The clinical outcome of balloon-assisted maturation procedure between autogenous radiocephalic fistula and brachiocephalic fistula in a single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Balloon-assisted maturation (BAM) by an endovascular method plays an important role in treating an immature arteriovenous fistula. However, the results between radiocephalic fistula and brachiocephalic fistula were rarely reported. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and outcome of BAM in different sites of autogenous arteriovenous fistulas. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent BAM procedures from January 2015 to December 2016. Of 148 patients, 117 and 31 patients had a radiocephalic fistula (RC) and a brachiocephalic fistula (BC), respectively. The primary outcome was BAM success. Data regarding fistula lesions, balloon types and size, frequency of procedures, and maturation time were collected for BAMs. The secondary outcome was the patency of a fistula in the follow-up period. RESULTS: No difference was observed in procedure of BAM frequency between the RC and BC groups. The total success rate was 77.7%, without significant difference between the RC and BC groups (81.20% vs 64.50%; P = .055). Within the procedures, the culprit lesion of juxta-anastomosis segment (73.5% vs 25.5%; P < .001) and arterial inlet (21.2% vs 7.8%; P = .04) were more common in the RC group, whereas the venous outlet was more common in the BC group (88.2% vs 57.7%; P < .001). Both groups had an equivalent patency rate after the BAM within the follow-up period (P = .272). CONCLUSIONS: BAM was an effective procedure for immature fistulas, without significant difference between RCs and BCs. Through the procedure, the culprit lesions causing non-maturation were found to be different between the two groups. The patency rate between the two groups after surgery seems to be equivalent within the follow-up period.

Outpatient Percutaneous Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of outpatient percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic repair (PEVAR) versus inpatient PEVAR without or with adjunct procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and June 2019, a cohort of 359 patients comprising 168 (46.8%) outpatients and 191 (53.2%) inpatients who had undergone PEVAR were enrolled. All the patients were asymptomatic but had indications for endovascular aortic repair, ie, fit for intravenous anesthesia and anatomically feasible with standard devices. Patient sex, age, comorbidities, smoking status, type of anesthesia, adjunct procedures, type of graft device, operative times, mortality, complications, and readmissions were analyzed. RESULTS: Median follow-up period was 16.5 months (interquartile range, 9-31 months). Except for a higher percentage of tobacco use (42.6% vs 28.8%; P = .04), dyslipidemia (39.7% vs 19.2%; P < .01), and use of local anesthesia (99.4% vs 82.2%; P < .01) in the outpatients, there was no significant difference in the type of graft and adjunct procedures used. No outpatient mortality occurred. There was no difference in the number, severity, and onset of complications (all P > .05). Outpatient unexpected same-day admission, 30-day readmission, and emergency department visit rates were 4.8%, 2.4% (P = .13), and 10% (P < .01), respectively. Operative times for outpatient PEVAR without adjunct procedures were shorter (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient PEVAR can be performed with a safety profile similar to that of inpatient PEVAR. The unexpected same-day admission, 30-day readmission, and emergency department visit rates were low. The outpatient PEVARs without adjunct procedures took less time.

Comparison between Totally Percutaneous Approach and Femoral Artery Cut-Down in Endovascular Aortic Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a Single Hospital.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term outcome of totally percutaneous endovascular aortic repair (pEVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) compared with femoral cut-down endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients with ruptured AAAs that underwent EVAR between March 2010 and April 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, preoperative vital signs, preoperative laboratory data, method of anesthesia, procedure duration, aneurysm morphology, brand of device used, length of hospital stay, access complications, and short-term outcomes were recorded. Univariate as well as multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Among 77 patients with ruptured AAAs, 17 (22.1%) received cEVAR and 60 (77.9%) received pEVAR. Significant differences in the procedure time (P = 0.004), method of anesthesia (P = 0.040), and 30-day mortality (P = 0.037) were detected between the cEVAR and pEVAR groups. Local anesthesia plus intravenous general anesthesia (odds ratio = 0.141, P = 0.018) was an independent factor associated with 30-day mortality and local anesthesia was better than general anesthesia for 24-hr mortality (P = 0.001) and 30-day mortality (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In patients with ruptured AAAs, pEVAR procedures took less time than cEVAR procedures, but the length of hospital stay did not differ significantly. The 30-day mortality rate was lower with pEVAR than with cEVAR. Local anesthesia may be the key factor in EVAR to improved technical and clinical success.

