The role of bevacizumab for treatment-refractory intracranial meningiomas: a single institution's experience and a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Meningiomas account for over 30% of all primary brain tumors. While surgery can be curative for these tumors, several factors may lead to a higher likelihood of recurrence. For recurrent meningiomas, bevacizumab may be considered as a therapeutic agent, but literature regarding its efficacy is sparse. Thus, we present a systematic review of the literature and case series of patients from our institution with treatment-refractory meningiomas who received bevacizumab. METHODS: Patients at our institution who were diagnosed with recurrent meningioma between January 2000 and September 2020 and received bevacizumab monotherapy were included in this study. Bevacizumab duration and dosages were noted, as well as progression-free survival (PFS) after the first bevacizumab injection. A systematic review of the literature was also performed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients at our institution with a median age of 55 years at initial diagnosis qualified for this study. When bevacizumab was administered, 2 patients had WHO grade I meningiomas, 10 patients had WHO grade II meningiomas, and 11 patients had WHO grade III meningiomas. Median PFS after the first bevacizumab injection was 7 months. Progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 57%. Two patients stopped bevacizumab due to hypertension and aphasia. Systematic review of the literature showed limited ability for bevacizumab to control tumor growth. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab is administered to patients with treatment-refractory meningiomas and, though its effectiveness is limited, outperforms other systemic therapies reported in the literature. Further studies are required to identify a successful patient profile for utilization of bevacizumab.

Early and sustained improvements in motor function in rats after infusion of allogeneic umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells following spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Animal study. OBJECTIVES: Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) have recently been shown to hold great therapeutic potential for spinal cord injury (SCI). However, majority of the studies have been done using human cells transplanted into the rat with immunosuppression; this may not represent the outcomes that occur in humans. Herein, we present the therapeutic effect of using rat UC-MSCs (rUC-MSC) without immunosuppression in a rat model of SCI. SETTING: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. METHODS: Twelve female rats were randomly divided into two groups, control, and rUC-MSC group, and then subjected to a T9 moderate contusion SCI. Next, 2 × 106 rUC-MSCs or ringer-lactate solution were injected through the tail vein at 7 days post injury. Rats were assessed for 14 weeks by an open-field Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) motor score as well as postmortem quantification of axonal sparing/regeneration, cavity volume, and glial scar. RESULTS: Animals treated with rUC-MSCs were found to have early and sustained motor improvement (BBB score of 14.6 ± 1.9 compared to 10.1 ± 1.7 in the control group) at 14 weeks post injury (mean difference: 4.55, 95% CI: 2.04 to 7.06; p value < 0.001). Total cavity volume in the injury epicenter was significantly reduced in the rUC-MSC group; control: 33.0% ± 2.1, rUC-MSC: 25.3% ± 3.8 (mean difference: -7.7% (95% CI: -12.3 to -2.98); p value < 0.05). In addition, spinal cords from rats treated with rUC-MSCs were found to have a significantly greater number of myelinated axons, decreased astrogliosis, and reduced glial scar formation compared to control rats. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that intravenous injection of allogenic UC-MSCs without immunosuppression exert beneficial effects in subacute SCI and thus could be a useful therapy to improve the functional capacity among patients with SCI.

Improved 3-year survival rates for glioblastoma multiforme are associated with trends in treatment: analysis of the national cancer database from 2004 to 2013.

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a common and aggressive malignancy associated with poor prognosis. Characteristics and treatment of long-term survivors are of particular interest in efforts to improve outcomes. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine trends and prognostic factors for 3-year survival from a national database. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with cranial GBM from 2004 to 2013 and with 3-year follow-up. Trends in 3-year and overall survival, patient characteristics, tumor properties, and treatment modalities were examined. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to investigate the association of these factors with 3-year survival. Predictor importance analysis was conducted using a metric defined as Wald χ2 penalized by degrees of freedom. RESULTS: A total of 88,919 GBM patients with 3-year follow-up were identified. Overall, 8757 (9.8%) patients survived ≥ 3 years. Three-year survival significantly improved from 8.0 to 10.5% (p < 0.001) from 2004 to 2013. Trimodal treatment administration also significantly increased from 38.7 to 55.9% (p < 0.001). During this span, patients increasingly presented as older (p = 0.040), without private insurance (p < 0.001), and with a higher comorbidity index (p < 0.001). On multivariable regression, factors such as trimodal treatment (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001), and MGMT methylation (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with increased odds of 3-year survival. Predictor importance analysis indicated that MGMT methylation, age, and treatment modality were the most significant relative determinants of 3-year survival. CONCLUSION: These findings illustrate an improved 3-year survival rate for GBM patients from 2004 to 2013 with a concurrent increase in trimodal treatment administration despite more adverse patient presenting characteristics.

Quality Outcomes Database Spine Care Project 2012-2020: milestones achieved in a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care and evolution to the American Spine Registry.

The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD), formerly known as the National Neurosurgery Quality Outcomes Database (N2QOD), was established by the NeuroPoint Alliance (NPA) in collaboration with relevant national stakeholders and experts. The overarching goal of this project was to develop a centralized, nationally coordinated effort to allow individual surgeons and practice groups to collect, measure, and analyze practice patterns and neurosurgical outcomes. Specific objectives of this registry program were as follows: "1) to establish risk-adjusted national benchmarks for both the safety and effectiveness of neurosurgical procedures, 2) to allow practice groups and hospitals to analyze their individual morbidity and clinical outcomes in real time, 3) to generate both quality and efficiency data to support claims made to public and private payers and objectively demonstrate the value of care to other stakeholders, 4) to demonstrate the comparative effectiveness of neurosurgical and spine procedures, 5) to develop sophisticated 'risk models' to determine which subpopulations of patients are most likely to benefit from specific surgical interventions, and 6) to facilitate essential multicenter trials and other cooperative clinical studies." The NPA has launched several neurosurgical specialty modules in the QOD program in the 7 years since its inception including lumbar spine, cervical spine, and spinal deformity and cerebrovascular and intracranial tumor. The QOD Spine modules, which are the primary subject of this paper, have evolved into the largest North American spine registries yet created and have resulted in unprecedented cooperative activities within our specialty and among affiliated spine care practitioners. Herein, the authors discuss the experience of QOD Spine programs to date, with a brief description of their inception, some of the key achievements and milestones, as well as the recent transition of the spine modules to the American Spine Registry (ASR), a collaboration between the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).

The T2-FLAIR-mismatch sign as an imaging biomarker for IDH and 1p/19q status in diffuse low-grade gliomas: a systematic review with a Bayesian approach to evaluation of diagnostic test performance.

OBJECTIVE: With the revised WHO 2016 classification of brain tumors, there has been increasing interest in imaging biomarkers to predict molecular status and improve the yield of genetic testing for diffuse low-grade gliomas (LGGs). The T2-FLAIR-mismatch sign has been suggested to be a highly specific radiographic marker of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status in diffuse LGGs. The presence of T2-FLAIR mismatch indicates a T2-hyperintense lesion that is hypointense on FLAIR with the exception of a hyperintense rim. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic review of the Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for reports of studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of T2-FLAIR mismatch in predicting the IDH and 1p/19q codeletion status in diffuse LGGs. Results were combined into a 2 × 2 format, and the following diagnostic performance parameters were calculated: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios. In addition, we utilized Bayes theorem to calculate posttest probabilities as a function of known pretest probabilities from previous genome-wide association studies and the calculated LRs. Calculations were performed for 1) IDH mutation with 1p/19q codeletion (IDHmut-Codel), 2) IDH mutation without 1p/19q codeletion (IDHmut-Noncodel), 3) IDH mutation overall, and 4) 1p/19q codeletion overall. The QUADAS-2 (revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool was utilized for critical appraisal of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 4 studies were included, with inclusion of 2 separate cohorts from a study reporting testing and validation (n = 746). From pooled analysis of all cohorts, the following values were obtained for each molecular profile-IDHmut-Codel: sensitivity 30%, specificity 73%, LR+ 1.1, LR- 1.0; IDHmut-Noncodel: sensitivity 33.7%, specificity 98.5%, LR+ 22.5, LR- 0.7; IDH: sensitivity 32%, specificity 100%, LR+ 32.1, LR- 0.7; 1p/19q codeletion: sensitivity 0%, specificity 54%, LR+ 0.01, LR- 1.9. Bayes theorem was used to calculate the following posttest probabilities after a positive and negative result, respectively-IDHmut-Codel: 32.2% and 29.4%; IDHmut-Noncodel: 95% and 40%; IDH: 99.2% and 73.5%; 1p/19q codeletion: 0.4% and 35.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The T2-FLAIR-mismatch sign is an insensitive but highly specific marker of IDH mutation but not 1p/19q codeletion in diffuse LGGs, although there may be significant exceptions. These findings support the utility of T2-FLAIR mismatch as an imaging-based biomarker for positive selection of patients with IDH-mutant gliomas.

Endoscopic versus open approach in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery for craniosynostosis remains a crucial element in successful management. Intervention by both endoscopic and open approaches has been proven effective. Given the differences in timing and indications for these procedures, differences in perioperative outcomes have yet to be thoroughly compared between the two approaches. The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the available evidence of perioperative outcomes between the two approaches in order to better influence the management paradigm of craniosynostosis. METHODS: We followed recommended PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Seven electronic databases were searched to identify all potentially relevant studies published from inception to February 2018 which were then screened against a set of selection criteria. Data were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis of proportions. RESULTS: Twelve studies satisfied all the selection criteria to be included, which described a pooled cohort involving 2064 craniosynostosis patients, with 965 (47%) and 1099 (53%) patients undergoing surgery by endoscopic and open approaches respectively. When compared to the open approach, it was found that the endoscopic approach conferred statistically significant reductions in blood loss (MD = 162.4 mL), operative time (MD = 112.38 min), length of stay (MD = 2.56 days), and rates of perioperative complications (OR = 0.58), reoperation (OR = 0.37) and transfusion (OR = 0.09), where all p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Both endoscopic and open approaches for the surgical management of craniosynostosis are viable considerations. The endoscopic approach confers a significant reduction in operative and postoperative morbidity when compared to the open approach. Given that specific indications for either approach should be considered when managing a patient, the difference in perioperative outcomes remain an important element of this paradigm. Future studies will validate the findings of this study and consider long-term outcomes, which will all contribute to rigor of craniosynostosis management.

Impact of Depression and Anxiety on Patient Reported Outcomes Measures after Lumbar Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety are common in patients undergoing spinal surgery and might negatively impact outcomes. This study investigates the possible effect of these diagnoses on patient reported outcomes following lumbar fusion. METHODS: Retrospective review of a registry containing prospectively collected data of lumbar fusion procedures at a single institution was performed from May 23, 2012 to June 15, 2022. Patients with a minimum of two year follow-up were included. Demographic information, diagnoses, medications, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), and complications data at preoperative, three months, six months, 1 year, and two years postoperative were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-tests, χ2, binomial correlation, odds ratios, logistic regression, and mean clinically important difference. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included (60 males, 96 females) with mean age 62.6 ± 11.1 years at surgery. Thirty-nine (25%) had depression and/or anxiety (DA). Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQol Group 5D questionnaire (EQ5D) scores were significantly worse in the DA cohort compared to controls (ODI 51.1 ± 18.3 vs. 42.9 ± 15.8; P = 0.010, EQ5D 0.46 ± 0.21 vs. 0.57 ± 0.21; P = 0.005). Both cohorts experienced similar relative improvement at two years (delta ODI -18.2 ± 27.9 vs. -17.8 ± 22.1; P = 0.924, EQ5D 6.8 ± 33.8 vs. 8.1 ± 32.9; P = 0.830). Absolute outcome scores were worse in the DA cohort at all intervals. DA were not independently predictive of changes in PROMs (delta ODI mean difference 4.49, r2 = 0.36, P = 0.924). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed similar improvement in PROMs following lumbar fusion for patients with anxiety and depression compared to healthy controls. These data suggest these patients are no less likely to benefit from appropriately planned lumbar fusion.

