Quantifying cup overhang after total hip arthroplasty: standardized measurement using reformatted computed tomography and association of overhang distance with iliopsoas impingement.

OBJECTIVES: Currently, there is no standardized measurement method for evaluating cup overhang (CO) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). We propose a novel, standardized method of measuring overhang distance in patients following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) on computed tomography (CT) images after multiplanar reformation and compare it to a previously proposed measurement method on sagittal CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent primary THA with an anterior approach. Patients with cup overhang (CO) and iliopsoas impingement (IPI) were identified by clinical and imaging data. Uncorrected overhang distance (ODu) was evaluated on orthogonal sagittal CT images while corrected overhang distance (ODc) was evaluated on reformatted sagittal CT images corrected for pelvic rotation and aligned with the plane of the cup face. RESULTS: Out of 220 patients with THA, 23 patients (10.4%) with CO and 16 patients (7.3%) with IPI were identified. CO was significantly associated to IPI (p < 0.001). The inter- and intrareader agreement was almost perfect for ODc (κ = 0.822, κ = 0.850), whereas it was fair and moderate for ODu (κ = 0.391, κ = 0.455), respectively. The discriminative ability of ODc was excellent (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.909 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.784-1.000)) in the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Conversely, AUC for ODu was poor, measuring 0.677 (95% CI 0.433-0.921). CONCLUSION: We implemented a novel measurement method for CT images reformatted at the plane of the cup face to assess overhang distance in patients with CO following THA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: While further validation is necessary, the proposed method is characterized by its high reproducibility and might be used to predict the occurrence of iliopsoas impingement in patients with cup overhang following total hip arthroplasty. KEY POINTS: • A novel, standardized method of measuring cup overhang distance in patients following primary total hip arthroplasty on CT images is proposed. • Cup overhang was associated to iliopsoas impingement. The proposed method was reproducible and showed excellent prediction of iliopsoas impingement in patients with cup overhang. • This method can be implemented in clinical practice when assessing CT images of patients with cup overhang for iliopsoas impingement.

No Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes for Periacetabular Osteotomy and Hip Arthroscopy With Capsular Plication in the Setting of Borderline Hip Dysplasia: A Propensity-Matched Multicenter Study With Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To compare minimum 5-year patient-reported outcome measures after hip arthroscopy (HA) and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for borderline hip dysplasia. METHODS: Hips with a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) between 18° and less than 25° that underwent either PAO or HA were selected from 2 institutions. The exclusion criteria were as follows: LCEA less than 18°, Tönnis osteoarthritis grade greater than 1, prior hip surgical procedures, active inflammatory disease, Workers' Compensation, and concomitant surgery. Patients underwent propensity matching based on age, sex, body mass index, and Tönnis osteoarthritis grade. Patient-reported outcome measures included the modified Harris Hip Score, as well as calculation of the minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptom state, and maximum outcome improvement satisfaction threshold. Preoperative radiographic predictors included comparison of the Femoro-epiphyseal Acetabular Roof index and ligamentum teres lesions. RESULTS: A total of 28 PAO patients underwent propensity matching to 49 HA patients. The 2 groups were similar in terms of mean age, sex, preoperative body mass index, and LCEA. The PAO group had a longer mean follow-up period (95.8 months vs 81.3 months, P = .001). The mean Femoro-epiphyseal Acetabular Roof index was significantly lower preoperatively in the HA group (P < .001). The 2 groups showed similar and significant improvements in the mean modified Harris Hip Score from preoperatively to latest follow-up (P < .001). The relative risk of subsequent surgery in the PAO group was 3.49 (P = .024), mostly attributed to hardware removal (25%). The revision rate was 3.6% in the PAO group and 8.2% in the HA group (P = .65). One patient in the PAO group required revision HA for intra-articular adhesions. Three of the patients requiring revision in the HA group underwent PAO because of persistent pain, and one underwent revision HA alone. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty was required in 1 patient in the HA group and no patients in the PAO group. CONCLUSIONS: Both PAO and HA with capsular plication provide borderline hip dysplasia patients with clinically significant improvements and low revision rates at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective, comparative therapeutic trial.

Combined Anteversion Threshold to Avoid Anterior Dislocation in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through the Direct Anterior Approach.

BACKGROUND: Component malposition in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can lead to dislocation, early implant failure, and revision surgery. As the surgical approach might affect the targeted combined anteversion (CA) of THA components, the present study aimed to evaluate the optimal CA threshold to avoid anterior dislocation in primary THA performed through a direct anterior approach (DAA). METHODS: A total of 1,176 THAs in 1,147 consecutive patients (men: 593, women: 554) who had an average age of 63 years (range, 24 to 91) and a mean body mass index of 29 (range, 15 to 48) were identified. Medical records were reviewed for dislocation, whereas postoperative radiographs were assessed to measure the acetabular inclination and CA using a previously validated radiographic method. RESULTS: An anterior dislocation occurred in 19 patients at an average of 40 days postoperatively. The average CA in patients who did and did not have a dislocation was 66 ± 8° and 45 ± 11°, respectively (P < .001). In 5 of 19 of the patients, a THA was performed for secondary osteoarthritis and 17 of 19 had a 28-mm femoral head. A CA ≥ 60° yielded a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 90% for predicting an anterior dislocation in the present cohort. A CA ≥ 60° was associated with a significantly higher risk of anterior dislocation (odds ratio = 75.6; P < .001) compared to patients who had a CA<60 points. CONCLUSION: The optimal CA to avoid anterior dislocations in THA performed through the DAA should be less than 60°. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross-sectional study, Level III.

High femoral offset as a risk factor for aseptic femoral component loosening in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Lateralized stems in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) showed to be associated with aseptic femoral loosening. However, femoral head length also affects femoral offset but was not considered so far. This study analyzed the impact of high femoral offset (hFO) combinations, formed by lateralized stems or large femoral head lengths, on aseptic femoral component loosening. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was performed including all patients that underwent primary cementless THA at our institution between July 2004 and December 2016. Patients were screened for aseptic femoral component loosening and grouped in aseptic loosening (AL) and non-aseptic loosening (nAL) group. Medical records were screened; implant details were noted and classified in hFO and standard femoral offset (sFO) combinations. Supposed risk factors for aseptic loosening were analyzed. RESULTS: Two thousand four hundred fifty-nine THA could be included, containing 14 THA (0.6%) with aseptic femoral component loosening. The AL group contained 11 hFO combinations (78.6%), whereas in the nAL group, 1315 hFO combinations (53.8%) were used. Subgroup analysis showed significant difference between two groups for hFO combinations (p = 0.014), age (p = 0.002), NSAR (p = 0.001), and bilateral THA on same day (p = 0.001). The multiple logistic regression analysis showed that hFO combination was the only variable for increased probability of aseptic loosening (OR, 3.7; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: High femoral offset combinations, formed by lateralized stems or large femoral head lengths in our collective of standard straight stems implanted by an anterior approach, show a 3.7-fold increased probability for aseptic femoral component loosening. Adjustment of the postoperative protocol may be considered in these cases to ensure proper stem ingrowth.

How useful are indirect radiographic measurements of hip instability in borderline hip dysplasia? An MRI-based comparison to a healthy cohort.

PURPOSE: Symptomatic hips with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) morphology pose a challenge in differentiating stable from unstable hips. The current study aims to compare indirect radiographic signs of instability in a symptomatic BHD population to those in a healthy cohort. METHODS: The study group consisted of patients with a lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) with values 18° ≤ LCEA < 25° who underwent corrective periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and reported an improvement in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The comparison group consisted of a healthy cohort of athletes who did not complain of any hip-related symptoms and who had normal values of their hip morphological parameters (LCEA, acetabular index (AI°), alpha angle (α°), femoral version, acetabular version). Indirect signs of instability consisting of the femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof index (FEAR), iliocapsularis-to-rectus-femoris (IC/RF) ratio and labral dimensions (height-to-length ratio) were assessed in both groups. Partial Pearson correlation, logistic multiple regression analysis and Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to determine correlations, as well as the sensitivity and specificity of these signs to differentiate between healthy hips and BHD. RESULTS: On binary logistic multiple regression analysis, the FEAR Index was the only independent predictor to differentiate between BHD and healthy hips (p < 0.001). The IC/RF ratio did not achieve significance. The calculated area under the curve (AUC) was 0.93 (0.87 - 0.99, CI 95%, p < 0.001) for the FEAR Index and 0.81 (0.70 - 0.92, CI 95%, p < 0.001) for the height-length ratio. Using the predefined cut-off values (dysplastic-FEAR Index ≥ 5° or labral height-to-length ratio ≤ 0.5), 27% sensitivity/100% specificity and 20% sensitivity/ 100% specificity, were achieved. ROC analysis provided the following new thresholds: FEAR Index ≥ -5° (73% sensitivity/97% specificity); labral height-to-length ratio ≤ 0.8 (70% sensitivity, 79% specificity). CONCLUSION: In our cohort, the FEAR index was an independent parameter that could differentiate between borderline dysplastic and asymptomatic hips. The previously published values for both the FEAR index and labral hypertrophy ratio had a poor sensitivity in differentiating symptomatic unstable BHD from healthy hips. The cut-off values of ≥ -5° (FEAR index) and ≤ 0.8 (labral height-to-length ratio) provided acceptable sensitivity and specificity when comparing to morphological healthy hips.

Augmented reality-guided pelvic osteotomy of Ganz: feasibility in cadavers.

INTRODUCTION: The periacetabular osteotomy is a technically demanding procedure with the goal to improve the osseous containment of the femoral head. The options for controlled execution of the osteotomies and verification of the acetabular reorientation are limited. With the assistance of augmented reality, new possibilities are emerging to guide this intervention. However, the scientific knowledge regarding AR navigation for PAO is sparse. METHODS: In this cadaveric study, we wanted to find out, if the execution of this complex procedure is feasible with AR guidance, quantify the accuracy of the execution of the three-dimensional plan, and find out what has to be done to proceed to real surgery. Therefore, an AR guidance for the PAO was developed and applied on 14 human hip cadavers. The guidance included performance of the four osteotomies and reorientation of the acetabular fragment. The osteotomy starting points, the orientation of the osteotomy planes, as well as the reorientation of the acetabular fragment were compared to the 3D planning. RESULTS: The mean 3D distance between planned and performed starting points was between 9 and 17 mm. The mean angle between planned and performed osteotomies was between 6° and 7°. The mean reorientation error between the planned and performed rotation of the acetabular fragment was between 2° and 11°. CONCLUSION: The planned correction can be achieved with promising accuracy and without serious errors. Further steps for a translation from the cadaver to the patient have been identified and must be addressed in future work.

Can pre-operative intraarticular injection predict pain relief after total hip arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: To study if pain relief after injection and arthroplasty correlate. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients (n = 88; median age 64 (interquartile range (IQR) 22) years, 49 (56%) females) that received fluoroscopic-guided intra-articular hip injection with contrast agent, anaesthetic (diagnostic), and corticosteroid (therapeutic) before implantation of primary total hip arthroplasty. Pain scores were assessed pre-injection, post-injection after 15 min (diagnostic phase) at first clinical follow up (therapeutic phase; median 2 (IQR 2) months), and postoperatively (last follow up (median 15 (IQR 5) months)). Responders had reduction in pain score ≥ 20 (numeric rating scale 0-100) points. The primary outcome was the same (or inverse) response to injection and arthroplasty. RESULTS: The median pain scores were higher pre-injection (68 (IQR 30) points) compared to the diagnostic phase (18 (IQR 40) points; p < 0.001), therapeutic phase (50 (IQR 40) points; p < 0.001), and post-operatively (2 (IQR 15) points; p < 0.001). On the one hand, 69 (78%) cases had the same response in the diagnostic phase and post-operatively (rho = 0.58; p < 0.001; sensitivity 83%); on the other hand 32 (36%) cases had the same response in the therapeutic phase and post-operatively (rho = 0.25; p < 0.001; sensitivity 33%). Furthermore, 57% and 91% of patients had an even better response post-operatively than in the diagnostic and therapeutic phases. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative intraarticular injection can predict pain relief after primary total hip arthroplasty. A positive response to hip arthroplasty may be better predicted by the response to local anaesthetic (diagnostic phase) than corticosteroids. Most patients (91%) with osteoarthritis may expect better pain relief after arthroplasty compared to the therapeutic phase after injection.

Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof (FEAR) Index Values on Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Significantly Increase With Hip Adduction and Decrease With Abduction.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of hip adduction and abduction on the femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index using conventional anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of patients with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD). METHODS: Patients with BHD (lateral center edge angle [LCEA] with values of 18° ≤ LCEA <25°) and who were subject to periacetabular osteotoym were selected from a consecutive retrospective cohort from January 2009 to January 2016. The hip ad-/abduction (adduction handled as negative values) and the FEAR index (lateral opening angles handled as positive values) were measured in the initially standardized acquired pelvic radiographs. Thereafter, using surgical planning software, different degrees of hip adduction and abduction were simulated from 20° of adduction to 30° of abduction, and the FEAR index was measured at each position. Pearson correlation was used to identify a potential correlation between the hip ad-/abduction and the FEAR index. RESULTS: Eighty-nine hips were included. Initial radiographs showed unintentional mean ad-/abduction of -5.3° ± 3.1° (range, -14° to 2°). The mean FEAR index at the initial ad-/abduction angle was -3.6° ± 7.2° (range, -18.0° to 16.0°) and was significantly different from neutral position (0° of ad-/abduction) -9.2° ± 7.0° (range, -27.0° to 10.0°) (P < .001). The FEAR index was negatively correlated to the hip ad-/abduction angle (r = 1, P < .001), with lower values for the FEAR index with the hip in abduction. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in FEAR index measurements were observed depending on hip ad-/abduction on pelvic radiographs. A linear change of the FEAR index of 5° per 5° of hip adduction or abduction could be demonstrated, with adduction resulting in increasing and abduction in decreasing values for the FEAR index. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

No relevant mechanical leg axis deviation in the frontal and sagittal planes is to be expected after subtrochanteric or supracondylar femoral rotational or derotational osteotomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate if one level of corrective femoral osteotomy (subtrochanteric or supracondylar) bears an increased risk of unintentional implications on frontal and sagittal plane alignment in a simulated clinical setting. METHODS: Out of 100 cadaveric femora, 23 three-dimensional (3-D) surface models with femoral antetorsion (femAT) deformities (> 22° or < 2°) were investigated, and femAT normalized to 12° with single plane rotational osteotomies, perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. Change of the frontal and sagittal plane alignment was expressed by the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and the posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA), respectively. The influence of morphologic factors of the femur [centrum-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle and antecurvatum radius (ACR)] were assessed. Furthermore, position changes of the lesser (LT) and greater trochanters (GT) in the frontal and sagittal plane compared to the hip centre were investigated. RESULTS: Mean femoral derotation of the high-antetorsion group (n = 6) was 12.3° (range 10-17°). In the frontal plane, mLDFA changed a mean of 0.1° (- 0.06 to 0.3°) (n.s.) and - 0.3° (- 0.5 to - 0.1) (p = 0.03) after subtrochanteric and supracondylar osteotomy, respectively. In the sagittal plane, PDFA changed a mean of 1° (0.7 to 1.1) (p = 0.03) and 0.3° (0.1 to 0.7) (p = 0.03), respectively. The low-antetorsion group (n = 17) was rotated by a mean of 13.8° (10°-23°). mLDFA changed a mean of - 0.2° (- 0.5° to 0.2°) (p < 0.006) and 0.2° (0-0.5°) (p < 0.001) after subtrochanteric and supracondylar osteotomy, respectively. PDFA changed a mean of 1° (- 2.3 to 1.3) (p < 0.01) and 0.5° (- 1.9 to 0.3) (p < 0.01), respectively. The amount of femAT correction was associated with increased postoperative deviation of the mechanical leg axis (p < 0.01). Using multiple regression analysis, no other morphological factors were found to influence mLDFA or PDFA. Internal rotational osteotomies decreased the ischial-lesser trochanteric space by < 5 mm in both the frontal and sagittal plane (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In case of femAT correction of ≤ 20°, neither subtrochanteric nor supracondylar femoral derotational or rotational osteotomies have a clinically relevant impact on frontal or sagittal leg alignment. A relevant deviation in the sagittal (but not frontal plane) might occur in case of a > 25° subtrochanteric femAT correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The relationship between pelvic tilt, frontal, and axial leg alignment in healthy subjects.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between anterior pelvic tilt and overall sagittal alignment has been well-described previously. However, the relationship between pelvic tilt, frontal, and axial leg alignment remains unclear. The aim of the study was to analyze the relationship between pelvic tilt and frontal and axial leg alignment in healthy subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty healthy subjects (60 legs) without prior surgery underwent standing biplanar long leg radiograph. Pelvic parameters (pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion were measured using SterEOS (EOS Imaging) software. EOS was acquired with the feet directing straight anteriorly, which corresponds to a neutral foot progression angle (FPA). The influence of HKA, femoral antetorsion, tibial torsion and gender on pelvic tilt was analyzed in a univariate correlation and multiple regression model. RESULTS: Sixteen female subjects and 14 male subjects with a mean age of 27.1 years ± 10 (range 20-67) were included. HKA, femoral antetorsion, and tibial torsion correlated with anterior pelvic tilt in univariate analysis (all p < 0.05). Anterior pelvic tilt increased 1.1° (95% CI: 0.7 to 1.5) per 1° of knee valgus (p < 0.001) and 0.5° (95% CI: 0.3 to 0.7) per 1° of external tibial torsion (p < 0.001). Overall, linear regression model fit explained 39% of variance in pelvic tilt by the HKA, femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion (R2 = 0.385; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Valgus alignment and increasing tibial torsion demonstrated a weak correlation with an increase in anterior pelvic tilt in healthy subjects when placing their feet anteriorly. The relationship between frontal, axial leg alignment and pelvic tilt needs to be considered in patients with multiple joint disorders at the hip, knee and spine. Alteration of the frontal, or rotational profile after realignment surgery or by implant positioning might influence the pelvic tilt when the FPA is kept constant.

