Prevalence and implications of perinephric fluid on renal point-of-care ultrasound in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is commonly utilized in the setting of renal colic. The presence of perinephric fluid may be an overlooked finding associated with ureteral obstruction. Our aims were to determine the prevalence of perinephric fluid on emergency physician-performed PoCUS and to determine whether perinephric fluid was associated with stone size or urologic intervention. METHODS: This was a 12-month cross-sectional study at an academic emergency department (ED) that took place from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. All adult ED patients ≥18 years of age who had a renal PoCUS examination performed were included. Patients with missing or inadequate PoCUS images were excluded. Investigators blinded to PoCUS images and interpretations performed chart review for demographic data and outcome variables, while separate investigators blinded to clinical data reviewed PoCUS images to assess for perinephric fluid and hydronephrosis. A chi-square analysis was used to determine significance of association between perinephric fluid and outcome variables (stone size, urologic intervention). RESULTS: There were 442 patients screened; 18 were excluded due to inadequate images and 4 were repeat visits of which only the initial visit was analyzed. Of the remaining 420 patients included, the prevalence of perinephric fluid was 6.2% (n = 26). Most patients (23/26) with perinephric fluid had final diagnoses consistent with ureterolithiasis. Hydronephrosis was present in 115 of the 420 patients (27.4%) and of these, 22 (19.1%) had perinephric fluid which was significantly associated with a need for urologic intervention; odds ratio (OR) 10.38 (95% CI 2.70-39.85), p < 0.01. Among the 67 patients with confirmed ureterolithiasis on computed tomography, perinephric fluid was associated with stone size ≥5 mm; OR 4.00 (95% CI 1.01-15.85), p = 0.04. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of perinephric fluid on emergency physician-performed renal PoCUS was 6.2% of all studies and 19.1% of patients with hydronephrosis. In the setting of ureterolithiasis, perinephric fluid was associated with larger stone size and need for urologic intervention.

Point-of-care ultrasound may expedite diagnosis and revascularization of occult occlusive myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographically occult occlusive myocardial infarction (OOMI), defined as coronary artery occlusion requiring revascularization without ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram (ECG), is associated with delayed diagnosis resulting in higher morbidity. Left ventricular (LV) wall motion abnormalities (WMA) appreciated on echocardiography can expedite OOMI diagnosis. We sought to determine whether point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) demonstrating WMA expedites revascularization time when performed on emergency department patients being evaluated for OOMI. METHODS: This was a single-site retrospective cohort study over a 38-month period. All admitted adult ED patients ≥35 years of age evaluated by the emergency physician with PoCUS for LV function, an ECG, and a standard troponin I biomarker assay were included. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), prior LV dysfunction, fever ≥100.4 °F, or hypotension were excluded. A structured chart abstraction was performed for relevant demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: We screened 1561 ED patients who underwent cardiac PoCUS for eligibility: 874 met exclusion criteria, 453 were discharged, and 234 were included in the analysis. Twenty-three patients had coronary interventions, of which 14 had WMA. PoCUS was performed 36 min (IQR -9-68) before troponin resulted (n = 234) and 39 min (IQR -23-96) before the first troponin elevation (n = 85). Twenty of the 23 patients diagnosed with OOMI had elevated troponins prior to catheterization with time from PoCUS to first troponin elevation of 43 min (IQR 9-263). Of these patients, 11 had WMA identified on PoCUS, and the WMA was appreciated 47 min (IQR 26-255) prior to troponin elevation. The time from ED arrival to revascularization was 673 min (IQR 251-2158); 432 min (IQR 209-1300) among patients with WMA (n = 14) compared with 2158 min (IQR 552-3390) for those without WMA (n = 9). CONCLUSION: Cardiac PoCUS may identify OOMI earlier than standard evaluation and may expedite definitive management.

The Use of Point of Care Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Peritonsillar Abscess.

The use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for diagnosis and treatment of peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is increasing 1. Proven advantages include improved diagnostic accuracy and treatment success rates as well as decreased otolaryngology consultation, computed tomography (CT) usage, return visits to the emergency department (ED), and length of stay 1. We present a case of a patient with a PTA that was diagnosed and successfully treated utilizing POCUS, avoiding the need for otolaryngology consultation and CT.

Prevalence of Phantom Scanning in Cardiac Arrest and Trauma Resuscitations: The Scary Truth.

Background: The prevalence of phantom scanning, or point of care ultrasound (POCUS) performed without saving images, has not been well studied. Phantom scanning can negatively affect patient care, reduce billed revenue, and can increase medicolegal liability. We sought to quantify and compare the prevalence of phantom scanning among emergency department (ED) cardiac arrests and trauma resuscitations. Methods: This was a single center, retrospective cohort study from July 1, 2019, to July 1, 2021, of all occurrences of POCUS examination documented on the resuscitation run sheet during cardiac arrest and trauma resuscitations. Two investigators reviewed the run sheets to screen for POCUS documentation. Instances where documentation was present were matched with saved images in the picture archiving and communication system. Instances where documentation was present but no images could be located were considered phantom scans. A two-tailed student's t test was utilized to compare the phantom scanning rate between cardiac arrest and trauma resuscitations. Results: A total of 1,862 patients were included in the study period, with 329 cardiac arrests and 401 trauma resuscitations having run sheet documentation of POCUS performance. The phantom scanning rate in cardiac arrests and trauma resuscitations was 70.5% (232/329) and 86.5% (347/401), respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Phantom scanning is common in both cardiac arrests and trauma resuscitations in the ED at our institution, but is significantly higher in trauma resuscitations. Further research is needed to assess causes and develop potential solutions to reduce the high prevalence of phantom scanning.