[Drug clinical comprehensive evaluation of tetrandrine in the treatment of pneumoconiosis].

Objective: To analyze the safety, effectiveness, economics, innovation, suitability and accessibility of tetrandrine in the treatment of pneumoconiosis, and provide evidence-based basis for health policy decision-making and clinical practice. Methods: In July 2022, the system searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, SinoMed databases (the retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to June 30, 2022), screened the documents that meet the standards, extracted and evaluated the data, and used the "HTA checklist" developed by the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) to evaluate the HTA report. AMSTAR-2 Scale was used to evaluate the quality of systematic evaluation/Meta analysis. CHEERS Scale was used to evaluate the quality of pharmacoeconomics research. The included cohort study or case-control study was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The included randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were evaluated using the Cochrane Risk Bias Assessment Tool (Cochrane RCT) quality evaluation criteria. Comprehensive comparison and analysis based on the characteristics of the data included in the study. Results: A total of 882 related literatures were detected from the initial screening. According to relevant standards, 8 RCT studies were finally selected for analysis. Statistical results showed that basic treatment with tetrandrine could better improve FEV(1) (MD=0.13, 95%CI: 0.06-0.20, P<0.001), FEV(1)/FVC (MD=4.48, 95%CI: 0.61-8.35, P=0.02) and clinical treatment efficiency. Tetrandrine had a low incidence of adverse reactions. The affordability coefficient of tetrandrine tablets was 0.295-0.492. Conclusion: Tetrandrine can improve the clinical symptoms and pulmonary ventilation function of pneumoconiosis patients, most of the adverse reactions are mild, and the clinical application is safe.

[Selecting and defining the clinical questions and outcomes of Guideline for the Emergency Treatment of Anaphylaxis].

OBJECTIVE: To select and define the clinical questions and outcomes of Guideline for the Emergency Treatment of Anaphylaxis. METHODS: A draft including clinical questions, which could be divided into foreground questions and background questions, and outcomes was drawn and revised by the secretary group for the guideline referring to the present guidelines with the guidance of a panel consisting of 7 experienced clinical medicine, pharmacy and nursing experts. Foreground questions and outcomes of the draft were voted into a final version after three rounds of counsels of 22 experienced medicine, pharmacy and nursing clinical experts using Delphi method including 3 rounds of inquiry. And the background questions were directly included in the guideline after the 22 experts' thorough revising. The research was carried out under the supervision of method ologists. Active coefficient, coefficient of variation and the frequencies of each score were calculated for quality control. RESULTS: The draft of 34 foreground questions, 6 background questions and 6 outcomes was finally drawn up after thorough selecting and consulting. The 6 background questions revised by the clinical experts were all included. After three rounds of Delphi method, 28 pivotal clinical questions covering the diagnosis, preparation for the treatment, treatment and administration after the treatment, and 6 outcomes were defined and included for the guideline. The rest of the foreground questions, 4 of which were recognized as essential and 2 as important, were excluded from the guideline and left for further revising or updating. As for the outcomes, 4 of them were recognized as critical and the rest as important. The experts contributing to the research were active as the active coefficient reached 100%, and the degree of consensus was fine as the frequencies of the feedback scoring equal to or greater than 4 for all the 28 foreground questions included were greater than 75% and the result was settled in the first round. And 2 outcomes, fatality rate and severity, reached a higher degree of consensus with coefficient of variation less than 15%. CONCLUSION: After thorough and rigorous selecting, the clinical questions and outcomes to be included in the Guideline for the Emergency Treatment of Anaphylaxis were finally selected and defined via Delphi method, guiding the future development of the guidelines.

[Individualized vancomycin dosing for a patient diagnosed as severe acute pancreatitis with concurrent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration therapy: a case report].

Pharmacokinetic parameters can be significantly altered for acute kidney injury (AKI), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration therapy (CVVH). Here we reported a case of individualized vancomycin dosing for a patient diagnosed as severe acute pancreatitis treated with concurrent ECMO and CVVH. A 65 kg 32-year-old woman was admitted to hospital presented with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), respiratory failure, metabotropic acidosis and hyperkalemia. She was admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) on hospital day 1 and was initiated on CVVH. She progressed to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on ICU day 2, and veno-venous ECMO was instituted. Several catheters were inserted into the body to support ECMO, CVVH and pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO), so vancomycin was prescribed empirically on ICU day 3 for prevention of catheter-related infection. Given the residual renal function and continuous hemofiltration intensity on day 3, vancomycin bolus of 1 000 mg was prescribed, followed by a maintenance dose of 500 mg every 8 hours. On ICU day 4, a vancomycin trough serum concentration of 14.1 mg/L was obtained before the fourth dose, which was within the target range of 10-20 mg/L. By ICU day 7, vancomycin dosage was elevated to 1.0 g every 12 hours because of aggravated infection and improved kidney function. On ICU day 14, a vancomycin trough serum concentration of 17 mg/L was obtained. Her white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil percentage (Neut%) dropped to the normal level by ICU day 19. This vancomycin regimen was successful in providing a target attainment of trough serum concentration ranging from 10-20 mg/L quickly and in controlling infection-related symptoms and signs properly. With the help of this case report we want to call attention to the clinically significant alteration in vancomycin pharmacokinetics among critically ill patients. Individualized vancomycin dosing regimens and therapeutic drug monitoring are necessary for critically ill patients receiving CVVH and ECMO to ensure that the target serum vancomycin levels are reached to adequately treat the infection and avoid nephrotoxicity.

Lack of evidence for a harmful effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on fracture risk among type 2 diabetes patients: a network and cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIM: To evaluate the comparative effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on risk of bone fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to 27 January 2016 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the outcome of fracture in patients with T2DM treated with SGLT2 inhibitors. Pairwise and network meta-analyses, as well as a cumulative meta-analysis, were performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 38 eligible RCTs (10 canagliflozin, 15 dapagliflozin and 13 empagliflozin) involving 30 384 patients, with follow-ups ranging from 24 to 160 weeks, were included. The fracture event rates were 1.59% in the SGLT2 inhibitor groups and 1.56% in the control groups. The incidence of fracture events was similar among these three SGLT2 inhibitor groups. Compared with placebo, canagliflozin (OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.71-1.88), dapagliflozin (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.37-1.25) and empagliflozin (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.74-1.18) were not significantly associated with an increased risk of fracture. Our cumulative meta-analysis indicated the robustness of the null findings with regard to SGLT2 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis based on available RCT data does not support the harmful effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on fractures, although future safety monitoring from RCTs and real-world data with detailed information on bone health is warranted.

Limited clinical utility of genotype-guided warfarin initiation dosing algorithms versus standard therapy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials.

In terms of inconsistent conclusions across all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and available meta-analyses, we aimed to use a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate whether clinical utility of a genotype-guided warfarin initiation dosing algorithm could be better than that of a standard therapy regimen, and whether currently relevant evidence could be reliable and conclusive. Overall, 11 eligible RCTs involving 2677 patients were included for further analyses. Compared with fixed dose or clinically adjusted warfarin initiation dosing regimens, genotype-guided algorithms significantly increased time in therapeutic range, shortened time to first therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) and time to stable doses, but did not show any marked improvements in excessive anticoagulation, bleeding events, thromboembolism, or all-cause mortality. Subgroup analyses revealed that, genotype-guided algorithms showed better control in the outcomes of time in therapeutic range or excessive anticoagulation than fixed-dose regimens rather than clinically adjusted regimens. Except for excessive anticoagulation, currently available evidence of all other outcomes was unreliable and inconclusive as determined with TSA. Our findings suggest that genotype-guided warfarin initiation dosing algorithms have superiority in the improvement of surrogate quality markers for anticoagulation control, but that this does not translate into statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes, which is largely because of the insufficient sample size in the RCTs analyzed.

Fluoxetine for the prophylaxis of poststroke depression in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Depression may affect patients' recovery and even their survival rate after stroke, but it is often overlooked or inadequately managed; data regarding the prophylactic efficacy and safety of fluoxetine are inconsistent in this setting. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to systematically assess the prophylactic efficacy and safety of fluoxetine for poststroke depression in patients with stroke. METHODS: We searched electronic databases up to December 2009 for studies evaluating the prophylactic efficacy of fluoxetine in patients with stroke. The pooled odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD), incremental efficiency and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS: We collected and evaluated a total of 385 patients identified from six trials. Meta-analysis demonstrated that fluoxetine reduced the incidence of poststroke depression (PSD) (OR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.56), helped recovery in neurological function (WMD = -4.72, 95% CI -8.31 to -1.13) and improved independence in activities of daily living (WMD = -8.04, 95% CI -13.40 to -2.68); fluoxetine is relatively safe in spite of the adverse events (OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.49, p = 0.82). However, fluoxetine groups and control groups did not differ in change of scores for depression (WMD = -3.97, 95% CI -9.85 to 1.90, p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoxetine was beneficial for the prophylaxis of poststroke depression in patients with stroke but not in reducing symptom severity of PSD.

[Post-marketing surveillance of Tanreqing injection in children: a real world study].

Objective: To evaluate the safety of Tanreqing injection among children in the real world. Methods: A multicenter, large sample, ambispective cohort study, with registration-type clinical safety monitoring. A total of 6 188 inpatients and patients from the emergency units, aged ≤ 14 years who all had been using Tanreqing injection in 59 secondary and tertiary hospitals in China, were recruited between January, 2014 and May, 2015. The main outcomes would include incidence and severity of adverse drug reaction (ADR)/adverse drug event (ADE) of Tanreqing injection. Univariate analysis was used to explain the risk factors of ADR. Results: The overall incidence of ADE was 4.20‰ (26 cases), including 4 serious ones. The incidence of ADR was 3.07‰ (19 cases), including 17 cases of general ADR and 2 cases of new ADR. All the ADR cases were mild or moderate, mostly showing damages in skin and appendages. The onset of disease happened in 24 hours after the Tanreqing injection but all the ADR cases got improved or cured. Having histories of allergies to drugs or foods would increase the incidence of ADR. Conclusion:Tanreqing injection caused low incidence of ADR in children. Progams as stratifying high-risk patients and improving administrative management could further increase the safety level of Tanreqing injection.

Effect of different sample pretreatment methods on the concentrations of excitatory amino acids in cerebrospinal fluid determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), the effect of different sample pretreatment methods on the concentrations of excitatory amino acids (EAAs, glutamate and aspartate) measured in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was investigated. The results showed that the measured values of glutamate and aspartate were constant when the samples were stored at -80 degrees C and then methanol was used for CSF deproteinization before assay; the values of glutamate (Glu) increased when 0.3 M perchloric acid was used for CSF deproteinization with the CSF subsequently being stored at -20 degrees C; the values of Glu changed when the samples were stored at -20 degrees C over 8 weeks with methanol subsequently being used for CSF deproteinization before assay. This reference data suggested that the CSF sample would be better stored at -80 degrees C. If the sample is stored at -20 degrees C over 8 weeks, the Glu values change with the storage time. If strong acidic reagents are used for precipitation of protein in the CSF sample and then stored at -20 degrees C, Glu values are abnormally increased. From this study, an accurate and sensitive reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for anti-excitotoxicity therapy and thorough study of EAAs in a clinical setting.

Naloxone attenuates development of hypertension in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats.

The effects of naloxone on the development of hypertension were studied in unilaterally nephrectomized rats implanted with deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA; 200 mg/kg) and given saline to drink. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) infusion of naloxone at 150 micrograms/hr significantly lowered systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to rats not receiving naloxone, (135 +/- 4.4 vs 158 +/- 5.9 mmHg on day 16). IP infusion of naloxone at 300 micrograms/hr produced the same reductions of SBP as that at 150 micrograms/hr in DOCA-salt treated rats. In other experiments intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion of naloxone at 7 micrograms/hr also significantly attenuated the DOCA-salt hypertension. The same dose given i.p. had no effect on the development of hypertension. Naloxone had no effect on plasma renin activity (PRA), plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), or concentrations of Na+ and K+ in plasma. The present data demonstrate that naloxone significantly attenuates the development of hypertension in rats given DOCA and fed a high salt diet. The attenuation of blood pressure could not be associated with the changes in PRA or plasma ANP. These results imply that the central opiate receptors play an important role in the pathogenesis of this model of hypertension.