Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on the Expression of CaMKII/Cav1.2 in Atrial Fibrillation Stimulation Rabbit Model.

Methods: Overall, 18 rabbits were randomly divided into control, pacing (600 beats/min), and pacing+sac/val groups. The rabbits in the pacing+sac/val cohort received oral sac/val (10 mg/kg twice daily) across the 21-day investigation period. After three weeks, the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and AF induction rate were compared. HL-1 cultures were exposed to fast pacing (24 h) with and without LBQ657 (active sacubitril form)/valsartan. Western blots were used for detecting Cav1.2 and CaMKII expression within atrial muscles of the rabbits and HL-1 cultures of AF model. Results: In comparison to the sham cohort, the AF induction rate was markedly increased together with AERP reduction within pacing cohort. Such changes were markedly rescued through sac/val treatment in pacing+sac/val cohort. The proteomic expression profiles of CaMKII and Cav1.2 showed that the CaMKII expression was markedly upregulated, while Cav1.2 expression was downregulated in the pacing cohort. Importantly, these effects were absent in pacing+sac/val cohort. Conclusion: Results of this study show that sac/val treatment regulates the expression of CaMKII/Cav1.2 and could alter this pathway in atrial rapid electrical stimulation models. Therefore, this investigation could contribute to a novel strategy in AF therapeutics in clinical settings.

Sacubitril/valsartan attenuates atrial electrical and structural remodelling in a rabbit model of atrial fibrillation.

Atrial structural and electrical remodelling play important roles in atrial fibrillation (AF). Sacubitril/valsartan attenuates cardiac remodelling in heart failure. However, the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on AF is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on atrial electrical and structural remodelling in AF and investigate the underlying mechanism of action. Thirty-three rabbits were randomized into sham, RAP, and sac/val groups. HL-1 cells were subjected to control treatment or rapid pacing with or without LBQ657 and valsartan. Echocardiography, atrial electrophysiology, and histological examination were performed. The concentration of Ca2+ and expression levels of calcineurin, NFAT, p-NFAT, Cav1.2, collagen Ⅰ and Ⅲ, ANP, BNP, CNP, NT-proBNP, and ST2 in HL-1 cells, and IcaL in left atrial cells, were determined. We observed that compared to that in the sham group, the atrium and right ventricle were enlarged, myocardial fibrosis was markedly higher, AF inducibility was significantly elevated, and atrial effective refractory periods were shortened in the RAP group. These effects were significantly reversed by sacubitril/valsartan. Compared to that in the sham group, collagen Ⅰ and Ⅲ, NT-proBNP, ST2, calcineurin, and NFAT were significantly up-regulated, while p-NFAT and Cav1.2 were down-regulated in the RAP group, and sacubitril/valsartan inhibited these changes. Ca2+ concentration increased and ICaL density decreased in in vivo and in vitro AF models, reversed by sacubitril/valsartan. Sacubitril/valsartan attenuates atrial electrical remodelling and ameliorates structure remodelling in AF. This study paves the way for the possibility of clinical use of sacubitril/valsartan in AF patients.

Fenofibrate inhibits atrial metabolic remodelling in atrial fibrillation through PPAR-α/sirtuin 1/PGC-1α pathway.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Atrial metabolic remodelling is critical for the process of atrial fibrillation (AF). The PPAR-α/sirtuin 1 /PPAR co-activator α (PGC-1α) pathway plays an important role in maintaining energy metabolism. However, the effect of the PPAR-α agonist fenofibrate on AF is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of fenofibrate on atrial metabolic remodelling in AF and explore its possible mechanisms of action. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The expression of metabolic proteins was examined in the left atria of AF patients. Thirty-two rabbits were divided into sham, AF (pacing with 600 beats·min(-1) for 1 week), fenofibrate treated (pretreated with fenofibrate before pacing) and fenofibrate alone treated (for 2 weeks) groups. HL-1 cells were subjected to rapid pacing in the presence or absence of fenofibrate, the PPAR-α antagonist GW6471 or sirtuin 1-specific inhibitor EX527. Metabolic factors, circulating biochemical metabolites, atrial electrophysiology, adenine nucleotide levels and accumulation of glycogen and lipid droplets were assessed. KEY RESULTS: The PPAR-α/sirtuin 1/PGC-1α pathway was significantly inhibited in AF patients and in the rabbit/HL-1 cell models, resulting in a reduction of key downstream metabolic factors; this effect was significantly restored by fenofibrate. Fenofibrate prevented the alterations in circulating biochemical metabolites, reduced the level of adenine nucleotides and accumulation of glycogen and lipid droplets, reversed the shortened atrial effective refractory period and increased risk of AF. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Fenofibrate inhibited atrial metabolic remodelling in AF by regulating the PPAR-α/sirtuin 1/PGC-1α pathway. The present study may provide a novel therapeutic strategy for AF.