Prediction Model for Neurogenic Bladder Recovery One Year After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Neurogenic bladder is a common complication after spinal cord injury (SCI) that carries substantial burdens on the inflicted individual. The objective of this study is to build a prediction model for neurogenic bladder recovery 1 year after traumatic SCI. METHODS: We queried the National Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems database for patients with traumatic SCI who had neurogenic bladder at the time of injury. The primary outcome of interest was the complete recovery of bladder function at 1 year. Multiple imputations were performed to generate replacement values for missing data, and the final imputed data were used for our analysis. A multivariable odds logistic regression model was developed for complete bladder recovery at 1 year. RESULTS: We identified a total of 2515 patients with abnormal bladder function at baseline who had an annual follow-up. A total of 417 patients (16.6%) recovered bladder function in 1 year. Predictors of complete bladder recovery included the following baseline parameters: sacral sensation, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment score, bowel function at baseline, voluntary sphincter contraction, anal sensation, S1 motor scores, and the number of days in the rehabilitation facility. The model performed with a discriminative capacity of 90.5%. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a prediction model for the probability of complete bladder recovery 1 year after SCI. The model performed with a high discriminative capacity. This prediction model demonstrates potential utility in the counseling, research allocation, and management of individuals with SCI.

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for patients undergoing intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Given the potential injury to the spinal cord and the nerve roots during the surgery and the necessity of minimal spinal cord manipulation during surgery, minimally invasive surgical techniques have emerged as alternatives to conventional open surgery in resection of ID-EM tumors. METHODS: An electronic database search was conducted, and the review was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines and recommendations. Inclusion criteria were as follows; (i) comparative studies of MIS vs OS; (ii) studies reporting outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for ID-EM tumors. Variables collected were patient demographics, estimated blood loss (EBL), mean operative time, length of stay, complications, extent of tumor resection. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 275 studies. After the selection criterion was applied 7 comparative studies were included. A total of 302 patients were included in the analysis with 149 (49.3%) of them undergoing MIS and 153 of them (50.7%) undergoing open surgery. EBL, operative time, and LOS were significantly lower in MIS group (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.0002 respectively). Two groups were similar with regards to the rates of surgical complications, medical complications and gross total resection. The most common surgical complication was CSF leak (52.3% of all complications). CONCLUSION: Results of this meta-analysis show a significant reduction in EBL, operative time, and length of stay with MIS while proving safe and preserving high rates of gross-total resection. The findings suggest that the minimally invasive spine surgery may serve as a beneficial alternative for patients undergoing spine surgery for ID-EM tumors of the spinal cord.

Rheumatoid Arthritis in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to synthesize recommendations for perioperative medical management of RA patients and quantify outcomes after spine surgery when compared to patients without RA. METHODS: A search of available literature on patients with RA and spine surgery was performed. Studies were included if they provided a direct comparison of outcomes between patients undergoing spine surgery with or without RA diagnosis. Meta-analysis was performed on operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital length of stay, overall complications, implant-related complications, reoperation, infection, pseudarthrosis, and adjacent segment disease. RESULTS: Included in the analysis were 9 studies with 703 patients with RA undergoing spine surgery and 2569 patients without RA. In RA patients compared to non-RA patients undergoing spine surgery, the relative risk of infection was 2.29 times higher (P = .036), overall complications 1.61 times higher (P < .0001), implant-related complications 3.93 times higher (P = .009), and risk of reoperation 2.45 times higher (P < .0001). Hospital length of stay was 4.6 days longer in RA patients (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of spinal pathology in patients with RA carries an increased risk of infection and implant-related complications. Spine-specific guidelines for perioperative management of antirheumatic medication deserve further exploration. All RA patients should be perioperatively co-managed by a rheumatologist. This review helps identify risk profiles in RA specific to spine surgery and may guide future studies seeking to medically optimize RA patients perioperatively.

Estimating Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Rates for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Are Diagnostic or Procedural Codes Accurate?

