Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 39(4): 619-625, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37946020

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Understanding how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected site of death-an important patient-centered outcome related to end-of-life care-would inform healthcare system resiliency in future public health emergencies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in site of death during the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults without a COVID-19 diagnosis. DESIGN: Using a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences method, we estimated net changes in site of death during the pandemic period (March-December 2020) from the pre-pandemic period (January-February 2020), using data on the same months in prior years (2016-2019) as the control. PARTICIPANTS: A 20% sample of Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries aged 66 years and older who died in 2016-2020. We excluded beneficiaries with a hospital diagnosis of COVID-19. MAIN MEASURES: We assessed each of the following sites of death separately: (1) home or community; (2) acute care hospital; and (3) nursing home. KEY RESULTS: We included 1,133,273 beneficiaries without a hospital diagnosis of COVID-19. We found that the proportion of Medicare beneficiaries who died at home or in the community setting increased (difference-in-differences [DID] estimate, + 3.1 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, + 2.6 to + 3.6 pp; P < 0.001) and the proportion of beneficiaries who died (without COVID-19 diagnosis) in an acute care hospital decreased (- 0.8 pp; 95% CI, - 1.2 to - 0.4 pp; P < 0.001) during the pandemic. We found no evidence that the proportion of deaths in nursing homes changed during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Using national data on older adults without a COVID-19 diagnosis, we found that site of death shifted toward home or community settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings may inform clinicians and policymakers in supporting end-of-life care during future public health emergencies.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Medicare , Idoso , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Pandemias , Teste para COVID-19 , Emergências
2.
Fam Pract ; 40(3): 473-485, 2023 05 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36730055

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a pressing need for healthcare to respond to the climate crisis. Family physicians, given their central role in community healthcare provision, are strategically placed to lead, support, and promote sustainable healthcare, yet guidance on how to do this is fragmented. OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate toolkits and aids on sustainable healthcare to act as a curated resource for family physicians and their care teams interested in delivering evidence-based sustainable healthcare in their clinical practices. METHODS: A scoping review was completed of the published and grey literature across 4 databases and 2 search engines to identify articles and aids/toolkits from 1990 to present. Toolkits were subsequently evaluated for purpose, evidence-base, implementation process, adaptability to family medicine, and outcome measures. RESULTS: The search identified 17,751 articles. Screening resulted in 20 published articles and 11 toolkits. Most articles presented simple checklists to support greening clinic initiatives, 3 studies focussed on partial carbon footprint analyses, and 4 on educational initiatives. Toolkits ranged in sustainability topics and degree of depth covered, and adaptability and outcome measures. None of the resources identified have been formally evaluated for effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: A range of aids exist to support greening of clinic operations; however, there is a significant gap in the literature for greening clinical care. Two toolkits were found to be comprehensive, one requiring tracking and reporting of sustainability initiatives. This scoping review provides a starting point for motivated family doctors and community clinics to initiate change and support more sustainable healthcare.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Escolaridade
3.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 38(7): 1067-1073, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35513517

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Factors leading to mechanical complications following insertion of central venous access devices (CVADs) in children are poorly understood. We aimed to quantify the rates and elucidate the mechanisms of these complications. METHODS: Retrospective (2016-2021) review of children (< 18 years old) receiving a CVAD. Data, reported as number of cases (%) and median (IQR), were analysed by Fisher's exact test, chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 317 CVADs (245 children) were inserted. Median age was 5.0 (8.9) years, with 116 (47%) females. There were 226 (71%) implantable port devices and 91 (29%) Hickman lines. Overall, 54 (17%) lines had a mechanical complication after 0.4 (0.83) years from insertion: fracture 19 (6%), CVAD migration 14 (4.4%), occlusion 14 (4.4%), port displacement 6 (1.9%), and skin tethering to port device 1 (0.3%). Younger age and lower weight were associated with higher risk of complications (p < 0.0001). Hickman lines had a higher incidence of complications compared to implantable port devices [24/91 (26.3%) vs 30/226 (13.3%); p = 0.008]. CONCLUSION: Mechanical complications occur in 17% of CVADs at a median of < 6 months after insertion. Risk factors include younger age and lower weight. Implantable port devices have a lower complications rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4: case-series with no comparison group.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Adolescente , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
4.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 72(7): 2070-2081, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721884

