RESUMO
Background: Deep dyspareunia affects 50% of people with endometriosis. The Ohnut is a set of interlocking rings that fit over the penis/insertive object. One or more rings can be used to limit insertion depth and reduce deep dyspareunia. Aim: We conducted a pilot, parallel, open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the feasibility of the study design and the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the Ohnut. Method: Participants were recruited from a tertiary center for endometriosis. Eligibility criteria were surgically confirmed endometriosis, age 19-49 years, monogamous sexual relationship with a partner willing to participate in the study, and no comorbid superficial dyspareunia, anxiety, or depression. Couples were randomized into an intervention group or a waitlist control group using a 1:1 allocation ratio. All couples had sex as normal during weeks 1 to 4 (baseline period), and couples in the intervention group used the Ohnut with sex during weeks 5 to 10 (intervention period) while controls had sex as normal. Patient participants used daily diaries to record sexual activity and deep dyspareunia score (0-10) for the 10-week study. Intervention group participants completed an acceptability questionnaire at the end of the study. Outcomes: The primary outcomes were feasibility of the study and acceptability of the Ohnut. We also assessed differences in deep dyspareunia scores in the participants who used the Ohnut compared to the control participants who did not. Results: We recruited approximately 5 couples per month of active recruitment. Of 864 potentially eligible participants, we successfully contacted 44.7% (n = 386), of whom 8.0% (n = 31) consented, 64.8% (n = 250) were ineligible, and 27.2% (n = 105) declined. Thirty-one couples were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group, and 17 couples completed the study. Intervention group couples used the Ohnut for an average of 72.4% (32.7%) of sexual encounters during the intervention period. The mean acceptability index score for the Ohnut was 0.83 (0.078) among patients and 0.83 (0.049) among partners (index between 0 and 1). After controlling for baseline deep dyspareunia, there was a significant difference in the intervention period mean deep dyspareunia scores between the control and intervention group (4.69 (2.44) vs 2.46 (1.82), P = .012). Clinical Implications: We identified preliminary evidence for the acceptability and efficacy of the Ohnut among both patients and partners, suggesting that the Ohnut may be a useful stand-alone or adjuvant management tool for endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia. Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of this study were the "real-world" use of the Ohnut and data collection from both patients and partners. Limitations of the study design included the strict eligibility criteria that affected feasibility and generalizability. Conclusion: This pilot RCT indicated that the Ohnut may be an acceptable and effective intervention to reduce endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia. We identified opportunities to improve design for a larger RCT. Clinical Trial Registration: This clinical trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT04370444).
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia is associated with reduced sexual quality of life, lower self-esteem, and impaired sexual function. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to assess the acceptability of a phallus length reducer (brand name: Ohnut [OhnutCo]), which is a buffer worn over the penis or a penetrating object to reduce endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia, and the feasibility of a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT). The secondary objective is to obtain estimates of the effectiveness of the buffer. An embedded substudy will explore the acceptability and the preliminary validity and reliability of a vaginal insert for the self-assessment of deep dyspareunia. METHODS: Ours is an investigator-initiated, 2-arm RCT. We will recruit 40 patient participants with diagnosed endometriosis between the ages of 19 and 49 years, as well as their sexual partners. The participating couples will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the experimental arm or the waitlist control arm. The length of the study period will be 10 weeks, during which time all participants will record deep dyspareunia severity following each episode of sexual intercourse. In weeks 1 to 4, all patient participants will record deep dyspareunia severity at each sexual encounter. In weeks 5 to 10, participants in the experimental arm will use the buffer during vaginal penetration; participants in the waitlist control arm will continue engaging in vaginal penetration as usual. Participants will complete questionnaires for assessing measures of anxiety, depression, and sexual function at baseline, at 4 weeks, and at 10 weeks. In the substudy, patient participants will self-assess dyspareunia by using a vaginal insert on 2 occasions, at least 1 week apart. The primary outcomes-the acceptability and feasibility of the buffer-will be assessed with descriptive statistics, and the secondary outcome-phallus length reducer effectiveness-will be assessed by using an analysis of covariance-based approach. For the vaginal insert, we will assess acceptability, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity via correlation analyses comparing the use of the insert to clinical examination in terms of dyspareunia assessment outcomes. RESULTS: Our pilot will provide initial data on the acceptability and effectiveness of the buffer and the feasibility of the study methodology. The results from our study are expected to be submitted for publication by the spring of 2023. As of September 2021, we have consented 31 couples into the study. CONCLUSIONS: Our study will provide preliminary evidence for the self-assessment and management of endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia. The findings will inform the decision to proceed to a definitive RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04370444; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04370444. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/39834.
RESUMO
We have established an animal model for olanzapine-induced body weight gain, and used it to explore the relation between this weight gain, excessive food consumption, gross motor activity, and macronutrient choice. Female Sprague-Dawley rats received olanzapine (OLAN) or diluent (1.2mg/kg per day) via gavage for 10 days. Rats receiving OLAN exhibited significant increases in body weight when compared with control rats. Body weight returned to control levels once OLAN treatment was discontinued. Food consumption among the OLAN-treated group was significantly greater than among control rats between 6 and 10 days of treatment. Between 4 and 10 days of treatment, feed efficiency (grams of weight gained/grams of food consumed) was also significantly greater among animals receiving OLAN. In contrast, chronic administration of haloperidol (0.04mg/kg; q.d.; gavage) did not influence body weight or food consumption of treated rats. Gross motor activity was significantly reduced by OLAN between 1 and 10 days of treatment, also returning to control levels when treatment was discontinued. No significant changes were observed in brain DA, DOPAC, HVA or 5-HIAA among animals receiving OLAN daily for 30 days; however, 5-HT levels were significantly elevated. In contrast, acute (1.2mg/kg; 2h; i.p.) administration of OLAN significantly increased brain DOPAC and HVA levels without affecting those of 5-HT or 5-HIAA. OLAN (1.2mg/kg; q.d.; 10 days) administration did not alter macronutrient choice (carbohydrate:protein ratio) of rats. These data show that an animal model of OLAN-induced weight gain is readily generated, and suggest that the weight gain results at least in part from increased food intake, reduced gross motor activity, and enhanced feed efficiency.