The Effect of Supplementary Staple Fixation on Biomechanical Properties of Soft Tissue Graft Tibial Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

This study aimed to test and compare the biomechanical properties of three tibial fixation methods of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tendon grafts under cyclic load and load-to-failure testing in the bovine proximal tibiae, comprising (1) staple fixation alone, (2) interference screw fixation alone, and (3) interference screw fixation with a supplementary staple. Twenty-four bovine tibiae used in the study were divided into three groups (eight proximal tibiae in each group) based on tibial fixation methods of ACL tendon grafts: group A (a spiked ligament staple alone), group B (a cannulated interference screw alone), and group C (a cannulated interference screw with a supplementary staple). Each graft fixation was exposed to cyclic loading conditions. Significant differences were determined in failure load among the three groups (p = 0.008). The mean failure load was significantly higher in group B (717.04 ± 218.51 N) than in group A (308.03 ± 17.22 N) (p = 0.006). No significant differences were observed among the groups regarding axial stiffness (p = 0.442). Cyclic displacement differed significantly among the three groups (p = 0.005). In pairwise comparisons, the mean cyclic displacement was significantly higher in group A (8.22 ± 3.24 mm) compared with group C (1.49 ± 0.41 mm) (p = 0.005). Failure displacement varied considerably among the groups (p = 0.037). Although group B (15.53 ± 6.43 mm) exhibited a greater mean failure displacement than both group A (4.9 ± 0.75 mm) and group C (8.84 ± 4.65 mm), these differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.602 and p = 0.329, respectively). Interference screw fixation alone and supplementary staple fixation have biomechanically similar characteristics in terms of initial strength and stiffness of tibial ACL soft tissue graft fixation. Regardless of staple use, an interference screw with the same diameter as the tibial tunnel can ensure sufficient tensile strength in tibial ACL graft fixation.

Biomechanical comparison of reverse offset-L osteotomy and chevron osteotomy in cadaveric hallux valgus surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Chevron osteotomy offers near-excellent clinical results and adequate stability at lower shift percentages, among the techniques used to correct hallux valgus deformity. This cadaveric study aimed to compare the Chevron osteotomy with the reverse offset-L osteotomy, which may provide a greater surface area and a more stable geometry to withstand higher cantilever forces at higher shift percentages. METHODS: Metatarsal bones obtained from 20 human cadavers with similar bone quality were divided into two groups: Chevron osteotomy was applied to the 1st group and reverse offset-L osteotomy was applied to the 2nd group. The load-to-failure, displacement in the y-axis, and total displacement values of both groups were compared statistically. Furthermore, bone densities were compared between the groups with computed tomography imaging. RESULTS: When outliers in both groups were excluded, a statistically significant difference was found in favor of reverse offset-L (143 ± 42 vs. 204 ± 51.2 N, p = 0.02) in terms of failure load. The groups were similar in terms of displacement on the y-axis and total displacement values. Bone densities were similar. CONCLUSION: The reverse offset-L osteotomy has been shown to withstand greater loads before failure compared to the standard Chevron osteotomy. This significant difference in load-to-failure may enable reverse offset-L to provide reliable stability in osteotomies performed in advanced HV cases requiring higher shifts.

Biomechanical comparison of fixation methods on third-generation femoral composite bone models in Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures: Contribution of the medial buttress plate to fixation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of cannulated screws in an inverted triangular configuration, medial buttress plates, and the combination of these 2 fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type 3 femoral neck fractures. METHODS: Twenty-eight anatomical composite third-generation femoral bone models were divided into 4 groups. The control group (group 1) was formed with 7 third-generation intact bone models. The fracture model was created with a 70° cutting block to fit 21 Pauwels type 3 fracture configurations. Seven models were fixed with an isolated 3.5 mm one-third semi-tubular medial buttress plate (group 2), 7 were fixed in an inverted triangular configuration with 6.5 mm cannulated screws (group 3), and 7 were fixed using a combination of 6.5 mm cannulated screws and a medial buttress plate (group 4). Cyclic loading was applied using axial forces ranging from 60 N to 600 N and moments ranging from 0.7 Nm to 7.0 Nm for 500 cycles. Once the cyclic loading stage was completed, the loads were removed from the system, and the quasi-static loading stage was employed to determine the stiffness and failure forces of the system under both axial and torsional forces. Quasi-static tests were performed with an axial speed of 1.8 mm/min and a torsional speed of 4.5°/min. The biomechanical properties of all groups were examined in terms of axial stiffness, torsional stiffness, and maximum axial force parameters. RESULTS: The stiffness values of groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 303 ± 35.8 N/mm, 159.6 ± 25 N/mm, 232 ± 35.9 N/mm, and 366.9 ± 58 N/mm, respectively, under axial forces (P < .01); 2172.7 ± 252.1 Nmm/°, 1225.3 ± 238.6 Nmm/°, 2123 ± 359.4 Nmm/°, and 2721.85 ± 304 Nmm/°, respectively, under torsional moments (P < .01); and 2072.1 ± 256.1 N, 1379.9 ± 290.6 N, 2099.1 ± 454.2 N, and 2648.4 ± 364.6 N, respectively, under the maximum force (P < .01). CONCLUSION: This study showed that in the fixation of Pauwels type 3 fractures formed on third-generation bone models, the utilization of half-thread cannulated screws in an inverted triangle configuration, along with a medial buttress plate, provided stronger fixation compared to the remaining implant groups and the control group. According to the evaluation of the parameters, the isolated application of a medial buttress plate had poorer biomechanical properties than other fixation methods.

