Do aggravating rhinologic symptoms at work indicate occupational exposure? A cross-sectional outpatient clinic study.

BACKGROUND: Air impurities can exacerbate or cause rhinologic diseases. However, only a few studies have assessed rhinologic patients' symptoms at work. OBJECTIVE: This study surveys the impact of work on rhinology clinic patients' quality of life in relation to work-related respiratory exposures. In addition, we surveyed patients' sick leave periods. METHODS: We recruited adult employed rhinology patients referred to the otorhinolaryngology clinic. A total of 177 patients were included. We collected data on patients' medical history, rhinologic disease-specific and generic quality of life, current or most recent job title, a description of current work, nasal symptoms, possible worked-related symptom triggers and sick leave periods during the preceding year. RESULTS: In total, 101 (57.1%) patients reported exacerbated rhinologic symptoms at work and reported more severe rhinologic disease and a lower disease-specific quality of life compared to non-work-related rhinologic patients (P = 0.008). A minority, 24.3% of our patients were exposed to any specific occupational respiratory sensitizer or irritant at work. The mean sick leave period due to rhinologic disease was 7.7 days per year. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to specific occupational sensitizers or irritants did not associate with increasing symptoms at work or quality of life amongst our patients. Most rhinology patients reported exacerbated symptoms at work. They appeared to be more symptomatic than the rest of the patients and, therefore, possibly hyperreactive to unspecific respiratory triggers at work. Rhinologic diseases caused our patients a marked burden with high work absenteeism.

Seasonal Variation in Generic and Disease-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life in Rhinologic Patients in Southern Finland.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal variation in exacerbations, hospitalisations, and mortality statistics has been reported for some diseases. To our knowledge, however, no published studies exist on the seasonality of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) amongst rhinologic patients. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: This study, therefore, aimed to investigate the possible seasonal variation in rhinologic patients' HRQoL using the rhinologic disease-specific Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and the generic 15D HRQoL instrument. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled unselected adult rhinologic patients requiring specialist care at the Helsinki University Hospital in this cross-sectional, questionnaire-based prospective study during four seasons: February (winter), May (spring), August (summer), and November (autumn). Patients received SNOT-22 and 15D questionnaires via post. The Finnish Meteorological Institute supplied climate data from these months. RESULTS: SNOT-22 and 15D data were available for 301 and 298 patients, respectively. We found no statistically significant differences (p = 0.948) between the mean monthly 15D scores or mean SNOT-22 scales. Furthermore, the mean SNOT-22 subscales did not differ between the monthly study periods. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Our study shows that seasonality did not impact rhinologic patients' SNOT-22 or 15D HRQoL scores. Thus, these questionnaires can be used for follow-up amongst rhinologic patients regardless of season.