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: End-of-life (EOL) care patterns may differ by physician age given differences in how physicians are trained or changes associated with aging. We sought to compare patterns of EOL care delivered to older Americans according to physician age. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of a 20% sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥66 years who died in 2016-2019 (n = 487,293). We attributed beneficiaries to the physician who had >50% of primary care visits during the last 6 months of life. We compared beneficiary-level outcomes by physician age (<40, 40-49, 50-59, or ≥60) in two areas: (1) advance care planning (ACP) and palliative care; and (2) high-intensity care at the EOL. RESULTS: Beneficiaries attributed to younger physicians had slightly higher proportions of billed ACP (adjusted proportions, 17.1%, 16.1%, 15.5%, and 14.0% for physicians aged <40, 40-49, 50-59, and ≥60, respectively; p-for-trend adjusted for multiple comparisons <0.001) and palliative care counseling or hospice use in the last 180 days of life (64.5%, 63.6%, 61.9%, and 60.8%; p-for-trend <0.001). Similarly, physicians' younger age was associated with slightly lower proportions of emergency department visits (57.4%, 57.0%, 57.4%, and 58.1%; p-for-trend <0.001), hospital admissions (51.2%, 51.1%, 51.4%, and 52.1%; p-for-trend <0.001), intensive care unit admissions (27.8%, 27.9%, 28.2%, and 28.3%; p-for-trend = 0.03), or mechanical ventilation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (14.2, 14.9%, 15.2%, and 15.3%; p-for-trend <0.001) in the last 30 days of life, and in-hospital death (20.2%, 20.6%, 21.3%, and 21.5%; p-for-trend <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that differences in patterns of EOL care between beneficiaries cared for by younger and older physicians were small, and thus, not clinically meaningful. Future research is warranted to understand the factors that can influence patterns of EOL care provided by physicians, including initial and continuing medical education.


Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Medicare , Médicos , Assistência Terminal , Humanos , Assistência Terminal/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Estudos Transversais , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Adulto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 71(10): 3237-3243, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37335260

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) began to reimburse clinicians for advance care planning (ACP) discussions, effective January 1, 2016. We sought to characterize the timing and setting of first-billed ACP discussions among Medicare decedents to inform future research on ACP billing codes. METHODS: Using a random 20% sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66 years and older who died in 2017-2019, we described the timing (relative to death) and setting (inpatient, nursing home, office, or outpatient with or without Medicare Annual Wellness Visit [AWV], home or community, or elsewhere) of the first-billed ACP discussion for each beneficiary. RESULTS: Our study included 695,985 decedents (mean [SD] years of age, 83.2 [8.8]; 54.2% female); the proportion of decedents who had at least one billed ACP discussion increased from 9.7% in 2017 to 21.9% in 2019. We found that the proportion of first-billed ACP discussions held during the last month of life decreased from 37.0% in 2017 to 26.2% in 2019, while the proportion of first-billed ACP discussions held more than 12 months before death increased from 11.1% in 2017 to 35.2% in 2019. We also found that the proportion of first-billed ACP discussions held in the office or outpatient setting along with AWV increased over time (from 10.7% in 2017 to 14.1% in 2019), while the proportion held in the inpatient setting decreased (from 41.7% in 2017 to 38.0% in 2019). CONCLUSIONS: We found that with increasing exposure to the CMS policy change, uptake of the ACP billing code has increased; first-billed ACP discussions are occurring sooner before the end-of-life stage and are more likely to occur with AWV. Future studies should evaluate changes in ACP practice patterns, rather than only an increasing uptake in ACP billing codes, following the policy implementation.


Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Medicare , Idoso , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Casas de Saúde , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem
6.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 71(11): 3457-3466, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37470082

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Geriatric training is designed to prepare physicians to meet the complex needs of older adults, including persons with dementia at the end-of-life (EOL) stage. We sought to compare patterns of EOL care delivered to persons with dementia between physicians with versus without geriatric training. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of a 20% random sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with dementia who died in 2016-2018 (n = 99,631). We attributed beneficiaries to a physician who had the largest number of primary care visits during the last 6 months of life and determined whether the physician was trained in geriatrics. Our outcome measures included: (i) advance care planning (ACP) and palliative care (e.g., ACP, hospice enrollment in the last 90 days of life), and (ii) high-intensity EOL care (e.g., emergency department visits or hospital admissions in the last 30 days of life). RESULTS: Beneficiaries with dementia under the care of physicians with geriatric training had a higher proportion of ACP (adjusted proportion, 15.8% vs. 13.0%; p < 0.001 after accounting for multiple comparisons), palliative care counseling (22.4% vs. 20.9%; p = 0.01), and hospice enrollment (63.7% vs. 60.6%; p < 0.001). Geriatric training was also associated with a lower proportion of emergency department visits (55.1% vs. 59.1%; p < 0.001), hospital admissions (48.8% vs. 52.3%; p < 0.001), ICU admissions (24.9% vs. 27.4%; p < 0.001), use of mechanical ventilation (11.2% vs. 13.0%; p < 0.001), and use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (2.1% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.03) in the last 30 days of life. There was no evidence that the placement of feeding tubes differed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' geriatric training was associated with the receipt of more ACP and palliative care and less intensive EOL care among persons with dementia. Provision of geriatric training for physicians may have the potential to improve the quality of EOL care delivered to persons with dementia.


Assuntos
Demência , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida , Médicos , Assistência Terminal , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Estudos Transversais , Medicare , Assistência Terminal/psicologia , Demência/terapia , Demência/psicologia
7.
Lancet Microbe ; 3(5): e376-e381, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35544098

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Neisseria gonorrhoeae poses an urgent public health threat because of increasing antimicrobial resistance; however, much of the circulating population remains susceptible to historical treatment regimens. Point-of-care diagnostics that report susceptibility could allow for reintroduction of these regimens, but development of such diagnostics has been restricted to ciprofloxacin, for which susceptibility can be predicted from a single locus. We aimed to define genetic variants associated with susceptibility to penicillin and tetracycline. METHODS: We collected publicly available global whole-genome sequencing data (n=12 045) from clinical N gonorrhoeae isolates, with phenotypic resistance data for penicillin (n=6935), and tetracycline (n=5727). Using conditional genome-wide association studies, we defined genetic variants associated with susceptibility to penicillin and tetracycline. We excluded isolates that could not be classified as either susceptible or resistant. To validate our results, we assembled 1479 genomes from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, for which urethral specimens are collected at sentinel surveillance sites across the USA. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of susceptibility-associated alleles using Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints for susceptibility and non-resistance in both the global and validation datasets. FINDINGS: In our conditional penicillin genome-wide association study, the presence of a genetic variant defined by a non-mosaic penA allele without an insertion at codon 345 was associated with penicillin susceptibility and had the highest negative effect size (ß) of significant variants (p=5·0x10-14, ß -2·5). In combination with the absence of blaTEM, this variant predicted penicillin susceptibility with high specificity (99·8%) and modest sensitivity (36·7%). For tetracycline, the wildtype allele at rpsJ codon 57, encoding valine, was associated with tetracycline susceptibility (p=5·6x10-16, ß -1·6) after conditioning on the presence of tetM. The combination of rpsJ codon 57 allele and tetM absence predicted tetracycline susceptibility with high specificity (97·2%) and sensitivity (88·7%). INTERPRETATION: As few as two genetic loci can predict susceptibility to penicillin and tetracycline in N gonorrhoeae with high specificity. Molecular point-of-care diagnostics targeting these loci have the potential to increase available treatments for gonorrhoea. FUNDING: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Science Foundation, and the Smith Family Foundation.


Assuntos
Gonorreia , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genética , Penicilinas/farmacologia , Tetraciclina/farmacologia
8.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(2): ofaa632, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33553473

RESUMO

Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections have been increasing globally, with prevalence rising across age groups. In this study, we report a case of disseminated gonococcal infection (DGI) involving a prosthetic joint, and we use whole-genome sequencing to characterize resistance genes, putative virulence factors, and the phylogenetic lineage of the infecting isolate. We review the literature on sequence-based prediction of antibiotic resistance and factors that contribute to risk for DGI. We argue for routine sequencing and reporting of invasive gonococcal infections to aid in determining whether an invasive gonococcal infection is sporadic or part of an outbreak and to accelerate understanding of the genetic features of N gonorrhoeae that contribute to pathogenesis.

9.
JACC Case Rep ; 3(14): 1625-1629, 2021 Oct 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34729516

RESUMO

In the present case report, we describe the management of severe coronary artery disease in a patient with Glanzmann thrombasthenia. To the best of our knowledge, there are no established guidelines for revascularization in this setting, and we pose novel discussion points regarding the nuanced care of this patient. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(7): e2011677, 2020 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32716515

RESUMO

Importance: Primary care physicians have limited time to discuss preventive care, but it is unknown how they prioritize recommended services. Objective: To understand primary care physicians' prioritization of preventive services. Design, Setting, and Participants: This online survey was administered to primary care physicians in a large health care system from March 17 to May 12, 2017. Physicians were asked whether they prioritize preventive services and which factors contribute to their choice (5-point Likert scale). Results were analyzed from July 8, 2017, to September 19, 2019. Exposures: A 2 × 2 factorial design of 2 hypothetical patients: (1) a 50-year-old white woman with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity, a 30-pack-year history of smoking, and a family history of breast cancer; and (2) a 45-year-old black man with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, a 30-pack-year history of smoking, and a family history of colorectal cancer. Two visit lengths (40 minutes vs 20 minutes) were given. Each patient was eligible for at least 11 preventive services. Main Outcomes and Measures: Physicians rated their likelihood of discussing each service during the visit and reported their top 3 priorities for patients 1 and 2. Physician choices were compared with the preventive services most likely to improve life expectancy, using a previously published mathematical model. Results: Of 241 physicians, 137 responded (57%), of whom 74 (54%) were female and 85 (62%) were younger than 50 years. Physicians agreed they prioritized preventive services (mean score, 4.27 [95% CI, 4.12-4.42] of 5.00), mostly by ability to improve quality (4.56 [95% CI, 4.44-4.68] of 5.00) or length (4.53 [95% CI, 4.40-4.66] of 5.00) of life. Physicians reported more prioritization in the 20- vs 40-minute visit, indicating that they were likely to discuss fewer services during the shorter visit (median, 5 [interquartile range {IQR}, 3-8] vs 11 [IQR, 9-13] preventive services for patient 1, and 4 [IQR, 3-6] vs 9 [IQR, 8-11] for patient 2). Physicians reported similar top 3 priorities for both patients: smoking cessation, hypertension control, and glycemic control for patient 1 and smoking cessation, hypertension control, and colorectal cancer screening for patient 2. Physicians' top 3 priorities did not usually include diet and exercise or weight loss (ranked in their top 3 recommendations for either patient by only 48 physicians [35%]), although these were among the 3 preventive services most likely to improve life expectancy based on the mathematical model. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, physicians prioritized preventive services under time constraints, but priorities did not vary across patients. Physicians did not prioritize lifestyle interventions despite large potential benefits. Future research should consider whether physicians and patients would benefit from guidance on preventive care priorities.


Assuntos
Prioridades em Saúde/normas , Médicos/normas , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Adulto , Competência Clínica/normas , Comorbidade , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Feminino , Prioridades em Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos/psicologia , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos de Atenção Primária/normas , Médicos de Atenção Primária/tendências , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Medicina Preventiva/tendências , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA