Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Microbiol ; 24(1): 112, 2024 Apr 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575862

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postpartum women often experience stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and vaginal microbial dysbiosis, which seriously affect women's physical and mental health. Understanding the relationship between SUI and vaginal microbiota composition may help to prevent vaginal diseases, but research on the potential association between these conditions is limited. RESULTS: This study employed 16S rRNA gene sequencing to explore the association between SUI and vaginal dysbiosis. In terms of the vaginal microbiota, both species richness and evenness were significantly higher in the SUI group. Additionally, the results of NMDS and species composition indicated that there were differences in the composition of the vaginal microbiota between the two groups. Specifically, compared to postpartum women without SUI (Non-SUI), the relative abundance of bacteria associated with bacterial dysbiosis, such as Streptococcus, Prevotella, Dialister, and Veillonella, showed an increase, while the relative abundance of Lactobacillus decreased in SUI patients. Furthermore, the vaginal microbial co-occurrence network of SUI patients displayed higher connectivity, complexity, and clustering. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the role of Lactobacillus in maintaining vaginal microbial homeostasis. It found a correlation between SUI and vaginal microbiota, indicating an increased risk of vaginal dysbiosis. The findings could enhance our understanding of the relationship between SUI and vaginal dysbiosis in postpartum women, providing valuable insights for preventing bacterial vaginal diseases and improving women's health.


Assuntos
Microbiota , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse , Doenças Vaginais , Feminino , Humanos , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/etiologia , Disbiose/microbiologia , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Vagina/microbiologia , Microbiota/genética , Lactobacillus/genética , Bactérias/genética , Doenças Vaginais/complicações
2.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 49(3): 482-490, 2024 Mar 28.
Artigo em Inglês, Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970523

RESUMO

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a common clinical problem that can lead to bladder and bowel dysfunction such as urinary incontinence, urinary retention, fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and sexual dysfunction. Pelvic floor rehabilitation aids are essential tools in the treatment of PFD. However, there is limited understanding of the efficacy and mechanisms of these aids, and there is a lack of standardized guidelines for selecting appropriate aids for different types of PFD. To assist patients in choosing suitable pelvic floor rehabilitation aids to their needs, it is necessary to summarize the existing types, mechanisms, and applications of these aids. Based on their mechanisms and target functions, pelvic floor rehabilitation aids can be mainly categorized into 3 main types. The first type includes aids that improve pelvic floor function, such as vaginal dumbbells, vaginal tampons, and vaginal dilators, which aim to strengthen pelvic floor muscles and enhance the contractility of the urethral, vaginal, and anal sphincters, thereby improving incontinence symptoms. The second type consists of aids that mechanically block the outlet, such as pessaries, urethral plugs, incontinence pads, incontinence pants, anal plugs, and vaginal bowel control systems, which directly or indirectly prevent incontinence leakage. The third type includes aids that assist in outlet drainage, such as catheters and anal excreta collection devices, which help patients effectively expel urine, feces, and other waste materials, preventing incontinence leakage. By summarizing the existing pelvic floor rehabilitation aids, personalized guidance can be provided to patients with PFD, helping them select the appropriate aids for their rehabilitation needs.


Assuntos
Distúrbios do Assoalho Pélvico , Diafragma da Pelve , Incontinência Urinária , Humanos , Feminino , Distúrbios do Assoalho Pélvico/reabilitação , Incontinência Urinária/reabilitação , Diafragma da Pelve/fisiopatologia , Incontinência Fecal/reabilitação , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Pessários
3.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 48(11): 1696-1702, 2023 Nov 28.
Artigo em Inglês, Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432860

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of using a single electrical or magnetic stimulation for treating pelvic floor dysfunction is limited. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of radiofrequency combined with magnetic stimulation treatment for mild to moderate pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: Patients who completed the treatment in the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University were screened, and were divided into 2 groups based on different treatment plans. There were 28 patients who completed magnetic stimulation therapy (the magnetic stimulation therapy group) and 21 patients who completed radiofrequency combined with magnetic stimulation therapy (the combined treatment group). The pelvic organ prolapse quantitation (POP-Q), pelvic floor muscle strength, and pelvic floor ultrasound results were analyzed to assess the efficacy before and after the treatment in both groups, and the POP-Q results of 3 months after the treatment were used to evaluate the maintenance effect of the treatment mode. RESULTS: The POP-Q evaluation results of Aa, Ap, and C points after the treatment in both groups were better than those before the treatment, with statistical significance (all P<0.05). The Aa point POP-Q result of the combined treatment group was better than that of the magnetic stimulation therapy group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Pelvic floor ultrasound evaluation showed that the bladder neck position during the valsalva maneuver in the combined treatment group was higher than that in the magnetic stimulation treatment group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The persistence effect of the combined treatment group was long better than that of the magnetic stimulation treatment group, with significant statistical significance (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The combined treatment is more effective and has a longer lasting effect than single magnetic stimulation treatment.


Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Humanos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Hospitais , Diafragma da Pelve , Fenômenos Magnéticos
4.
Am J Cancer Res ; 14(1): 403-406, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38323296

RESUMO

[This corrects the article on p. 4602 in vol. 12, PMID: 36381312.].

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA