Survival Impact and Clinical Predictors of Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Bloodstream Infection.

PURPOSE: The impact of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) on outcomes of patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) has not been studied. We aim to evaluate the risk factors and survival impact of GIB on the outcome of BSI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted prospectively at National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. Patients aged ≥18 years for who BSI was confirmed by blood cultures were enrolled and followed for 90 days. Risk factors of GIB were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. The survival impact of GIB on BSI was evaluated with the Cox proportional hazards model with inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: Of the 1034 patients with BSI, 79 (7.64%) developed acute GIB. We identified 5 independent predictors of GIB. Patients with BSI complicated with GIB had an increased 90-day mortality compared to patients without GIB (hazard ratio 1.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.14, 2.65). CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal bleeding had an adverse impact on the short-term survival in patients with BSI. The clinical predictors may help identify patients who may benefit from active prevention and treatment of GIB.

Evaluation of Direct Surgical Remodeling of Frontal Bossing in Patients With Sagittal Synostosis.

BACKGROUND: The need for surgical correction of frontal bossing in patients with sagittal synostosis is currently debated. The authors retrospectively analyzed frontal bossing in patients with isolated, nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis who underwent calvarial remodeling with and without frontal craniotomy and compared with control subjects. METHODS: The authors analyzed computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with sagittal synostosis <9 months of age (6.2 ±â€Š1.6 months) who underwent modified-pi procedure either with frontal craniotomy (FC, n = 15) or without frontal craniotomy (NFC, n = 10). Only patients treated with both pre-operative and 1-year post-operative CT scans were included. Non-synostotic age-matched control scans were also analyzed. Cephalic index (CI), 3 previously validated measures of frontal bossing (bossing angle, horizontal bossing ratio, and vertical bossing ratio), and pre-nasion volume ratio were obtained. Additionally, three-dimensional photographs of 10 FC patients were evaluated for frontal bossing between 1 and 8 years post-operatively. RESULTS: Pre-operatively, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups (.064

Comparison of outcome and cost among open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for rectal cancer: A propensity score matched analysis of nationwide inpatient sample data.

BACKGROUND: Population-based studies evaluating outcomes of different approaches for rectal cancer are scarce. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database between 2008 and 2012. We compared the outcomes and costs among rectal cancer patients undergoing robotic, laparoscopic, or open surgeries using propensity scores for adjusted and matched analysis. RESULTS: We identified 194 957 rectal cancer patients. Over the 5-year period, the annual admission number decreased by 13.9%, the in-hospital mortality rate decreased by 32.2%, while the total hospitalization cost increased by 13.6%. Compared with laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery had significantly lower length of stay (LOS) (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.57-0.84), comparable wound complications (OR 1.08, 95%CI 0.70-1.65) and higher cost (OR 1.42, 95%CI 1.13-1.79), while open surgery had significantly longer LOS (OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.19-1.59), more wound complications (OR 1.49, 95%CI 1.08-1.79), and comparable cost (OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.79-1.07). There were no difference in in-hospital mortality among three approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery was associated with better outcomes than open surgery. Robotic surgery was associated with higher cost, but no advantage over laparoscopic surgery in terms of mortality and complications. Studies on cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery may be warranted.

A Comparison of the Need for Speech Therapy After 2 Palatal Repair Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the levator musculature during cleft palate repair has been suggested to be important in long-term speech outcomes. In this study, we compare the need for postoperative speech therapy between 2 intravelar veloplasty techniques. METHODS: Chart review was performed for patients with nonsyndromic cleft palate who underwent either primary Kriens or overlapping intravelar veloplasty before 18 months of age. All subjects completed a follow-up visit at approximately 3 years of age. Data obtained included documentation of ongoing or recommended speech therapy at age 3 years and reasons for speech therapy, which were categorized as cleft-related and non-cleft-related by a speech-language pathologist. RESULTS: One surgeon performed all Kriens procedures (n = 81), and the senior author performed all overlapping procedures (n = 25). Mean age at surgery (Kriens = 13.5 ± 1.4 months; overlapping = 13.1 ± 1.5 months; P = 0.188) and age at 3-year follow-up (Kriens = 3.0 ± 0.5 years; overlapping = 2.8 ± 0.5 years; P = 0.148) were equivalent in both groups. Cleft severity by Veau classification (P = 0.626), prepalatoplasty pure tone averages, (P = 0.237), pure tone averages at 3-year follow-up (P = 0.636), and incidence of prematurity (P = 0.190) were also similar between the 2 groups. At 3 years of age, significantly fewer overlapping intravelar veloplasty patients required cleft-related speech therapy (Kriens = 47%; overlapping = 20%; P = 0.015). The proportions of patients requiring non-cleft-related speech therapy were equivalent (P = 0.906). CONCLUSIONS: At 3 years of age, patients who received overlapping intravelar veloplasty were significantly less likely to need cleft-related speech therapy compared with patients who received Kriens intravelar veloplasty. Cleft severity, hearing loss, and prematurity at birth did not appear to explain the difference found in need for speech therapy.

Triple Threat: HDV, HBV, HIV Coinfection.

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) only infects patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) due to its reliance on HBV surface proteins to form its envelope. With shared routes of transmission, HDV coinfection is estimated to occur in 15% of patients with HIV and HBV. However, HDV is often underdiagnosed and may be missed particularly in people living with HIV (PLWH) who are already on antiretroviral therapy with anti-HBV activity and coincidental HBV suppression. At the same time, HDV causes the most severe form of chronic viral hepatitis and leads to faster progression of liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, increased recognition and effective treatment are paramount, and as novel treatment options approach global markets, the study of their efficacy in PLWH should be pursued.

Causes and outcomes of hepatic fibrosis in persons living with HIV.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The epidemiology of liver disease in people living with HIV has evolved since the arrival of effective hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in HIV patients is highly prevalent while hepatitis D, hepatitis E, and occult hepatitis B remain underappreciated. We discuss mechanisms of fibrosis in HIV and review clinical outcomes of HIV-associated liver diseases. RECENT FINDINGS: HIV-HCV co-infection is receding as a cause of progressive liver disease, but fibrosis biomarkers after HCV treatment remain elevated. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) with anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) activity promotes stable liver disease, but oversimplifying ART regimens in unrecognized suppressed HBV may lead to activation of HBV. A high prevalence of fibrosis and rapid progression of fibrosis are seen in HIV-associated NAFLD, with visceral fat as a major risk factor. Newer ART such as integrase strand inhibitors may have limited intrinsic hepatoxicity but do increase weight, which may secondarily lead to hepatic steatosis. Promising therapies for HIV-associated NAFLD include tesamorelin and CCR5 blockade agents. SUMMARY: Our understanding of the natural history and pathogenesis of liver diseases in HIV has advanced and adapted to the changing landscape of liver disease in this population. Future research should evaluate long-term clinical and histological outcomes, prevention strategies, and treatment options to improve morbidity and mortality in HIV-related liver diseases.

Epidemiology of Emergency Department Sepsis: A National Cohort Study Between 2001 and 2012.

The aim of this study is to examine the incidence trend of sepsis over 11 years and compared mortality outcomes among Taiwanese patients with sepsis admitted from emergency department (ED) and non-ED routes. We used a nationwide health insurance database from Taiwan, which comprise of 23 million beneficiaries. Patients with sepsis were identified by ICD-9 CM codes for infection and organ dysfunction from 2001 to 2012. We performed propensity score matching and compared mortality rates between ED-admitted and non ED-admitted patients.During the 11-year study period, we identified 1,256,684 patients with sepsis. 493,397 (29.3%) were admitted through the ED, and 763,287 (70.7%) were admitted directly to the floor. For patients with sepsis, mortality in ED-admitted patients decreased from 27.2% in 2002 to 21.1% in 2012 while that in non-ED admitted patients decreased from 35.3% in 2002 to 30.7% in 2012. Although patients with sepsis admitted through the ED had a higher incidence of organ dysfunction than patients who were directly admitted, they had more favorable outcomes in mortality, length of intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay. After propensity score matching, ED-admitted patients had a 7% lower risk of 90-day mortality (HR, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.89-0.97) compared with directly admitted patients. During the study period, mortality declined faster among ED admitted sepsis patients than directly admitted sepsis patients. Results of this study should be interpreted in light of limitations. Like other administrative database studies, treatment details are not available. Further clinical studies evaluating the treatment and outcome difference between ED and non-ED admitted sepsis patients are warranted.

Combining procalcitonin with the qSOFA and sepsis mortality prediction.

To investigate whether procalcitonin (PCT) can improve the performance of quick sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in predicting sepsis mortality, we conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study with independent validation in a prospectively collected cohort in 3 tertiary medical centers. Patients with presumed sepsis were included. Serum PCT levels were measured at admission. Quick SOFA score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were calculated for each patient. PCT levels were assigned into 0, 1, and 2 points for a serum level of <0.25, 0.25 to 2, and >2 ng/mL, and added to the quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score. The incremental value of PCT to qSOFA was then evaluated by logistic regression, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and reclassification analysis.In all, 1318 patients with presumed severe infection were enrolled with a 30-day mortality of 13.5%. Serum level of PCT showed a high correlation with qSOFA score and 30-day inhospital mortality. The area under the ROC curve was 0.56 for SIRS criteria, 0.67 for qSOFA score, and 0.73 for qSOFA_PCT in predicting 30-day mortality. The risk prediction improvement was reflected by a net reclassification improvement of 35% (17%-52%). Incorporation of PCT into the qSOFA model could raise the sensitivity to 86.5% (95% confidence interval 80.6%-91.2%). In the validation cohort, qSOFA_PCT greatly improved the sensitivity to 90.9%.A simple modification of qSOFA score by adding the ordinal scale of PCT value to qSOFA could greatly improve the suboptimal sensitivity problem of qSOFA and may serve as a quick screening tool for early identification of sepsis.

National Trends of Organ Dysfunctions in Sepsis:An 11-Year Longitudinal Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the trend of incidence and mortality of specific organ dysfunction among sepsis patients at the population level. This study aimed to examine the trend and mortality of organ dysfunction in patients with sepsis using a nationwide database in Taiwan. METHODS: We conducted a study using 2002-2012 data from the nationwide health insurance database of Taiwan. Sepsis hospitalizations were identified by Angus algorithm to include all cases with ICD-9-CM codes for specific sepsis diagnosis and both an infectious process and a diagnosis of acute organ dysfunction. The primary outcome was the trend of incidence and in-hospital mortality of specific type of organ dysfunction in sepsis patients. RESULTS: We identified 1,259,578 adult patients with sepsis. Acute respiratory dysfunction, cardiovascular dysfunction/shock, and renal system dysfunction were the leading three types of acute organ dysfunction, accounting for 65.6, 30.5, and 18.3% of all sepsis patients, respectively. All types of organ dysfunction increased over time, except for hepatic and metabolic systems. Renal system (annual increase: 13.5%) and cardiovascular system dysfunction (annual increase: 4.3%) had the fastest increase. Mortality from all sources of infection has decreased significantly in the study period (trend p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first true nationwide population-based data showing the trend and outcome of acute organ dysfunction in sepsis patients. Renal and cardiovascular systems dysfunction are increasing at an alarming rate.