Editorial Commentary: The ideal treatment options for hip cartilage repair remains elusive and requires consideration of individual patient factors.

Arthroscopic treatment of hip chondral lesions is a challenge. Recent research shows arthroscopic debridement with preservation of the subchondral bone plate shows superior results versus microfracture. The results of microfracture can be unpredictable, largely due to the formation of fibrocartilage, which lacks the durability of hyaline cartilage. Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) has emerged as a promising alternative. This technique combines microfracture or abrasion with the application of a collagen membrane, aiming to enhance the quality of the repair tissue. AMIC not only improves patient-reported outcomes but also decreases the rate of conversion to THA when compared to microfracture. Yet, the results remain only fair and variable. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), which involves the cultivation and reimplantation of chondrocytes, while more labor-intensive, may lead to more robust and durable repair. Additionally, newer methods like minced cartilage implantation show encouraging early results. We are in the early stages of understanding cartilage repair, and individual patient factors, such as size of the lesion, age, activity level, and coexisting conditions all require consideration.

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Leads to Small but Consistent Reductions in Pain Between 18 and 24 Hours Postoperatively in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the use of a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block would reduce perioperative pain after arthroscopic therapy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and to examine opioid requirements and occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS: Between May 2022 and October 2022, patients (N = 68) undergoing arthroscopic surgery for FAIS were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The first group received an ultrasound-guided PENG preoperatively with 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and standardized postoperative oral medication. The second group received a sham block preoperatively with 20 mL of 0.9% saline and standardized postoperative oral medication. The primary end point was pain scores (visual analog score [VAS], 0-10) during the first 24 hours postoperatively. To quantify clinical significance of outcome achievement for the VAS pain score, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated using the half standard deviation method. The incidence of PONV as well as opioid usage (converted to morphine equivalent) within the first 24 hours were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Randomization and permission were successfully obtained from 68 participants. From the fifteenth postoperative hour, the PENG group reported significantly less postoperative pain than the control group (24th postoperative hour: VAS pain PENG group 1.3 ± 0.9 [0-3]; 95% confidence interval {CI} 0.4-1.2 vs the VAS pain control group 2.4 ± 1.6 [0-5]; 95% CI 1.4-4.7; P = .009). The VAS pain score threshold for achieving the MCID at 24 hours postoperative was defined as a decrease of 1.1. 27 patients (79%) in the PENG group and 22 patients (65%) in the control group were able to achieve MCID (P = .009). Opioid dosage and postoperative nausea did not differ significantly between groups (P = .987 and P = .655, respectively). Concomitant complications such as falls, hematomas, or weakened muscles did not occur in either group. CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, a PENG block minimally reduced pain after arthroscopic treatment for FAIS between the 18th and 24th postoperative hours. The PENG group achieved significantly more often the pain VAS MCID. However, there was no proof that the PENG group consumed fewer opioids than the control group. Overall, PONV was found at a low and comparable rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Combining a digital health application with standard care significantly enhances rehabilitation outcomes for ACL surgery patients.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common sports injuries. Regardless of the surgical treatment, patients require intensive education about the pathology, therapeutic options and physical therapy. However, it is often not possible for the patient to start physical therapy directly and schedule adequate consultations. Digital health applications are medical devices that can help bridge the gap between physiotherapy sessions and provide qualified, convenient and effective education and treatment. This study is needed to explore alternative methods to ensure continuous and effective rehabilitation for ACL patients who face delays in accessing traditional physiotherapy. The study aimed to compare app-assisted therapy plus standard of care (conventional orthopaedic and physiotherapeutic measures) versus isolated standard of care for patients with planned ACL surgery. METHODS: A monocentric, two-arm, 1:1 randomized controlled study examined 80 patients after a cruciate ligament rupture with or without meniscal injury. Patients over 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of ACL rupture and planned surgical reconstruction using autologous grafts were included. The study criteria additionally included willingness to use the Orthopy app and sufficient German language proficiency. The study excluded patients with severe concomitant injuries, prior knee surgeries, chronic pain conditions and those not compatible with app usage. Patients were randomized and their baseline data (t0) was collected. Subsequently, they received their treatment according to their treatment group. The study included a presurgery period (2-6 weeks) and a postsurgery period (14 weeks). Interim assessments were done via online questionnaires at t1 (if more than 3 weeks before surgery) and t3, t4 and t5 (postsurgery). Additional clinical assessments were conducted at t2 (presurgery) and t6 (14 weeks postsurgery). Primary outcome measures included the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), with subjective pain and function levels (numeric rating scale [NRS]) as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The clinical trial was able to show positive outcomes on the KOOS Pain and Symptoms subscale of the primary endpoint KOOS in the interventional group compared to the standard of care group. A statistically significant pain reduction could be seen at t1 (p = 0.0005), t2 (p = 0.0068) and t4 (approximately 6 weeks after surgery; p = 0.01). A significant reduction of symptoms at t1 (p = 0.0001), t2 (p = 0.0036) and t6 (p = 0.0377) were recognized. These findings are further supported by the significant benefit of the pain NRS at t4 and positive tendencies at t3, t5 and t6. The KOOS subscales quality of life (p = 0.0066), activities of daily living (p = 0.0009) and Sport (p = 0.0484) showed significant effects before surgery. CONCLUSION: The Orthopy app is a medical device that is both safe and effective for use. Combining the Orthopy app and standard of care can significantly improve prehabilitation and rehabilitation in surgical treatment with ACL reconstruction compared with the isolated standard of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Assessing the Efficacy: Mid-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of the Comprehensive Short Stem System in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: For degenerative shoulder disease, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has proven successful; however, problems such as scapular notching and instability still exist. These difficulties are intended to be addressed by recently improved prosthesis designs with reduced neck-shaft angles (NSA). Still, there are issues with complications, particularly with the humerus. In an effort to avoid these problems and maintain bone stock, a recently designed straight-short-stem humeral component was used; however, yet its clinical and radiological outcomes in RSA remain largely unexplored. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using a 55mm straight short stem (Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System; Zimmer Biomet), a retrospective analysis of 93 patients undergoing primary RSA was carried out. Clinical assessments, including scores and range of motion, were conducted both before and after surgery. Complications, bone adaptation, and stem alignment were all evaluated radiographically. Significant correlations between postoperative shoulder movements and function were linked with angles of prosthesis lateralization and distalization. RESULTS: Patients demonstrated significant improvements in clinical scores at 35-month follow-up on average: Constant-Murley (76.4 ± 13.4), ASES (84.8 ± 16.5), DASH (17.1 ± 15.8), and UCLA (7.1 ± 1.5). Radiographic assessments showed no stem loosening and stable implant attachment. There was no scapular notching, and there were noticeable improvements in shoulder range of motion and function. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study validates the efficacy of a straight short stem for acceptable clinical outcomes and implant stability in RSA. Notably, it demonstrates specific angle ranges crucial for optimal post-surgical shoulder function. The findings suggest this stem design presents potential benefits in RSA, highlighting its safety and effectiveness while providing insights for future clinical strategies. The study contributes valuable data toward understanding and enhancing patient outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty procedures.

Postoperative hip bracing reduces kinesiophobia in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy: a randomized-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Detailed postoperative rehabilitation protocols after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are still a matter of debate. Adjunctive hip bracing represents a promising tool to improve early patients' mobilization. To present, the effect of hip brace therapy on postoperative functional outcomes and specific patient individual psychologic factors remains controversially discussed. Consequently, we aimed to report postoperative outcomes focusing on hip function, pain and kinesiophobia between braced and unbraced patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized-controlled trial was conducted, including patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS. After exclusion, a final study cohort of 36 patients in the intervention group (postoperative hip brace) and 36 patients in the control group (no hip brace) were compared for kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), pain (Visual analog scale) and joint function (International Hip Outcome Tool-12) within the first six postoperative months. RESULTS: Hip arthroscopy significantly improved all patient-reported outcomes in both groups. Intergroup analysis revealed significantly lower levels of kinesiophobia in braced patients at 6-months follow up (30.7 vs. 34.1, p = 0.04) while not negatively affecting pain and joint function. No intra- and postoperative complications occurred within both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study could demonstrate that bracing after hip arthroscopy can positively influence kinesiophobia, while the brace did not negatively impact postoperative pain and quality of life. Thus, hip bracing could be a viable assistive therapy in the postoperative rehabilitation phase after hip arthroscopy.

