Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Spinal Cord ; 61(12): 667-683, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37828368

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Delphi Technique. OBJECTIVES: Describe the development of a decision support tool to prevent community-acquired pressure injuries (CAPrIs) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) for use in SCI clinics, called the Community-Acquired Pressure Injury Prevention-Field Implementation Tool (CAPP-FIT). SETTING: Veteran Health Administration Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA. METHODS: Concept mapping of current pressure injury (PrI) guidelines and qualitative research describing risks, actions, and resources needed to prevent CAPrIs associated with SCI were used to develop 40 veteran checklist items (Items) along with 37 associated provider actions (Actions) for the tool. The Delphi technique was used to refine Items and Actions with a panel of interprofessional SCI providers (n = 15), veterans with SCI (n = 4), and caregivers (n = 3) to determine consensus on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree-strongly disagree) for each Item and Action. A 75% agreement was set for responses rated as strongly agree or agree. RESULTS: Panelists were 60% female, 62% White, 33% veterans with SCI or caregivers, 33% wound care certified with a mean age of 59 years. Two survey rounds were required for consensus for 41 Item and 38 Action CAPP-FIT. Response rate was 95% for both rounds. Delphi round 1 showed all but two Actions affirming agreement above 75%. Substantive comments from panelists required revision to 5 Items and 9 Actions and one additional Item/Actions related to coping, meeting threshold percent agreement in Round 2. CONCLUSIONS: The CAPP-FIT could become a useful tool for Veterans living with SCI, caregivers, and SCI providers.


Assuntos
Úlcera por Pressão , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Úlcera por Pressão/etiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controle , Técnica Delphi , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Consenso
2.
Ann Intern Med ; 158(10): 718-26, 2013 May 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23689765

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anabolic steroids have been reported to improve wound healing. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether oxandrolone increases the percentage of target pressure ulcers (TPUs) that heal compared with placebo and whether healed ulcers remain closed 8 weeks after treatment. DESIGN: Parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomized trial conducted from 1 August 2005 to 30 November 2008. Patients, clinical care providers, study personnel, and statisticians were blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00101361). SETTING: 16 inpatient spinal cord injury (SCI) services at Veterans Affairs medical centers. PATIENTS: 1900 prescreened, 779 screened, and 212 randomly assigned inpatients with SCI and stage III or IV TPUs. INTERVENTION: Oxandrolone, 20 mg/d (n = 108), or placebo (n = 104) until the TPU healed or 24 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was healed TPUs. The secondary outcome was the percentage of TPUs that remained healed at 8-week follow-up. RESULTS: 24.1% (95% CI, 16.0% to 32.1%) of TPUs in oxandrolone recipients and 29.8% (CI, 21.0% to 38.6%) in placebo recipients healed (difference, -5.7 percentage points [CI, -17.5 to 6.8 percentage points]; P = 0.40). At 8-week follow-up, 16.7% (CI, 9.6% to 23.7%) of oxandrolone recipients and 15.4% (CI, 8.5% to 22.3%) of placebo recipients retained a healed TPU (difference, 1.3 percentage points [CI, -8.8 to 11.2 percentage points]; P = 0.70). No serious adverse events were related to oxandrolone. Liver enzyme levels were elevated in 32.4% (CI, 23.6% to 41.2%) of oxandrolone recipients and 2.9% (CI, 0.0% to 6.1%) of placebo recipients (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Selection of severe wounds may have reduced treatment response. Approximately one third of patients did not complete the study in the treatment and placebo groups. The study was terminated after a futility analysis showed a low probability of detecting a significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: Oxandrolone showed no benefit over placebo for improving healing or the percentage of TPUs that remained closed after 8 weeks of treatment. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.


Assuntos
Anabolizantes/uso terapêutico , Oxandrolona/uso terapêutico , Úlcera por Pressão/tratamento farmacológico , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso , Anabolizantes/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Fígado/enzimologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxandrolona/efeitos adversos , Pré-Albumina/metabolismo , Úlcera por Pressão/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA