Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Sleep Res ; : e14260, 2024 Jun 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867140

RESUMO

Obstructive sleep apnea and sleep-related hypoxia have been associated with higher rates of hospitalization and mortality among patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We further explored the association between obstructive sleep apnea, COVID-19 severity and related mortality. In addition, we examined the effects of clinical and demographic parameters on COVID-19. In this retrospective study, we included adult patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 prior to the Omicron variant identification. We compared the severity of COVID-19 and mortality with the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. The study population included 44,275 patients who tested positive for COVID-19. Of these, 97% had mild or asymptomatic disease, 1.2% had moderate disease, and 1.8% had severe disease. Obstructive sleep apnea was diagnosed in 980 (2.2%) patients. In a multivariate analysis, obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis increased the risk of severe COVID-19 by 1.6 (95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.4) compared with mild disease. However, no increase in mortality was associated with obstructive sleep apnea. Interestingly, patients with moderate and high socioeconomic status had a 1.6 times higher risk for severe COVID-19 than patients from the low socioeconomic status group (95% confidence interval: 1.2-2.1 and 95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.3, respectively). The risk of dying due to COVID-19 was 1.6 (95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.5) and 3.1 (95% confidence interval: 1.8-5.3) times higher in patients with medium and high socioeconomic status, respectively, compared with patients with low socioeconomic status. Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea was found to be an independent risk factor for severe COVID-19. The higher the socioeconomic status, the higher the risk of severe COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.

2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 151: e132, 2023 Jul 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37482675

RESUMO

A new COVID-19 vaccine was introduced in a remarkably short period of time. Public and healthcare workers (HCWs) were concerned about the safety of the vaccine, especially in light of the use of new technologies. A review regarding attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination found a 22.5% hesitancy rate among HCWs. Online anonymous questionnaires were delivered using a web-based surveying platform to community HCWs in a central district in Israel from 3 to 19 January 2021. The real COVID-19 vaccination data were collected between the beginning of the vaccination rollout and the end of the month after the survey as well as the real vaccination rate among the general population. Of the 3,172 HCWs, 549 (17%) responded to the questionnaire. The highest positive attitude towards the vaccine was among physicians (95%), while nurses showed the highest level of hesitation (14%) for a specific sector (P < 0.05). However, the real vaccination rates were similar among physicians (63%) and nurses (62%). Surprisingly, the total vaccination rate of HCWs was substantially lower (52%) than that of the general population (71%). The main vaccination motivators were the social and economic effects of the COVID-19 epidemic. Focused strategies to reduce the level of hesitancy among HCWs are needed.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Israel/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Pessoal de Saúde
3.
Eur J Pediatr ; 182(7): 3211-3216, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37127797

RESUMO

Benign transient hyperphosphatasemia is a condition characterized by greatly increased serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) without laboratory or clinical evidence of underlying bone or liver disease. It is usually identified incidentally during routine blood testing. We describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of benign transient hyperphosphatasemia in a cohort of healthy infants and children. We performed a retrospective review of electronic medical records on all children aged 1 day to 18 years with a diagnosis of benign transient hyperphosphatasemia, who were registered at 3 central districts in Israel from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2020. The demographic and clinical characteristics were retrieved from the medical files. The study group comprised 382 infants and children aged from 2 months to 14 years who had serum ALP > 1000 U/L (mean 2557 U/L, range 1002-14,589 U/L). The majority of participants (87%) were aged up to 24 months (median age 14 months, IQR 10-18 months). Fifty-four percent of the study participants were male. In many patients, there was a history of recent fever, gastroenteritis or diarrhea, acute otitis media, and viral infection. A seasonal peak was observed in autumn-early winter, but this may be a detection bias. CONCLUSION: Benign transient hyperphosphatasemia seems to be a disorder described among otherwise healthy infants and children, which resolves spontaneously. Other known causes of markedly elevated serum ALP should be excluded, especially bone and liver disease. Higher awareness and recognition of this benign condition are important in order to avoid unnecessary tests and parental anxiety. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Benign transient hyperphosphatasemia is a benign condition characterized by greatly increased serum alkaline phosphatase without laboratory or clinical evidence of underlying bone or liver disease, which usually resolves spontaneously, with no intervention. WHAT IS NEW: • In the case of an incidental finding of high serum alkaline phosphatase in an otherwise healthy infant or child with no other clinical or laboratory suspicion of bone or liver disease, we recommend repeating the alkaline phosphatase level within a few months in order to confirm the resolution of this condition. • When benign transient hyperphosphatasemia is suspected, a "wait and see" approach is optimal in order to avoid unnecessary investigations and parental anxiety.


