RESUMO
Purpose: To explore the clinical indications of using the nerve-sparing technique in radical prostatectomy. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathological data of 101 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) at our institution. Twenty-five patients underwent open surgery, and 76 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. The biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate was analyzed by the method of Kaplan-Meier. The distance between the ipsilateral neurovascular bundles (NVBs) and foci of prostate tumor (N-T distance) was measured in postoperative specimens. We defined the N-T distance >2 mm as the threshold to perform nerve-sparing (NS) in RP. Through logistic regression analysis, we determined the preoperative clinical indications for the nerve-sparing technique in RP. Results: The average BCR-free survival time was 53.2 months in these 101 patients with RP, with the 3- and 5-year BCR-free rates being 87.9% and 85.8%, respectively. The N-T distance was measured in 184 prostate sides from postoperative specimens of 101 patients. Univariate analysis showed that the percent of side-specific biopsy cores with cancer (≥1/3), maximum tumor length in biopsy core (≥5 mm), average percent involvement of each positive core (≥50%), PI-RADS score, and prostate MP-MRI imaging (extra-capsular extension) were associated with the N-T distance (p < 0.003). Furthermore, the percent of side-specific biopsy cores with cancer (≥1/3) (OR = 4.11, p = 0.0047) and prostate MP-MRI imaging (extra-capsular extension) (OR = 3.92, p = 0.0061) were found to be statistically significant independent predictors of the N-T distance in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: The clinical indications of nerve-sparing RP were <1/3 side-specific biopsy cores with cancer and no extra-capsular extension by prostate MP-MRI examination.
RESUMO
Context: To improve the prognosis of variant histology (VH) bladder cancers, clinicians have used neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on the basis of radical cystectomy (RC). Despite some new data, the evidence remains mixed on their efficacy. Objective: To update the current evidence on the role of NAC and AC for VH bladder cancers. Evidence Acquisition: We searched for all studies investigating NAC or AC for bladder cancer patients with variant histology in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to December 2021. The primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Evidence Synthesis: We identified 18 reports comprising a total of 10,192 patients in the NAC studies. In patients with VH, the use of NAC did improve CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.99, p = 0.044), and OS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.84, p = 0.000), but not RFS (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.56-2.33, p = 0.706). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that receiving NAC was associated with better OS in sarcomatoid VH (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54-0.83, p = 0.000) and neuroendocrine VH (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.68, p = 0.000). For AC, we identified eight reports comprising a total of 3254 patients. There was a benefit in CSS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.87, p = 0.006) and OS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.98, p = 0.032). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that only neuroendocrine VH had better CSS (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.67, p = 0.174) when receiving AC. Conclusions: NAC or AC for VH bladder cancers confers an OS and CSS benefit compared with RC alone. For NAC, the benefit was independently observed in the sarcomatoid and neuroendocrine subgroups. As for AC, only neuroendocrine subgroups improved CSS. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021289487.
RESUMO
Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) accounts for only 7% of all the RMS cases. Due to the limited available data, there is no consensus on the diagnosis and management of the paratesticular tumors. Here, we interrogated two paratesticular RMS cases in 25 and 27-year-old men presenting with painless and rapidly growing mass in the scrotum. Whereas the data showed no upregulation of tumor markers such as ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-HCG), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), scrotal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging indicated the existence of paratesticular and inguinal lesions respectively. There was local recurrence in one patient who underwent radical orchiectomy for the sarcoma one year ago. In addition, the CT scans showed no occurrence of distant metastasis. The two patients underwent radical inguinal orchiectomy or resection of the recurrent tumors with nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Histologic examination revealed embryonal RMS (eRMS) without lymph node metastasis. We highlight the importance of multi-disciplinary participation for paratesticular RMS detection and preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy (UNB) for rapid confirmatory diagnosis. Complete surgical resection coupled with chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the main treatment option for the paratesticular RMS. In addition, sperm cryopreservation treatment and endocrine follow-up could increase the overall survival and quality of life of the patients.