BACKGROUND: The utility of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is well established for some spine surgeries (eg, intramedullary tumor resection, scoliosis deformity correction), but its benefit for most degenerative spine surgery, including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), remains debated. National datasets provide "big data" approaches to study the impact of IONM on spine surgery outcomes; however, if administrative coding in these datasets misrepresents actual IONM usage, conclusions will be unreliable. The objective of this study was to compare estimated rates (administrative coding) to actual rates (chart review) of IONM for ACDF at our institution and extrapolate findings to estimated rates from 2 national datasets. METHODS: Patients were included from 3 administrative coding databases: the authors' single institution database, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Estimated and actual institutional rates of IONM during ACDF were determined by administrative codes (International Classification of Diseases [ICD] or Current Procedural Terminology [CPT]) and chart review, respectively. National rates of IONM during ACDF were estimated using the NIS and NSQIP datasets. RESULTS: Estimated institutional rates of IONM for ACDF were much higher with CPT than ICD coding (73.2% vs 16.5% in 2019). CPT coding for IONM better approximated actual IONM usage at our institution (74.6% in 2019). Estimated IONM utilization rates for ACDF in national datasets varied widely: 0.76% in CPT-based NSQIP and 18.4% in ICD-based NIS. CONCLUSIONS: ICD coding underestimated IONM usage during ACDF at our institution, whereas CPT coding was more accurate. Unfortunately, the CPT-based NSQIP is nearly devoid of IONM codes, as it has not been a collection focus of that surgical registry. ICD-based datasets, such as the NIS, likely fail to accurately capture IONM usage. Multicenter and/or national datasets with accurate IONM utilization data are needed to inform surgeons, insurers, and guideline authors on whether IONM has benefit for various spine surgery types. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Currently available national databases based on administrative codes do not accurately reflect IONM usage.

Transradial versus Transfemoral Approaches in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroendovascular Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Current Literature.

BACKGROUND: The adoption of the transradial approach (TRA) has been increasing in popularity as a primary method to conduct both diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. As this technique gains broader acceptance and use within the neuroendovascular community, comparing its complication profile with a better-established alternative technique, the transfemoral approach (TFA), becomes more important. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of TRA compared with TFA in patients undergoing diagnostic, therapeutic, and combined neuroendovascular procedures. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A literature search of PubMed and other databases was conducted for studies from all available dates. To compare TRA and TFA, we performed an indirect meta-analysis between studies that mentioned the complications of the procedures. RESULTS: Our search yielded 532 studies, of which 108 met full inclusion criteria. A total of 54,083 patients (9137 undergoing TRA and 44,946 undergoing TFA) were included. Access site complication rate was lower in TRA (1.62%) compared with TFA (3.31%) (P < 0.01). Neurological complication rate was lower in TRA (1.64%) compared with TFA (3.82%) (P = 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively). Vascular spasm rate was higher in TRA (3.65%) compared with TFA (0.88%) (P < 0.01). Wound infection complication rate was higher in TRA (0.32%) compared with TFA (0.2%) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing TFA are significantly more likely to experience access site complications and neurological complications compared with patients undergoing TRA. Patients undergoing TRA are more likely to experience complications such as wound infections and vascular spasm.