Simplifying radiologic reports with natural language processing: a novel approach using ChatGPT in enhancing patient understanding of MRI results.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the factual accuracy, completeness of medical information, and potential harmfulness of incorrect conclusions by medical professionals in automatically generated texts of varying complexity (1) using ChatGPT, Furthermore, patients without a medical background were asked to evaluate comprehensibility, information density, and conclusion possibilities (2). METHODS: In the study, five different simplified versions of MRI findings of the knee of different complexity (A: simple, B: moderate, C: complex) were each created using ChatGPT. Subsequently, a group of four medical professionals (two orthopedic surgeons and two radiologists) and a group of 20 consecutive patients evaluated the created reports. For this purpose, all participants received a group of simplified reports (simple, moderate, and severe) at intervals of 1 week each for their respective evaluation using a specific questionnaire. Each questionnaire consisted of the original report, the simplified report, and a series of statements to assess the quality of the simplified reports. Participants were asked to rate their level of agreement with a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The evaluation of the medical specialists showed that the findings produced were consistent in quality depending on their complexity. Factual correctness, reproduction of relevant information and comprehensibility for patients were rated on average as "Agree". The question about possible harm resulted in an average of "Disagree". The evaluation of patients also revealed consistent quality of reports, depending on complexity. Simplicity of word choice and sentence structure was rated "Agree" on average, with significant differences between simple and complex findings (p = 0.0039) as well as between moderate and complex findings (p = 0.0222). Participants reported being significantly better at knowing what the text was about (p = 0.001) and drawing the correct conclusions the more simplified the report of findings was (p = 0.013829). The question of whether the text informed them as well as a healthcare professional was answered as "Neutral" across all findings. CONCLUSION: By using ChatGPT, MRI reports can be simplified automatically with consistent quality so that the relevant information is understandable to patients. However, a report generated in this way does not replace a thorough discussion between specialist and patient.

The role of different acetabular morphologies on patient-reported outcomes following periacetabular osteotomy in borderline hip dysplasia.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment option for borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) includes hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). To the present day the controversial discussion remains, which intervention to prefer. Literature reports supporting an educated choice are scare, based on small patient cohorts and do not address the variability of acetabular morphology. Consequently, we intended to report PAO outcomes, from patients diagnosed with BHD, dependent on acetabular morphology, in a large patient cohort and aimed to define risk factors for poor clinical results and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective monocentre study was conducted. Patients enrolled underwent PAO for symptomatic BHD (LCEA, 18°-25°). A total of 107 hips were included with 94 complete data sets were available for evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 1 year and a mean follow-up of 2.3 years. The mean age was 31 ± 8.2 years, and 81.3% were female. As the primary outcome measure, we utilized the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) with minimal clinically important change (MCID) of eight to define clinical failure. Results were compared after a comprehensive radiographic assessment distinguishing between lateral deficient vs. anterior/posterolateral deficient acetabular and stable vs. unstable hip joints. RESULTS: Overall, clinical success was achieved in 91.5% of patients and the mHHS improved significantly (52 vs. 84.7, p < 0.001). Eight hips failed to achieve the MCID and four had radiographic signs of overcorrection. Comparing variable joint morphologies, the rate of clinical success was higher in patients with an anterior/posterolateral deficient acetabular covarage compared to lateral deficient acetabular (95.2% vs. 90.4%). tThe highest rate of clinical failure was recorded in unstable hip joints (85.7% vs. 92.5% in stable hips). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that PAO is an effective means to treat symptomatic BHD with variable acetabular morphologies, achieving a clinical success in 91.5% of all patients. To maintain a high level of safety and patient satisfaction technical accuracy appears crucial.

