A Comparative Assessment of Outcomes Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis and Tongue-Lip Adhesion in Pierre Robin Sequence.

The purpose of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of tongue-lip adhesion (TLA) and mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) to resolve upper airway obstruction in patients with Robin sequence (RS). A retrospective cohort study was performed of subjects presenting to a tertiary care pediatric center who underwent either primary MDO or TLA for the treatment of RS between 2004 and 2020. N=59 subjects met inclusion criteria (n=34 MDO, n=25 TLA), and there were no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics other than age at surgery (MDO 31 d vs. TLA 17 d, P=0.049). Preoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was similar between cohorts (33.9 and 46.7, P=0.38). Subjects who underwent MDO demonstrated improved AHI on initial postoperative polysomnogram performed at 2 weeks (3.4 vs. 11.6, P=0.014), however AHI at the second postoperative timepoint (270 vs. 142 d, P=0.007) was no different between cohorts (2.8 vs. 2.6, P=0.89). No subject in either group required enteral nutrition or supplemental oxygen at last follow-up. In subjects undergoing MDO, 14.7% demonstrated temporary asymmetric marginal mandibular nerve dysfunction. Forty-seven percent of MDO patients had injury to first primary molars. MDO and TLA both ultimately achieved similar long-term resolution of upper airway obstruction and associated feeding difficulties in patients with Robin sequence. MDO offered a more immediate airway improvement, but the procedure carried a potential risk of neurosensory and dental injury when compared with TLA.

Protraction Headgear Compliance and Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.

Assess cephalometric parameters and the need for orthognathic surgery (OS) and its relationship with compliance in protraction headgear (PHG).Retrospective case series.Hospital cleft-craniofacial center.23 patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate and history of lip and palate repair.Patients received PHG and orthodontic treatment. Compliant patients were compared to patients that were not. Protraction was applied with 170-gram elastics and patients were instructed to wear for at least 12 hours daily.Cephalometric measurements at initial (T1), post-PHG (T2), and pre-surgical or post-orthodontic treatment (T3) of at least age 15 for females and 17 for males and the presence of OS were compared.83% (19) of patients reported compliance with therapy. Of those compliant, 68% (13) had OS and 32% (6) did not (P = .99). Inter-group comparisons at T1 between compliant and noncompliant showed no significant differences and the non-OS patients started with larger nasolabial angles (P < .05). At T2, there were no significant cephalometric differences between groups. At T3, compliant patients showed significantly more upper incisor proclination than noncompliant patients. Between OS and non-OS, OS patients had significantly decreased ANB, Wits, convexity, overjet, and FMA and larger nasolabial angles (P < .05).Patients compliant with PHG showed no difference in the need for OS. However, after orthodontic treatment, compliant patients showed more upper incisor proclination and OS patients with decreased ANB, Wits, convexity, overjet, FMA, and larger nasolabial angles.

Review of Diet Protocols Following Orthognathic Surgery and Analysis of Postoperative Weight Loss.

INTRODUCTION: Orthognathic surgery is routinely practiced, yet little comparative data exists to evaluate post-orthognathic surgery diet protocols. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate which postoperative diet protocols are recommended and to quantify post-orthognathic surgery weight changes in our institutional cohort. METHODS: An internet search was carried out on Google for "orthognathic surgery diet" and the postoperative diet recommendations from centers worldwide were quantified. Additionally, a retrospective analysis of patients that underwent orthognathic surgery at our institution was performed, and their preoperative and postoperative weights were recorded. RESULTS: The internet search yielded 58 centers that met our inclusion criteria. Most centers were in the United States (n = 37, 63.8%) and were oral and maxillofacial surgeon (OMFS)-led centers (n = 39, 67.2%). Postoperative diets were categorized into 7 distinct protocols, ranging from most to least restrictive-the most popular was liquid diet for 2 to 4 weeks followed by soft diet for 2 to 6 weeks. There were no significant patterns observed across different geographical regions or specialties.In our institution, 135 patients were identified. Overall, there was an average maximum weight loss of 4.1 kg by week 4, followed by a gradual increase in weight. Linear regression analysis showed that patients with greater preoperative body mass index (BMI) lost more weight postoperatively than patients with lower BMI (R2 = 0.25, P < .001). CONCLUSION: There is a significant variability in recommended postoperative diets following orthognathic surgery. Following a moderately restrictive diet at our institution, patients returned to their preoperative weight after approximately 4 months.