RESUMO
Time management is one central aspect of students' self-regulated learning. In addition, biased time estimation seems to be central to students' self-regulation of their time. In this study, we explored college students' time estimation bias. In addition, we were interested in whether the activation of task beliefs influenced students' time estimation bias and how specific beliefs about task difficulty influence time estimation bias. Findings suggested that students tended to demonstrate bias in their estimations of the time their academic tasks would take. Additionally, the activation of task beliefs did not influence students' time estimation accuracy. Finally, both prior task difficulty and anticipated difficulty influenced students' time estimation bias. These findings highlight the complexity of students' time estimation bias and point to the opportunities for future directions.
RESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925812.].
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Motivational barriers and lack of knowledge about peer review inhibit creation of supportive peer feedback between nursing students. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of knowledge of peer-review practices and value for the process of creating supportive peer feedback on the quality of feedback nursing students create for their peers. METHOD: Data from 155 graduate nursing students were analyzed in this quasi-experimental, repeated-measures design, using analysis of covariance and conditional process analysis. RESULTS: Students who had high levels of knowledge and a strong sense of value for providing feedback to peers produced higher-quality supportive peer feedback. CONCLUSION: Even when a student has sufficient knowledge and skills to produce supportive peer feedback, their ability may not transfer to real peer-review contexts if they do not also have a strong sense of value for providing high-quality feedback to peers.