Total Resection of Infected Peripheral Hemodialysis Grafts Has a Favorable Impact on Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection could be an eradication treatment for patients with infected hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of 3 surgical methods, including total resection, subtotal resection, and revision. METHODS: The patients who underwent surgical excision of infected AVGs performed at a single center from August 2012 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The following 3 surgical methods were used in our study: revision, subtotal resection, and total resection. Patients' demographics, medical history, perioperative details, reconstruction time, and follow-up data were collected. The outcomes including perioperative complications (within 30 days), mortality, reinfection rate of AVGs, with new access reconstruction or not, and the outcomes between reconstruction and nonreconstruction in the follow-up period were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-one patients had infected AVGs in our study. Patients' mean age was 62 years, and 65.9% of the patients were female. The mean duration from the time of diagnosis to the operation was 14.4 days. Signs and symptoms at presentation included fever (51.2 %), swelling (43.9%), pain (58.5%), erythematous change (92.7%), and more severe features, such as altered consciousness (14.6%) and hypotension (12.2%). The pathological changes in the infected grafts included bleeding (29.3%), pus formation (73.2%), pseudoaneurysm (26.8%), and graft exposure (17.1%). Wound and graft cultures revealed an infectious etiology with fungi (7.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.2%), Enterococcus spp. (2.4%), and Staphylococcus spp. (58.5%), with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus accounting for only 7.3%. Total resection, subtotal resection, and revision surgery were performed in 17.1%, 63.4%, and 19.5% of patients, respectively. Seven patients with complications required reoperation (17.1%), and adhesion ileus and hospital-acquired pneumonia occurred in only 2.4% and 7.3% of patients, respectively. During follow-up, most patients (82.9%) had reconstruction of the peripheral hemodialysis access with mean time of 64.3 (range: 21-92) days; mean time of use of new access was 90.5 days; and mean time of removal of catheter was about 106.3 days. Mortality rates in patients without and with reconstructed AV access during follow-up were 50% and 18%, respectively (P < 0.004). Eight cases (19.5%) had recurrence of AV access infections during follow-up; of these, 2 had revision surgery and 6 had subtotal resection. However, no patient with total resection had recurrent infections. CONCLUSIONS: The total resection group had no recurrent infection compared to the subtotal and revision groups. In addition, patients with reconstruction of peripheral hemodialysis access had a low mortality rate during the follow-up period.

Response Findings after Treatment and Outcomes on CT after Endovascular Repair of Mycotic Aortic Aneurysm.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate post-treatment computed tomography (CT) findings and outcomes of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for mycotic aortic aneurysm (MAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data of patients with MAA who underwent EVAR from June 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 22 patients were included (19 men and 3 women). The periaortic features of the MAA regression after EVAR were graded and evaluated by follow-up CT. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 36.5 months (range, 0.5-97 months.). The cumulative survival rate at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years was 95.5%, 86.4%, 81.6%, and 73.4%, respectively. The early and late infection-related complication (IRC) rate was 18.2% and 13.6%, respectively. One patient died within 1 month from severe acidosis and shock. Of the other patients, the median time to stable response of the MAA was 6 months (range, 3-36 months). Fourteen patients (66.7%) showed early response of the MAA, while 7 patients (33.3%) showed delayed response. A significant association was observed between delayed response and late IRCs (P = .026). CONCLUSIONS: The post-EVAR periaortic features on follow-up CT aid in monitoring the treatment response of the MAA. Early response of the MAA was associated with a low rate of late IRCs and might aid in adjusting the antibiotic duration after the patient has achieved complete or nearly complete regression of the MAA.

