Phase II trial of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after curative surgery.

BACKGROUND: HIPEC is an emerging procedure to treat peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. Data about HIPEC in locally advanced gastric cancer is scarce. The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the safety and toxicity of prophylactic HIPEC with cisplatin for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: From March 2015 to November 2016, a prospective, randomized phase II trial was conducted. After radical gastrectomy, patients in the experimental group underwent HIPEC with cisplatin followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with SOX regime. Patients in the other group were treated with SOX regime alone. Postoperative complications and patient survival were compared. RESULTS: In total, 50 patients were eligible for analyses. No significant difference was found in the incidence of postoperative complications including anastomotic/intestinal leakage, liver dysfunction, bone marrow suppression, wound infection and ileus (P > 0.05). Mean duration of hospitalization after radical gastrectomy was 11.7 days. 12.2 days in experimental group and 10.8 days in control group respectively (P = 0.255). The percentage of patients with elevated tumor markers was 12.1% in experimental group, which was significantly lower than 41.2% in control group (P = 0.02). 3-year RFS of patients who treated with or without prophylactic HIPEC were 84.8 and 88.2% respectively (P = 0.986). In the multivariate analysis, pathological T stage was the only independent risk factor for the RFS of patients (P = 0.012, HR =15.071). CONCLUSION: Additional intraoperative HIPEC with cisplatin did not increase postoperative complications for locally advanced gastric cancer after curative surgery. Prophylactic HIPEC with cisplatin was safe and tolerable, while it did not reduce the risk of peritoneal recurrence in this trial, supporting further studies to validate the efficacy of it. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000038331. Registered 18 September 2020 - Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=59692 .

The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system for gastric cancer is superior to the 7th edition: results from a Chinese mono-institutional study of 1663 patients.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the superiority of the 8th edition of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system for patients in China with gastric cancer. METHODS: The survival outcomes of 1663 patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical resection were analyzed. RESULTS: In the 8th edition system, homogeneous 5-year survival rates among different pathological TNM (pTNM) categories belonging to the same stage were observed. However, in the 7th edition system, the differences of 5-year survival rate among pTNM categories belonging to the same stage were observed in stages IIB (P = 0.010), IIIB (P = 0.004), and IIIC (P < 0.001). For patients in the pT1-3 (P < 0.001) and pT4a (P < 0.001) categories, there were significant differences in survival between patients in the pN3a and pN3b categories. Furthermore, partial cases (pT4bN0M0/T4aN2M0) of stage IIIB were downstaged to stage IIIA in the 8th edition system, and the 5-year survival rate of these patients was significantly better than that of patients in stage IIIB in the 8th edition system. Similarly, the 5-year survival rate of patients in p4bN2M0/T4aN3aM0 downstaged from stage IIIC to IIIB was significantly better than that of patients in stage IIIC. Compared with the 7th edition system, the 8th edition system had a higher likelihood ratio and linear trend chi-squared score and a smaller Akaike information criteria value. CONCLUSIONS: The 8th edition system is superior to the 7th edition system in terms of homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradients for Chinese patients with gastric cancer.

The optimal extent of gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer: distal subtotal gastrectomy is superior to total gastrectomy in short-term effect without sacrificing long-term survival.

BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer remains controversial. In our study, the short-term effects and longer-term survival outcomes of distal subtotal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy are analysed to determine the optimal extent of gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively collect and analyse clinicopathologic data and follow-up outcomes from a prospectively collected database at the Peking University Cancer Hospital. Patients with middle-third gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection are enrolled in our study. RESULTS: We collect data of 339 patients between January 2005 and October 2011. A total of 144 patients underwent distal subtotal gastrectomy, and 195 patients underwent total gastrectomy. Patients in the total gastrectomy group have longer operative duration (P < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.001) than those in the distal subtotal gastrectomy group. In the total gastrectomy group, more lymph nodes are harvested (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the rate of postoperative complications is lower in the distal subtotal gastrectomy group than in the total gastrectomy group (8% vs 15%, P = 0.047). Further analysis demonstrates that the rate of anastomosis leakage is lower in the distal subtotal gastrectomy group than in the total gastrectomy group (0% vs 4%, P = 0.023). Kaplan-Meier (log rank test) analysis shows a significant difference in overall survival between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival rates in the distal subtotal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy groups are 65% and 47%, respectively (P < 0.001). Further stage-stratified analysis reveals that no statistical significance exists in 5-year survival rate between the distal subtotal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy groups at the same stage. Multivariate analysis shows that age (P = 0.046), operation duration (P < 0.001), complications (P = 0.037), usage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001), tumor size (P = 0.012), presence of lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.043) and N stage (P < 0.001) are independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with middle-third gastric cancer, distal subtotal gastrectomy shortens the operation duration and postoperative hospital stay and reduces postoperative complications. Meanwhile, the long-term survival of patients with distal subtotal gastrectomy is similar to that of those with total gastrectomy at the same stage. The extent of gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer is not an independent prognostic factor for survival.

Prognostic significance of the total number of harvested lymph nodes for lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the number of harvested lymph nodes (HLNs) and prognosis of gastric cancer patients without an involvement of lymph nodes has not been well-evaluated. The objective of this study is to further explore this issue. METHODS: We collected data from 399 gastric cancer patients between November 2006 and October 2011. All of them were without metastatic lymph nodes. RESULTS: Survival analyses showed that statistically significant differences existed in the survival outcomes between the two groups allocated by the total number of HLNs ranging from 16 to 22. Therefore, we adopted 22 as the cut-off value of the total number of HLNs for grouping (group A: HLNs <22; group B: HLNs≥22). The intraoperative and postoperative characteristics, including operative blood loss (P=0.096), operation time (P=0.430), postoperative hospital stay (P=0.142), complications (P=0.552), rate of reoperation (P=0.966) and postoperative mortality (P=1.000), were comparable between the two groups. T-stage-stratified Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that the 5-year survival rate of patients at the T4 stage was better in group B than in group A (76.9% vs. 58.5%; P=0.004). An analysis of multiple factors elucidated that the total number of HLNs, T stage, operation time and age were independently correlated factors of prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding gastric cancer patients without the involvement of lymph nodes, an HLN number ≥22 would be helpful in prolonging their overall survival, especially for those at T4 stage. The total number of HLNs was an independent prognostic factor for this population of patients.

Postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin versus S-1 alone in locally advanced gastric cancer (RESCUE-GC study): a protocol for a phase III randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The ACTS-GC study had shown postoperative adjuvant therapy with S-1 improved survival of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Addition of oxaliplatin to S-1 is considered to be acceptable as one of the treatment options for gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node excision. METHODS: We have commenced a randomized phase III trial in December 2016 to evaluate S-1 plus oxaliplatin compared with S-1 alone in the adjuvant setting for locally advanced gastric cancer. A total of 564 patients will be accrued from 13 Chinese institutions in two years. The primary endpoint is 3-year relapse-free survival. The secondary endpoints are 5-year overall survival, proportion of patients who complete the postoperative chemotherapy and incidence of adverse events. ETHIC AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the institutional review board of each participating institution and it was activated on December, 2016. The enrollment will be finished in December, 2018. Patient's follow-up will be ended until December, 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02867839. Registered on August 4, 2016.

Comparison of different methods of splenic hilar lymph node dissection for advanced upper- and/or middle-third gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) often includes dissection of splenic hilar lymph nodes (SHLNs). This study compared the safety and effectiveness of different approaches to SHLN dissection for upper- and/or middle-third AGC. METHODS: We retrospectively compared and analyzed clinicopathologic and follow-up data from a prospectively collected database at the Peking University Cancer Hospital. Patients were divided into three groups: in situ spleen-preserved, ex situ spleen-preserved and splenectomy. RESULTS: We analyzed 217 patients with upper- and/or middle-third AGC who underwent R0 total or proximal gastrectomy with splenic hilar lymphadenectomy from January 2006 to December 2011, of whom 15.2 % (33/217) had metastatic SHLNs, and from whom 11.4 % (53/466) of the dissected SHLNs were metastatic. The number of harvested SHLNs per patient was higher in the ex situ group than in the in situ group (P = 0.017). Length of postoperative hospital stay was longer in the splenectomy group than in the in situ group (P = 0.002) or the ex situ group (P < 0.001). The splenectomy group also lost more blood volume (P = 0.007) and had a higher postoperative complication rate (P = 0.005) than the ex situ group. Kaplan-Meier (log rank test) analysis showed significant survival differences among the three groups (P = 0.018). Multivariate analysis showed operation duration (P = 0.043), blood loss volume (P = 0.046), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.005), and N stage (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: The ex situ procedure was more effective for SHLN dissection than the in situ procedure without sacrificing safety, whereas splenectomy was not more effective, and was less safe. The SHLN dissection method was not an independent risk factor for survival in this study.

Recurrent amplification of MYC and TNFRSF11B in 8q24 is associated with poor survival in patients with gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is an aggressive malignancy whose mechanisms of development and progression are poorly understood. The identification of prognosis-related genomic loci and genes may suffer from the relatively small case numbers and a lack of systematic validation in previous studies. METHODS: Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) coupled with patient clinical information was applied to identify prognosis-related loci and genes with high-frequency recurrent gains in 129 GC patients. The candidate loci and genes were then validated using an independent cohort of 384 patients through branched DNA signal amplification analysis (QuantiGene assays). RESULTS: In the 129 patients, a copy number gain of three chromosome regions-namely, 8q22 (including ESRP1 and CCNE2), 8q24 (including MYC and TNFRSF11B), and 20q11-q13 (including SRC, MMP9, and CSE1L)--conferred poor survival for patients. In addition, the correlation between the branched DNA signal amplification analysis results and the aCGH results was analyzed in 73 of these 129 patients, and MYC, TNFRSF11B, ESRP1, CSE1L, and MMP9 were found to be well correlated. Further validation using an independent cohort (n = 384) verified that only MYC and TNFRSF11B within 8q24 are related to survival. Patients with gains in both MYC and TNFRSF11B had poorer survival than those with no gains, particularly those with noncardia GC. Gains in both of these genes were also a significant independent prognostic indicator. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that copy number gains in MYC and TNFRSF11B located at 8q24 are associated with survival in GC, particularly noncardia GC.

Patterns of antiemetic prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in China.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have attempted to evaluate the use of antiemetic therapy for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) at a national level in China or to assess how treatment regimens adhere to current guidelines. METHODS: We searched the China Health Insurance Research Association (CHIRA) Database to identify patients with cancer who were ≥18 years old and received either moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC and HEC, respectively) between 2008 and 2012. Patients' characteristics as well as usage of specific antiemetic regimens were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 14,548 patients included in the study, 6,477 received HEC while 8,071 were treated with MEC. Approximately 89.9% used antiemetics prophylactically to prevent acute CINV and 71.5% for delayed CINV while 9.0% were prescribed antiemetics as rescue therapy. A significantly lower proportion of patients treated with HEC received prophylactic antiemetic therapy for delayed CINV as compared to those treated with MEC (59.4% vs. 81.3%; P<0.001). The HEC group had a slightly lower proportion of patients using a mixed regimen containing a 5-HT3 antagonist to prevent both acute and delayed CINV than the MEC group (P≤0.012); however, a higher proportion received a mixed regimen containing corticosteroids (P≤0.007). Although more than half of the patients in the HEC group took three antiemetics to prevent acute and delayed CINV, these rates were significantly lower than those of the MEC group (both P<0.001). Finally, analysis of the regimens used revealed that there is over-utilization of drugs within the same class of antiemetic. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that more attention is needed for treatment of delayed CINV, in terms of both overall use and the components of a typical treatment regimen.