Accuracy of pelvic measurements on virtual radiographic projections based on computed tomography scans compared to conventional radiographs pre- and postoperatively.

BACKGROUND: The anteroposterior (ap) radiograph of the pelvis is decisive in the diagnosis of different pathologies of the hip joint. Technical advantages have reduced the radiation dose of pelvic CT to levels comparable to radiographs. The purpose of this study was to validate if standard radiographic parameters (lateral center edge angle, medial center edge angle, acetabular index, acetabular arc, extrusion index, crossover sign and posterior wall sign) can accurately be determined on radiograph-like projections reconstructed from the CT dataset pre- and postoperatively. METHODS: A consecutive series of patient with symptomatic dysplasia of the hip and a full radiologic workup (radiographs and CT scan pre- and postoperatively) who underwent periacetabular osteotomy were included. Standard radiographic parameters were compared between radiographs and radiograph-like projections by two authors pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 16 hips (32 radiographs/32 radiograph-like projections) were included in the study. No significant difference was found between the radiographs and radiograph-like images for all parameter for both examiners. ICC between radiograph and radiograph-like projections for all investigated parameters showed good to excellent reliability (0.78-0.99) pre- and postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Radiograph-like projections show comparable results to radiographs with regard to the important investigated parameters (lateral center edge angle, medial center edge angle, acetabular index, acetabular arc, extrusion index, crossover sign and posterior wall sign). Thus, ultra-low-dose CT scans may reduce the need for conventional radiographs in pre- and postoperative analyses of 3-dimensional hip pathologies in the future, as the advantages increasingly outweigh the disadvantages.

Total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach for sequelae of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.

INTRODUCTION: Due to multiplanar deformities of the hip, total hip arthroplasty (THA) for sequelae of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) is often technically demanding. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with sequelae of LCPD undergoing THA through the direct anterior approach (DAA) and non-anterior approaches to the hip. METHODS: All patients with sequelae of LCPD who underwent primary THA between 2004 and 2018 (minimum follow-up: 2 years) were evaluated and separated into two groups: THA through the DAA (Group AA), or THA through non-anterior approaches to the hip (Group non-AA). Furthermore, a consecutive control group of patients undergoing unilateral THA through the DAA for primary hip osteoarthritis (Group CC) was retrospectively reviewed for comparison. RESULTS: Group AA comprises 14 hips, group non-AA 17 hips and group CC 30 hips. Mean follow-up was 8.6 (± 5.2; 2-15), 9.0 (± 4.6; 3-17) and 8.1 (± 2.2; 5-12) years, respectively. At latest follow-up, Harris Hip Score was 90 (± 20; 26-100), 84 (± 15; 57-100), and 95 (± 9; 63-100) points, respectively. Overall, 6 patients treated for LCPD (each 3 patient in the AA and non-AA group) developed postoperative sciatic nerve palsy, of which only one was permanent. Complication-related revision rate at the latest follow-up was 15% in the AA-group and 25% in the non-AA group, respectively. CONCLUSION: THA through the DAA might be a credible option for the treatment of sequelae of LCPD with comparable complication rates and functional outcomes to non-anterior approaches.

Combining the advantages of 3-D and 2-D templating of total hip arthroplasty using a new tin-filtered ultra-low-dose CT of the hip with comparable radiation dose to conventional radiographs.

BACKGROUND: Inaccurately scaled radiographs for total hip arthroplasty (THA) templating are a source of error not recognizable to the surgeon and may lead to inaccurate reconstruction and thus revision surgery or litigation. Planning based on computed tomography (CT) scans is more accurate but associated with higher radiation exposure. The aim of this study was (1) to retrospectively assess the scaling deviation of pelvic radiographs; (2) to prospectively assess the feasibility and the radiation dose of THA templating on radiograph-like images reconstructed from a tin-filtered ultra-low-dose CT dataset. METHODS: 120 consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed to assess the magnification error of our current THA templates. 27 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and a radiographic work-up in the supine position including a new tin-filtered ultra-low-dose CT scan protocol was obtained. THA was templated on both images. Radiation dose was calculated. RESULTS: Scaling deviations between preoperative radiographs and CT of ≥ 5% were seen in 25% of the 120 retrospectively analyzed patients. Between the two templates trochanter tip distance differed significantly (Δ2.4 mm, 0-7 mm, p = 0.035)), predicted femoral shaft size/cup size was the same in 45%/41%. The radiation dose of the CT (0.58 mSv, range 0.53-0.64) was remarkably low. CONCLUSION: Scaling deviations of pelvic radiographs for templating THA may lead to planning errors of ≥ 3 mm in 25% and ≥ 6 mm in 2% of the patients. 2-D templating on radiograph-like images based on tin-filtered ultra-low-dose CT eliminates this source of error without increased radiation dose. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective and prospective comparative study, Level III.

A novel method for evaluating combined component anteversion in total hip arthroplasty on cross-table lateral hip radiographs.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate measurement of combined component anteversion (CA) is important in evaluating the radiographic outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a novel radiographic method in estimating CA in THA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radiographs and computer tomography of patients who underwent a primary THA were retrospectively reviewed, to measure the radiographic CA (CAr), defined as the angle between a line connecting the center of the femoral head to the most anterior rim of the acetabular cup and a line connecting the center of the femoral head to the base of the femoral head to allow a comparison with the CA measured on the CT (CACT). Subsequently, a computational simulation was performed to evaluate the effect of cup anteversion, inclination, stem anteversion, and leg rotation on the CAr and develop a formula that would correct the CAr according to the acetabular cup inclination based on the best-fit equation. RESULTS: In the retrospective analysis of 154 THA, the average CAr_cor, and CACT were 53 ± 11° and 54 ± 11° (p > 0.05), respectively. A strong correlation was found between CAr and CACT (r = 0.96, p < 0.001), with an average bias of - 0.5° between CAr_cor and CACT. In the computational simulation, the CAr was strongly affected by the cup anteversion, inclination, stem anteversion, and leg rotation. The formula to convert the CAr to CA_cor was: CA-cor = 1.3*Car - (17* In (Cup Inclination) - 31. CONCLUSION: The combined anteversion measurement of THA components on the lateral hip radiograph is accurate and reliable, implying that it could be routinely used postoperatively but also in patients with persistent complaints following a THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross-sectional study, Level III.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is crucial when treating Finegoldia magna infections.

Finegoldia magna is an anaerobic gram-positive bacterium that can cause invasive human infections. Recently, a 52-year-old patient suffering from a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) due to F. magna was treated with cefepime on hemodialysis; however, treatment failed due to relapse caused by antibiotic-resistant strains. Reports on the antimicrobial susceptibility of F. magna clinical isolates are rare. We collected 57 clinical F. magna isolates from Zurich, Switzerland, between September 2019 and July 2020 and tested their antimicrobial susceptibility to investigate the local resistance pattern. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was evaluated for nine antibiotics (benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, cefepime, levofloxacin, rifampicin, metronidazole, doxycycline, and clindamycin) by E-test according to CLSI guidelines. All F. magna strains were susceptible to benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and metronidazole, while 75% to clindamycin. F. magna isolates showed MIC values lower than species-unrelated breakpoints for cefuroxime, levofloxacin, and cefepime in 93%, 56%, and 32% of the cases, respectively. MIC values for rifampicin and doxycycline were lower than locally determined ECOFFs in 98% and 72% of the cases, respectively. In summary, we recommend the use of benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, or metronidazole without prior AST as first-line treatment option against F. magna PJI infections. If cefuroxime, cefepime, levofloxacin, rifampicin, doxycycline, or clindamycin are used, AST is mandatory.

MRI findings of ischiofemoral impingement after total hip arthroplasty are associated with increased femoral antetorsion.

BACKGROUND: Ischiofemoral impingement (IFI) is a known complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). PURPOSE: To assess if increased postoperative (FA) is associated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of IFI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 221 patients with THA, two independent readers measured FA, ischiofemoral space (IFS), quadratus femoris space (QFS), edema, and fatty infiltration of quadratus femoris muscle. Three sets of IFI-imaging features were defined: acute IFI (set 1): IFS ≤15 mm or QFS ≤10 mm and edema in the quadratus femoris muscle; chronic IFI (set 2): IFS ≤15 mm or QFS ≤10 mm and fatty infiltration of quadratus femoris muscle Goutallier grade ≥2; acute and chronic IFI (set 3) with both criteria applicable. For each set, FA angles were compared between positive findings of IFI and negative findings of IFI. The t-test for independent samples tested statistical significance. RESULTS: In 7.2% (16/221) of patients, findings of IFI (IFS ≤15 mm or QFS ≤10 mm and edema, n = 1; fatty infiltration, n = 9; or both, n = 6) were observed. In women, 11.4% (14/123) exhibited findings of IFI compared to 2.0% (2/98) in men. Comparison in set 1 (n = 7): mean antetorsion of 23.9° ± 9.8° (findings of acute IFI) compared to 14.4° ± 9.7° (P = 0.01). Comparison in set 2 (n = 15): mean antetorsion of 16.2° ± 6.3° (findings of chronic IFI) compared to 14.5° ± 9.9° (P = 0.49). Comparison in set 3 (n = 6): mean antetorsion of 20.4° ± 3.8° (findings of acute and chronic IFI) compared to 14.5° ± 9.9° (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: After THA, high postoperative FA is associated with MRI findings of acute as well as acute and chronic IFI. Findings of IFI were commonly seen in women.

Registration based assessment of femoral torsion for rotational osteotomies based on the contralateral anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted techniques for surgical treatment of femoral deformities have become increasingly important. In state-of-the-art 3D deformity assessments, the contralateral side is used as template for correction as it commonly represents normal anatomy. Contributing to this, an iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm is used for registration. However, the anatomical sections of the femur with idiosyncratic features, which allow for a consistent deformity assessment with ICP algorithms being unknown. Furthermore, if there is a side-to-side difference, this is not considered in error quantification. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence and value of the different sections of the femur in 3D assessment of femoral deformities based on the contralateral anatomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 3D triangular surface models were created from CT of 100 paired femurs (50 cadavers) without pathological anatomy. The femurs were divided into sections of eponymous anatomy of a predefined percentage of the whole femoral length. A surface registration algorithm was applied to superimpose the ipsilateral on the contralateral side. We evaluated 3D femoral contralateral registration (FCR) errors, defined as difference in 3D rotation of the respective femoral section before and after registration to the contralateral side. To compare this method, we quantified the landmark-based femoral torsion (LB FT). This was defined as the intra-individual difference in overall femoral torsion using with a landmark-based method. RESULTS: Contralateral rotational deviation ranged from 0° to 9.3° of the assessed femoral sections, depending on the section. Among the sections, the FCR error using the proximal diaphyseal area for registration was larger than any other sectional error. A combination of the lesser trochanter and the proximal diaphyseal area showed the smallest error. The LB FT error was significantly larger than any sectional error (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that if the contralateral femur is used as reconstruction template, the built-in errors with the registration-based approach are smaller than the intraindividual difference of the femoral torsion between both sides. The errors are depending on the section and their idiosyncratic features used for registration. For rotational osteotomies a combination of the lesser trochanter and the proximal diaphyseal area sections seems to allow for a reconstruction with a minimal error.

Acetabular reconstruction with femoral head autograft in primary total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach is a reliable option for patients with secondary osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia of the hip.

BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia is challenging to treat with total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach (DAA). Reconstructing the former anatomy while restoring the acetabular bone stock for future revisions in this young patient collective combined with the known advantages of the DAA would be desirable. The purpose of this study was to analyze the feasibility, radiographic outcome and clinical outcome of primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty with bulk femoral head autograft for acetabular augmentation through a DAA with a minimal follow-up of 12 months. METHODS: A retrospective, consecutive series from March 2006 to March 2018 of 29 primary total hip arthroplasty with acetabular augmentation with bulk femoral head autograft through a direct anterior approach was identified. All complications, reoperations and failures were analyzed. Radiographic and clinical outcome was measured. RESULTS: 24 patients (29 hips) with a mean age of 43 (18-75) years and a mean follow-up of 35 months (12-137) were included. Surgical indication was secondary osteoarthritis for developmental dysplasia of the hip (Hartofilakidis Grade A (n = 19), B (n = 10)) in all cases. We noted no conversion of the approach, no dislocation and no acetabular loosening. The center of rotation was significantly distalized by a mean of 9 mm (0-23) and significantly medialized by a mean of 18 mm (6-29). The bone graft was fully integrated after 12 months in all cases. CONCLUSION: Acetabular reconstruction with femoral head autograft in primary THA through a direct anterior approach seems to be a reliable option for the treatment of secondary osteoarthritis in patients with DDH Hartofilakidis grade A and B. Prospective cohort studies with a large sample population and a long-term follow-up are necessary to confirm our findings.

External snapping hip syndrome is associated with an increased femoral offset.

BACKGROUND: External snapping hip syndrome (ESH) is postulated to be one of the causes of greater trochanteric pain syndrome, which also includes greater trochanteric bursitis and tendinopathy or tears of the hip abductor mechanism. However, it was not yet described what kind of bony morphology can cause the snapping and whether symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals have different imaging features. PURPOSE: It was the purpose of this study to look for predisposing morphological factors for ESH and to differentiate between painful and asymptomatic snapping. METHODS: A consecutive cohort with ESH and available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between 2014 and 2019 was identified. The control group consisted of patients that underwent corrective osteotomies around the knee for mechanical axis correction and never complained of hip symptoms nor had undergone previous hip procedures. The following parameters were blindly assessed for determination of risk factors for ESH: CCD (corpus collum diaphysis) angle; femoral and global offset; femoral antetorsion; functional femoral antetorsion; translation of the greater trochanter (GT); posterior tilt of the GT; pelvic width/anterior pelvic length; intertrochanteric width. Hip and pelvic offset indexes were calculated as ratios of femoral/global offset and intertrochanteric/pelvic width, respectively. For the comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic snapping, the following soft-tissue signs were investigated: presence of trochanteric bursitis or gluteal tendinopathy; presence of surface bony irregularities on trochanter major and ITB (Iliotibial band) thickness. RESULTS: A total of 31 hips with ESH were identified. The control group (n = 29) consisted of patients matched on both age (± 1) and gender. Multiple regression analysis determined an increased hip offset index to be independent predictor of ESH (r = + 0.283, p = 0.025), most likely due to the higher femoral offset in the ESH group (p = 0.031). Pearson correlation analysis could not identify any significant secondary factors. No differences were found between painful and asymptomatic snapping on MRI. CONCLUSIONS: A high hip offset index was found as an independent predictor for external snapping hip in our cohort, mainly due to increased femoral offset. No imaging soft-tissue related differences could be outlined between symptomatic and asymptomatic external snapping. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00590 .

The Lisbon Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement imaging-part 2: general issues, parameters, and reporting.

OBJECTIVES: Imaging assessment for the clinical management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is controversial because of a paucity of evidence-based guidance and notable variability among practitioners. Hence, expert consensus is needed because standardised imaging assessment is critical for clinical practice and research. We aimed to establish expert-based statements on FAI imaging by using formal methods of consensus building. METHODS: The Delphi method was used to formally derive consensus among 30 panel members from 13 countries. Forty-four questions were agreed upon, and relevant seminal literature was circulated and classified in major topics to produce answering statements. The level of evidence was noted for all statements, and panel members were asked to score their level of agreement (0-10). This is the second part of a three-part consensus series and focuses on 'General issues' and 'Parameters and reporting'. RESULTS: Forty-seven statements were generated and group consensus was reached for 45. Twenty-five statements pertaining to 'General issues' (9 addressing diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and postoperative imaging) and 'Parameters and reporting' (16 addressing femoral/acetabular parameters) were produced. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence was reviewed critically, recommended criteria for diagnostic imaging highlighted, and the roles/values of different imaging parameters assessed. Radiographic evaluation (AP pelvis and a Dunn 45° view) is the cornerstone of hip-imaging assessment and the minimum imaging study that should be performed when evaluating adult patients for FAI. In most cases, cross-sectional imaging is warranted because MRI is the 'gold standard' imaging modality for the comprehensive evaluation, differential diagnosis assessment, and FAI surgical planning. KEY POINTS: • Diagnostic imaging for FAI is not standardised due to scarce evidence-based guidance on which imaging modalities and diagnostic criteria/parameters should be used. • Radiographic evaluation is the cornerstone of hip assessment and the minimum study that should be performed when assessing suspected FAI. Cross-sectional imaging is justified in most cases because MRI is the 'gold standard' modality for comprehensive FAI evaluation. • For acetabular morphology, coverage (Wiberg's angle and acetabular index) and version (crossover, posterior wall, and ischial spine signs) should be assessed routinely. On the femoral side, the head-neck junction morphology (α° and offset), neck morphology (NSA), and torsion should be assessed.