Determining Which Patients Require Preoperative Pelvic Radiotherapy Before Curative-Intent Surgery and/or Ablation for Metastatic Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine the optimal indications for preoperative pelvic radiotherapy (RT) in patients with metastatic rectal cancer who underwent curative-intent surgical resection and/or ablation. METHODS: Between January 2000 and October 2019, 246 patients who met our inclusion criteria were enrolled. Preoperative RT was performed in 22 patients (8.9%). Lower margin below the peritoneal reflection (p < 0.001), mesorectal fascia (MRF) invasion (p = 0.02), and lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) involvement (p = 0.005) were more frequent in the preoperative RT group. RESULTS: During the median follow-up period of 13.3 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.0-36.3 months), local recurrence (LR) was identified in 60 patients (24.4%). It was the first site of recurrence in 45 of them (18.3%). Among them, three patients were in the preoperative RT group. On multivariable analysis, lower margin below the peritoneal reflection, MRF invasion, LPLN involvement, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level ≥ 10 ng/mL before treatment, and preoperative RT were significant prognostic factors for LR-free survival (LRFS). In the patient group without any risk factors, the 2-year LRFS rate was 94.9% without preoperative RT. In the patient group with one or more risk factors, the 2-year LRFS was 64.4% without and 95.2% with preoperative RT. CONCLUSION: LR developed in about 25% of patients within 2 years. Preoperative RT should be considered, especially in patients with a risk factor for LR, including lower margin below the peritoneal reflection, MRF invasion, LPLN involvement, or CEA ≥ 10 ng/mL before treatment.

Dual Oxidase 2 (DUOX2) as a Proteomic Biomarker for Predicting Treatment Response to Chemoradiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Using High-Throughput Proteomic Analysis and Machine Learning Algorithm.

High-throughput mass-spectrometry-based quantitative proteomic analysis was performed using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsy samples obtained before treatment from 13 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), who were treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) followed by surgery. Patients were divided into complete responder (CR) and non-complete responder (nCR) groups. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of 79 independent FFPE tissue samples was performed to validate the predictive ability of proteomic biomarker candidates. A total of 3637 proteins were identified, and the expression of 498 proteins was confirmed at significantly different levels (differentially expressed proteins-DEPs) between two groups. In Gene Ontology enrichment analyses, DEPs enriched in biological processes in the CR group included proteins linked to cytoskeletal organization, immune response processes, and vesicle-associated protein transport processes, whereas DEPs in the nCR group were associated with biosynthesis, transcription, and translation processes. Dual oxidase 2 (DUOX2) was selected as the most predictive biomarker in machine learning algorithm analysis. Further IHC validation ultimately confirmed DUOX2 as a potential biomarker for predicting the response of nCR to CCRT. In conclusion, this study suggests that the treatment response to RT may be affected by the pre-treatment tumor microenvironment. DUOX2 is a potential biomarker for the early prediction of nCR after CCRT.

Incorporating sarcopenia and inflammation with radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with nivolumab.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the combined effects of sarcopenia and inflammation on outcomes in patients with HCC treated with nivolumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 102 patients treated with nivolumab between 2017 and 2018. Sarcopenia was diagnosed when the L3 skeletal muscle indices were < 42 cm2/m2 and < 38 cm2/m2 in men and women, respectively. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and absolute lymphocyte count were used as surrogate markers of inflammation and immune cell reservoir. High NLR (hNLR) was defined as NLR ≥ 3, and severe lymphopenia (sLP) was defined as lymphocyte < 800/µL. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 21.9 (interquartile range, 8.3-58.3) months, patients with sarcopenia showed shorter OS than those without sarcopenia (median, 2.9 vs. 7.5 months, respectively). Patients with either hNLR or sLP exhibited inferior survival than those without risk factor (median OS, 2.8 vs. 14.5 months; median PFS, 1.3 vs. 3.7 months, respectively). Among 70 patients treated with RT, benefit of RT was observed in patients with sarcopenia or those without hNLR/sLP (all p < 0.05). After multivariable analysis, RT, hNLR/sLP, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, and alpha-fetoprotein were significantly associated with OS (all p < 0.05), and hNLR/sLP was also associated with decreased PFS together with ALBI grade, alpha-fetoprotein, and RT (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The current study hypothetically demonstrated that the risk group stratified by hNLR/sLP outweighs the significance of sarcopenia in predicting outcomes after nivolumab. Furthermore, patients with sarcopenia might benefit from RT, especially those without risk factors of hNLR/sLP.