Assuntos
Fosfatase Alcalina , Hepatopatias , Humanos , Masculino , Criança , Lactente , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hepatopatias/diagnóstico , Osso e Ossos , Diarreia
4.
Prev Med ; 55(4): 285-291, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22906808

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of self-experience multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention on health care providers (HCPs), patients and clinics. METHODS: We randomized 15 primary-care clinics (serving 93,821 members), matched by patient profile, to provide the HCPs, either intervention or control HMO program. We followed personally 77 HCPs and 496 patients, and evaluated clinical measurement rate (CMR) changes (January-September 2010; Israel). RESULTS: HCPs within the intervention group demonstrated personal improvement in health initiative attitudes (p<0.05 vs. baseline), and a decrease in salt intake (p<0.05 vs. control). HCP intervention group's patients exhibited overall improvement in dietary patterns, specifically in salt, red meat (p<0.05 vs. baseline), fruit, and vegetable (p<0.05 vs. control) intake. Height, lipids, HbA1(C) and CMR increased within the intervention group's clinics (p<0.05 vs. baseline) with increased referral to angiography tests (p<0.05 vs. control). Within the intervention group, HCPs' salt pattern improvement was associated with increased lipid CMR (r=0.71; p=0.048), and lower HCPs' body weight was associated with increased blood pressure (r=-0.81; p=0.015) and lipid (r=-0.69; p=0.058) CMR. CONCLUSIONS: HCPs' personal lifestyles are directly correlated with their clinical performance. Interventions to promote health through HCP's self-experience are valuable and somewhat haloed to patients and clinics, suggesting an adjunct strategy in primary prevention.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde , Estilo de Vida , Relações Médico-Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Feminino , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Cultura Organizacional , Autoimagem , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Estados Unidos
5.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur ; 25(6): 509-18, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22946234

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The developing generic market has huge advantages of availability and affordability of therapy. The question of whether a therapeutic equivalent substitute under an unfamiliar name may cause confusion that leads to medical errors has not been sufficiently studied. This paper seeks to answer this question. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The study was triggered following sporadic reports according to which patients mistakenly consider therapeutic equivalents as unrelated medications rather than substitutes. Family physicians and pharmacists in one of eight districts of Clalit, Israel's largest healthcare provider were surveyed. The survey's questions recall episodes of medication uncertainty, confusion, misidentification, and medication mistakes associated with switching from one therapeutic equivalent to another. A total of 66 physicians and 63 pharmacists responded to the surveys (61 percent and 45 percent, respectively). FINDINGS: The results recall uncertainty, confusion, misidentification, and mainly cases of medication mistakes in which patients consumed both therapeutic equivalents simultaneously as was reported by 81 percent of physicians and 70 percent of pharmacists. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: There are two limitations in this work, the first is the study type, which is recall survey; the second is the response rate which is not unusual among health care professionals. However, the high face-validity and the consistency of the findings in both physicians and pharmacists surveyed indicates high validity of the study conclusions. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: A practical implication is unique medication error of consuming both therapeutic equivalents simultaneously. The authors wish to raise awareness of the potential of such error, which may be difficult to disclose as each of the therapeutic equivalents is apparently the intended medication but consuming them simultaneously results practically in doubling the intended dose. Given the forecast for generic market growth, awareness is not enough and worldwide regulatory cooperation should be made otherwise these types of medication errors will inevitably emerge. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The study is original as a literature search revealed no studies evaluating potential medication mistakes attributed to a switch between therapeutic equivalents.


Assuntos
Medicamentos Genéricos , Erros de Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Farmacêuticos , Médicos de Família , Equivalência Terapêutica
6.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(8)2022 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35893816

RESUMO

We aimed to examine rates of COVID-19 vaccination to elucidate the need for targeted public health interventions. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical files of all adults registered in a central district in Israel from 1 January 2021 to 31 March 2022. The population was characterized by vaccination status against COVID-19 and the number of doses received. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify predictors of low vaccination rates that required targeted interventions. Of the 246,543 subjects included in the study, 207,911 (84.3%) were vaccinated. The minority groups of ultra-Orthodox Jews and Arabs had lower vaccination rates than the non-ultra-Orthodox Jews (68.7%, 80.5% and 87.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). Adults of low socioeconomic status (SES) had lower vaccination rates compared to those of high SES (74.4% vs. 90.8%, p < 0.001). Adults aged 20−59 years had a lower vaccination rate than those ≥60 years (80.0% vs. 92.1%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified five independent variables that were significantly (p < 0.001) associated with low vaccination rates: minority groups of the ultra-Orthodox sector and Arab population, and underlying conditions of asthma, smoking and diabetes mellitus (odds ratios: 0.484, 0.453, 0.843, 0.901 and 0.929, respectively). Specific targeted public health interventions towards these subpopulations with significantly lower rates of vaccination are suggested.

7.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 1038308, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36714648

RESUMO

Objective: Three aims: to elucidate determinants associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake in children and the association with parental vaccination; to compare rates of PCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 results between vaccinated and unvaccinated children; to estimate the rate of parental COVID-19 vaccination and its association with the vaccination rate of their children. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all children aged 5-11 years registered at a central district in Israel from November 21st, 2021 to April 30th, 2022, and characterized COVID-19 vaccinated vs. unvaccinated individuals. Data retrieved from the electronic medical files included: demographics [age, gender, sector, socioeconomic status (SES)]; COVID-19 vaccination (first and second doses) and influenza vaccination status; co-morbidities; and parental vaccinations for COVID-19. We divided the population into three distinct demographic groups: non-ultra-orthodox Jews (43,889 children), ultra-orthodox Jews (13,858 children), and Arabs (4,029 children). Results: Of the 61,776 children included in the study, 20,355 (32.9%) received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccination rates were similar amongst males and females and were higher in children aged 9-11 years compared to children aged 5-6 years. Multivariate analysis identified five independent determinants that were significantly (p < 0.001) associated with low vaccination rates: Arab and ultra-orthodox sectors (odds ratios: 0.235 and 0.617, respectively); children aged 5-8 years; children of low SES; and children who had not received previous seasonal influenza vaccination. Relatively high vaccination rates were noted amongst children with the following medical co-morbidities: treatment with biological agents (42.9%); solid tumor transplantation (42.9%); type 1 diabetes mellitus (38.5%), asthma (38.2%), and attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (37.6%). Regarding the uptake of two vaccine doses among children with co-morbidities, it was highest in those with type 1 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, treatment with biological agents, asthma and obesity. Conclusion: This study highlights several pediatric sub-populations with low and high vaccine uptake. It is essential to focus on determinants associated with low vaccination rates.

8.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 41(11): 927-932, 2022 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35980828

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to elucidate variables associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine compliance in adolescents and devise targeted interventions. Our secondary aim was to compare the rates of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, hospitalizations and deaths between vaccinated and unvaccinated adolescents. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic medical records was performed on all adolescents 12-17 years of age registered at Clalit Health District in Israel during January 1, 2021, to November 18, 2021, with characterization by vaccination status against COVID-19. Univariate and multivariable analyses were employed to identify predictors of vaccination. RESULTS: Of the 43,919 subjects included in the study, 28,207 (64.2%) were vaccinated. Non-ultraorthodox Jewish adolescents had a higher vaccination rate than the minorities Arabs or ultraorthodox Jews (72.5%, 66.2% and 40.5%, respectively, P < 0.001). Adolescents of high socioeconomic status had nearly 2-fold higher vaccination rates than those of low socioeconomic status (80.4% vs 42.3%; P < 0.0001). Adolescents 16-17 years old had a higher rate of COVID-19 vaccination than those 12-15 years old (72.5% vs 60.6%, P < 0.001), as were girls versus boys (64.7% vs 63.8%, P = 0.047). Multivariate analysis identified 3 independent variables that were significantly ( P < 0.001) associated with low vaccination: ultraorthodox sector, Arab population, and underlying obesity (hazard rations 0.42, 0.72 and 0.84, respectively). Vaccination was significantly associated with reduced severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, hospitalization and death ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study highlights several pediatric populations with low COVID-19 vaccine compliance. Targeted interventions aimed at these populations are suggested with consideration of their special cultural, social and societal characteristics.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adolescente , Árabes , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Judeus , Masculino , Vacinação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA