Testing a Conceptual Model of Physiologic Reserve, Intrinsic Capacity, and Physical Resilience in Hospitalized Older Patients: A Structural Equation Modelling.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship among physiologic reserve, intrinsic capacity, and physical resilience has not been examined, and a conceptual model that includes these key determinants of healthy ageing is needed. This study aimed to test a conceptual model using real-world data to determine the relationships among physiologic reserve, intrinsic capacity, physical resilience, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This longitudinal study was conducted at a 1,343-bed tertiary-care medical centre. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were 65 years of age or older and able to communicate independently. Demographic factors, cumulative illness rating scale for geriatrics [CIRS-G] (assessing physiologic reserve), intrinsic capacity, physical resilience instrument for older adults [PRIFOR] (assessing physical resilience), and clinical frailty scale [CFS] were collected at admission. The CFS and EuroQoL 5-dimension 3-level questionnaire [EQ5D] were administered at discharge. RESULTS: The mean age of the 413 patients was 76.34 ± 6.72 (52.5% female). Two conceptual models were identified and supported. Specifically, the path coefficients in the two models showed that the CIRS-G had diverse associations with each intrinsic capacity domain, and that all intrinsic capacity domains (except vitality) were significantly associated with PRIFOR. Moreover, PRIFOR was significantly associated with follow-up CFS, baseline control, and EQ5D scores. CONCLUSION: Physiologic reserve positively correlated with the cognitive and locomotive domains of intrinsic capacity. Moreover, older patients with better intrinsic capacity may have improved physical resilience, which may lead to better clinical outcomes. Efforts to improve the intrinsic capacity and physical resilience of older patients are necessary to promote healthy ageing.

[Establishment of Administrative Core Competencies and Evaluation Indicators for Head Nurses].

BACKGROUND: The increasing complexity of the healthcare environment in recent years highlights the importance of cultivating in head nurses the leadership and management competencies necessary to effectively handle complicated administrative tasks and lead nurses in facing various challenges. Identifying the core administrative management competencies required of head nurses and evaluating competency level using behavioral indicators are fundamental to evaluating related training outcomes. PURPOSE: This study was designed to identify the core administrative management competencies required of head nurses as well as the associated job responsibilities, tasks, behavioral evaluation indicators, work outputs, and requisite knowledge and skills. METHODS: This study was conducted in two phases using a qualitative method. The first phase identified the core administrative management competencies and their behavioral definitions. The second phase established competency-related job responsibilities, tasks, behavioral evaluation indicators, work outputs, and requisite knowledge and skills. Each phase consisted of (1) a qualitative interview (first stage) or focus group discussion (second stage) to establish the prototype content; (2) a head nurse workshop to obtain multiple perspectives to modify the prototype content; and (3) a focus group discussion to achieve consensus regarding the content. RESULTS: Nine core competencies related to head nurse administration were identified, including: strategic planning, care supervision, quality improvement, communication, crisis management, responsible leadership, evidence-based practice, digital technology application, and presentation persuasion. Corresponding to these competencies, four responsibilities and associated work tasks were identified. Finally, the related behavioral evaluation indicators, work outputs, and requisite knowledge and skills were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS / IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of this study may be used as the basis for head nurse administrative management training programs, while the identified behavioral evaluation indicators may be used to evaluate head nurse work performance and training outcomes. We recommend other institutions apply the results of this study and develop their own administrative core competencies and evaluation indicators for head nurses.

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR).

BACKGROUND: Physical resilience is known to minimize the adverse outcomes of health stressors for older people. However, validated instruments that assess physical resilience in older adults are rare. Therefore, we aimed to validate the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR) to fill the literature gap. METHODS: Content analysis with content validity was first carried out to generate relevant items assessing physical resilience for older adults, and 19 items were developed. Psychometric evaluation of the 19 items was then tested on 200 older adults (mean [SD] age = 76.4 [6.6] years; 51.0% women) for item properties, factor structure, item fit, internal consistency, criterion-related validity, and known-group validity. RESULTS: All 19 items had satisfactory item properties, as they were normally distributed (skewness = -1.03 to 0.38; kurtosis = -1.05 to 0.32). However, two items were removed due to substantial ceiling effects. The retained 17 items were embedded in three factors as suggested by the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results. All items except one had satisfactory item fit statistics in Rasch model; thus, the unidimensionality was supported for the three factors on 16 items. The retained 16 items showed promising properties in known-group validity, criterion-related validity, and internal consistency (α = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The 16-item PRIFOR exhibits good psychometric properties. Using this instrument to measure physical resilience would be beneficial to identify factors that could protect older people from negative health consequence. With the use of the PRIFOR, intervention effects could also be evaluated. It is helpful to strengthen resilience and thereby facilitate successful aging.

