Endoscopic main duct stenting in refractory postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy - a friend or a foe?

BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant (CR) postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) are common. Endoscopic treatment (ET) has only scarcely been explored. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for CR POPF after DP and the efficacy of ET in adjunct to standard therapy. METHODS: Consecutive patients without previous pancreatic surgery who underwent DP between 2011 and 2020 were evaluated, analyzing risk factors for CR POPF. The choice and performance of ET, main pancreatic duct (MPD) stenting, was not standardized. Healing time and complications after ET were registered. RESULTS: 406 patients underwent DP, CR POPF occurred in 29.6%. ET was performed in 17 patients 27 days (median) after index surgery. Risk for CR POPF was increased in ASA-PS 1-2 patients, MPD ≤ 3 mm, procedure time ≥ 3 h, and CRP ≥ 180 on postoperative day 3. POPF resolved with standard treatment after 32 days and 59 days in the ET group (p < 0.001). There was one mortality in the ET-group (not procedure related). Mild post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: CR POPF is common after DP. Long operating time, a narrow MPD, low ASA score, and high postoperative CRP were risk factors for CR POPF. ET was not beneficial but proper evaluation was not possible due to few patients and non-standardized treatment. Complications after ET appeared mild.

Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in right- and left-sided colon cancer: a rationale for optimization of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor therapy.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) has been identified as a potential target for prevention and therapy of human colorectal cancers (CRC) and other cancers. Because right-sided colon cancers (RSCCs) exhibit clinicopathologic and genetic differences from left-sided colorectal cancers (LSCRCs), determination of COX-2 status in these subsets of CRCs may be clinically relevant in designing COX-2 inhibitor trials for CRC and in subsequent assessment of objective therapeutic response to such therapy. Thirty-six primary CRC resection specimens (18 left, 18 right) from 36 patients were evaluated. Representative tumor sections were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis of COX-2. A semiquantitative system was used to score cytoplasmic COX-2 immunostaining. The tumors were considered COX-2 positive if more than 10% tumor cells showed COX-2 staining. Clinicopathologic and COX-2 data were compared for LSCRCs versus RSCCs. All 18 LSCRCs and 13 of 18 (72%) RSCCs were well to moderately differentiated. Overall rates of COX-2 positivity for the LSCRCs versus RSCCs were 67% (12 of 18) and 33% (6 of 18), respectively (P = 0.04). Furthermore, 11 of 12 (92%) COX-2 positive LSCRCs and 3 of 6 (50%) COX-2 positive RSCCs were stage II-IV at resection. All 12 COX-2 positive LSCRCs were associated with advanced primary tumor and 4 of 12 (33%) LCRCs had distant metastases. These associations could not be evaluated for the RSCCs because of the limited number of COX-2 positive cases. The more frequent expression of COX-2 in LSCRCs as compared with RSCCs supports the hypothesis that COX-2 expression may be related to genetic alterations specific to right- or left-sided CRCs. Further studies are needed to elucidate such relationships. Our data also suggest that stratification of patients with CRC into right- and left-sided subsets may be important in optimal patient selection for COX-2 inhibitor therapy and for subsequent assessment of objective therapeutic response.