Determining whether postoperative chemoradiotherapy is required in patients with pathologic T3N0 rectal cancer with negative resection margin.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for locoregional recurrence (LR) and determine possible candidates for postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in pathologic T3N0 (pT3N0) rectal cancer patients with a negative resection margin after total mesorectal excision (TME). METHOD: Data from 365 patients who had pT3N0 rectal cancer between 2003 and 2012 in the Samsung Medical Center were reviewed. All patients underwent upfront surgery without preoperative treatment. Postoperative management involved either no adjuvant therapy (n = 122), chemotherapy alone (n = 100), or CCRT (n = 143). RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 71 months. The 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and LR-free survival (LRFS) rates were 95.9%, 86.9%, and 96.3%, respectively. When comparing the three groups (surgery alone [n = 122], chemotherapy alone [n = 100], and CCRT [n = 143]), there was no significant difference in LRFS among them (94.0%, 93.4%, and 99.2%, respectively; p = 0.20). However, when patients were stratified by risk factors (distance from anal verge ≤ 5 cm and distal resection margin [DRM] ≤ 2 cm), the 5-year LRFS improved by more than 10% by adding CCRT (98.9% with CCRT vs. 87.4% without CCRT, p = 0.006) in those with more than one risk factor. Postoperative CCRT did not affect the 5-year LRFS (100% with CCRT vs. 99.0% without CCRT, p = 0.66) in patients with no risk factors. CONCLUSION: Postoperative CCRT significantly decreased LR in patients with pT3N0 rectal cancer with a negative resection margin but having a distance from the anal verge ≤ 5 cm or DRM ≤ 2 cm.

CycleSeg: Simultaneous synthetic CT generation and unsupervised segmentation for MR-only radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: MR-only radiotherapy treatment planning is an attractive alternative to conventional workflow, reducing scan time and ionizing radiation. It is crucial to derive the electron density map or synthetic CT (sCT) from MR data to perform dose calculations to enable MR-only treatment planning. Automatic segmentation of relevant organs in MR images can accelerate the process by preventing the time-consuming manual contouring step. However, the segmentation label is available only for CT data in many cases. PURPOSE: We propose CycleSeg, a unified framework that generates sCT and corresponding segmentation from MR images without access to MR segmentation labels METHODS: CycleSeg utilizes the CycleGAN formulation to perform unpaired synthesis of sCT and image alignment. To enable MR (sCT) segmentation, CycleSeg incorporates unsupervised domain adaptation by using a pseudo-labeling approach with feature alignment in semantic segmentation space. In contrast to previous approaches that perform segmentation on MR data, CycleSeg could perform segmentation on both MR and sCT. Experiments were performed with data from prostate cancer patients, with 78/7/10 subjects in the training/validation/test sets, respectively. RESULTS: CycleSeg showed the best sCT generation results, with the lowest mean absolute error of 102.2 and the lowest Fréchet inception distance of 13.0. CycleSeg also performed best on MR segmentation, with the highest average dice score of 81.0 and 81.1 for MR and sCT segmentation, respectively. Ablation experiments confirmed the contribution of the proposed components of CycleSeg. CONCLUSION: CycleSeg effectively synthesized CT and performed segmentation on MR images of prostate cancer patients. Thus, CycleSeg has the potential to expedite MR-only radiotherapy treatment planning, reducing the prescribed scans and manual segmentation effort, and increasing throughput.