Use of the Octopus Technique for Endovascular Treatment of Complex Aortic Lesions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate feasibility and effectiveness using the octopus endograft technique to treat complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endovascular repair of CAAs, including thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAAs) and dissections involving major side branches, was performed at a single center from June 2014 to June 2017. Patients included 9 men and 2 women (mean age, 60.5 y; range, 40-89 y) were included. The octopus technique was applied using standard aortic grafts with branch stent grafts to preserve the renovisceral arteries. RESULTS: Aortic pathologies comprised 3 mycotic aneurysms, 2 chronic dissections with acute rupture, 1 progressively enlarging chronic type B dissection, 1 acutely ruptured TAAA, and 4 unruptured TAAAs. Mean procedural and fluoroscopic times were 562 min (range, 324-840 min) and 183 min (range, 73-338 min), respectively. Three patients died within 1 month. Mean duration of follow-up was 26.3 months (range, 8-42 months) for remaining patients. Technical success rate of target vessel stent placement was 89.7% (35/39). Major complication rate was 45.5% (5/11), including 3 deaths, 1 permanent paraplegia, and 1 temporary paraplegia that resolved in 2 months. All 3 mycotic aneurysms with mean duration of follow-up of 29 months (range, 8-42 months) were excluded successfully without endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: The octopus technique is feasible for treatment of CAAs requiring urgent management or with difficult anatomy without the use of available custom-made or off-the-shelf branched devices. The procedure carries substantial morbidity and mortality and requires further investigation for its long-term durability.

A prospective randomized study of stent graft placement after balloon angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of hemodialysis patients with prosthetic graft outflow stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis graft outflow stenosis is a significant complication occurring in hemodialysis patients with prosthetic grafts for vascular access. Balloon angioplasty remains the first-line endovascular treatment of this complication, although covered stent graft implantation after balloon angioplasty also appears to be an effective and promising treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and durability of stent graft placement after balloon angioplasty in comparison to balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of graft outflow stenosis in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized study of 98 patients with clinically significant dialysis graft outflow stenosis treated in the vascular surgery section of a tertiary medical center. The patients were randomized into two groups; 49 patients were treated with stent graft placement after balloon angioplasty, and 49 patients were treated with balloon angioplasty alone. All patients underwent angiography of the graft site at 3 and 6 months after intervention, and restenosis rates were compared between the two groups. In addition, the duration of postintervention primary patency in the two groups was recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The postintervention restenosis rate of the stent graft placement group was superior to that seen in the balloon angioplasty alone group (9% vs 69% at 3 months [P < .0001] and 29% vs 72% at 6 months [P < .0001]). The mean postintervention primary patency duration was 380.22 ± 28.54 days for the stent graft placement group and 151.08 ± 16.79 days for the balloon angioplasty alone group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of stent grafts in hemodialysis patients with graft outflow stenosis yielded superior results compared with the results seen in hemodialysis patients treated with balloon angioplasty alone. Patients treated with stent grafts after balloon angioplasty had a lower restenosis rate and a longer duration of postintervention primary patency. The placement of a stent graft after balloon angioplasty appears to be an optimal therapeutic approach for the treatment of hemodialysis patients with graft outflow stenosis.

Treatment of infected abdominal aortic aneurysm caused by Salmonella.

BACKGROUND: We reviewed the outcomes of patients treated for nontyphoidal Salmonella-infected abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment at a single center. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 26 patients with nontyphoidal Salmonella-infected AAA. Four patients underwent medical therapy alone, while 22 patients underwent surgical therapy. Revascularization method selection was dependent on preoperative antibiotic response in the surgical therapy group. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate for the surgical therapy group was 14%, while the rate for the medical therapy group was 100%. Overall survival for the surgical therapy group was 82%, while the reinfection rate was 9%. In the surgical therapy group, 2 patients had periaortic abscesses and underwent in situ prosthetic graft replacement; none developed graft-related complications or died in the hospital. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing revealed no significant differences in graft-related complication and overall survival rates between in situ prosthetic graft group and extra-anatomic bypass group. Salmonella choleraesuis had a higher antimicrobial resistance rate than other isolates. The predictors of survival were clinical presentation of abdominal pain and receiving surgical therapy. CONCLUSIONS: If patients with Salmonella-infected AAAs have good responses to preoperative antibiotic therapy, in situ prosthetic graft replacement is a viable revascularization method, even in the situation of periaortic abscess presentation formation.

A single-center study of vascular access sites for intravenous ports.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the use of intravenous ports and provides a guide related to clinical decision making. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 1505 patients who had received intravenous ports at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in 2006. The relationships between the complications and entry routes were assessed. The intervention-free periods were also determined and compared. The patients were followed up until June 2010. RESULTS: Of the 1543 procedures performed, 412 were reinterventions to treat complications, most of which corresponded to fewer than 0.1 episodes per 1000 catheter-days; these were not associated with any particular entry route. There was a higher catheter fracture rate when the right subclavian vein was chosen as the entry vessel (p < 0.05). The intervention-free period ranged from 207 to 533 days. CONCLUSION: The subclavian vein is not recommended for the use of intravenous ports. There is not only a higher risk of iatrogenic pneumothorax or hemothorax using this entry route but also a higher fracture rate, which may be caused by pinch-off syndrome. The greater saphenous vein should only be considered when the patient has superior vena cava syndrome. However, a higher incidence of infection and a lower device survival rate should be expected with this location.

Analysis of chest X-ray plain film images of intravenous ports inserted via the superior vena cava.

PURPOSES: The optimal tip position for an intravenous port and the angle between the locking nut and the catheter are still debatable. This study evaluates the use of chest X-ray plain films for screening patients with potential intravenous port complications. METHODS: We reviewed, retrospectively, 1505 patients who had an intravenous port implanted between January 1 and December 31, 2006 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and were followed up until June 30, 2010. Of the 1119 patients with an intravenous port implanted via the superior vena cava (SVC), 279 underwent re-interventions for complications. There were four different types of single lumen port, and entry vessels on the right side were utilized as the predominant entry sites through the vessel cut-down method for catheter cannulation. The anatomic catheter tip was confirmed on the postero-anterior view of plain chest X-ray films. We used the Picture Arching and Communicating System (PACS) (GE, Fairfield, CT, USA) to record the angle and distance in degrees and centimeters, respectively. RESULTS: The tracheal carina was seen easily on the chest X-ray plain film and the location of the catheter tip and the angle between the locking nut and the catheter were identified. The location of the catheter tip was significantly related to migration (p < 0.0001). The cut-off value of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for location and migration was 0.68 cm below the carina. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.8385 and had favorable predictive power. CONCLUSION: The ideal position of an intravenous port to avoid migration is 0.68 cm below the carina. For surgeons, a quantified reference may minimize technical errors. Patients with shallow tip location should be followed up regularly and aggressive intervention initiated for any intravenous port malfunction.

Long-term efficacy and risk factors of balloon-assisted maturation for radial-cephalic arteriovenous fistula with small-caliber veins.

INTRODUCTION: Balloon angioplasty maturation (BAM) is a salvage method for autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation failure. AVF creation using small-diameter veins is considered to have poor outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the long-term patency of small-diameter veins (≤3 mm) using BAM. METHODS: BAM was performed if the fistula failed to mature and function adequately to provide prescribed dialysis. FINDINGS: Out of 61 AVFs, 22 AVFs successfully matured without further intervention (AVF group) and 39 AVFs failed to mature. Except for 1 patient who required peritoneal dialysis, the remaining 38 patients received salvage BAM, and 36 of those successful matured (BAM group). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences between the AVF and BAM groups in terms of primary functional patency (p = 0.503) and assisted functional patency (p = 0.499). Compared with the AVF group, the BAM group had similar assisted primary functional patency (1-year: 94.7% vs. 93.1%; 3-year: 88.0% vs. 93.1%; 5-year: 79.2% vs. 88.3%). In addition, there were no significant difference between groups in the duration of primary functional patency and assisted primary functional patency (p > 0.05). Multivariate analyses showed that vein diameter and number of BAM procedures were independent predictors of primary functional patency in the AVF group and BAM group, respectively. Patient with 1 mm increase in vein size had 0.13-fold probability of having decreased duration of patency (HR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.99, p = 0.049), while patients who received two times of BAM procedures were 2.885 as likely to have decreased duration of primary functional patency (HR = 2.885, 95% CI: 1.09-7.63, p = 0.033) than patients who received one BAM procedure. DISCUSSION: BAM is a relatively effective salvage management option with an acceptable long-term patency rate, even for small cephalic veins.

High pulse pressure predicts primary arteriovenous fistula failure within 1 year.

BACKGROUND: The arteriovenous fistula is the preferred access route for hemodialysis, although its high primary failure rate remains a clinical challenge. Multiple studies have attempted to determine the risk factors for primary arteriovenous fistula failure; however, none have identified pulse pressure as a potential predictive marker. High pulse pressure is a surrogate poor arterial compliance endpoint and leads to inferior cardiovascular outcomes. Our aim was to determine whether elevated pulse pressure indicates poor arteriovenous fistula maturation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 274 patients who underwent an arteriovenous fistula index operation between September 1, 2018 and May 31, 2019. Demographic, clinical data, and operative parameters were collected and analyzed. The maximum follow-up period was 365 days. Arteriovenous fistula failure was defined as the inability to achieve functional use during the follow-up period. We identified risk factors for arteriovenous fistula failure by performing a multivariate logistic regression analysis using backward elimination procedures. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients were included in the study. The patients' average age was 61.3 ± 14.0 years, approximately half of the patients (n = 161, 58.8%) were male, and the majority had hypertension. At the end of the follow-up period, 68 (24.8%) had arteriovenous fistula failure. The proportion of patients with pulse pressure values of >60 mmHg was significantly higher in the failure group than in the maturation group (66.0% vs 80.9%; p = 0.021). A PP value of >60 mmHg (odds ratio = 2.25; 95% confidence interval = 1.14-4.42; p = 0.019) and coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction (odds ratio = 1.97; 95% confidence interval = 1.01-3.84; p = 0.045) were found to be independent risk factors for primary arteriovenous fistula failure. CONCLUSIONS: High pulse pressure is an independent risk factor for primary arteriovenous fistula failure.

Drug-coated balloon for early recurrent arteriovenous fistula dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To report the efficacy and safety of a drug-coated balloon (Ranger, Boston Scientific) in patients with dysfunctional autogenous arteriovenous fistula. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, prospective observational cohort study, 25 participants with dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula were enrolled from January 2018 to June 2019. The drug-coated balloon was applied after successful vessel preparation by high-pressure balloon angioplasty. The primary endpoint was the target lesion primary patency rate at 6 months. The secondary outcome included anatomical and clinical success rate, postoperative major adverse events within 30 days, and the target lesion primary patency rate at 12 months. Statistical analysis of the data was performed. The χ test or Fisher's exact test was used for analyzing categorical variables, and continuous variables were analyzed using Student's t-test. Also, Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the target lesion primary patency days with the log-rank test. RESULTS: At 6 months, the target lesion primary patency rate was 68% in the drug-coated balloon treatment group. The anatomical and clinical success rates were 100%. One patient had thrombosed access 10 days after the index procedure, and two died of cardiovascular events 4 months after the operation. Subgroup analysis showed that the early recurrent stenosis group had non-inferior mean drug-coated balloon primary patency days (less than 90 days after prior percutaneous angioplasty, n = 10) compared with the late recurrence group (prior PTA patency days more than 90 days, n = 10), 179.3 ± 102.9 versus 257.1 ± 71 days (p = 0.153). DCB angioplasty had significant improvement in primary patency days for early recurrent stenosis (67.7 ± 19.3 vs 179.3 ± 102.9, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated the appliance of Ranger DCB in stenotic AVFs is a safe and effective treatment modality, especially for early recurrent AVF stenosis.

Risk factors and possible mechanisms of superior vena cava intravenous port malfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors leading to catheter malfunction. BACKGROUND: Reliable venous access is crucial for cancer patients. Malfunction of intravenous ports may lead to discontinuation of treatment and repeated interventions. We retrospectively reviewed the independent risk factors for catheter malfunction among patients receiving intravenous port implantations. METHODS: A total of 1508 procedures were included from the calendar year 2006, and clinical data and chest plain films were analyzed. The patients were followed-up until June 30, 2010. For patients still alive, the last outpatient follow-up date was considered as the end point. For the remaining patients, the date of death or discharge against advice was considered as the end points. The risk factors for catheter malfunction were then evaluated. RESULTS: The intervention-free periods of the malfunction group and nonmalfunction group were 317 and 413 days, respectively. Statistical analyses showed that the Nut-Catheter Angle was the only risk factor for catheter malfunction (P = 0.001). A logistic model also confirmed that the Nut-Catheter Angle was the only risk factor for catheter malfunction (P < 0.001). Valve tip catheters were not advantageous with regard to catheter malfunction prevention as compared to open tip catheters. CONCLUSIONS: A smaller Nut-Catheter Angle had a greater risk for catheter malfunction. Catheter impingement caused by inadequate pocket creation and port implantation lead to compromised catheter lumen and difficulty flushing. The possibility of retained blood and medications increased thin thrombotic biofilm formation and medication precipitation. Catheter malfunctions can be avoided by using proper surgical techniques and adequate maintenance.

Treatment of primary infected aortic aneurysm without aortic resection.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of two different treatment strategies for patients with primary infected aortic aneurysms, including antibiotic treatment alone and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with aggressive antibiotic treatment, as alternatives to the established treatment of open surgical repair. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who were treated for infected aortic aneurysm without undergoing aortic resection from January 2000 to December 2010 at a single institution. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients underwent traditional open repair during the study period. Sixteen patients with infected aortic aneurysm (11 men; median age, 70; range, 44-80 years) were identified as not having undergone aortic resection during the 11 years reviewed in the study. Nine patients received antibiotic treatment only (group I) and seven patients underwent EVAR with aggressive antibiotic treatment (group II). Salmonella species were isolated from seven patients in group I, and oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from the remaining two patients. In group II, six patients had blood culture results showing Salmonella species and one patient had a blood culture result showing Escherichia coli. Group I (7 of 9 patients; 78%) had a higher hospital mortality rate than group II (0%; P = .003). Mean follow-up among survivors was 10 ± 15 months (range, 1-37 months). One patient in group II developed a reinfection episode (14%). There was no significant difference between group I (67%; SE, 27.2%) and group II (86%; SE, 13.2%) in the 3-month survival rates (log-rank, P = .39). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the premise that EVAR is beneficial for the patients with infected aortic aneurysm. Treating an infected aortic aneurysm with antibiotics alone could not stop aneurysm expansion and eradicate the aortic infection before the aneurysm ruptures. For the patients with infected aortic aneurysms who have limited life expectancy and multiple comorbidities, EVAR with aggressive antibiotic treatment should be considered preferentially over antibiotic treatment alone.

Safety of the endovascular aneurysm repair procedure: real-world evidence using interrupted-time series analysis.

OBJECTIVES: In Taiwan, endovascular aneurysm repair for treating abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) was introduced in 2004 and became reimbursable in February 2010. We evaluated the real-world practice and safety of endovascular aneurysm repair in Taiwan. METHODS: Patients who underwent repair operations for AAA (open or endovascular) from 2000 to 2016 were enrolled (n = 11485). Outcome statistics (during the index hospitalization: length of stay, rate of ischaemic bowel disease and 30-day mortality; after discharge: 30-day readmission rate, 2-year mortality, 2-year reintervention rate and 2-year paraplegia rate) were calculated for each half-year cohort. Propensity score-based stabilized weights were used to balance covariates among each half-year cohort. Interrupted time-series analysis was then performed. RESULTS: The elective and emergency ratio of AAA repair was 50:50 from 2000 to 2004 and became 60:40 from 2010 to 2016. The half-year rate of endovascular aneurysm repair was 0% in 2000 to 2004/06, 83.16% in 2010 and 98.1% in 2016. Interrupted time series analysis revealed that after endovascular aneurysm repair became reimbursable, both elective and emergency groups had a reduction in length of stay (-4.2 days, P < 0.0001; -1.5 days, P = 0.0928) and 30-day mortality (-5.22%, P = 0.0702; -7.76%, P = 0.0086) but a significant increase in the reintervention rate (5.05%, P = 0.0031; 4.36%, P = 0.0097). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular aneurysm repair was predominantly used in treating AAAs after it was reimbursed in Taiwan. Endovascular aneurysm repair is efficacious regarding short-term outcomes but increased the 2-year reintervention rate in both groups.

Increased intra-abdominal haemorrhage after thoracic endovascular aortic replacement in patients with concomitant blunt aortic injuries and abdominal trauma: a National Trauma Data Bank analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The role of thoracic endovascular aortic replacement (TEVAR) in patients with concomitant blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) and blunt abdomen trauma (BAT) was evaluated using nationwide real-world data. The risk of post-TEVAR abdominal haemorrhage was studied. METHODS: Patients with BTAI and BAT in the National Trauma Data Bank were retrospectively studied. Propensity score matching was used to evaluate the effect of TEVAR in delayed abdominal surgeries for haemostasis and the delayed need for blood transfusion. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent risk factors for delayed intra-abdominal haemorrhage in these patients. RESULTS: A total of 928 concomitant BTAI and BAT patients were studied (TEVAR versus non-TEVAR, 206 vs 722). After a well-balanced propensity score matching analysis, patients who received TEVAR had significantly more delayed abdominal surgeries for haemostasis (7.7% vs 4.5%, standardized mean difference = 0.316) and delayed need for blood transfusion (11.6% vs 7.1%, standardized mean difference = 0.299) than those who did not. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that TEVAR increased the need for delayed abdominal surgeries (odds ratio = 2.026, P = 0.034). Among the patients who underwent TEVAR, the patients with delayed abdominal surgeries for haemostasis had a significantly higher proportion of severe abdominal injury (abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 4 or 5) than patients without delayed abdominal surgeries for haemostasis (31.6% vs 15.5%, P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with concomitant BTAI and BAT had a higher risk of intra-abdominal haemorrhage after TEVAR, especially patients with severe abdominal trauma.