Patients older than 55 years regain sporting and recreational activities after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: (1) To compare sporting and recreational activity levels before and at a minimum 6 year follow-up, and (2) to assess the clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients older than 55 years. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data of 150 patients with a mean age of 64 ± 4.5 (57-74) years was evaluated 8.6 ± 1.4 (6-11) years after primary ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. All patients were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee scoring system (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner activity level, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The level of recreational activities was assessed using a sport-specific questionnaire. All patients were categorized according to Isolated and Combined ACL injury groups. RESULTS: The data of 125 patients were analyzed at the last follow-up. While 25 patients were lost to follow-up, 117 of 125 patients were active before their injury in at least one sports discipline compared to 121 of 125 patients after ACL reconstruction. One hundred and two (82%) patients had returned to their recreational activities at the final follow-up. The mean IKDC subjective score increased from 49.5 ± 23.2 (11.5-100) to 76.2 ± 14.8 (33.3-100) (p < 0.0001). The mean KOOS sport increased significantly from 36 ± 36.2 (0-100) to 74.1 ± 25.5 (0-100) (p < 0.0001). The mean VAS score improved from 6.0 ± 2.6 (0-10) to 1.0 ± 1.4 (0-6) (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the median Tegner activity level (preoperative 5 (2-8) vs. follow-up 5 (2-8) (n.s). There was no significant difference in the number of sports disciplines and duration when comparing pre-injury and mid-term follow-up activity after ACL reconstruction. High-impact activities experienced a significant decline, while a significant increase in participation in low-impact activities was recorded. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with symptomatic instability regained their pre-injury recreational activity level with excellent clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Nevertheless, a change from high-to low-impact activities has been observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Recreational activity after open hip abductor repair.

BACKGROUND: Hip abductor tear (HAT) is an increasingly diagnosed cause of refractory lateral hip pain and dysfunction, affecting 10-25% of the general population. PURPOSE: (1) to determine the rate of return to activity and to assess the physical and recreational activity of patients undergoing open hip abductor repair (oHATr) and (2) to describe the modification or initiation of new sports disciplines. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 28 patients (29 hips) who underwent an oHATr were prospectively analyzed at a midterm follow-up of 3.5 (range 2-5) years. The sports and recreational activity levels, as well as type of sports practiced before and after surgery, and The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) were assessed via questionnaire. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, all patients were active in sports after surgery. The duration and frequency of sports activities showed a slight decrease (48-42 min per week and 3.2-2.9 sessions per week, respectively) (p = 0.412 and 0.135, respectively). The VR-12 had a score of 45 (13.12-63.18) points for the physical component and 41 (32-53.8) points for the mental component. 100% of the patients would undergo the surgery again. 95% of patients were satisfied with the overall results of the surgical outcome, with 98% satisfied with their hip pain relief and ability to undertake daily and work activities. Moreover, 94% were satisfied with their ability to return to recreational activities. The failure rate in our cohort was approximately 14%. CONCLUSION: All patients who underwent an oHATr were able to return at least to one type of sport. This cohort was highly satisfied with their sports involvement and recreational activity achievement. In addition, 88% of patients reported that oHATr improved sports activity. There was a shift from higher to lower impact sports. Furthermore, just 3 hips present a retear after surgery.

Amorphous calcium deposits of the hip joint: current observations and state of the scientific discussion.

INTRODUCTION: As a result of increasing hip arthroscopies, rare pathologies as intra-articular amorphous calcium deposits in the capsule-labral (perilabral) recess can be recognized. There is a lack of publications on this pathology. The largest case series included 18 patients. An association between femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and female sex was observed. Furthermore, a correlation between the size of the calcific deposit and the preoperative hip function score was reported. Our hypothesis was that the data of our patient collective with intraoperative amorphous calcium deposits of the hip joint are comparable to the existing data to confirm previous observations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 01/2018 to 08/2020, a total of 714 hip arthroscopies were performed. 12 (1.7%) patients who presented intra-articular amorphous calcium deposits during arthroscopy were included. On radiographs, signs of impingement and osteoarthritis were determined. Characteristics and size of the calcific deposits were examined. Preoperative and at the time of follow-up (23 months), patient-reported outcome scores (PROS) were evaluated. Duration of symptoms, pain medication, comorbidities, and return-to-work were evaluated too. RESULTS: The PROS of the four female and eight male patients improved significantly. The average size of the calcific deposit was 6.9 mm in the anteroposterior radiographs. Separation of the calcific deposit from the acetabular rim was seen in nine cases. No correlation between deposit sizes and PROS was found. Cam morphology was treated in ten cases. All patients returned to work after a median of 7 weeks (2.5-13 weeks). CONCLUSION: Amorphous calcium deposits were found in approximately 1% of all hip joints with indication for hip arthroscopy. They are not consistently associated with gender, intra-articular hip pathologies or comorbidities. The clustered occurrence in cam FAI can be justified solely by the fact that impingement is by far the most common indication for hip arthroscopy.