Rate of C8 Radiculopathy in Patients Undergoing Cervicothoracic Osteotomy: A Systematic Appraisal of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: The emergence of C8 radiculopathy is a known complication following cervicothoracic osteotomies. However, the clinical profile of C8 radiculopathy is not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of C8 radiculopathy after cervicothoracic osteotomies and to form a clinical profile describing the characteristics through a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: An electronic database search for full-text English articles was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The search yielded results on indications for cervicothoracic osteotomies, surgical approaches, mean follow-up time, and significant complications, including C8 radiculopathy. RESULTS: Our literature search yielded 2135 articles, of which 12 qualified to be included in the analysis. The 12 articles comprised 451 patients undergoing various osteotomy approaches. The mean age of subjects was 51.0 years (range, 11.4-63.2 years), and the majority of patients were male (66%, n = 298). Ankylosing spondylitis was the most frequent indication for surgery (44.8%, n = 202). The number of patients with postoperative C8 radiculopathy was found to decrease over time (1997-2020) by showing statistical significance (r = -0.65, P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Of the 451 patients included in this study, 53 had C8 radiculopathy (11.8% of the total patient population). Moreover, the rate of C8 radiculopathy decreased over time in a statistically significant manner. An understanding of the factors associated with the incidence of C8 radiculopathy is essential for future improvement of patient outcomes.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Cage Materials Used for Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Standalone Cages: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Interbody cages are currently being used to address diseases of the vertebra requiring surgical stabilization. Titanium cages were first introduced in 1988. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages are used frequently as one of the alternatives to titanium cages in current practice. This study aimed to compare available cage materials by reviewing the surgical and radiographic outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. METHODS: A comprehensive search of several electronic databases was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Baseline characteristics, operative outcomes, arthrodesis rates, subsidence rates, and complications were collected from included studies. Collected outcomes were further stratified according to the procedure type, the number of levels operated, and graft used to compare cage materials. RESULTS: Following the screening for inclusion criteria, a total of 37 studies with 2363 patients were included. The median age was 49.5 years and the median follow-up was 26 months. Overall, no significant differences were found between PEEK and titanium cages regarding fusion, neurologic deficit, subsidence rates, or "good and excellent" outcome according to Odom criteria. However, the standalone comparison between PEEK, titanium, and poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) cages showed a significantly lower fusion rate for PMMA (PEEK: 94%, PMMA: 56%, titanium: 95%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, a comparison of the long-term patient-reported and the radiographic outcomes associated with the use of titanium and PEEK, intervertebral body cages showed similar findings. However, there were significantly lower fusion rates for PMMA cages when using a standalone cage without graft material.

Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes and Treatment-Related Toxicity of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy and En Bloc Resection for Sacral Chordoma.

Importance: Maximal resection is the preferred management for sacral chordomas but can be associated with unacceptable morbidity. Outcomes with radiotherapy are poor. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is being explored as an alternative when surgery is not preferred. Objective: To compare oncologic outcomes and treatment-related toxicity of CIRT and en bloc resection for sacral chordoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: Univariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between treatment type and oncologic and toxicity outcomes in this retrospective cohort study. Nearest-neighbor propensity score matching was used to match the CIRT cohort with the en bloc resection cohort and 10 National Cancer Database (NCDB) cohorts separately, with the objective of obtaining more homogeneous cohorts when comparing treatments. Patient- and tumor-related characteristics from 2 institutional cohorts were collected for patients diagnosed with sacral chordomas between April 1, 1994, and July 31, 2017. The NCDB was queried for data on patients with sacral chordoma from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2016, as a comparator in overall survival (OS) analyses. Data analysis was conducted from February 24, 2020, to January 16, 2021. Exposures: En bloc resection, incomplete resection, photon radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy, and CIRT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. Peripheral motor nerve toxic effects were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. Results: A total of 911 patients were included in the study (NCDB: n = 669; median age, 64 [IQR, 52-74] years; 410 [61.3%] men; CIRT: n = 188; median age, 66 [IQR, 58-71] years; 128 [68.1%] men; en bloc surgical resection: n = 54; median age, 53.5 [IQR 49-64] years, 36 [66.7%] men). Comparison of the propensity score-matched institutional en bloc resection and CIRT cohorts revealed no statistically significant difference in OS (CIRT: median OS, 68.1 [95% CI, 44.0-102.6] months; en bloc resection: median OS, 58.6 [95% CI, 25.6-123.5] months; P = .57; hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.25-2.06]; P = .53). The CIRT cohort experienced lower rates of peripheral motor neuropathy (odds ratio, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.04-0.40]; P < .001). On comparison of the propensity score-matched NCDB cohorts with the CIRT cohort, significantly higher OS was found for CIRT compared with margin-positive surgery without adjuvant radiotherapy (CIRT: median OS, 64.7 [95% CI, 57.8-69.7] months; margin-positive surgery without adjuvant radiotherapy: median OS, 60.6 [95% CI, 44.2-69.7] months, P = .03) and primary radiotherapy alone (CIRT: median OS, 64.9 [95% CI 57.0-70.5] months; primary radiotherapy alone: 31.8 [95% CI, 27.9-40.6] months; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that CIRT can be used as treatment for older patients with high performance status and sacral chordoma in whom surgery is not preferred. CIRT might provide additional benefit for patients who undergo margin-positive resection or who are candidates for primary photon radiotherapy.

Launching the Quality Outcomes Database Tumor Registry: rationale, development, and pilot data.

OBJECTIVE: Neurosurgeons generate an enormous amount of data daily. Within these data lie rigorous, valid, and reproducible evidence. Such evidence can facilitate healthcare reform and improve quality of care. To measure the quality of care provided objectively, evaluating the safety and efficacy of clinical activities should occur in real time. Registries must be constructed and collected data analyzed with the precision akin to that of randomized clinical trials to accomplish this goal. METHODS: The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) Tumor Registry was launched in February 2019 with 8 sites in its initial 1-year pilot phase. The Tumor Registry was proposed by the AANS/CNS Tumor Section and approved by the QOD Scientific Committee in the fall of 2018. The initial pilot phase aimed to assess the feasibility of collecting outcomes data from 8 academic practices across the United States; these outcomes included length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient complications. RESULTS: As of November 2019, 923 eligible patients have been entered, with the following subsets: intracranial metastasis (17.3%, n = 160), high-grade glioma (18.5%, n = 171), low-grade glioma (6%, n = 55), meningioma (20%, n = 184), pituitary tumor (14.3%, n = 132), and other intracranial tumor (24%, n = 221). CONCLUSIONS: The authors have demonstrated here, as a pilot study, the feasibility of documenting demographic, clinical, operative, and patient-reported outcome characteristics longitudinally for 6 common intracranial tumor types.

Disparities in Reported Testing for 1p/19q Codeletion in Oligodendroglioma and Oligoastrocytoma Patients: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

PURPOSE: A chromosomal 1p/19q codeletion was included as a required diagnostic component of oligodendrogliomas in the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors. We sought to evaluate disparities in reported testing for 1p/19q codeletion among oligodendroglioma and oligoastrocytoma patients before and after the guidelines. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with histologically-confirmed WHO grade II/III oligodendroglioma or oligoastrocytoma from 2011-2017. Adjusted odds of having a reported 1p/19q codeletion test for patient- and hospital-level factors were calculated before (2011-2015) and after (2017) the guidelines. The adjusted likelihood of receiving adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy) based on reported testing was also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 6,404 patients were identified. The reported 1p/19q codeletion testing rate increased from 45.8% in 2011 to 59.8% in 2017. From 2011-2015, lack of insurance (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.62-0.97;p=0.025), lower zip code-level educational attainment (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.49-0.78;p<0.001), and Northeast (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.57-0.82;p<0.001) or Southern (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.49-0.79;p<0.001) facility geographic region were negatively associated with reported testing. In 2017, Black race (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.91;p=0.024) and Northeast (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.84;p=0.009) or Southern (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.22-0.78;p=0.007) region were negatively associated with reported testing. Patients with a reported test were more likely to receive adjuvant treatment (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.46-2.04;p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite the 2016 WHO guidelines, disparities in reported 1p/19q codeletion testing by geographic region persisted while new disparities in race/ethnicity were identified, which may influence oligodendroglioma and oligoastrocytoma patient management.

Economic Burden of Hospitalizations Associated with Opioid Dependence Among Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion.

