Relationship among total tear IgE, specific serum IgE, and total serum IgE levels in patients with pollen-induced allergic conjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the number of patients with pollinosis, particularly Japanese cedar pollinosis, has markedly increased. We previously reported about local allergic conjunctivitis, which is a phenotype of allergic conjunctivitis (AC). AC cases are often sensitized by various antigens. This study aimed to investigate the relationship among total tear IgE (t-tIgE), specific serum IgE (s-sIgE), and total serum IgE (t-sIgE) levels in patients with pollen-induced AC. METHODS: In 2019, 1372 patients were clinically diagnosed with AC at the Yamana Eye Clinic using t-tIgE, t-sIgE, and s-sIgE tests against 39 allergens. Among the pollen-induced AC patients who underwent allergen testing, 99 tested positives for s-sIgE against pollen. The subjects comprised 33 (33.3%) male and 66 (66.7%) female individuals aged 9-86 years. RESULTS: The t-tIgE test was positive in 68 (68.7%) patients and negative in 31 (31.3%) patients. In the t-sIgE test, 45 (45.5%) patients had t-sIgE levels above the reference value of 170 IU/mL. The higher the total score of the positive class value of each pollen-specific IgE (pollen-sIgE) antibody, the higher the positive rate of t-tIgE (p < 0.001). Of 32 patients in whom food-specific IgE (food-sIgE) was detected, 81.3% of the pollen-sIgE-positive and food-sIgE-positive cases were also positive for t-sIgE and t-tIgE. However, significant difference was not found between the total score of food-sIgE of the t-tIgE positive group and negative group. CONCLUSIONS: Pollen-induced AC is caused by pollen sensitization of the conjunctiva. Food-induced AC might be induced by the different pathological mechanism involved in pollen-induced AC.

Local allergic conjunctivitis: a phenotype of allergic conjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) has been reported in the field of otolaryngology; however, the concept of local allergic conjunctivitis (LAC) has not been widely studied in the ophthalmologic community. We routinely examined total IgE levels in tear fluids (t-tIgE) and antigen-specific IgE levels in serum (s-sIgE) in patients with suspected allergic conjunctivitis, on the basis of Japanese guidelines for allergic conjunctival diseases. There are several cases in which the results of t-tIgE and s-sIgE testing are divergent. We suggest that these divergent cases correspond to LAR in otolaryngology. METHODS: The study included 148 patients (33 men and 115 women) with clinical symptoms and signs of allergic conjunctivitis. Allerwatch Tear IgE® was used for measurement of t-tIgE levels. ImmunoCAP Rapid® and View Allergy 39® were used for measurement of s-sIgE levels. Conjunctival cytology using spatula was used to identify eosinophils on the conjunctiva. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients (56.1%) were positive and 65 patients were negative for t-tIgE in the AW. In the ICR, 97 patients (65.5%) were positive for at least one of the eight allergens, whereas 51 (34.5%) were negative for all allergens. Among 83 patients positive for t-tIgE, 14 (16.9%) had no detectable s-sIgE. Therefore, we considered the possibility of LAC in cases in which only local IgE could be detected. Among 28 cases (18.9%) who were negative for t-tIgE and s-sIgE, 21 underwent conjunctival scraping; eosinophils were found in four cases and eosinophilic granules in two. Accordingly, we considered the possibility of non-IgE-type AC in these six cases. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the existence of LAC that is a candidate of a phenotype of AC.

JACQLQ subjective symptom questionnaire score and clinical test results for patients with allergic conjunctival disease.

We investigated the relationship between subjective symptoms and objective findings in patients with allergic conjunctival diseases (ACD) and test results for tear total IgE (t-tIgE), conjunctival eosinophils (c-Eo), serum total IgE (s-tIgE), serum-antigen specific IgE (s-sIgE), and serum eosinophils (s-Eo). Subjective symptoms and objective findings of patients with ACD were evaluated using Japanese Allergic Conjunctival Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (JACQLQ), which described disability score and emotional score written by patient and clinical findings score written by ophthalmologist. We investigated the relationship between questionnaire scores and laboratory data for t-tIgE, c-Eo, s-tIgE, s-sIgE, and s-Eo. Scores of impediments to life and of moods were highest in vernal keratoconjunctivitis among ACD. Cases with positive pollen-sIgE showed significantly more nasal symptom score than those with negative pollen-sIgE (P < 0.05). Cases with positive t-tIgE or c-Eo showed significantly more objective symptoms' JACQLQ score than those with negative t-tIgE or c-Eo (P < 0.05), respectively. Cases positive for house dust/mite-sIgE, showed significantly more objective symptoms' JACQLQ score than those without for house dust/mite-sIgE (P < 0.05). These results indicate that ACD could be analyzed more accurately by the combination of JACQLQ and laboratory data.