Radiation Oncologists' Perspectives on Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: A Survey from Korean Oligometastasis Working Group.

BACKGROUND: Interest in the oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is increasing, and various clinical studies have reported the benefits of metastasis-directed radiation therapy (MDRT) in OMPC. However, the recognition regarding the adopted definitions, methodologies of assessment, and therapeutic approaches is diverse among radiation oncologists. This study aims to evaluate the level of agreement for issues in OMPC among radiation oncologists. METHODS: We generated 15 key questions (KQs) for OMPC relevant to definition, diagnosis, local therapies, and endpoints. Additionally, three clinical scenarios representing synchronous metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) (case 1), metachronous mPC with visceral metastasis (case 2), and metachronous mPC with castration-resistance and history of polymetastasis (case 3) were developed. The 15 KQs were adapted according to each scenario and transformed into 23 questions with 6-9 per scenario. The survey was distributed to 80 radiation oncologists throughout the Republic of Korea. Answer options with 0.0-29.9%, 30-49.9%, 50-69.9%, 70-79.9%, 80-89.9%, and 90-100% agreements were considered as no, minimal, weak, moderate, strong, and near perfect agreement, respectively. RESULTS: Forty-five candidates voluntarily participated in this study. Among 23 questions, near perfect (n = 4), strong (n = 3), or moderate (n = 2) agreements were shown in nine. For the case recognized as OMPC with agreements of 93% (case 1), near perfect agreements on the application of definitive radiation therapy (RT) for whole metastatic lesions were achieved. While ≥70% agreements regarding optimal dose-fractionation for metastasis-directed RT (MDRT) has not been achieved, stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is favored by clinicians with higher clinical volume. CONCLUSION: For the case recognized as OMPC, near perfect agreement for the application of definitive RT for whole metastatic lesions was reached. SBRT was more favored as a MDRT by clinicians with a higher clinical volume.

The Clinical Efficacy of Colorectal Cancer Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases by Sterotactic Body Ablative Radiotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: There is increasing interest in the efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for treating colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with oligometastases (OM), recently. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of CRC patients with pulmonary OM treated with SABR and toxicities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies that reported SABR for CRC patients with pulmonary OM were searched from MEDLINE and Embase. Treatment outcomes including LC, PFS, OS, and toxicities of grade 3 or higher were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies with 1,668 patients were chosen for this meta-analysis. Pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year LC rates were 83.1%, 69.3%, and 63.9%, respectively. PFS rates were 44.8%, 26.5%, and 21.5% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. OS rates at 1-, 2-, and 3-year were 87.5%, 69.9%, and 60.5%, respectively. The toxicity rate of grade 3 or higher was 3.6%. The effect of dose escalation was meta-analyzed using available studies. CONCLUSION: Application of SABR to CRC patients with pulmonary OM achieved modest local control with acceptable toxicity according to the present meta-analysis. Further studies establishing the clinical efficacy of SABR are guaranteed.

Evidence-based clinical recommendations for hypofractionated radiotherapy: exploring efficacy and safety - Part 2. Lung (non-small cell lung cancer).

