Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose isoniazid for the treatment of rifampicin- or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic data on high-dose isoniazid for the treatment of rifampicin-/multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB) are limited. We aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of high-dose isoniazid, estimate exposure target attainment, identify predictors of exposures, and explore exposure-response relationships in RR/MDR-TB patients. METHODS: We performed an observational pharmacokinetic study, with exploratory pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses, in Indonesian adults aged 18-65 years treated for pulmonary RR/MDR-TB with standardized regimens containing high-dose isoniazid (10-15 mg/kg/day) for 9-11 months. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed after ≥2 weeks of treatment. Total plasma drug exposure (AUC0-24) and peak concentration (Cmax) were assessed using non-compartmental analyses. AUC0-24/MIC ratio of 85 and Cmax/MIC ratio of 17.5 were used as exposure targets. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of drug exposures and responses, respectively. RESULTS: We consecutively enrolled 40 patients (median age 37.5 years). The geometric mean isoniazid AUC0-24 and Cmax were 35.4 h·mg/L and 8.5 mg/L, respectively. Lower AUC0-24 and Cmax values were associated (P < 0.05) with non-slow acetylator phenotype, and lower Cmax values were associated with male sex. Of the 26 patients with MIC data, less than 25% achieved the proposed targets for isoniazid AUC0-24/MIC (n = 6/26) and Cmax/MIC (n = 5/26). Lower isoniazid AUC0-24 values were associated with delayed sputum culture conversion (>2 months of treatment) [adjusted OR 0.18 (95% CI 0.04-0.89)]. CONCLUSIONS: Isoniazid exposures below targets were observed in most patients, and certain risk groups for low isoniazid exposures may require dose adjustment. The effect of low isoniazid exposures on delayed culture conversion deserves attention.

Analytical and Clinical Validation of Assays for Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS) of Drugs in Different Blood Matrices: A Literature Review.

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is the newest and most promising sample-collection technique for quantitatively analyzing drugs, especially for routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and pharmacokinetic studies. This technique uses an absorbent white tip to absorb a fixed volume of a sample (10-50 µL) within a few seconds (2-4 s), is more flexible, practical, and more straightforward to be applied in the field, and is probably more cost-effective than conventional venous sampling (CVS). After optimization and validation of an analytical method of a drug taken by VAMS, a clinical validation study is needed to show that the results by VAMS can substitute what is gained from CVS and to justify implementation in routine practice. This narrative review aimed to assess and present studies about optimization and analytical validation of assays for drugs taken by VAMS, considering their physicochemical drug properties, extraction conditions, validation results, and studies on clinical validation of VAMS compared to CVS. The review revealed that the bio-analysis of many drugs taken with the VAMS technique was optimized and validated. However, only a few clinical validation studies have been performed so far. All drugs that underwent a clinical validation study demonstrated good agreement between the two techniques (VAMS and CVS), but only by Bland-Altman analysis. Only for tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid were three measurements of agreement evaluated. Therefore, VAMS can be considered an alternative to CVS in routine practice, especially for tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Still, more extensive clinical validation studies need to be performed for other drugs.

Model-Based Meta-analysis of Rifampicin Exposure and Mortality in Indonesian Tuberculous Meningitis Trials.

BACKGROUND: Intensified antimicrobial treatment with higher rifampicin doses may improve outcome of tuberculous meningitis, but the desirable exposure and necessary dose are unknown. Our objective was to characterize the relationship between rifampicin exposures and mortality in order to identify optimal dosing for tuberculous meningitis. METHODS: An individual patient meta-analysis was performed on data from 3 Indonesian randomized controlled phase 2 trials comparing oral rifampicin 450 mg (~10 mg/kg) to intensified regimens including 750-1350 mg orally, or a 600-mg intravenous infusion. Pharmacokinetic data from plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were analyzed with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Six-month survival was described with parametric time-to-event models. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic analyses included 133 individuals (1150 concentration measurements, 170 from CSF). The final model featured 2 disposition compartments, saturable clearance, and autoinduction. Rifampicin CSF concentrations were described by a partition coefficient (5.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5%-6.4%) and half-life for distribution plasma to CSF (2.1 hours; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9 hours). Higher CSF protein concentration increased the partition coefficient. Survival of 148 individuals (58 died, 15 dropouts) was well described by an exponentially declining hazard, with lower age, higher baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score, and higher individual rifampicin plasma exposure reducing the hazard. Simulations predicted an increase in 6-month survival from approximately 50% to approximately 70% upon increasing the oral rifampicin dose from 10 to 30 mg/kg, and predicted that even higher doses would further improve survival. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rifampicin exposure substantially decreased the risk of death, and the maximal effect was not reached within the studied range. We suggest a rifampicin dose of at least 30 mg/kg to be investigated in phase 3 clinical trials.

Pharmacokinetics of standard versus high-dose rifampin for tuberculosis preventive treatment: A sub-study of the 2R2 randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic data of rifampin, when used for tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) are not available. We aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of rifampin used for TPT, at standard and higher doses, and to assess predictors of rifampin exposure. METHODS: A pharmacokinetic sub-study was performed in Bandung, Indonesia among participants in the 2R2 randomized trial, which compared TPT regimens of 2 months of high-dose rifampin at 20 mg/kg/day (2R20) and 30 mg/kg/day (2R30), with 4 months of standard-dose rifampin at 10 mg/kg/day (4R10) in adolescents and adults. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed after 2-8 weeks of treatment. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed non-compartmentally. Total exposure (AUC0-24) and peak concentration (Cmax) between arms were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to assess predictors of AUC0-24 and Cmax. RESULTS: We enrolled 51 participants in this study. In the 4R10, 2R20, and 2R30 arms, the geometric mean AUC0-24 was 68.0, 186.8, and 289.9 h⋅mg/L, and Cmax was 18.4, 36.7, and 54.4 mg/L, respectively; high interindividual variabilities were observed. Compared with the 4R10 arm, AUC0-24 and Cmax were significantly higher in the 2R20 and 2R30 arms (P < 0.001). Drug doses, body weight, and female sex were predictors of higher rifampin AUC0-24 and Cmax (P < 0.05). AUC0-24 and Cmax values were much higher than those previously reported in persons with TB disease. CONCLUSIONS: Doubling and tripling the rifampin dose led to three- and four-fold higher exposure compared to standard dose. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and simulations are warranted to support trials of shortening the duration of TPT regimens with high-dose rifampin.

Isoniazid exposures and acetylator status in Indonesian tuberculous meningitis patients.

The effect of acetylator status on the exposure to isoniazid in plasma and CSF in tuberculous meningitis (TBM) patients remains largely unexplored. Here, we describe isoniazid exposures and acetylator status of 48 subjects in the ReDEFINe study (NCT02169882). Fifty percentwere fast (half-life <130 min) or slow (half-life >130 min) acetylators. Slow acetylators had higher AUC0-24, Cmax and CSF concentrations than fast acetylators (GM AUC0-24 25.5 vs 10.6 mg/L*h, p < 0.001); plasma Cmax 5.5 vs 3.6 mg/L, p = 0.023; CSF concentration 1.9 vs 1.1 mg/L, p = 0.008). Higher isoniazid doses may benefit fast acetylators in TBM.

Genetic polymorphism related to ethambutol outcomes and susceptibility to toxicity.

The World Health Organization (WHO) stated that ensuring access to effective and optimal treatment is a key component to eradicate tuberculosis (TB) through the End TB Strategy. Personalized medicine that depends on the genetic profile of an individual is one way to optimize treatment. It is necessary because of diverse drug responses related to the variation in human DNA, such as single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Ethambutol (EMB) is a drug widely used as the treatment for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (Mtb) and/non-tuberculous mycobacteria and has become a potential supplementary agent for a treatment regimen of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB. In human genetic polymorphism studies of anti-tuberculosis, the majority focus on rifampicin or isoniazid, which discuss polymorphisms related to their toxicity. Whereas there are few studies on EMB, the incidence of EMB toxicity is lower than that of other first-line anti-TB drugs. To facilitate personalized medicine practice, this article summarizes the genetic polymorphisms associated with alterations in the pharmacokinetic profile, resistance incidence, and susceptibility to EMB toxicity. This study includes 131 total human studies from 17 articles, but only eight studies that held in the low-middle income country (LMIC), while the rest is research conducted in developed countries with high incomes. Personalized medicine practices are highly recommended to maintain and obtain the optimal therapeutic effect of EMB.

Pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability of isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide in children and adolescents treated for tuberculous meningitis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability of isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide in children and adolescents with tuberculous meningitis (TBM). DESIGN: Prospective observational pharmacokinetic study with an exploratory pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis. SETTING: Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia. PATIENTS: Individuals aged 0-18 years clinically diagnosed with TBM and receiving first-line anti-tuberculosis drug dosages according to revised WHO-recommended treatment guidelines. INTERVENTIONS: Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide were assessed on days 2 and 10 of treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma exposures during the daily dosing interval (AUC0-24), peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) and CSF concentrations. RESULTS: Among 20 eligible patients, geometric mean AUC0-24 of isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide was 18.5, 66.9 and 315.5 hour∙mg/L on day 2; and 14.5, 71.8 and 328.4 hour∙mg/L on day 10, respectively. Large interindividual variabilities were observed in AUC0-24 and Cmax of all drugs. All patients had suboptimal rifampicin AUC0-24 for TBM treatment indication and very low rifampicin CSF concentrations. Four patients developed grade 2-3 drug-induced liver injury (DILI) within the first 4 weeks of treatment, in whom anti-tuberculosis drugs were temporarily stopped, and no DILI recurred after reintroduction of rifampicin and isoniazid. AUC0-24 of isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide along with Cmax of isoniazid and pyrazinamide on day 10 were higher in patients who developed DILI than those without DILI (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Higher rifampicin doses are strongly warranted in treatment of children and adolescents with TBM. The association between higher plasma concentrations of isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide and the development of DILI needs confirmatory studies.