BACKGROUND: The current study seeks to examine the association between chronic opioid use and postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried for patients with and without chronic opioid use undergoing ACDF or PLF for degenerative disc disease between 2012 and 2015 using ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was performed to assess the association between chronic opioid use and length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge, and hospital charge. RESULTS: A total of 391 patients undergoing ACDF and 644 patients undergoing PLF with opioid dependence were identified. On multivariable regression analysis, opioid dependence was significantly associated with an increased LOS (mean, 3.09 days vs. 2.16 days; odds ratio (OR) for prolonged LOS (>3 days), 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-3.14; P < 0.001). Although on unadjusted analyses, patients with opioid dependence undergoing ACDF were found to have higher hospital charges (mean, U.S. $18,698.42 vs. $11,378.61; P < 0.001) and higher rates of nonroutine discharge (19.18% vs. 10.21%; P < 0.001), the multivariable regression analyses found no significant association between opioid dependence and odds of hospital charges >75th percentile (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.84-2.47; P = 0.188) or nonroutine discharge (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.93-2.34; P = 0.098). For those undergoing PLF, opioid dependence was significantly associated with increased hospital charges (mean, U.S. $37,712.98 vs. $30,475.43, P < 0.001; OR for hospital charge >75th percentile, 1.78, 95% CL, 1.23-2.58, P = 0.002), LOS (mean, 3.42 days vs. 2.30 days; OR for prolonged LOS, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.16-2.00; P = 0.003), and nonroutine discharge (46.89% vs. 36.47%; OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.34-2.26; P < 0.001) on both unadjusted and adjusted multivariable regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis using a national administrative database showed that opioid dependence may be associated with worse economic outcomes for patients undergoing ACDF and PLF.

Rate and Characteristics of Vertebral Artery Injury Following C1-C2 Posterior Cervical Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative vascular injuries in the cervical spine are rare, but carry significant morbidity and mortality when they do occur. There is a need to better characterize the risk of vertebral artery injury (VAI) after posterior C1-C2 fusion. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of VAI in patients undergoing posterior C1-C2 cervical fusion. METHODS: An electronic database search was performed to identify studies that reported rates of VAI following posterior cervical fusion at C1-C2 level. Patient-specific risk factors, surgical indication, surgical technique, and other data were collected for each study. Forest plots were created to outline the pooled ratios of VAI in the literature. RESULTS: Eleven studies with 773 patients were identified. Mean age of patients was 48.47 years (range, 6-78 years), and most patients were female (61.7%, n = 399). Trauma was the most frequent indication for surgery (18.8%, n = 146), followed by inflammatory processes affecting the vertebrae (13.2%, n = 102). The rate of VAI per patient was 2% (95% confidence interval = 1%-4%) among 773 patients, while injury rate per screw was 1% (95% confidence interval = 0%-2%) among 2238 screws placed. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of VAI after C1-C2 posterior cervical fusion was found to be 2% for each operated patient and 1% for each screw placed.

Determining the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable and Nonexpandable Titanium Cages in Cervical Fusion Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Expandable cages have been increasingly used in cervical and lumbar reconstructions; however, there is a paucity in the literature on how they compare with traditional nonexpandable cages in the cervical spine. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis, comparing the clinical and radiologic outcomes of expandable versus nonexpandable corpectomy cage use in the cervical spine. METHODS: A database search identified studies detailing the outcomes of expandable and nonexpandable titanium cage use in the cervical spine. These studies were screened using the PRISMA protocol. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were used with a 95% confidence interval. Two analyses were carried out for each outcome: one including all studies and the other including only studies reporting on exclusively 1-level and 2-level cases. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included. The mean change in segmental lordosis was significantly greater in expandable cages (all, 6.72 vs. 3.69°, P < 0.001; 1-level and 2-level, 6.81° vs. 4.31°, P < 0.001). The mean change in cervical lordosis was also significantly greater in expandable cages (all, 5.71° vs. 3.11°, P = 0.027; 1-level and 2-level, 5.71° vs. 2.07°, P = 0.002). No significant difference was found between the complication rates (all, P = 0.43; 1-level and 2-level, P = 0.94); however, the proportion of revisions was significantly greater in expandable cages (all, 0.06 vs. 0.02, P = 0.03; 1-level and 2-level, 0.08 vs. 0.01, P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The use of expandable cages may carry a modest improvement in radiologic outcomes compared with nonexpandable cages in the cervical spine; however, they may also lead to a higher rate of revisions based on our analyses.