Revision lateralization osteotomy of the tibial tubercle has excellent outcomes in patients suffering from previous medial tibial tubercle overcorrection.

INTRODUCTION: Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) is a common procedure used to treat patients with patellofemoral instability (PFI) and osteoarthritis (PFOA). Medial patellar maltracking due to previous excessive medialization of the tibial tubercle has rarely been reported. Therefore, the goal of this study was to assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after revision osteotomy with lateralization of the tibial tubercle (RL-TTO) to correct medial patellofemoral maltracking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2017 and 2021, a series of 11 patients (male/female 1/10; age 35.8 ± 10.5 years) were treated by RL-TTO, of whom 8 patients could be retrospectively evaluated after a mean of 32.4 ± 15.1 months (range 18-61 months) postoperatively. The Kujala anterior knee pain scale, the patellofemoral subscale of the Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS-PF), and a numeric analog scale (NAS; 0-10) regarding anterior knee pain (AKP) at rest and during activity were assessed from pre- to postoperatively. RESULTS: The preoperative mean tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) and tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distances were - 6.5 ± 6.5 mm and 0.7 ± 4.6 mm, respectively. The intraoperatively determined amount of tibial tubercle lateralization averaged 10.7 ± 3.6 mm. The Kujala score and KOOS-PF improved significantly from 33.6 ± 10.1 (23-51) points to 94.4 ± 6.2 points (82-100) (p < 0.001) and from 20.6 ± 13.2 points (0-43.3) to 87.3 ± 9.9 points (72.8-100) (p < 0.001) from pre- to postoperatively, respectively. Pain at rest decreased from 5.8 ± 1.9 to 0.8 ± 0.9 (p < 0.001), and pain during activity decreased from 8.6 ± 1.3 to 1.6 ± 1.5 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: RL-TTO significantly improved subjective knee function and AKP in patients suffering from medial patellar maltracking due to previous excessive tibial tubercle medialization osteotomy at short-term follow-up.

Analysis and 3D correction of glenoid dysplasia with metal hemi-wedge base plate augment: short-term radiographic outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid defects can be addressed traditionally by asymmetric reaming or by bone-preserving correction to a more lateral joint line by bone or metal augmented baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasties. While there is more evidence in literature regarding the outcome and complications of Bony Increased Offset Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty (BIO-RSA), there is minimal reported experience with the outcome after metal glenoid augments. The aim of this study was to determine whether a metal augment can correct the glenoid deformity in an anatomic manner. METHODS: Glenoid morphology and deformity were determined in 50 patients with Walch type B1, B2, D and Favard type E0-E3 glenoid defects using preoperative radiographic and computed tomography (CT) analysis. All patients received a preoperative planning CT with 3D planning, and measurements of glenoid inclination (in 3 planes proximal, middle, distal), reversed shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA) and glenoid version were obtained. All patients had a pathologic inclination in the coronal or frontal planes of > 10°. Above the threshold of 10° pathological glenoid version or inclination metal hemi-augments of 10°, 20°, or 30° were used which allow an individual 360° augment positioning according to the patient glenoid deformity. RESULTS: The mean preoperative numbers of the glenoid version demonstrate that most glenoids were in retroversion and superior inclination. In total 2410° wedges, 1820° wedges and 8 30° wedges were used. In the majority of cases, the wedge was positioned posteriorly and/or cranially between 10:00 and 12:00 o'clock, which allows a correction in a 3D manner of the glenoid inclination and version. The mean RSA angle could be corrected from 22.76 ± 6.06 to 0.19° ± 2.7 (p < 0.0001). The highest retroversion of the glenoid is evidenced in the proximal section and it could be corrected from - 23.32° ± 4.56 to - 6.74° ± 7.75 (p < 0.0001) and in the middle section from - 18.93° ± 3.35 to - 7.66° ± 5.28 (p < 0.0001). A mean sphere bone overhang distance (SBOD) of 5.70 ± 2.04 mm was found in order to avoid or minimize relevant scapular notching. CONCLUSION: By using a new 360° metal-augmented baseplate, the preoperative pathological inclination and retroversion can be corrected without medialization of the joint line. Future clinical results will show whether this bone-preserving procedure improves also the clinical outcomes as compared to asymmetric medialized reaming or wedged BIO-RSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case series.

Pain and rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty are approach dependent: results 6 weeks and 2 years after surgery in a multisurgeon, single-center, and prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was the evaluation of pain, function, and overall satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using three different standard surgical approaches (DAA (direct anterior approach), lateral, and posterior approach) 2 years postoperatively. Additionally, we compared the results with recently published results of the same study population 6 weeks postoperatively. METHODS: In a multisurgeon, prospective, single-center cohort study, a total of initial 188 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) between February 2019 and April 2019 were analyzed on pain, function, and satisfaction within the first days, 6 weeks, and 2 years postoperatively according to three different approaches (DAA, lateral, and posterior approach). Our research group recently published results directly and 6 weeks postoperatively. We evaluated the same study collectively 2 years postoperatively and compared the results with the data 6 weeks postoperatively. One hundred twenty-five patients could be included. Outcome parameters for the present study were the pain level according to the visual analogue scale (VAS), the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), and an overall satisfaction scale 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean overall satisfaction 2 years postoperatively was 9.7 ± 1 (3-10). Satisfaction was significantly better for the DAA than for the lateral approach (p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between the lateral and posterior approaches (p = 0.06) and between the DAA and the posterior approaches (p = 0.11). In total, the mean pain level was 0.4 ± 0.9 (0-5) at 6 weeks and 0.5 ± 1.1 (0-7) at 2 years postoperatively (p = 0.3). Regarding the different approach groups, pain levels 6 weeks and 2 years postoperatively were significantly lower for the DAA than for the lateral approach (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between DAA and posterior approach (p = 0.05) and the lateral and posterior approach (p = 0.26). The mean mHHS significantly increased from 84.7 + 14.5 (37.4-100) 6 weeks to 95 + 12.5 (23.1-100.1) 2 years postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Regarding the different approaches, mHHS was significantly higher for the DAA than for the lateral approach (p = 0.03). Differences between the DAA and the posterior approach (p = 0.11) and between the lateral and posterior approaches (p = 0.24) were insignificant. CONCLUSION: At 2 years postoperative, DAA showed significantly better overall satisfaction, pain level, and mHHS than the lateral approach. The differences between DAA and the posterior approach and lateral and posterior approaches were insignificant. Whether the superior results of the DAA to the lateral approach persist over a longer period must be clarified by further studies. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study, level of evidence 2.

Length doesn't play a role - Sexual activity in men after short stem Total hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hip pain due to osteoarthritis or hip dysplasia has been shown to negatively affect many daily life aspects. One aspect, however, which persists underestimated is sexual health. The number of total hip arthroplasties (THA) are increasing, especially in young patients who have high functional expectations, not only to pain relief, but to an increase in hip mobility and quality of life as well as sexual activity. AIM: (1) to report the demographic factors, (2) the sexual activity before and after THA, as well as the concerns related to sexual activity after THA and (3) the patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) in sexually active male patients. METHODS: We evaluated the results of patients between 18 and 65 years of age following primary cementless short femoral stem THA using a direct anterior approach (DAA) at a midterm follow-up of 4 years. A web-based questionnaire (via SurveyMonkey) was chosen to assess frequency, positions, complaints, fears, dealing with the questions and PROMs. Our patients sexual activity was via The Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) validated. RESULTS: Patients resumed their sexual activities after 6 weeks. The two main causes of difficulty in sexual activity before surgery were pain and limitation of the range of motion of the hip joint. Patients experienced less pain and an improvement in hip range of motion after THA. 89% of patients expressed a desire for more detailed and specific information on the subject. The patients foremost concern about muscle weakness, surgical scar or fear of dislocation. After 4 years follow-up our patients presented a significant improvement of the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) from 34.1 preoperative to 92.6 after THA. CONCLUSION: THA improves the quality in sexual life, in relation to less pain and improvement in the range of motion, but not in the frequency of sexual activity. Men's sexual positions required less mobility and could therefore be considered safer.

Patients with combined pelvic and spinal injuries have worse clinical and operative outcomes than patients with isolated pelvic injuries analysis of the German Pelvic Registry.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic fractures are often associated with spine injury in polytrauma patients. This study aimed to determine whether concomitant spine injury influence the surgical outcome of pelvic fracture. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data of patients registered in the German Pelvic Registry between January 2003 and December 2017. Clinical characteristics, surgical parameters, and outcomes were compared between patients with isolated pelvic fracture (group A) and patients with pelvic fracture plus spine injury (group B). We also compared apart patients with isolated acetabular fracture (group C) versus patients with acetabular fracture plus spine injury (group D). RESULTS: Surgery for pelvic fracture was significantly more common in group B than in group A (38.3% vs. 36.6%; p = 0.0002), as also emergency pelvic stabilizations (9.5% vs. 6.7%; p < 0.0001). The mean time to emergency stabilization was longer in group B (137 ± 106 min vs. 113 ± 97 min; p < 0.0001), as well as the mean time until definitive stabilization of the pelvic fracture (7.3 ± 4 days vs. 5.4 ± 8.0 days; p = 0.147). The mean duration of treatment and the morbidity and mortality rates were all significantly higher in group B (p < 0.0001). Operation time was significantly shorter in group C than in group D (176 ± 81 min vs. 203 ± 119 min, p < 0.0001). Intraoperative blood loss was not significantly different between the two groups with acetabular injuries. Although preoperative acetabular fracture dislocation was slightly less common in group D, postoperative fracture dislocation was slightly more common. The distribution of Matta grades was significantly different between the two groups. Patients with isolated acetabular injuries were significantly less likely to have neurological deficit at discharge (94.5%; p < 0.0001). In-hospital complications were more common in patients with combined spine plus pelvic injuries (groups B and D) than in patients with isolated pelvic and acetabular injury (groups A and C). CONCLUSIONS: Delaying definitive surgical treatment of pelvic fractures due to spinal cord injury appears to have a negative impact on the outcome of pelvic fractures, especially on the quality of reduction of acetabular fractures.

Editorial Commentary: Hip Dysplasia-Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Versus Periacetabular Osteotomy: Do Not FEAR the Size of the Next Step.

Hip dysplasia is characterized by inadequate acetabular coverage of the femoral head. There is a consensus that hip dysplasia with a lateral center edge angle (LCEA) less than18° should be treated with realignment of acetabular coverage by acetabular osteotomy, but there is controversy whether milder, borderline dysplasia with an LCEA between 18° and 25° should be treated with arthroscopy or acetabular reorientation. Identifying whether the problem is related to dysplasia or femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is essential, and a crucial factor is whether the hip is unstable. A femoroepiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index with a cutoff value of 2 predicts hip stability with 90% probability, even with a normative LCEA. In addition, according to the anterior-wall index (AWI), the anterior acetabular border should cross onto the middle third of the medial femoral head radius on a line that runs parallel to the femoral neck axis through the center of the femoral head. A reduced AWI suggests a deficient anterior rim. Next, lateral labrum length correlates with the FEAR index and anterior labrum length with AWI, i.e., anterior dysplasia. Consequently, the lateral labrum increases in size with progressive instability, and the anterior labrum increases in size with decreased anterior coverage. Threshold values for labrum size should be defined to guide clinical decision making. Ultimately, we require an algorithm to guide arthroscopy versus bony correction.

The Erector Spinae Plane Block in the Setting of Hip Arthroscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the use of an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) would reduce perioperative pain after arthroscopic therapy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and to examine the amount of additional opioids and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS: From October 2019 to October 2020, 68 patients undergoing arthroscopic therapy for FAIS were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The first group received an ultrasound-guided ESPB preoperatively with 30 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and standard postoperative oral medication. The second group received a sham block preoperatively with 30 mL of 0.9% saline and standard postoperative oral medication. The primary endpoint was pain scores (numeric pain score out of 10) during the first 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption during the first 24 hours (converted to morphine equivalents) and the incidence of PONV. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded for all patients. Categorial data were compared with chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Continuous data were compared with 2-sided t tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: Sixty-eight subjects consented and were successfully randomized. Reported postoperative pain was significantly lower in the ESPB group than in the control group during the first 24 hours. The opioid amount (P = .865) and postoperative nausea (P = .642) did not differ significantly between groups. No associated complications such as falls, hematomas, or muscular weakness occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that ESPB significantly decreases pain in the first 24 hours after arthroscopic therapy for FAIS. However, there was no evidence of lower opioid consumption compared with the control group. Overall, a low and comparable rate of PONV was present. Therefore, the ESPB seems to complement a multimodal approach to perioperative pain management in hip arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1, randomized controlled trial.

Recreational activity after cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients older than 75 years.

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective study aimed to compare activity levels before and at mid-term follow-up after primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients older than 75 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 79 patients with a mean age at surgery of 78 years (range 76-84 years) was evaluated 6.3 years (range 4-8 years) after cementless THA due to osteoarthritis and was followed up with a questionnaire to determine their activity level. Pre- and post-operative recreational activities were assessed at routine follow-up using the University of California, Los Angeles activity score, and the Schulthess Clinic sports and activity questionnaire. Post-operative health-related quality of life was measured using Veterans Rand 12-item survey (VR-12). RESULTS: Six years after THA, 72% of preoperatively active patients had returned to activity. Comparing activity preoperatively (before the onset of symptoms) and 6 years after THA, the number of disciplines and session length has decreased significantly. A significant decline in high-impact activities was observed, while participation in low-impact activities significantly increased. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients maintained a recreational activity level in the mid-term after primary cementless THA. However, a change in disciplines toward low-impact activities was observed.

Pain and rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty are approach dependent: a multisurgeon, single-center, prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess perioperative pain and mobilization after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using three different surgical approaches. METHODS: This was a multisurgeon, prospective, single-center cohort study. A total of 188 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty (THA) between February 2019 and April 2019 were analyzed according to the surgical approach used (direct anterior, lateral, and posterior approach). Outcome parameters were the daily walking distance during the inpatient stay, the pain level according to the visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and motion during the inpatient stay and at 6-week follow-up and the modified Harris Hips Score (mHHS) preoperatively and at 6 weeks. RESULTS: The walking distance within the groups increased significantly during the inpatient stay (p < 0.001). The DAA and posterior approach patients had a significantly longer walking distance than the lateral approach patients on the third postoperative day (DAA vs. lateral, p = 0.02; posterior vs. lateral 3, p = 0.03). DAA and posterior approach patients reported significantly less pain during motion on the third postoperative day and at 6-week follow-up than the lateral approach patients (3 postoperative day: DAA vs. lateral, p = 0.011; posterior vs. lateral, p = 0.04; 6 weeks control: DAA vs. lateral, p = 0.001; Posterior vs. lateral 3, p = 0.005). The mHHS demonstrated significant improvement within each group. However, lateral approach patients reported significantly less improvement than the DAA and posterior approach patients (DAA vs. lateral, p = 0.007; posterior vs. lateral, p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: This study analyzed perioperative pain progression and short-term rehabilitation after THA according to the different surgical approaches. Direct anterior and posterior approaches have shown comparable improvements in pain, walking distance, and mHHS. Whether this effect persists over a longer period of time must be clarified in future studies. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study, level of evidence, 2.

Osteoarthrosis, Advanced Age, and Female Sex Are Risk Factors for Inferior Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy and Labral Debridement for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Case Series With Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: (1) To determine the cumulative survivorship using the endpoint of total hip arthroplasty (THA) correlated with osteoarthrosis (Tönnis grade ≤ 1 vs Tönnis grade > 1) at a minimum 10-year follow-up and (2) to identify risk factors for THA conversion. METHODS: This study examined 112 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) between 2007 and 2009. The inclusion criterion was primary hip arthroscopy to treat FAIS with corresponding chondrolabral pathologies. The exclusion criteria were secondary hip pathologies, revision hip arthroscopy, or dysplasia. The mean follow-up period was 11 years. Cumulative survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis using the endpoint of THA. Risk factors for THA conversion were identified using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Forty patients underwent THA. The cumulative survivorship rate at 11 years was 86% for patients with a Tönnis grade of 1 or less and 46% for those with a Tönnis grade greater than 1. Osteoarthrosis, advanced age, and female sex were associated with lower hip survival rates. In particular, the risk of THA conversion was 24% higher for patients with an advanced age at the time of surgery, 97% higher for female patients, and 133% higher for hips with a Tönnis grade greater than 1. CONCLUSIONS: The survivorship rate at a mean 11-year follow-up after arthroscopic FAIS therapy was 86.3% in the group with a Tönnis grade of 1 or less and 46.4% in the group with a Tönnis grade greater than 1. The presence of osteoarthrosis, advanced age, and female sex adversely affected the outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.