Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 72(12): 2555-2558, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37246690

RESUMO

Intestinal perforation from a plastic biliary stent is a known but rare complication of endoscopic biliary stent placement. Intra-peritoneal perforation is less common but carries more morbidity and mortality. Only a few cases of early stent migration and perforation have been reported. We present the case of a duodenal perforation caused by early migration of plastic biliary stent that resulted in intra-peritoneal biliary peritonitis.


Assuntos
Migração de Corpo Estranho , Perfuração Intestinal , Humanos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Perfuração Intestinal/cirurgia , Plásticos , Migração de Corpo Estranho/diagnóstico por imagem , Migração de Corpo Estranho/cirurgia
2.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 72(11): 2302-2304, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37013308

RESUMO

Mirizzi syndrome is a rare syndrome, caused by the compression of gall stones which may result in CBD obstruction or fistula formation. It may sometimes present without any prior symptoms. It has been classified into five types by Csendes. Usually open surgical approach is recommended for the condition, especially for Types III-V. We present the case of a patient who presented with right hypochondrial pain and was intra-operatively discovered to have type Va Mirrizi syndrome and was managed successfully laparoscopically.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Fístula , Síndrome de Mirizzi , Humanos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Síndrome de Mirizzi/complicações , Síndrome de Mirizzi/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Mirizzi/cirurgia , Fístula/cirurgia
3.
Cureus ; 16(2): e54007, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38476799

RESUMO

Objectives Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh hernioplasty (IPOM) for ventral hernias has been used for a long time. However, there have been some issues associated with it, thereby leading to the introduction of a new technique that involves laparoscopic closure of the fascial defect with suture followed by intraperitoneal onlay mesh placement (IPOM-Plus). We carried out this study to compare the outcome of laparoscopic IPOM with fascial defect closure versus without defect closure in midline ventral hernia repair in terms of recurrence. Methodology This comparative study was carried out in the Department of Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, from October 16, 2020, to April 15, 2022. A total of 84 patients of both genders, aged between 18 and 70 years, presenting with midline ventral hernia were included in the study. Patients with recurrent hernia, unstable cardiopulmonary conditions, neurological or psychiatric diseases, chronic renal disease, congestive cardiac failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were excluded from the study. Patients were assigned to two groups. Group 1 underwent IPOM with the closure of the defect, and Group 2 underwent IPOM without the closure of the defect. Patients were observed for immediate postoperative complications. Patients were monitored for one year to assess recurrence through clinical evaluation and ultrasonography. Results In this study, seroma formation was found in 3 (7.14%) patients for laparoscopic IPOM with fascial defect closure and 10 (23.81%) in those undergoing laparoscopic IPOM without defect closure (P-value = 0.035). Recurrence was identified in 2 (4.76%) patients undergoing laparoscopic IPOM with fascial defect closure and 9 (21.43%) in those undergoing laparoscopic IPOM without defect closure (P-value = 0.024). Conclusions This study concluded that the frequency of recurrence is less after laparoscopic IPOM with fascial defect closure in midline ventral hernia repair than after laparoscopic IPOM without fascial defect closure.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA