An electronic ordering system was implemented in May 2011. Rejection rates along with reasons for rejection were tracked between January 2010 and December 2013. RESULTS: A total of 40,104 blood samples were received during this period, of which 706 (1.8%) were rejected for the following reasons: 382 (54.0%) unsigned samples, 235 (33.0%) mislabeled samples, 57 (8.0%) unsigned requisitions, 18 (2.5%) incorrect tubes, and 14 (1.9%) ABO discrepancies. Of the samples, 2.5% were rejected in the year prior to implementing the electronic ordering system compared with 1.2% in the year following implementation ( P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that implementation of an electronic ordering system significantly decreased the rate of blood sample rejection.


Assuntos
Armazenamento de Sangue/métodos , Incompatibilidade de Grupos Sanguíneos/prevenção & controle , Tipagem e Reações Cruzadas Sanguíneas/métodos , Processamento Eletrônico de Dados/métodos , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA