One-day systemic corticosteroid administration for asthma and future "short bursts" risk in real clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic corticosteroid administration, also called short bursts (SB), is harmful for patients with asthma; however, the actual burden of one-day SB remains unsolved. This study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of patients requiring one-day SB against asthma in clinical practice. METHODS: Consecutive patients who regularly visited our hospital for asthma treatment between January 2019 and December 2020 were reviewed and followed for one year. SB was defined as ≥3 days of systemic corticosteroid treatment for an exacerbation. One-day SB was defined as one-day of systemic corticosteroid to treat an exacerbation. The one-day SB group included patients who received only one-day SB but no SB during the preceding year. Frequent SB was defined as that occurring ≥2 times/year. RESULTS: Data on 229 patients were analyzed. Among them, 2.6% (95% confidence interval 1.2-5.6%) were in the one-day SB group. The one-day SB group was female-dominant, obese, non-eosinophilic, and non-atopic. The median one-day SB was 1.5 times/year and almost half of one-day SB were performed by patients themselves. Independent of the low pulmonary function, high blood eosinophil count, and inhaled corticosteroid dose, one-day SB was associated with future frequent SB (adjusted odds ratio = 18.2, 95% confidence interval 1.1-288, P = 0.040, compared to the no SB group). CONCLUSIONS: Although one-day SB was not frequently experienced, even one-day SB without conventional SB was associated with future frequent SB. It is important to grasp the actual condition of one-day SB and to reinforce the treatment used.

Characteristics of patients with frequent systemic corticosteroid bursts for asthma in real clinical practice: are there frequent "short bursts?"

OBJECTIVE: The data on intermittent systemic corticosteroid therapy for asthma exacerbation, clinically called a "short burst," is limited. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients with frequent systemic corticosteroid bursts for asthma in real clinical practice. METHODS: Consecutive patients who regularly visited our hospital for asthma treatment between January 2019 and December 2020 were reviewed. The number of systemic corticosteroid bursts during the past 1 year was collected, and those with frequent bursts (≥2 times/year) were defined as the Frequent group. RESULTS: Data on 236 patients were analyzed. Among them, 5.5% (95% confidence interval 3.2-9.2%) were in the Frequent group. In the Frequent group, 23% of patients had no unplanned visits, and 38% experienced at least one corticosteroid burst without visiting a physician (self-medication). One-third of patients did not undertake high-dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment, and three-fourths of patients did not undertake long-acting muscarinic antagonist treatment. Low pulmonary function and increased blood eosinophils were independently associated with the Frequent group (adjusted odds ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.99, P = 0.039, per 10% predicted increase in a forced expiratory volume in 1 s; adjusted odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.29, P = 0.025, per 100/µL increase in blood eosinophils). CONCLUSIONS: There was a certain rate of frequent corticosteroid bursts in real clinical practice. It is important to determine the actual condition, as some patients experienced "hidden" frequent bursts and have the option to reinforce the treatment.

Allergy to Omalizumab: Lessons from a Reaction to the Coronavirus 2019 Vaccine.

Omalizumab can cause hypersensitivity reactions. We herein report the first case of an 18-year-old woman with refractory cough-predominant asthma that correlated with allergic reactions caused by omalizumab and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. The patient developed angioedema after taking omalizumab. She had previously experienced intense coughing immediately after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. A skin prick test was positive for polysorbate 20, which was probably the cause of the allergic reactions to omalizumab and the COVID-19 vaccine. Clinicians should check for an allergic reaction, irrespective of its intensity, triggered by polysorbate and be careful when prescribing biologics to patients in order to avoid allergic reactions.

Impact of adding pethidine on disinhibition during bronchoscopy with midazolam: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: We sometimes experience disinhibition during bronchoscopy with sedation. However, the impact of adding pethidine on disinhibition has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to examine the additive impact of pethidine on disinhibition during bronchoscopy with midazolam. METHODS: This retrospective study involved consecutive patients who underwent bronchoscopy between November 2019 and December 2020 (sedated with midazolam: Midazolam group) and between December 2020 and December 2021 (sedated with midazolam plus pethidine: Combination group). The severity of disinhibition was defined as follows: moderate, disinhibition that always needed restraints by assistants; and severe, disinhibition that needed antagonization of sedation by flumazenil to continue bronchoscopy. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to match baseline characteristics between both groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching with depression, the type of bronchoscopic procedure, and the dose of midazolam, 142 patients matched in each group. The prevalence of moderate-to-severe disinhibition significantly decreased from 16.2% to 7.8% (P = 0.028) in the Combination group. The Combination group had significantly better scores for sensation after bronchoscopy and feelings toward bronchoscopy duration than did the Midazolam group. Although the minimum SpO2 during bronchoscopy was significantly lower (88.0 ± 6.2 mmHg vs. 86.7 ± 5.0 mmHg, P = 0.047) and the percentage of oxygen supplementation significantly increased (71.1% vs. 86.6%, P = 0.001) in the Combination group, no fatal complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adding pethidine could reduce disinhibition occurrence in patients undergoing bronchoscopy with midazolam, with better subjective patient outcomes during and after bronchoscopy. However, whether more patients may need oxygen supplementation and whether hypoxia occurs during bronchoscopy should be considered. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000042635.

Severe eosinophilia and subsequent dermatologic immune-related adverse event with squamous cell carcinoma antigen elevation induced by nivolumab and ipilimumab.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for malignant lesions are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), but reports about severe eosinophilia induced by ICIs are scarce. A 73-year-old man with lung squamous cell carcinoma was treated by chemotherapy (carboplatin plus paclitaxel) and ICIs (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). After two cycles of chemotherapy, the ICIs were continued. After 5 months, the eosinophilia, which had exceeded 5000/µl, increasingly deteriorated, and the only detected irAE was a grade 1 rash. Under continuation of the ICIs, although the eosinophilia decreased, a grade 3 rash and severe pruritis subsequently appeared. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) was steeply increased simultaneously. A complete response had been achieved, and oral prednisolone markedly improved the rash, pruritis, and eosinophilia. Clinicians should be aware that precedent severe eosinophilia and subsequent severe irAE could occur in patients treated by nivolumab and ipilimumab, and SCCA elevation could be associated with dermatologic irAE.

Prevalence and characteristics of disinhibition during bronchoscopy with midazolam.

BACKGROUND: Disinhibition is sometimes experienced during bronchoscopy with sedation. However, data on disinhibition during bronchoscopy are scarce. We examined the prevalence and characteristics of disinhibition during bronchoscopy with midazolam. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed consecutive patients who underwent bronchoscopy between November 2019 and December 2020. The severity of disinhibition was defined as follows: mild, disinhibition sometimes requiring restraints by assistants; moderate, disinhibition always requiring restraints by assistants; and severe, disinhibition requiring antagonization of sedation by flumazenil to continue bronchoscopy. RESULTS: Among 251 eligible patients who were sedated using midazolam, 36 (14.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.5%-19.2%), 42 (16.7%; 95% CI, 12.6%-21.8%), and 7 (2.8%; 95% CI, 1.4%-5.6%) experienced mild, moderate, and severe disinhibition, respectively. Depression (odds ratio [OR] 2.77; 95% CI, 1.20-6.41), endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) (OR 10.23; 95% CI, 1.02-103.01, referred to brushing/bronchial washing/observation), and increased administration of midazolam (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02-1.42, per 1-mg increase) were independently associated with moderate-to-severe disinhibition. Patients experiencing moderate disinhibition reported significantly better scores for discomfort during bronchoscopy. Besides the maximum systolic and diastolic blood pressures during bronchoscopy, the changes in hemodynamic and respiratory statuses during bronchoscopy or complications did not significantly differ between patients experiencing moderate-to-severe disinhibition and those experiencing none-to-mild disinhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-to-severe disinhibition occurred in 19.5% of patients during bronchoscopy with midazolam. We should focus on disinhibition when patients have depression or are planning to undergo EBUS-TBNA, and sparing the administration of midazolam might reduce the occurrence of disinhibition. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000038571.

Drastically Progressive Ethambutol-induced Optic Neuropathy after Withdrawal of Ethambutol: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Ethambutol-induced optic neuropathy (EON) is a well-known complication, although low-dose ethambutol seldom causes EON. An 85-year-old man with non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease was taking antibiotics, including low-dose ethambutol. On day 85 of treatment, the diagnosis of EON was made. Despite prior discontinuation, his best corrected visual acuity drastically deteriorated from 20/17 (right eye) and 20/20 (left eye) to 20/330 (right eye) and 20/1,000 (left eye) within 3 weeks, and this symptom did not resolve. To our knowledge, there have been no reported cases with drastically progressing and irreversible EON even after the withdrawal of low-dose and short-term ethambutol.

Ground-glass opacity as a paradoxical reaction in miliary tuberculosis: A case report and review of the literature.

A paradoxical reaction (PR) is an excessive immune response occurring during antitubercular therapy (ATT), but is rare in patients with miliary tuberculosis. A 78-year-old woman complained of general malaise, loss of appetite, and fever for 10 days. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed diffuse, bilateral, discrete miliary nodules. The patient was treated with ATT for miliary tuberculosis. Nine days after starting the treatment, she developed a spiking fever and worsening malaise. Repeat CT showed new localized ground-glass opacity (GGO) in the right upper lobe. After excluding possible etiologies, she was diagnosed with PR due to ATT. She was successfully managed with oral prednisolone while continuing ATT. The GGO diminished and did not recur after discontinuation of the steroids. We reviewed 28 reported cases of miliary tuberculosis with a PR in patients not infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Those not on immunosuppressive therapy were likely to develop a PR early. This case illustrates that a PR may present as localized GGO in miliary tuberculosis in the lung of patients treated with ATT. In cases of a PR with marked symptoms, steroid therapy may be valuable.

Drastically progressive lung cavity lesion caused by Actinomyces odontolyticus in a patient undergoing chemoradiotherapy: A case report and literature review.

Pulmonary actinomycosis reportedly forms 15% of all cases of actinomycosis, and pulmonary Actinomyces odontolyticus is particularly rare. A 60-year-old man with a hoarse voice was referred to our hospital. Lung squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed at the clinical tumor-node-metastasis stage of cT2N2M0, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy was initiated. Further, a small cavity was also detected in the left upper lobe, but it was observed. During chemoradiotherapy, the small cavity lesion rapidly increased accompanying infiltration, and administration of short-term antibiotics did not improve the patient's condition. Bronchoscopy did not show any diagnostic results. Although a rapidly progressive malignant lesion could not be excluded and surgical management was considered, resection could not be performed because of the tight adhesion of the mass. Therefore, bronchoscopy was performed again, and the bronchial lavage culture showed a positive smear for the Actinomyces species. Further, using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), the bacteria was identified as A. odontolyticus. After long-term administration of amoxicillin, the lung cavity with infiltration gradually improved. To the best of our knowledge, there have been nine cases of pulmonary A. odontolyticus (excluding those with only empyema or pleural mass without lung lesions), which can occur in immunocompetent patients with persistent lung shadow. None of the cases showed drastic deterioration; therefore, the present case is the first to highlight that A. odontolyticus possibly produce drastically progressive lung cavity lesion. Further, repeated bronchoscopy and MALDI-TOF MS could help to diagnose pulmonary actinomycosis.

Long survival of a small-cell lung cancer patient who received maintenance chemotherapy with irinotecan.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 15% of all lung cancers. It is characterized by rapid tumor growth and early metastasis to multiple organs. Response to initial chemotherapy is generally good; however, the majority of patients develop recurrence and the prognosis of such patients is reportedly 2-4 months. Evolution of the treatment for SCLC has stagnated, and cisplatin + etoposide has been the standard chemotherapy for decades. Meanwhile, the combination of cisplatin + irinotecan has demonstrated equivalent efficacy to cisplatin + etoposide. Recently, maintenance chemotherapy has been extensively investigated in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and is currently recommended as a standard treatment in clinical guidelines. On the contrary, a maintenance strategy has not been established for SCLC. Here, we describe an SCLC patient who received maintenance chemotherapy with irinotecan for more than 2 years after induction chemotherapy with cisplatin + irinotecan, and survived long term with no recurrence.