Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in 688 patients: a retrospective comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard for treating appendicitis. The cosmetic benefits of using single-incision laparoscopy are well known, but its duration, complications and time to recovery have not been well documented. We compared 2 laparoscopic approaches for treating appendicitis and evaluated postoperative pain, complications and time to full recovery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of consecutive patients with appendicitis and compared those who underwent conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) performed using 3 incisions and those who underwent single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA). During SILA, the single port was prepared to increase visibility of the operative site. RESULTS: Our analysis included 688 consecutive patients: 618 who underwent CLA and 70 who underwent SILA. Postsurgical complications occurred more frequently in the CLA than the SILA group (18.1% v. 7.1%, p = 0.018). Patients who underwent SILA returned to oral feeding sooner than those who underwent CLA (median 12 h v. 22 h, p < 0.001). These between-group differences remained significant after controlling for other factors. Direct comparison of only nonperforated cases, which was determined by pathological examination, revealed that SILA was significantly longer than CLA (60 min v. 50 min, p < 0.001). Patients who underwent SILA had longer in-hospital stays than those who underwent CLA (72 v. 55 h, p < 0.001); however, they had significantly fewer complications (3.0% v. 14.4%, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: In addition to its cosmetic advantages, SILA led to rapid recovery and no increase in postsurgical pain or complications.

CONTEXTE: La chirurgie laparoscopique est devenue la norme pour le traitement de l'appendicite. Les avantages de la laparoscopie à simple incision au plan esthétique sont bien connus, mais la durée de l'intervention, ses complications et le temps de récupération n'ont pas été adéquatement documentés. Nous avons comparé 2 approches laparoscopiques pour le traitement de l'appendicite et évalué la douleur et les complications postopératoires, de même que le temps de récupération complète. MÉTHODES: Nous avons passé en revue de manière rétrospective les dossiers de patients consécutifs atteints d'appendicite et comparé ceux qui ont subi une appendicectomie laparoscopique classique (ALC) à 3 incisions à ceux qui ont subi une appendicectomie laparoscopique à simple incision (ALSI). Durant l'ALSI, l'incision était préparée de manière à améliorer la visibilité du champ opératoire. RÉSULTATS: Notre analyse a inclus 688 patients consécutifs : 618 qui ont subi une ALC et 70, une ALSI. Les complications postopératoires ont été plus nombreuses dans le groupe soumis à l'ALC qu'à l'ALSI (18,1 % c. 7,1 %, p = 0,018). Les patients soumis à l'ALSI ont repris l'alimentation orale plus rapidement que ceux qui avaient subi une ALC (temps médian 12 h c. 22 h, p < 0,001). Ces différences entre les groupes sont demeurées significatives après incorporation d'autres facteurs. La comparaison directe des cas non perforés seulement, révélés par l'examen anatomopathologique, a révélé que l'ALSI a demandé significativement plus de temps que l'ALC (60 min c. 50 min, p < 0,001). Les patients soumis à l'ALSI ont séjourné plus longtemps à l'hôpital que les patients soumis à l'ALC (72 h c. 55 h, p < 0,001); toutefois, ils ont présenté significativement moins de complications (3,0 % c. 14,4 %, p = 0,006). CONCLUSION: En plus de ses avantages au plan esthétique, l'ALSI a permis une récupération rapide, sans accroissement de la douleur ou des complications postopératoires.

Appendix diameter: a predictor of wound infection after laparoscopic appendectomy.

Our aim was to investigate whether appendix diameter is an independent risk factor for wound infection in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Patients who underwent LA (n = 582) were grouped into those with wound infections and those without. Possible factors associated with wound infection were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. When the diameter of the appendix was greater than 15 mm, patients were 2.32 times as likely to have a wound infection (95% CI, 1.02 to 5.29; P = 0.045) than if the appendix was less than 10 mm in diameter. Patients with perforated appendices were 2.51 times as likely to have a wound infection (95% CI, 1.25 to 5.02; P = 0.010) than if the appendix was not perforated. Wound infection was associated with longer operation time, return to oral intake, and hospital stay. Appendix diameter may predict postoperative wound infection after laparoscopic appendectomy.