Ferroptosis-related gene signature and clinical prognostic factors as prognostic marker for colon adenocarcinoma.

Aim: To build a ferroptosis-related prognostic model for patients with colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). Methods: COAD expression profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas were used as the training set and GSE39582 from Gene Expression Omnibus as the validation set. Differentially expressed ferroptosis-related genes between patients with COAD and normal controls were screened, followed by tumor subtype exploration based on ferroptosis-related gene expression levels. A ferroptosis score (FS) model was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalized Cox analysis. Based on FS, patients were subgrouped into high- and low-risk subgroups and overall survival was predicted. The potential prognostic value of the FS model and the clinical characteristics were investigated using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Twenty-four differentially expressed ferroptosis-related genes were identified, four of which (CYBB, PRNP, ACSL4, and ACSL6) were included in the prognostic signature. Moreover, age, pathological T stage, and tumor recurrence were independent prognostic factors for COAD. The FS model combined with three independent prognostic factors showed the best prognostic value (The Cancer Genome Atlas: area under the curve = 0.897; GSE39582: area under the curve = 0.858). Conclusion: The novel prognostic model for patients with COAD constructed by pairing the FS model with three important independent prognostic factors showed promising clinical predictive value.

Short-term clinical outcomes and five-year survival analysis of laparoscopic-assisted transanal natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid and rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study.

Background: The cosmetic benefits of natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) are easily noticeable, but its principles of aseptic and tumor-free procedure have caused controversy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted transanal NOSE or conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for sigmoid and rectal cancer at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2018. The study aimed to compare the general characteristics, perioperative indicators, postoperative complications, and five-year follow-up results between the two groups. Results: A total of 121 eligible patients were enrolled, with 52 underwent laparoscopic-assisted transanal NOSE and 69 underwent CLS. There were no significant differences observed between the two groups in terms of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), TNM stage, etc. (P > 0.05). However, the NOSE group exhibited significantly shorter total incision length and longer operation time compared to the CLS group (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups in terms of positive rate of bacterial culture, incidence rates of intraabdominal infections or anastomotic leakage (P > 0.05). Furthermore, during follow-up period there was no statistically significant difference observed between these two groups concerning overall survival rate and disease-free survival outcomes (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The management of surgical complications in CLS is exemplary, with NOSE presenting a sole advantage in terms of incision length albeit at the cost of prolonged operative time. Therefore, NOSE may be deemed appropriate for patients who place high emphasis on postoperative cosmetic outcomes.