[Self-Perceived Long-Term Care Competency and Its Related Factors Among Nurses Working in cute Care Facilities].

BACKGROUND: In response to the promotion of long-term care policies, nurses in hospitals must not only have professional knowledge related to disease care but also be equipped with care competencies related to long-term care. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the self-perceived competencies of nurses working in acute care facilities with regard to long-term-care and related factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional research design with quota sampling was used. The participants were recruited from registered nurses employed at a medical center in southern Taiwan, and data from 159 valid, returned questionnaires were used in the analysis. The research instruments used included the long-term care competency scale and long-term care-related knowledge, and care intention. T test, Chi-square, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to examine the relationship between the targeted variables and long-term care competency. Regression analysis was used to determine the important determinants of long-term care competency. RESULTS: The average age of the participants was 30.86 years (± 3.38). Most currently worked in the internal medicine department, 93.1% were educated to the university level, 44% had worked for fewer than 5 years, and 32.7% were N3 level nurses. Long-term care competency was found to be significantly and positively correlated with gender (t = 2.06, p = .041), seniority at the facility (F = 2.49, p = .046), job satisfaction (r = .28, p < .001), and long-term care service practices (r = .227, p < .001). After the regression analysis, self-perceived long-term care competency was found to be positively related to job satisfaction and long-term care service practices. CONCLUSIONS / IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of this study suggest that a long-term care training should be incorporated into the regular in-service education program to improve the knowledge and attitudes of nurses with regard to older and disabled patients and to develop their professional role in long-term care. Furthermore, the results may be referenced by nursing supervisors in acute care facilities when making arrangements for nurses to participation in the Clinical Nursing Ladder Program and when arranging nursing staff training and setting the direction of long-term care-related education and training in healthcare facilities.

[Precision Health Care for Older Adults: The Geri-FORCE Case Management System].

Health problems in older adults are often concomitant with multiple comorbidities and geriatric syndromes that involve the psychological and social domains. Traditional models of disease care address the health problems of older adults inadequately. Therefore, we applied a case management framework (assess, plan, act, coordinate, evaluate and interact) to discuss how to implement an elderly-centered approach to integrated care that integrates comprehensive, multidisciplinary, and continuous care. The Geriatrics Formulated by Outcome Related Care & Empowerment (Geri-FORCE) was developed by the Formosan Association of Care and Education for the Seniors to help establish a geriatric case management system grounded in precision health care. We propose developing an informatics technology system for older adults that integrates the Geri-FORCE model with case management. This system should accurately identify the main health problems in older adults and provide a care plan that is patient-tailored, integrated, and continuous. We expect that the developed Geri-FORCE case management system will improve quality of care and promote health while reducing care burdens and costs.

[Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines: Delirium Management in Hospitalized Older Patients].

BACKGROUND: The health problems of hospitalized older patients are complicated, with delirium a common neurocognitive disorder in this population. Delirium has been correlated with the longer periods of hospitalization, higher mortality, and higher rates of institutionalization. However, clinical practice guidelines for delirium management in hospitalized older patients are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop evidence-based practice guidelines for delirium management in hospitalized older patients. METHODS: A multidisciplinary task group at a medical center in southern Taiwan was established. Team members reviewed current delirium practice guidelines. A revised set of practice guidelines was developed by constructing foreground questions on key issues and by systematically searching, appraising, and synthesizing the relevant evidence. After a new draft of the guidelines was established, the Delphi method was used to reach a consensus among experts. Finally, the developed guideline document was applied in a geriatric ward of a medical center in order to evaluate applicability. RESULTS: The developed delirium guidelines address 3 issues with 35 recommendations. The panel of clinical and methodological experts recommended that these delirium guidelines be applied in practice. Most nurses in the targeted geriatric ward indicated that the guidelines were feasible and easy to implement. However, several of the procedures were identified as difficult to implement, including "provide a therapeutic environment", "promote good sleep patterns and sleep hygiene", and "consider psychotropic medication as a last resort for agitation". CONCLUSIONS / IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The evidence-based delirium management guidelines for hospitalized older patients that were developed in this study integrates the recommendations from the best available evidence and earned a high consensus among clinical experts. Thus, these guidelines are recommended for clinical application.