Mono or Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Treating Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease after Lower Extremity Revascularization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) after lower-limb intervention remains controversial. Currently, the prescription of DAPT after an intervention is not fully recommended in guidelines due to limited evidence. This study compares and analyzes the prognosis for symptomatic PAD patients receiving DAPT versus monotherapy after lower-limb revascularization. Up to November 2021, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies reporting the efficacy, duration, and bleeding complications when either DAPT or monotherapy were used to treat PAD patients after revascularization. Three randomized controlled trials and seven nonrandomized controlled trials were included in our study. In total, 74,651 patients made up these ten studies. DAPT in PAD patients after intervention was associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79−0.94; p < 0.01), major adverse limb events (HR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47−0.78; p < 0.01), and major amputation (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64−0.96) when follow-up was for more than 1-year. DAPT was not associated with major bleeding events when compared with monotherapy (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.69−2.18; p = 0.50) but was associated with a higher rate of minor bleeding as a complication (OR = 2.54; 95% CI, 1.59−4.08; p < 0.01). More prospective randomized studies are needed to provide further solid evidence regarding the important issue of prescribing DAPT.

Clinical outcomes of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy in the treatment of May-Thurner syndrome-related deep venous thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is an anatomic stenotic variation associated with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the left leg. The classical DVT treatment strategy is medical treatment without thrombus removal. This study was performed to assess the clinical outcomes of the combination of AngioJet™ rheolytic thrombectomy and stenting for treatment of MTS-related DVT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated for MTS-related DVT from January 2017 to June 2020 at a single institution. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (nine women) underwent AngioJet™ rheolytic thrombectomy for MTS-related DVT during the study period. The median DVT onset time was 8 days (interquartile range (IQR), 3-21 days). The median procedure time was 130 minutes (IQR, 91-189 minutes), and the median hospital stay was 7 days (IQR, 5-26 days). One patient had a residual thrombus and occluded iliac stent and underwent adjuvant catheter-directed thrombolysis for revascularization. The primary patency rate for the iliac stent was 92.9% at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Concomitant AngioJet™ rheolytic thrombectomy and stenting of MTS-induced lesions may be beneficial for patients with MTS-related DVT.

In situ versus extra-anatomic reconstruction for primary infected infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: There is no standard procedure for revascularization after infected infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm resection. This study examines the outcomes of two contemporary methods. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records for patients who underwent repair of infected infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms from January 1998 to December 2007 at a single institution. Patients with infected prosthetic aortic grafts were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (22 men; mean age, 65 ± 12) had in situ graft (group I, n = 13) or extra-anatomic bypass (group II, n = 15), with a mean follow-up of 22 months. Mean hospital lengths of stay were 36 ± 16 days for group I and 46 ± 17 days for group II. Overall perioperative mortality was 5 of 28 (18%), comprising 1 of 13 in group I (8%) and 4 of 15 in group II (27%; P = .333). No early or late vascular-related complications occurred in group I. In group II, three patients had early vascular-related complications, including, graft infection, graft occlusion and ischemia colitis, and five patients had late vascular-related complications, including graft infection and graft occlusion. One patient ultimately lost a limb. Group I had a 0% late complication rate vs 33% in group II (P = .044). For cumulative survival rates, Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing revealed no significant differences between groups I and II. CONCLUSION: In situ graft revascularization is viable in afebrile patients or patients who have good response to preoperative antibiotic therapy. Extra-anatomic bypass grafting for infected infrarenal abdominal aneurysm resection has a similar long-term survival rate and should be considered in patients who are unsuitable for in situ graft revascularization; however, the postoperative complication rate is higher. Further prospective study with large patient populations is needed to determine the selection criteria for using in situ revascularization as alternative methods for treatment of infected abdominal aneurysms.