Gastrectomy in comprehensive treatment of advanced gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: a prospectively comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy is the key treatment for advanced gastric cancer. The benefit of adjuvant surgery following preoperative chemotherapy in gastric cancer with liver metastasis has not been well established. METHODS: Forty-nine gastric cancer patients diagnosed with synchronous liver metastasis initially treated with chemotherapy were categorized into the following two groups: surgery group: 25 patients who underwent gastrectomy and subsequently received postoperative chemotherapy and control group: 24 patients who received chemotherapy alone. RESULTS: The median overall survival of patients in the surgery group and control group was 20.5 and 9.1 months, respectively, (P = 0.006). The median progression-free survival in the surgery group was 10.9 months, with statistical significance when compared with 5.0 months in the control group (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that response to chemotherapy was the only independent factor in predicting prognosis. The survival of patients who achieved partial response (PR) was prolonged if they received adjuvant surgery (P = 0.024). No significant difference in the survival of patients underwent combined hepatic resection when compared with patients performed gastrectomy only. CONCLUSIONS: For gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis, adjuvant gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy might be beneficial for survival comparing with chemotherapy alone, especially in patients response to initial preoperative chemotherapy.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves the survival of gastric cancer patients with ovarian metastasis and peritoneal dissemination.

The prognosis for ovarian metastasis of gastric cancer is poor. There is no currently available treatment for this disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in female gastric cancer patients with metachronous ovarian metastasis. From January 2000 to December 2010, 62 patients developed ovarian metastasis after undergoing gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Thirty-two patients underwent CRS plus HIPEC, and 30 patients underwent CRS alone. The median age of all 62 patients was 44 years (range 19-71 years). Metastatic carcinoma involving bilateral ovaries was observed in 50 patients (80.6 %). The median survival time in the CRS + HIPEC group was 15.5 months (95 % confidence interval [CI] 12.1-18.9 months) but was only 10.4 months (95 % CI 8.5-12.2 months) in the CRS group (P = 0.018). Among the 32 patients with pelvic peritoneal metastasis, a stratified analysis revealed that the median survival period for the 15 patients treated with CRS + HIPEC was significantly higher than that for the patients treated with CRS alone (P = 0.046). Among the 30 patients who suffered from ovarian metastasis alone, the median survival times were similar in both groups (P = 0.141). A multivariate analysis revealed that CRS + HIPEC and a low Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) were independent predictors for improved survival. In conclusion, our study indicates that employing the HIPEC procedure after CRS could improve the survival time of patients with ovarian metastasis with few complications; however, we do not recommend HIPEC treatment for ovarian metastasis alone.

Clinicopathological and prognostic differences between mucinous gastric carcinoma and signet-ring cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the differences in clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis between mucinous gastric carcinoma (MGC) and signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). METHODS: Clinicopathologic and prognostic data of 1,637 patients with histologically confirmed MGC or SRCC who received surgical operations in the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Beijing Cancer Hospital between December 2004 and December 2009 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The clinicopathological features were analyzed statistically using χ(2) test. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis of Cox proportional hazards regression model (backward, stepwise). RESULTS: A total of 181 patients with gastric cancer (74 MGC, 107 SRCC) were included. MGC, when compared with SRCC, was featured by senile patients, stage III and IV, upper third stomach, large tumor size, positive lymph node metastasis, and positive lymphatic vascular invasion (P<0.05). The overall 5-year survival rate showed no difference between the two groups (48.8% vs. 44.8%, P>0.05). However, the survival rate for MGC patients was significant lower than that for SRCC patients when compared among the age <60 years, negative distant metastasis, and tumor localized at upper third stomach (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models revealed that distant metastasis was a significant independent prognostic indicator in MGC group, and lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis was significant independent prognostic indicators in SRCC group. CONCLUSIONS: While compared with SRCC, MGC is associated with a more aggressive tumor biologic behavior. There is no statistically significant difference in distant metastasis, an independent prognostic indicator for both MGC and SRCC, which might be the reason for no significant difference of the overall survival rate between the patients with MGC and SRCC.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX: improved outcomes in Chinese patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although the role of peri-operative chemotherapy is established in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer, the optimal regime remains to be determined. FOLFOX has been used in palliative setting with good response rates but its role in a neoadjuvant setting is not well established. METHODS: This is a prospective non-randomized study comparing peri-operative FOLFOX versus adjuvant FOLFOX in patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer. Response to chemotherapy was assessed according to WHO criteria and pathological changes. Kaplan-Meier log rank test was used to calculate and compare survival differences. RESULTS: There were 73 patients (neoadjuvant = 36). Complete and partial response was observed in 2 (6%) and 21 (64%) patients, respectively. Four-year overall survival (OS) in the neoadjuvant arm was 78% versus 51% in the adjuvant arm (P = 0.031). Subgroup analysis found R0 resection (86% vs. 55%, P = 0.011) and patients with proximal cancers (87% vs. 14%, P < 0.001) to have improved OS. The most common side effect was grade 1-2 leukopenia. There were no grade 3 neuropathies, grade 4 cytopaenias, or treatment related deaths. CONCLUSION: Peri-operative treatment with FOLFOX shows promise in patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer. It warrants further evaluation and should be considered an alternative to peri-operative ECF.

Complications after radical gastrectomy following FOLFOX7 neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the postoperative morbidity and mortality occurring in the first 30 days after radical gastrectomy by comparing gastric cancer patients who did or did not receive the FOLFOX7 regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We completed a retrospective analysis of 377 patients after their radical gastrectomies were performed in our department between 2005 and 2009. Two groups of patients were studied: the SURG group received surgical treatment immediately after diagnosis; the NACT underwent surgery after 2-6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: There were 267 patients in the SURG group and 110 patients in the NACT group. The NACT group had more proximal tumours (P = 0.000), more total/proximal gastrectomies (P = 0.000) and longer operative time (P = 0.005) than the SURG group. Morbidity was 10.0% in the NACT patients and 17.2% in the SURG patients (P = 0.075). There were two cases of postoperative death, both in the SURG group (P = 1.000). No changes in complications or mortality rate were observed between the SURG and NACT groups. CONCLUSION: The FOLFOX7 neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with increased postoperative morbidity, indicating that the FOLFOX7 neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a safe choice for the treatment of local advanced gastric cancer.

[Role of papillomavirus in adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].

OBJECTIVE: To determine if human papillomavirus (HPV) infection could be associated with the development of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG). METHODS: A total of 106 consecutive AEG patients and 59 consecutive gastric carcinoma patients who accepted surgery at our department between January 2004 and December 2006 were selected. Specimens from tumors and uninvolved mucosa were obtained intra-operatively. Genomic DNA was extracted by the phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction protocol. The HPV infection was determined by PCR using primer set SPF1 and GP6+. Specificity of the amplified products was confirmed by sequencing. RESULTS: The HPV infection rates in AEG and gastric cancer were 10.4% (11/106) and 10.2% (6/59) separately (P = 0.966). CONCLUSION: HPV is not a major factor in the carcinogenesis of AEG type II, AEG type III or stomach.

[Surgical treatment results and prognostic analysis of 514 cases with gastroesophageal junction carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the important clinicopathological and therapeutical factors affecting the prognosis of patients with gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. METHODS: Data of 514 cases with gastroesophageal junction carcinoma who underwent surgical treatment from September 1995 to January 2007 was retrospectively analyzed. Relevant prognostic factors were studied with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: For all 514 cases (424 men and 90 women), the median age was 63 years. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of this group were 74.8%, 42.1% and 29.1%, respectively. Gross type, TNM classification, histological type, vascular invasion and extent of surgical resection affected patients' survival remarkably. There was no significant difference in survival between operative approaches (via laparotomy or left thoracotomy) (P > 0.05). Long-term survival was similar between proximal subtotal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy in advanced cases (P > 0.05). For stage II and III tumors, patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy had better prognosis than those without (P < 0.05). Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed TNM classification and vascular invasion were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: TNM classification and vascular invasion are independent prognostic factors for gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve prognosis of the patients with stage II and III tumors. Radical resection should be achieved with rational surgical procedures tailored by tumor position, size, staging and so on.

Identification of key long non-coding RNAs in gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to identify key long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and their potential roles in the pathogenesis of gastric adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The lncRNA and mRNA expression profile between gastric adenocarcinoma and adjacent non-tumor tissues were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Differentially expressed lncRNAs (DElncRNAs) and mRNAs (DEmRNAs) between gastric adenocarcinoma and adjacent non-tumor tissues were identified after bioinformatics analysis. DElncRNA-DEmRNA co-expression network and DElncRNA-nearby DEmRNA interaction network were constructed, respectively. Functional annotation for DEmRNAs interacted with DElncRNAs was performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of selected DElncRNAs was conducted. RESULTS: Based on TCGA, the mRNA and lncRNA expression profiles of 375 gastric adenocarcinoma and 32 adjacent non-tumor tissues were downloaded. A total of 1502 DEmRNAs and 928 DElncRNAs between gastric adenocarcinoma and adjacent non-tumor tissues were identified. HOXC-AS3 might involve with gastric adenocarcinoma by regulating a set of HOX genes (HOXC8, HOXC9, HOXC10, HOXC11, HOXC12 and HOXC13) with cis-effect. AC115619.1-APOA4/APOB and AP006216.2-APOA1/APOA4 integrations might play roles in gastric adenocarcinoma through regulating pathways of Fat digestion and absorption and Vitamin digestion and absorption. Six lncRNAs including (HOTAIR, C20orf166-AS1, PGM5-AS1, HOXC-AS3, HOXC-AS2 and AC012531.1) have excellent diagnostic value for gastric adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies key lncRNAs in gastric adenocarcinoma which provides clues for exploring the pathogenesis and developing potential biomarkers for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Molecular characteristics of synchronous multiple gastric cancer.

Rationale: Multiple gastric cancer (MGC) is characterized by the presence of more than two different tumors in the stomach. However, the clonal relationship and carcinogenesis of MGC remain unclear. We investigated the clonal relationship and role of germline mutations in the carcinogenesis of MGC. Methods: We gathered 16 multiple gastric cancer patients. Thirty-three tumor samples and sixteen normal gastric tissue or blood samples were obtained from January 2016 to December 2017. We also conducted analyses for 208 gastric cancer and 49 esophagogastric junction cancer (GC-EGJ) tumors from TCGA. DNA extraction from our samples was conducted for whole-exome sequencing (WES). Results: Tumor mutation burden (TMB) was not statistically significant within database and our data in the GC-EGJ (P=0.0591) and GC groups (P=0.3113). The mutation spectrum and signatures also showed uniform distributions in GC and GC-EGJ groups within our data and TCGA database. Among sixteen patients, four were identified as monoclonal, in which 11, 10, 26 and 6 somatic mutations were shared within different tumors of P7, P8, P9 and P16, respectively. However, no common mutation between different tumors of the same patient was found among the other 12 patients. After identifying predisposing genes, we found that germline MSH2 and NCOR2 mutations were significantly dominant in 8/12 and 10/12 of genetic MGC patients. Additionally, all patients were identified with MSH2 mutations in cancer samples of those genetic MGC patients. Taking genetic MGCs as a whole, we identified that TP53 were significantly mutated in 14 of 25 tumor samples. Main conclusions: WES analyses are suggestive of monoclonal and polyclonal origin of MGC, which may promote the classification of MGC into genetic and metastatic MGC. For patients with genetic MGC, germline MSH2 X314_splice variants may contribute to carcinogenesis, thus prompting the consideration of more radical surgery and/or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

Controlling angiogenesis in gastric cancer: A systematic review of anti-angiogenic trials.

PURPOSE: Angiogenesis is a promising therapeutic target to inhibit tumor growth. This review summarizes data from clinical trials of anti-angiogenic agents in gastric cancer. DESIGN: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase and conference databases is performed to identify clinical trials with specific anti-angiogenic agents in gastric cancer treatment RESULTS: The risk of disease progression (37-52%) and death (19-22%) with ramucirumab as second-line treatment decreases in phase III trials in advanced gastric cancer. No significant improvement in overall survival (OS) with the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy is shown. Bevacizumab or ramucirumab combined with traditional chemotherapy is associated with higher adverse event rate compared to chemotherapy alone. Except for apatinib, phase II trials of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may improve overall response rate, but there are no significant improvements in OS and progression-free survival (PFS) when combined with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Phase III trials in advanced gastric cancer have demonstrated improved outcome with ramucirumab as second-line treatment. Most of the other studies on anti-angiogenic agents in gastric cancer have reported improvement in response rate but not in OS compared to chemotherapy alone. Future research is expected in optimizing the anti-angiogenic therapy combined with traditional treatment.

The extent of inflammatory infiltration in primary cancer tissues is associated with lymphomagenesis in immunodeficient mice.

Xenotransplantation of human cancers into immunodeficient mice is a very useful approach for studying human tumor biology. However, the occasional occurrence of lymphomagenesis in some mice can spoil the model and must be investigated in detail. We found that a high percentage (32.5%, 26/80) of cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) resembled lymphoma in NOD/SCID mice. Of the 26 xenografts, 23 were human-derived expressing human CD45 (hCD45+) and proved to be of the B-cell subtype (CD3-/CD20+), and they were all positive for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). The remaining 3 xenografts proved to be mouse-derived for both hCD45- and negative amplification of a human gene. The most interesting finding is that gastric cancer had much higher rates (24/126, 19.0%) of lymphoma formation in the PDX model than did colorectal cancer (1/43, 2.3%). Statistical analysis revealed that cancer type and inflammation in the parent tumor are significantly associated with lymphomagenesis. Further validation discovered lymphomagenesis by inoculating only gastritis mucosa. Therefore, our findings suggest that it is necessary to take precautions when directly xenografting cancer tissues with remarkable baseline inflammation, such as gastric cancer into immunodeficient NOD/SCID strains. Further, the established xenograft models should be validated by both leukocyte markers and human gene signatures.

[Application of perioperative imatinib mesylate therapy in initial resectable primary local advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor at intermediate or high risk].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of perioperative imatinib mesylate (IM) therapy for patients with initial resectable primary local advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) at intermediate or high risk on R0 resection rate and the prognosis. METHODS: Forty-eight above GIST patients between December 2001 and February 2012 were divided into 2 groups: neoadjuvant group (15 cases, pre- and post-operation IM therapy) and adjuvant group (33 cases, post-operative IM therapy). R0 resection rate, complication rate, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The maximal tumor diameter and average tumor diameter were larger in neoadjuvant group as compared to adjuvant group (11.2 cm vs. 7.7 cm, P=0.005; 9.1 cm vs. 6.2 cm, P=0.014). The response rate of preoperative IM therapy was 93.3% (14/15). The R0 resection rate was 86.7% and 84.8% (P=1.000), and the complication rate was 13.3% and 9.1% (P=0.642) in neoadjuvant and adjuvant group respectively. The 3-year DFS was 55% and 41% (P=0.935), and 5-year OS was 83% and 75% (P=0.766) in neoadjuvant and adjuvant group respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Resectable primary local advanced GIST at intermediate or high risk with larger tumor diameter receiving perioperative IM therapy can achieve the same R0 resection rate, complication rate, DFS and OS as the GIST with smaller diameter receiving operation first. Perioperative IM therapy has potential advantage.