Rifampicin Alters Metformin Plasma Exposure but Not Blood Glucose Levels in Diabetic Tuberculosis Patients.

The pharmacokinetic (PK) and clinical implications of combining metformin with rifampicin are relevant to increasing numbers of patients with diabetic tuberculosis (TB) across the world and are yet unclear. We assessed the impact of rifampicin on metformin PKs and its glucose-lowering effect in patients with diabetic TB by measuring plasma metformin and blood glucose during and after TB treatment. Rifampicin increased metformin exposure: plasma area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time point 0 to the end of the dosing interval (AUC0-τ ) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) geometric mean ratio (GMR; during vs. after TB treatment) were 1.28 (90% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.44) and 1.19 (90% CI 1.02-1.38; n = 22). The metformin glucose-lowering efficacy did not change (Δglucose - Cmax ; P = 0.890; n = 18). Thus, we conclude that additional glucose monitoring in this population is not warranted. Finally, 57% of patients on metformin and rifampicin, and 38% of patients on metformin alone experienced gastrointestinal adverse effects. Considering this observation, we advise patients to take metformin and rifampicin with food and preferably separated in time. Clinicians could consider metoclopramide if gastrointestinal adverse effects occur.

High dose oral rifampicin to improve survival from adult tuberculous meningitis: A randomised placebo-controlled double-blinded phase III trial (the HARVEST study).

Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM), the most severe form of tuberculosis (TB), results in death or neurological disability in >50%, despite World Health Organisation recommended therapy. Current TBM regimen dosages are based on data from pulmonary TB alone. Evidence from recent phase II pharmacokinetic studies suggests that high dose rifampicin (R) administered intravenously or orally enhances central nervous system penetration and may reduce TBM associated mortality. We hypothesize that, among persons with TBM, high dose oral rifampicin (35 mg/kg) for 8 weeks will improve survival compared to standard of care (10 mg/kg), without excess adverse events. Protocol: We will perform a parallel group, randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind, phase III multicentre clinical trial comparing high dose oral rifampicin to standard of care. The trial will be conducted across five clinical sites in Uganda, South Africa and Indonesia. Participants are HIV-positive or negative adults with clinically suspected TBM, who will be randomised (1:1) to one of two arms: 35 mg/kg oral rifampicin daily for 8 weeks (in combination with standard dose isoniazid [H], pyrazinamide [Z] and ethambutol [E]) or standard of care (oral HRZE, containing 10 mg/kg/day rifampicin). The primary end-point is 6-month survival. Secondary end points are: i) 12-month survival ii) functional and neurocognitive outcomes and iii) safety and tolerability. Tertiary outcomes are: i) pharmacokinetic outcomes and ii) cost-effectiveness of the intervention. We will enrol 500 participants over 2.5 years, with follow-up continuing until 12 months post-enrolment. Discussion: Our best TBM treatment still results in unacceptably high mortality and morbidity. Strong evidence supports the increased cerebrospinal fluid penetration of high dose rifampicin, however conclusive evidence regarding survival benefit is lacking. This study will answer the important question of whether high dose oral rifampicin conveys a survival benefit in TBM in HIV-positive and -negative individuals from Africa and Asia. Trial registration: ISRCTN15668391 (17/06/2019).

Pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability of higher oral and intravenous doses of rifampicin in adult tuberculous meningitis patients.

High-dose intravenous (i.v.) rifampicin improved the outcome of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) in a previous study. Unfortunately, i.v. rifampicin is not available in many high-endemic settings. This study examined exposures to and safety of higher oral rifampicin doses compared with i.v. rifampicin. Thirty adult Indonesian TBM patients were randomised to rifampicin 750 mg (ca. 17 mg/kg) orally, 900 mg (ca. 20 mg/kg) orally or 600 mg (ca. 13 mg/kg, as used previously) i.v. over 1.5 h for 14 days, combined with other TB drugs. The pharmacokinetics of rifampicin was assessed in the critical phase of TBM treatment (≤3 days after treatment initiation) and at ≥9 days. In the first days of treatment, the geometric mean (range) plasma AUC0-24 values following rifampicin 750 mg orally, 900 mg orally and 600 mg i.v. were 131.4 (38.1-275.1), 164.8 (66.9-291.2) and 145.7 (77.7-430.2) mg⋅h/L, respectively; Cmax values were 14.3 (6.1-22.2), 16.2 (5.7-28.3) and 24.7 (13.9-37.8) mg/L. CSF concentrations correlated with plasma exposures. After ≥9 days, AUC0-24 values had decreased to 100.1, 101.2 and 94.9 mg⋅h/L. Transient grade 3 ALT increases (8/30 patients) and one grade 4 ALT increase occurred, not related to rifampicin exposure. Higher oral rifampicin doses resulted in approximately similar plasma AUC0-24 but lower plasma Cmax values compared with 600 mg i.v. over 1.5 h. Exposures to rifampicin varied substantially and decreased due to autoinduction. Liver function disturbances occurred in this severely ill population. Future studies should examine even higher rifampicin doses in TBM treatment.