[The effectiveness of far-infrared therapy in hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula: a systematic review].

BACKGROUND: Over 85% of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receive hemodialysis and 80% of hemodialysis patients in Taiwan contract arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Studies have shown that using far infrared therapy (FIR) improves AVF by improving blood flow. However, the systematic literature reviews have been insufficient to make definite conclusions regarding the effectiveness of this intervention. PURPOSE: This paper uses a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the FIR intervention and to explore its effectiveness. METHODS: Researchers searched the following five Chinese and English electronic databases for relevant articles: National Dissertations and Theses, Airiti Library, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, and PubMed/MEDLINE. Keywords including "far infrared therapy", "arteriovenous fistula", and "hemodialysis" were entered. The search was limited to articles published before February 2014. A total of 98 articles that matched the search criteria were extracted. Article topics were screened and repetitions of topics were removed. Three articles met the study inclusion criteria and were selected for further analysis. An assessment of the quality of these 3 studies using the Modified Jadad Scale earned a score of 3. RESULTS: Findings of this systematic review show that FIR interventions improve blood flow to and from the AVF and that the intervention decreases AVF malfunctioning. Currently, literature on this topic is limited in Taiwan. Therefore, more evidence is needed to validate the findings of the current study. CONCLUSIONS / IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of the current study support the ability of patients with FIR to improve their AVF functions as well as the immediate clinical applicability of the suggested intervention. Although current empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of gripping a ball in maintaining AVF functions, many hemodialysis patients, due to age or illness, are not physically capable of doing this exercise. Therefore, FIR is a very good alternative measure.

A Qualitative Exploration of Older Patients' Experiences With Frailty and Related Management Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is highly prevalent in hospitalized older patients and may increase the risk of adverse health outcomes. Understanding the experiences of older patients and the management strategies they use to recover from frailty is crucial to developing appropriate interventions. PURPOSE: This study was designed to explore the frailty experiences of older adults and the management strategies they use to recover from frailty. METHODS: Using purposive sampling, semistructured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 16 older patients with frailty. Data were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: The experiences of participants were classified into three phases, including the (a) individual sensing phase, (b) daily-living-threatening phase, and (c) acclimatization and acceptance phase. When experiencing frailty, the participants developed management strategies to facilitate recovery, which manifested in three phases: (a) making flexible adjustments to the daily routine, (b) using adequate support systems, and (c) adopting positive thinking. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results indicate that familial support and positive thinking are important management strategies for successful recovery in frail individuals. Older patients require adequate support systems. Positive thinking was also found to be an effective management strategy for recovery. Healthcare professionals should not only focus on providing supportive resources but also provide support to older patients to facilitate their adoption of positive thinking to face life changes brought on by frailty.

Helping Relationships From Significant Others Scale: Chinese Version.

Using the helping relationships from significant others (HRSO) scale assists patients, such as those with chronic kidney disease (CKD), in adopting a healthy lifestyle to decelerate disease progression, complications, and mortality. To study the efficacy of the scale, we recruited a convenience sample (n = 250) of patients with CKD from a nephrology clinic in southern Taiwan. Principal axis factor analysis and a promax rotation revealed a 15-item, three-factor explanation of 68.44 % of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit. The Composite reliability was .91, .89, and .92 in the same factors. Cronbach's alpha was .90 for the 15-item scale, with the 3 subscales ranging from .86 to .91. The split reliability was .73. The HRSO is a valid and reliable scale to measure significant others' support of patients with CKD in maintaining a healthy lifestyle.