Feasibility of microwave ablation of the vertebral growth plate for spine growth regulation: a preliminary study.

PURPOSE: To explore the feasibility of microwave ablation (MWA) of the vertebral growth plate as a minimally invasive treatment for early-onset scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One side of the L1-L3 vertebral growth plates were ablated using different MWA powers. Ablation safety and size were examined. Subsequently, L1-L3 vertebral growth plates were ablated on one side for 40 s at 20 W. At 2, 4, and 6 weeks after the ablation, growth changes of the spine were observed. RESULTS: No piglets died during and after ablation, and all had modified Tarlov Grade 5. The safe MWA time (time for safely ablating the vertebral growth plate) was 17.0 ± 1.5 s at 50 W, 23.0 ± 2.3 s at 40 W, 31.0 ± 3.1 s at 30 W, 47.0 ± 3.7 s at 20 W, 70.0 ± 4.2 s at 15 W, and 158.0 ± 5.0 s at 10 W. With power <15 W, the vertebral growth plate could not be effectively ablated within the safe ablation time. Within the safe ablation times, the MWA size on hematoxylin and eosin slices on a transverse diameter was between 7 and 10 mm; and that on longitudinal diameter was mainly determined by the ablation needle length. Moreover, the growth plate and annulus fibrosus on the ablated side grew poorly over time, the vertebral body showed significant wedge-shaped changes, and the spine showed significant unbalanced growth. CONCLUSION: MWA of the vertebral growth plate can be performed safely when accompanied with appropriate thermometry, and could be a new minimally invasive strategy in regulating spine growth.

Meta-analysis of new intervention measures for preventing side effects of artificial joint replacement.

BACKGROUND: Intertrochanteric fracture of the femur occurs mostly among older people, and seriously affects daily life and quality of life. At present, physical intervention, drug treatment, routine intervention and rehabilitation training are widely used for prevention of side effects, but it is still inconclusive which intervention has the best effect. AIM: To compare the effects of new intervention measures for preventing side effects of artificial joint replacement. METHODS: We searched the Chinese and English literatures for comparative studies on the prevention of side effects of new interventions for artificial joint replacement from July 2013 to June 2023 in China HowNet, PubMed, Wanfang, Weipu and other databases. Study quality was evaluated by improved Jadad scoring standard, and the effects of different interventions on preventing different complications were analyzed by meta-analysis of evidence-based medicine with Review Manager 5.0 software. RESULTS: Ten articles, including 869 cases, were finally included. The preventive effects of different interventions on the side effects of artificial joint replacement were studied, and valid data were extracted. There were two articles on the preventive effects of drug intervention, four on comparison of the preventive effects of combined and single interventions, and three on the preventive effects of physical intervention, rehabilitation training and routine intervention. Meta-analysis showed that the preventive effect of rivaroxaban was significantly better than low molecular weight heparin calcium [mean difference (MD) = -0.16, 95%CI: -0.28 to -0.04, P < 0.05]. The effect of combined intervention was significantly better than that of single intervention (MD = -0.08, 95%CI: -0.16 to -0.01, P < 0.001). Physical intervention was significantly better than routine intervention and rehabilitation training (MD = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.16-0.36, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban combined with rehabilitation training is preferred for preventing deep vein thrombosis after artificial joint replacement. In the prevention of pulmonary embolism, rivaroxaban drug intervention is given priority. The effect of combined intervention is better than that of single intervention.