RESUMO
Drug coated balloons (DCBs) are currently indicated in guidelines as a first choice option in the management of instant restenosis, whereas their use in de novo lesions is still debated. The concerns raised after the contrasting results of the initial trials with DCBs in de novo lesions have been more recently overcome by a larger amount of data confirming their safety and effectiveness as compared to drug-eluting stents (DES), with potentially greater benefits being achieved, especially in particular anatomical settings, as in very small or large vessels and bifurcations, but also in selected subsets of higher-risk patients, where a 'leave nothing behind' strategy could offer a reduction of the inflammatory stimulus and thrombotic risk. The present review aims at providing an overview of current available DCB devices and their indications of use based on the results of data achieved so far.
RESUMO
Background: Treatment delays are the most easily audited index of quality of care in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; among the components of ischemia time, system delay has been demonstrated to be a predictor of outcomes, and in a mountainous region it relies mostly upon helicopter rescue service. Aim: The aim of the study is to analyze the impact of the activation of helicopter rescue service for the nighttime for urgent transportation of patients on the time to revascularization and on the outcomes of STEMI patients. Methods: Data were prospectively collected in a database and retrospectively split into two different cohorts, based on the presentation date in the 18 months before, or after, the first day of implementation of the new organizational model. The patients were also split into two groups based on the place of STEMI diagnosis, either the chief town territory or the rest of the region, and retrospectively evaluated for vital status at 30 days and 2 years after index event. Results: The number of patients included was 751. For patients coming from outside Trento, an improvement in ST-segment resolution was shown (ST-segment elevation reduction >50% in 54.0% of the patients vs. 36.4%, p < 0.01). Moreover, a reduction in diagnosis-to-reperfusion median time has been demonstrated (from 105 to 97 min, p < 0.01), mainly driven by a reduction during the night shift (from 119 to 100 min, p = 0.02). With regard to 30-day and 2-year mortality, no statistically significant differences were achieved. Discussion: The organizational effort has translated into a significant reduction in the treatment delay for patients coming from outside the chief town. However, although a longer diagnosis to reperfusion time has been related to a higher mortality, a significant reduction in mortality was not demonstrated in our study. However, an improvement in ST-segment elevation resolution was shown for patients coming from outside the city of Trento, a result that could have other potential clinical benefits. Conclusions: Implementation of night flight proved to be effective in reducing the time between the diagnosis and the treatment of patients in the setting of STEMI, improving ST-segment elevation resolution, although no impact was shown on short- and long-term mortality.
RESUMO
Aim: The aim of our study is to assess the predictors and the prognostic role of left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery after Impella-supported percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: This retrospective, observational study included patients admitted for AMI who underwent Impella-supported PCI in two Italian high-volume cardiac catheterization laboratories. Only patients who underwent an echocardiographic assessment of left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) before the procedure (acute LVEF) and during follow-up (follow-up LVEF) were included in the present analysis. Patients with a baseline LVEF ≥40% were excluded from the present analysis. LVEF recovery was calculated as the difference between follow-up LVEF and acute LVEF. A delta ≥5% was considered significant and was used to define the responder group. Results: From April 2007 to December 2020, 64 consecutive patients were included in our study. A total of 55 patients (86%) received hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5, and 9 patients (14%) with Impella CP. Median LVEF at follow-up was significantly higher compared to baseline (36% (30−42) vs. 30% (24−33), p < 0.001). Based on LVEF recovery, 37 patients (57.8%) were deemed responders. According to multivariate analysis, complete functional revascularization was an independent predictor of a significant EF recovery (OR: 0.159; 95% CI: 0.038−0.668; p = 0.012). At three-year follow-up, lack of LVEF recovery was the only predictor of mortality (HR: 5.315; 95% CI: 1.100−25.676; p = 0.038). Conclusions: Functional complete revascularization is an independent predictor of the recovery of LVEF in patients presenting with AMI who underwent Impella-supported PCI. The recovery of LV function is associated with improved prognosis and could be used to stratify the risk of future events at long-term follow-up.