Evaluation of Unicortical Locking Screw Placement for Torsional Loads in Distal Radius Fractures: A Biomechanical Study in Cadavers.

Background We aimed to compare bio-mechanical outcomes of short-length 75%-length uni-cortical screw (SL75UCS) and full-length 100%-length screws (FL100S) under axial compression (AXC) and torsional compression (TRC) in cadaveric distal radius volar plate model. Methodology A total of 20 wrists from 10 fresh frozen cadavers were included. A 2.5 mm titanium alloy distal radius anatomical plate was placed to the distal radii in full anatomical position, just proximal to the watershed line. Three bi-cortical screws to the shaft of the radius, followed by uni-cortical drilling for distal screwing were placed. Measurement by pulling the drill once it reached the opposite cortex was applied. We selected the screw lengths such that they corresponded to the SL75UCS. In the same configuration for each of the cadavers, we delivered six screws from distal radius holes of the anatomical plate. An oscillating handsaw was used to create an extra-articular distal radius fracture model (AO 23-A3.2). We created a dorsal AP model by performing a 1-cm wedge osteotomy from the dorsal aspect. Complete separation of the volar cortex was achieved. Potting was performed by embedding the shaft of the prepared radius into the polyurethane medium. We placed aluminum apparatus into the distal end to ensure applying of AXC and TRC in bio-mechanistic tests. Results No statistically significant difference of stiffness between the SL75UCS and FL100S both under AXC (p=0.88) and TRC (p=0.82). SL75UCS and FL100S groups did not differ in elastic limit under AXC (p=0.71) and TRC (p=0.71). Maximal force on SL75UCS and FL100S groups were also similar under both AXC (p=0.71) and TRC (p=0.50). Conclusions Our study findings suggest that drilling the dorsal cortex may not be necessary in the management of distal radius fractures. Instead, utilizing SL75UCS could serve as a viable alternative. This approach offers potential advantages in reducing the risk of extensor tendon complications associated with drilling or screw protrusion. It is a safe method under torsional load to avoid drilling of the dorsal cortex and SL75UCS could be performed in order to prevent from extensor tendon complications secondary to drilling or screw protrusion.

Biomechanical comparison of four different fixation methods in the management of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: Is there a clear winner?

BACKGROUND: Cannulated screws augmented with the medial buttress plate could confer greater biomechanical stability and higher union rates than the screw fixation alone for treating young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures (FNFs). No study has evaluated the effects of distal bicortical screw fixation and biomechanical properties of buttress plate augmentation under simultaneous vertical and rotational forces, physiologically acting on the hip joint. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical properties of four methods of three cannulated screw fixation under the combined axial and torsional loading in a synthetic femur model of type III FNF. METHODS: Twenty-four third-generation composite femora were divided into four groups (6 femora in each group) based on the screw fixation configuration: inverted triangle configuration (Group A),  Pauwels' configuration (Group B), inverted triangle configuration combined with medial buttress plate using distal unicortical (Group C), and distal bicortical screw placement (Group D). A Pauwels type III FNF was simulated on the sawbones. Each model was subjected to the combined axial and torsional cyclic loading and subsequently tested to failure. RESULT: Significant differences were determined in axial stiffness (AS) among the four groups (p = 0.024), whereas there was no significant difference in torsional stiffness (p = 0.147). The mean AS was higher in group D (639.5 ± 86.2 N/mm) than in group A (430.6 ± 94.8 N/mm), group B (426.2 ± 41.9 N/mm), and group C (451.2 ± 156.7 N/mm). Failure forces (FFs) were significantly different among four groups (p = 0.007), while there was no considerable difference in failure moment values (p = 0.555). The mean FF was significantly higher in group D (1307.1 ± 96.4 N) than in group A  (1076.9 ± 371.2 N) and group B (1075.5 ± 348.3 N) (p = 0.014 and p = 0.018, respectively). There was no significant difference in the mean FF between groups D and C. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the medial plate use, multiple cannulated systems could provide similar biomechanical results regarding torsional stiffness and failure moments. Bicortical placement of the most distal screw in medial buttress plate application could improve axial stability but not significantly affect the rotational stability of the inverted triangle screw fixation system in managing type III FNFs.

Biomechanical and fracture characteristics of different filling and fixation methods applied to various proximal tibial metaphyseal defect sizes in an ovine model.

BACKGROUND: Ideal treatment method based on the size of the defect in local aggressive bone tumors is yet to be described. We evaluated the mechanical behavior of different fixation methods for various defect sizes located in the proximal tibia. METHODS: Ninety-one sheep tibiae were distributed in five groups. Each study group was further divided into three subgroups, forming 25%, 50%, and 75% metaphyseal defects. The five groups were divided as follows: 1) control group where tibiae remained intact (n = 7); 2) isolated defect created, without filling (n = 21); 3) filling with cement (n = 21); 4) application of two subchondral cortical screws in addition to cement (n = 21); and 5) application of plate-screw fixation in addition to cement (n = 21). A loading test simulating the axial load applied by the distal femur to the tibia plateau was performed. The maximum failure load was compared between groups according to the defect size and fixation method. FINDINGS: In 25% defects, group 5 had significantly higher failure load than other groups. However, in 50% and 75% defects, additional fixation did not increase the failure load. Also, additional screw fixation did not increase failure load in all defect sizes. There was a significant positive correlation between fracture morphology and defect size, fixation method, and failure load. INTERPRETATION: Additional plate-screw fixation would increase the stability in defects ≤25%. In defects ≥50%, additional fixation does not increase stability. Screw fixation in addition to cementing does not increase stability in all defect sizes.