[Comparison of subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy and total colectomy with ileoproctostomy in treating slow transit constipation].

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcome and quality of life of subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy and total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TAC-IRA) in patients with severe slow transit constipation (STC). METHODS: Of the 56 patients enrolled in this study from January 1999 to June 2008, 32 cases underwent subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy, and 20 patients underwent TAC-IRA. The patients' clinical characteristics, operative data, postoperative outcome, functional result and gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) survey were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 1-7 years (median, 4 years). The basic clinical characteristics between the two groups was comparable. During the follow-up period, the number of daily bowel movements in the subtotal colectomy group was significantly fewer than that in TAC-IRA group (2.5+/-0.8 vs. 3.4+/-0.8; P=0.000). The Wexner continence score was significantly lower in subtotal colectomy group (4.4+/-1.6 vs. 5.8+/-1.9; P=0.011), and the GIQLI score in subtotal colectomy group was significantly higher than that in the TAC-IRA group (120.7+/-7.5 vs. 111.1+/-12.0; P=0.005). CONCLUSION: Subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy appeared to be the superior treatment than the TAC-IRA for selected patients with slow transit constipation for improved functional outcomes and quality of life.

[Long-term results of subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy in chronic slow-transit constipation].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term results after subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy in idiopathic chronic slow-transit constipation. METHODS: Between January 2003 and February 2004, 14 patients with chronic slow-transit constipation and 2 patients with mixed constipation underwent subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy. The following information was collected during follow-up (mean 3 years): number of bowel movement, stool consistency, complications, quality of life and degree of satisfaction. RESULTS: There was no mortality or major postoperative complications. One month after the operation, bowel frequency was a mean of 4 daily, with a semi-liquid stool consistency. After 3 years, bowel frequency was a mean of 2 daily, with a semi-solid stool consistency. Although no patient used antidiarrheal medicine, laxatives continued to be used by one case with mixed chronic constipation. All patients reported a good or improved quality of life and satisfied with the results. Two patients developed adhesive ileus post operation. There was no diarrhea or incontinence occurred during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Subtotal colectomy with end-to-end antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy for appropriately selected patients with slow-transit constipation results in consistent relief of constipation and satisfactory outcome.

The effect of nano-TiO2 photocatalysis on the antioxidant activities of Cu, Zn-SOD at physiological pH.

Security issues of nanoparticles on biological toxicity and potential environmental risk have attracted more and more attention with the rapid development and wide applications of nanotechnology. In this work, we explored the effect and probable mechanism of nano-TiO2 on antioxidant activity of copper, zinc superoxide dismutase (Cu, Zn-SOD) under natural light and mixed light at physiological pH. Nano-TiO2 was prepared by sol-hydrothermal method, and then characterized by X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Transmission electron micrographs (TEM). The Cu, Zn-SOD was purified by sephadex G75 chromatography and qualitatively analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polypropylene amide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The effect and mechanism were elucidated base on Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FT-IR), Circular Dichroism (CD), zeta potential, and electron spin resonance (ESR) methods. Accompanying the results of FT-IR, CD and zeta potential, it could be concluded that nano-TiO2 had no effect on the antioxidant activity of Cu, Zn-SOD by comparing the relative activity under natural light at physiological pH. But the relative activity of Cu, Zn-SOD significantly decreased along with the increase of nano-TiO2 concentration under the mixed light. The results of ESR showed the cause of this phenomenon was the Cu(II) in the active site of Cu, Zn-SOD was reduced to Cu(I) by H2O2 and decreased the content of active Cu, Zn-SOD. The reduction can be inhibited by catalase. Excess O2·- produced by nano-TiO2 photocatalysis under mixed light accumulated a mass of H2O2 through disproportionation reaction in this experimental condition. The results show that nano-TiO2 cannot affect the antioxidant activity of Cu, Zn-SOD in daily life. The study on the effect of nano-TiO2 on Cu, Zn-SOD will provide a valid theory support for biological safety and the toxicological effect mechanism of nanomaterials on enzyme.

[Total colonic exclusion plus side to side ileorectal antiperistaltic anastomosis in the treatment for elderly patients with slow transit constipation].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of total colonic exclusion plus side to side antiperistaltic ileorectal anastomosis in the treatment for elderly patients with slow transit constipation (STC). METHODS: Clinical data of 13 patients with severe idiopathic STC undergoing the above novel procedure in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between May 2009 and September 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The Wexner constipation score and gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) before and 6 months after operation were compared. RESULTS: There were 8 female and 5 male patients, with a mean age of 74 years (range 63-82 years). No procedure-related deaths or any serious complication occurred. The length of follow-up ranged from 6 to 29 months (median,12 months). The duration of surgery was (55±4) min. Blood loss was (30±2) ml. The postoperative hospital stay ranged 10 to 16 days (mean 11.4 days). The first bowel movement occurred in the 4th day (range 2nd-8th day) after operation. There was no intestinal occlusion and anastomotic leakage that required surgery in all the patients. No fecal incontinence or constipation recurrence was found. One patient developed blind loop syndrome 14 months after operation. Postoperative complications included incision fat liquefaction in 2 cases, anorectal bearing-down while bowel movement in 2 cases, and minor defecate difficulty needed glycerin enema in 1 case. Wexner scores was significantly improved from 22.8±3.3 before operation to 5.4±2.1 six months after operation (P<0.05). GQLI was significantly increased from 93.6±20.5 before operation to 120.8±13.0 six months after operation (P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, the outcome was excellent in 11 patients and good in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: Total colonic exclusion plus side to side antiperistaltic ileorectal anastomosis is easy, safe and effective in the treatment for selected elderly patients with STC.

[Use of antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy in colorectal reconstruction].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility and functional outcome of antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy in colorectal reconstruction. METHODS: Fifty-six patients who underwent antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy were retrospectively studied. Indications for antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy included slow transit constipation(n=44), synchronous colon cancer or colonic polyps(n=5), acute obstructing left colon carcinoma(n=4), and adult megacolon(n=3). RESULTS: Short-term postoperative complications included wound infections(n=5), 3 lymphatic leakages(n=3), and inflammatory small bowel obstruction(n=1). One month after antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy, the median frequency of daily bowel movement was 4.0(range, 2-6). After a median follow-up of 4 years(range, 1 month to 7 years), the median daily bowel frequency was 2.5(range, 0.5-4.0). Five patients suffered from long-term postoperative complications including small bowel obstruction(n=3), incision hernia(n=1), and mild cecal dilatation(n=1). The mean Wexner incontinence score was 4.2±1.1. CONCLUSION: Antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy is safe and effective for colorectal reconstruction.

Subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy for selected patients with slow transit constipation-from Chinese report.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TAC-IRA) is recommended widely for the patients with severe, refractory slow transit constipation (STC). Subtotal colectomy with end-to-end antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis (Sarli procedure), an alternative for STC, has been paid particular attention. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare alterations of clinical functions and qualities of life between TAC-IRA and Sarli procedure. METHODS: Seventeen patients with STC who underwent Sarli procedure and 20 patients with STC who underwent TAC-IRA were chosen for this study. Patient characteristics, operative data, postoperative data, alterations of clinical function, and quality of life were compared. The gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) survey was used to evaluate postoperative qualities of life. RESULTS: At the mean 4-year follow-up (range 2-6 years), the frequency of daily bowel movement in the Sarli group was significantly less than that in the TAC-IRA group (2.4 +/- 0.9 vs. 3.4 +/- 0.8; P = 0.0014), and the Wexner continence scores were significantly lower in the Sarli group compared to the TAC-IRA group (4.3 +/- 1.8 vs. 5.8 +/- 1.9; P = 0.0223). However, the GIQLI score in Sarli group was higher than the TAC-IRA group (119.8 +/- 7.5 vs. 111.1 +/- 12.0, P = 0.0455). Post subtotal colectomy barium enema showed a sign of "reservoir" at the residual ascending colon and cecum. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the TAC-IRA, subtotal colectomy with end-to-end antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy for appropriately selected patients with STC resulted in relief of constipation, satisfactory functional outcome, and improved qualities of life.

[Efficacy comparison of subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy and total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for patients with slow transit constipation].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy between subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy and total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TAC-IRA) for patients with severe refractory slow transit constipation(STC). METHODS: During 1999 to 2002, TAC-IRA was the preferred procedure for 20 STC patients in our department. From 2003 to 2005, 17 STC patients underwent subtotal colectomy plus antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy. Clinical data of the two groups were collected and compared retrospectively. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in basic preoperative clinical data between the two groups. During the follow-up period, the time of daily defecation in the antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy group was less than that of TAC-IRA group (2.4+/-0.9 vs 3.4+/-0.8, P=0.0014), meanwhile the Wexner continence score was significantly lower in the antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy group (4.3+/-1.8 vs 5.8+/-1.9, P=0.0223). Barium enema after subtotal colectomy showed that residual ascending colon and cecum presented a sign of "reservoir". CONCLUSION: Subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy is a better method for appropriately selected patients with STC than TAC-IRA.