Several recent studies have investigated the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) for various cancers. However, HFRT for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without concurrent chemotherapy is not yet widely used because of concerns about serious side effects and the lack of evidence for improved treatment results. Investigations of HFRT with concurrent chemotherapy in NSCLC have usually been performed in single-arm studies and with a small number of patients, so there are not yet sufficient data. Therefore, the Korean Society for Radiation Oncology Practice Guidelines Committee planned this review article to summarize the evidence on HFRT so far and provide it to radiation oncology clinicians. In summary, HFRT has demonstrated promising results, and the reviewed data support its feasibility and comparable efficacy for the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. The incidence and severity of esophageal toxicity have been identified as major concerns, particularly when treating large fraction sizes. Strategies, such as esophagus-sparing techniques, image guidance, and dose constraints, may help mitigate this problem and improve treatment tolerability. Continued research and clinical trials are essential to refine treatment strategies, identify optimal patient selection criteria, and enhance therapeutic outcomes.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy for clinically node-positive prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the treatment outcomes of combined definitive radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for clinically node-positive prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 60 patients with clinically suspected metastatic lymph nodes on radiological examination were retrospectively analyzed. Eight patients (13.3%) were suspected to have metastatic common iliac or para-aortic lymph nodes. All patients underwent definitive RT with a dose fractionation of 70 Gy in 28 fractions. ADT was initiated 2-3 months before RT and continued for at least 2 years. Biochemical failure rate (BFR), clinical failure rate (CFR), overall survival (OS), and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) were calculated, and genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 5.47 years. The 5-year BFR, CFR, OS, and PCSS rates were 19.1%, 11.3%, 89.0%, and 98.2%, respectively. The median duration of ADT was 2.30 years. BFR and CFR increased after 3 years, and 11 out of 14 biochemical failures occurred after the cessation of ADT. Grade 2 and beyond late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity rates were 5.0% and 13.3%, respectively. However, only two grade 3 adverse events were reported, and no grade 4-5 adverse events were reported. Patients with non-regional lymph node metastases did not have worse BFR, CFR, or adverse event rates. CONCLUSION: This study reported the efficacy and tolerable toxicity of hypofractionated definitive RT combined with ADT for clinically node-positive prostate cancer. Additionally, selected patients with adjacent non-regional lymph node metastases might be able to undergo definitive RT combined with ADT.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to analyse the treatment outcomes of moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and the prognostic implications of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in high-risk localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The medical records of 140 patients who underwent definitive RT (70 Gy in 28 fractions) combined with ADT were retrospectively reviewed. ADT consists of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and an anti-androgen. Clinical outcomes included the biochemical failure rate (BFR), clinical failure rate (CFR), overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS). The BFR and CFR were stratified by the PSA nadir and the time to the PSA nadir, respectively. Acute and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS: The 5-year BFR, CFR, OS and PCSS rates were 9.8%, 4.5%, 90.2% and 98.7%, respectively. Ninety-five (67.9%) patients achieved a PSA nadir of 0.01 ng/mL. Patients with a PSA nadir >0.01 ng/mL had a significantly higher BFR and CFR (BFR, P = 0.001; CFR, P = 0.027), even after adjusting for other prognostic factors [per 0.1 ng/mL; BFR, hazard ratio (HR) 4.440, P < 0.001; CFR, HR 4.338, P = 0.001]. However, the time to the PSA nadir and pre-RT PSA were not significantly associated with the BFR and CFR. Six patients (4.3%) reported grade 3 late adverse events, mostly haematuria and haematochezia. CONCLUSION: Definitive RT with moderate hypofractionation combined with long-term ADT showed good efficacy for high-risk localized prostate cancer. The lowest PSA nadir was significantly associated with a low recurrence rate, indicating the importance of PSA follow-up.

A meta-analysis comparing efficacy and safety between proton beam therapy versus carbon ion radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) by a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing clinical evidence. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies comparing the clinical outcomes of PBT and CIRT. The included studies were required to report oncological outcomes (local control [LC], progression-free survival [PFS], or overall survival [OS]) or adverse events. RESULTS: Eighteen articles comprising 1857 patients (947 treated with PBT and 910 treated with CIRT) were included in the analysis. The pooled analysis conducted for the overall population yielded average hazard ratios of 0.690 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.493-0.967, p = 0.031) for LC, 0.952 (95% CI, 0.604-1.500, p = 0.590) for PFS, and 1.183 (0.872-1.607, p = 0.281) for OS with reference to CIRT. The subgroup analyses included patients treated in the head and neck, areas other than the head and neck, and patients with chordomas and chondrosarcomas. These analyses revealed no significant differences in most outcomes, except for LC in the subgroup of patients treated in areas other than the head and neck. Adverse event rates were comparable in both groups, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.097 (95% CI, 0.744-1.616, p = 0.641). Meta-regression analysis for possible heterogeneity did not demonstrate a significant association between treatment outcomes and the ratio of biologically effective doses between modalities. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the comparability of PBT and CIRT in terms of oncological outcomes and adverse events.

Evidence-based clinical recommendations for hypofractionated radiotherapy: exploring efficacy and safety - Part 3. Genitourinary and gynecological cancers.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) has become a trend in the modern era, as advances in RT techniques, including intensity-modulated RT and image-guided RT, enable the precise and safe delivery of high-dose radiation. Hypofractionated RT offers convenience and can reduce the financial burden on patients by decreasing the number of fractions. Furthermore, hypofractionated RT is potentially more beneficial for tumors with a low α/ß ratio compared with conventional fractionation RT. Therefore, hypofractionated RT has been investigated for various primary cancers and has gained status as a standard treatment recommended in the guidelines. In genitourinary (GU) cancer, especially prostate cancer, the efficacy, and safety of various hypofractionated dose schemes have been evaluated in numerous prospective clinical studies, establishing the standard hypofractionated RT regimen. Hypofractionated RT has also been explored for gynecological (GY) cancer, yielding relevant evidence in recent years. In this review, we aimed to summarize the representative evidence and current trends in clinical studies on hypofractionated RT for GU and GY cancers addressing several key questions. In addition, the objective is to offer suggestions for the available dose regimens for hypofractionated RT by reviewing protocols from previous clinical studies.

Evidence-based clinical recommendations for hypofractionated radiotherapy: exploring efficacy and safety - Part 1. Brain and head and neck.

Advances in radiotherapy (RT) techniques, including intensity-modulated RT and image-guided RT, have allowed hypofractionation, increasing the fraction size over the conventional dose of 1.8-2.0 Gy. Hypofractionation offers advantages such as shorter treatment times, improved compliance, and under specific conditions, particularly in tumors with a low α/ß ratio, higher efficacy. It was initially explored for use in RT for prostate cancer and adjuvant RT for breast cancer, and its application has been extended to various other malignancies. Hypofractionated RT (HFRT) may also be effective in patients who are unable to undergo conventional treatment owing to poor performance status, comorbidities, or old age. The treatment of brain tumors with HFRT is relatively common because brain stereotactic radiosurgery has been performed for over two decades. However, re-irradiation of recurrent lesions and treatment of elderly or frail patients are areas under investigation. HFRT for head and neck cancer has not been widely used because of concerns regarding late toxicity. Thus, we aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of the current evidence for HFRT for brain tumors and head and neck cancer and to offer practical recommendations to clinicians faced with the challenge of choosing new treatment options.

Androgen deprivation alone versus combined with pelvic radiation for adverse events and quality of life in clinically node-positive prostate cancer.

The COHORT trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone versus combined with radiation therapy (ADT + RT) for clinically node-positive prostate cancer. We reported adverse events and quality of life between the two treatment groups. Fifty-nine patients were randomized to receive ADT alone or ADT + RT and analyzed as per-protocol. Patients allocated to the ADT alone arm received ADT for at least 2 years. Patients in the ADT + RT arm received additional pelvic RT. Higher rates of grade ≥ 2 acute genitourinary (0% vs. 7.1%) and late gastrointestinal adverse events (0% vs. 14.3%) were reported in the ADT + RT arm compared with the ADT alone. However, grade ≥ 2 late genitourinary toxicity was more common in the ADT alone than the ADT + RT arm (9.7% vs. 3.6%). No grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported. There was no statistically significant difference in EPIC scores between two treatment arms. However, the urinary and bowel domains tended to decrease and recover in the ADT + RT arm. In conclusion, ADT + RT demonstrated higher rates of adverse events compared to ADT alone. However, the addition of RT did not significantly impact the quality of life.

Proton Beam Radiotherapy as a Curative Alternative to Radiofrequency Ablation for Newly Diagnosed Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 323 patients who underwent PBT (n=40) or RFA (n=283) as a curative treatment for previously untreated HCC between October 2016 and June 2021. The primary endpoints were local progression and toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 3.4 years (range=1.1-5.7 years). In terms of portal vein tumor thrombosis, tumor size, alpha-fetoprotein, and prothrombin-induced by vitamin K absence-II, the PBT group had significantly more severe tumor burdens than those of the RFA group (p<0.0001, p<0.0001, p=0.0004, and p<0.0001, respectively). No significant difference was observed in cumulative local progression rate (10.4% in PBT vs. 7.8% in RFA at 3-years, p=0.895). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported in only one patient (0.4%) after RFA. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that treatment modality was not a significant prognostic factor for local progression (hazard ratio=1.05; 95% confidence interval=0.32-3.48; p=0.934). CONCLUSION: PBT demonstrated comparable local control with acceptable toxicity to RFA in newly diagnosed HCC. Therefore, PBT may be a valid alternative.

Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer with mesorectal fascia involvement.

PURPOSE: For the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), research on primary lesions with mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement is lacking. This study analyzed the clinical outcomes and efficacy of dose-escalated neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) to patients with LARC involving MRF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 301 patients who were diagnosed with LARC involving MRF and underwent NCRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Patients who received radiotherapy (RT) doses of ≤50.4 Gy were defined as the non-boost group, while ≥54.0 Gy as the boost group. Pathological tumor response and survival outcomes, including intrapelvic recurrence-free survival (IPRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS), were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients (89.4%) achieved a negative pathological circumferential resection margin and 104 (34.6%) had good pathological tumor regression grades. With a median follow-up of 32.4 months, IPRFS, DMFS, and OS rates at 5-years were 88.6%, 78.0%, and 91.2%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis by RT dose, the boost group included more advanced clinical stages of patients. For the non-boost group and boost group, 5-year IPRFS rates were 90.3% and 87.0% (p = 0.242), 5-year DMFS rates were 82.0% and 71.3% (p = 0.105), and 5-year OS rates were 93.0% and 80.6% (p = 0.439), respectively. Treatment related toxicity was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.211). CONCLUSION: Although this retrospective study failed to confirm the efficacy of dose-escalated NCRT, favorable IPRFS and pathological complete response was achieved with NCRT followed by TME. Further studies combining patient customized RT dose with systemic therapies are needed.

Metastasis-Directed Local Therapy of Hepatic Oligometastasis from Colorectal Cancer and Future Perspective in Radiation Therapy.

Introduction of the concept for oligometastasis led to wide application of metastasis-directed local ablative therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). By application of the metastasis-directed local ablative therapies including surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR), the survival outcomes of patients with metastatic CRC have improved. The liver is the most common distant metastatic site in CRC patients, and recently various metastasis-directed local therapies for hepatic oligometastasis from CRC (HOCRC) are widely used. Surgical resection is the first line of metastatic-directed local therapy for HOCRC, but its eligibility is very limited. Alternatively, RFA can be applied to patients who are ineligible for surgical resection of liver metastasis. However, there are some limitations such as inferior local control (LC) compared with surgical resection and technical feasibility based on location, size, and visibility on ultrasonography of the liver metastasis. Recent advances in radiation therapy technology have led to an increase in the use of SABR for liver tumors. SABR is considered complementary to RFA for patients with HOCRC who are ineligible for RFA. Furthermore, SABR can potentially result in better LC for liver metastases > 2-3 cm compared with RFA. In this article, the previous studies regarding curative metastasis-directed local therapies for HOCRC based on the radiation oncologist's and surgeon's perspective are reviewed and discussed. In addition, future perspectives regarding SABR in the treatment of HOCRC are suggested.

Differential Perspectives by Specialty on Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Korean Oligometastasis Working Group's Comparative Survey Study.

PURPOSE: Despite numerous studies on the optimal treatments for oligometastatic disease (OMD), there is no established interdisciplinary consensus on its diagnosis or classification. This survey-based study aimed to analyze the differential opinions of colorectal surgeons and radiation oncologists regarding the definition and treatment of OMD from the colorectal primary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 141 participants were included in this study, consisting of 63 radiation oncologists (44.7%) and 78 colorectal surgeons (55.3%). The survey consisted of 19 questions related to OMD, and the responses were analyzed using the chi-square test to determine statistical differences between the specialties. RESULTS: The radiation oncologists chose "bone" more frequently compared to the colorectal surgeons (19.2% vs. 36.5%, p=0.022), while colorectal surgeons favored "peritoneal seeding" (26.9% vs. 9.5%, p=0.009). Regarding the number of metastatic tumors, 48.3% of colorectal surgeons responded that "irrelevant, if all metastatic lesions are amendable to local therapy", while only 21.8% of radiation oncologist chose same answer. When asked about molecular diagnosis, most surgeons (74.8%) said it was important, but only 35.8% of radiation oncologists agreed. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that although radiation oncologists and colorectal surgeons agreed on a majority of aspects such as diagnostic imaging, biomarker, systemic therapy, and optimal timing of OMD, they also had quite different perspectives on several aspects of OMD. Understanding these differences is crucial to achieving multidisciplinary consensus on the definition and optimal management of OMD.

Effect of pre-operative radiation therapy on surgical outcome in retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Background: A high rate of locoregional recurrence is one of the major difficulties in successful treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Although pre-operative radiation therapy (RT) is considered a potential way to improve local recurrence, concerns about the associated treatment toxicity and risk of peri-operative complications need to be addressed. Hence, this study investigates the safety of pre-operative RT (preRTx) for RPS. Methods: A cohort of 198 patients with RPS who had undergone both surgery and RT was analyzed for peri-operative complications. They were divided into three groups according to the RT scheme: (1) preRTx group, (2) post-operative RT without tissue expander, and (3) post-operative RT with tissue expander. Results: The preRTx was overall well tolerated and did not affect the R2 resection rate, operative time, and severe post-operative complications. However, the preRTx group was associated with higher incidence of post-operative transfusion and admission to intensive care unit (p = 0.013 and p = 0.036, respectively), where preRTx was an independent risk factor only for the post-operative transfusion (p = 0.009) in multivariate analysis. The median radiation dose was the highest in preRTx group, although no significant difference was demonstrated in overall survival and local recurrence rate. Conclusion: This study suggests that the preRTx does not add significant post-operative morbidity to the patients with RPS. In addition, radiation dose elevation is achievable with the pre-operative RT. However, a meticulous intra-operative bleeding control is recommended in those patients, and further high-quality trials are warranted to evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes.

Prostate-specific antigen kinetics in hypofractionated radiation therapy alone for intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes and define the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics as potential prognostic factors in patients with intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy. Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 149 patients with intermediate- or high-risk localized PCa who underwent definitive radiation therapy (70 Gy in 28 fractions) without androgen deprivation therapy. Clinical outcomes were analyzed based on risk stratification (favorable-intermediate, unfavorable-intermediate, and high-risk). The biochemical failure rate (BFR) and clinical failure rate (CFR) were stratified based on the PSA nadir and the time to the PSA nadir to identify the prognostic effect of PSA kinetics. Acute and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events were analyzed. Results: Significant differences were observed in the BFR and CFR according to risk stratification. No recurrence was observed in the favorable intermediate-risk group. The 7-year BFR and CFR for the unfavorable intermediate-risk and high-risk groups were 19.2% and 9.8%, and 31.1% and 25.3%, respectively. Patients with a PSA nadir >0.33 ng/mL or a time to the PSA nadir <36 months had a significantly greater BFR and CFR. The crude rate of grade 3 late adverse events was 3.4% (genitourinary: 0.7%; gastrointestinal: 2.7%). No grade 4-5 adverse event was reported. Conclusion: A significant difference in clinical outcomes was observed according to risk stratification. The PSA nadir and time to the PSA nadir were strongly associated with the BFR and CFR. Therefore, PSA kinetics during follow-up are important for predicting prognosis.